[The Gurdjieff Legacy]: There is a latent force of meaning hidden within this idea of Kundabuffer
which, at certain moments, when we pause long enough for it to touch
us, can penetrate to another level of our consciousness—to a level where
it is able to disturb us. To disturb us in a way we know and intuit
that we need to be disturbed.
Yet
such moments are rare. Why? Because the shock inherent within an
objective truth so easily gets deflected, neutralized, by one or another
form of buffer—that is, through that unseen predisposition by means of
which we are 'protected' from the discomfort of having to deal with what
otherwise would be disturbing to our familiar and cozy frame of
reference.
The various and sundry forms of these buffers are
beyond count, but, for our purpose here, two will suffice. One is to
inwardly genuflect to the authority of the personage who has
communicated the shock, thereby sidestepping its intrinsic awakening
force. The other is all too readily to 'agree' with the formulation
within which the shock of a newly revealed truth is hidden—on however
superficial a level. After all, who of us is not able to generate a
virtual litany of absurdities of human behaviour? Having thus 'agreed',
we are then at liberty to proceed as usual, and thus to escape the
thrust of the new revelation....read more>>>...