That line of events has never gelled with the myriad of insights undertaken since May 2007. Either, the abilities of clairvoyance & remote viewing have been lost ... or the main elements of the media story is a falsehood. Dare it be said that the latter is the more likely! It does not appear that the related tales appertaining to the apartment have been entirely true. Events around that premise have never felt right. It could have been easier to dismiss these gut feelings ... and be a believer of the tale being weaved by the media world. But ... that would not have been right. It is more than likely that the real events surrounding that place do not bear any resemblance to what has been reported! Insights have always lead attention away from the supposed apartment to elsewhere. Insights never fell for the blood on the wall stories and the claims that DNA was found in that apartment. Not once were those stories of a demise in that apartment found acceptable. Gut reaction has always said these stories of blood & DNA been falsehood leading to being led up the garden path. It had all be staged for something else. A trap had always been seen to have been sprung. Something pre-rehearsed yes. But not as a cover up for the accidental death of a little girl elsewhere. Insights have always stated that no death has occurred then or since. The term the sprat to catch the mackerel was another phrase given around this time ... and has remained since. The question which has been considered since relates to whether or not that apartment was ever used by the family? Were they staying elsewhere and this apartment used as a decoy? Why it was ... there were serious considerations made prior to the evening of the disappearance. This is another line of thought uncovered by insights. The family as unwitting pawns was another.
Monday, 3 August 2009
The Place Of The Disappearance
Having been self taught to go with what is consistently given ... the information received through remote viewing/visualisations appertaining to 'the place of the disappearance' ... has been contradictory to the official storyline.
That line of events has never gelled with the myriad of insights undertaken since May 2007. Either, the abilities of clairvoyance & remote viewing have been lost ... or the main elements of the media story is a falsehood. Dare it be said that the latter is the more likely! It does not appear that the related tales appertaining to the apartment have been entirely true. Events around that premise have never felt right. It could have been easier to dismiss these gut feelings ... and be a believer of the tale being weaved by the media world. But ... that would not have been right. It is more than likely that the real events surrounding that place do not bear any resemblance to what has been reported! Insights have always lead attention away from the supposed apartment to elsewhere. Insights never fell for the blood on the wall stories and the claims that DNA was found in that apartment. Not once were those stories of a demise in that apartment found acceptable. Gut reaction has always said these stories of blood & DNA been falsehood leading to being led up the garden path. It had all be staged for something else. A trap had always been seen to have been sprung. Something pre-rehearsed yes. But not as a cover up for the accidental death of a little girl elsewhere. Insights have always stated that no death has occurred then or since. The term the sprat to catch the mackerel was another phrase given around this time ... and has remained since. The question which has been considered since relates to whether or not that apartment was ever used by the family? Were they staying elsewhere and this apartment used as a decoy? Why it was ... there were serious considerations made prior to the evening of the disappearance. This is another line of thought uncovered by insights. The family as unwitting pawns was another.
That line of events has never gelled with the myriad of insights undertaken since May 2007. Either, the abilities of clairvoyance & remote viewing have been lost ... or the main elements of the media story is a falsehood. Dare it be said that the latter is the more likely! It does not appear that the related tales appertaining to the apartment have been entirely true. Events around that premise have never felt right. It could have been easier to dismiss these gut feelings ... and be a believer of the tale being weaved by the media world. But ... that would not have been right. It is more than likely that the real events surrounding that place do not bear any resemblance to what has been reported! Insights have always lead attention away from the supposed apartment to elsewhere. Insights never fell for the blood on the wall stories and the claims that DNA was found in that apartment. Not once were those stories of a demise in that apartment found acceptable. Gut reaction has always said these stories of blood & DNA been falsehood leading to being led up the garden path. It had all be staged for something else. A trap had always been seen to have been sprung. Something pre-rehearsed yes. But not as a cover up for the accidental death of a little girl elsewhere. Insights have always stated that no death has occurred then or since. The term the sprat to catch the mackerel was another phrase given around this time ... and has remained since. The question which has been considered since relates to whether or not that apartment was ever used by the family? Were they staying elsewhere and this apartment used as a decoy? Why it was ... there were serious considerations made prior to the evening of the disappearance. This is another line of thought uncovered by insights. The family as unwitting pawns was another.