Dr. Yeadon was referring to a paper titled: The European Regulatory Environment of RNA-Based Vaccines which you can read by following this LINK.
The paper states: “Interestingly, depending on whether RNA-based vaccines are directed against tumours or infectious disease, they are formally considered gene therapy products or not, respectively.”
Dr. Yeadon comments:
“The answer is of course they’re gene therapy. They instruct your body to manufacture a part of a foreign organism by inserting genetic code into your cells.
“If the objective is to raise an immune response against a non-self tumour target, it’s called and classified as gene therapy. However, if the objective is to raise an immune response against a non-self foreign protein, specifically one from a pathogen, it’s not gene therapy (and instead a vaccine).
“Now, I know this is nuts and extremely dangerous. It suggests the people deciding this were stupid, reckless and/ or evil (why choose?). Why do I say that? For this blindingly obvious reason.
“A standard vaccine is to be given to large numbers of people in perfectly good health including many not at the slightest risk from the pathogen against which the vaccine is intended to induce immunity. So, not people in whom much risk can be justified. But it’s this very setting in which this new and untested technology are to be given to billions that we set the lowest bar....<<<Read More>>>...