In order to understand anything about public policy as the 21st
century progresses, it is critically important to hone one’s ability to
read esoterically. What is important is not what is said, but what is
not said. There is the official, publicly acceptable, ‘exoteric’ line.
And then there is the truth that lies underneath – often deliberately
obscured.
I was thinking about this the other day when reading,
as one tends to do over a nice lunch at the local Italian bistro with a
pizza and a glass of red, a 2015 position paper on ‘Making the electricity system more flexible and delivering the benefits for consumers’.
This was issued by Ofgem (the quango which regulates the energy market
in the UK) at the start of the ongoing process to transform our energy
market into one governed by “energy smart appliances”. These, for those who have been paying attention,
are electric devices (your fridge, your washing machine, your EV
charger, etc.) which are able to respond to ‘load control’ signals
issued through the internet, and thereby reduce or delay energy
consumption. Or, to put it more bluntly, appliances which can be
controlled remotely so as to limit how much electricity households are
able to use. Coming soon to a kitchen near you.
The last time I wrote about this issue
in substance was in 2023, not long before the Energy Act 2023 was
enacted. That statute created the legal framework within which the use
of energy smart appliances could be mandated and regulated. We now find
ourselves entering the next stage: gradual implementation. A draft set
of regulations, the Energy Smart Appliances Regulations 2026, is currently making its way through Parliament. This, we are told, is the “first phase“.
The regulations, among other things, provide for “minimum smart
functionality, safety, grid stability requirements and cyber and
physical security requirements”, and “the creation of a single
regulatory framework for smart appliances”. We can then look forward to a
“second phase” beginning in 2027, when presumably things will start to
get more serious.
What is going on? Clearly, and I use this
phrase advisedly, a Deep State project is afoot. 2015 is quite a long
time ago now: there have been four General Elections since then, not to
mention 500 or so Prime Ministers and an awful lot of turmoil (Brexit,
lockdowns, Ukraine, mini-budget, etc.). But the shift towards mandating
the installation and use of energy smart appliances has continued
regardless. It is almost as though it is not politicians who have been
driving the policy, but Ofgem acting in cahoots with civil servants in
the then-Department of Energy and Climate Change, who also issued a very similar policy paper
in 2015 to Ofgem’s own. It is not our elected representatives who want
us to use energy smart appliances, in other words. It is the regulators.
And the policy is invincible to changes in government.
This
makes it far more important, in getting to grips with the idea, to read
what the regulators say over what politicians do. And what they say has
to be parsed carefully. There is in fact a glossary of terms which of
necessity have to be read esoterically – they are used not just to
obfuscate but often actually to give the opposite impression to what is
really going on. One has to grapple with the exoteric and often flip it
upside down to find out what is underneath.
The Ofgem position
paper which I mentioned earlier is a very good illustration. And this
begins with the title: ‘Making the electricity system more flexible and
delivering the benefits for consumers’. This sounds, on the face of it,
like something benign. Indeed, if anything, it is suggestive of a free
market approach – it looks to the naked eye as if the strategy is to
liberalise the energy market in order to drive down prices at the supply
side. But that is in fact more or less the exact opposite of what the
position paper sets out. In fact, what it is focused on is something
which it calls Demand Side Flexibility (DSF), or sometimes Demand Side
Response (DSR) – better understood as precisely the reverse of
supply-side reform.
What, then, is Demand Side Flexibility?
Well, the position paper goes to great lengths to make clear what a good
thing it is. Demand Side Flexibility, it says, is about “empowerment”
of consumers. It is about helping them to “better monitor and manage
their energy use” and “make informed choices about when they use
electricity”. It us about giving them “opportunities to lower [their]
bills by changing when and how [they]” do so. Indeed, it is about giving
them the space in which to ‘smarten’ their approach to energy use in
the round....<<<
Read More>>>...
