Madeleine: Why was she taken?

Transcript
10:58pm-11:15pm
28^th May 2007
New Zealand

(part of transcript only)

I perceive a reluctance for communication. There is silence around me.

I see a figure now playing the charades game whereby you have to each guess the word on a piece of paper on your head by the way others mime in front of you. Is that me they are saying is doing that?

I see a man kneeling on grass playing with a child

(............) name given Red dress. Photograph. Young girl (. ......) is lost … find (......) name given but not Madeleine

----- (another name given)

----------- (full name given)

"Who is --------------?" (the name)

‘I suspect he will be the one who you find is with her; along with others … he’s taken (-----) before now …

"Is this just a random abduction then?"

"No … -------------------" (sentence omitted - MJ)

'WHO"

NO Reply

"Will she be found ?"

YES

"Alive"

YES

"Why the news attention"

Because

"Because why?"

Because …it is necessary

He went senile you know

"Who went senile"

The old man you talking too. My silly old husband.

From the Scottish side

Aye

No not really …

"Which is it?"

Someone remarried in the family, married a scot …

"Really?"

Yes going back. Their family link ----

"Really?"

Maddy will be fine

(not be fine)

"which is it?"

Depends on a fork in the road … a crucial lead approaching …

"What is that"

What happens is down to two people ahead

"Ok relevant names"

Robert Shaw

Johnny …

Again I get the same reluctance as all the other transcripts --- the same resignation that there might be relevant information here; the same blind sojourn and the same blank wall. No confirmations ... a really testing scenario. A real 'leap of faith' to keep this going. But I know the connection was 'real'. The information must be put here ... not all of it ...but sufficient ... again I must apologise to anyone who is offended by what is written here and in previous posts ...