Thus, the attitude toward Ica stones was revised. Previously considered a remake, now some artifacts are recognized as authentic. Enrique Raul Morales from Paraguay conducted a study that lasted over 7 years. He traveled all over America in search of the most ancient specimens of Ica stones. He managed to classify the artifacts and prove the differences between the replicas and the real objects.
Those who believe that the Ica stones are genuine usually cite the local legends and artwork that depict the stones as evidence of their authenticity.
These individuals also point to the similarity between the stones and ancient Peruvian artwork and symbols. Additionally, some argue that the stones may have been handed down through generations, eventually leading to their discovery in the twentieth century.
Though most scientists and scholars do not believe that the Ica stones are genuine, there are some who do. These include researchers such as Erich von Däniken and David Childress, who cite local legends, artwork, and symbols to support their claim that the stones are genuine artifacts. Additionally, some independent researchers, such as Gary Evans, have argued that the stones may be genuine.
Images were applied to the stones by means of engraving. It is extremely difficult to distinguish a real stone from a modern one with the naked eye. But under a microscope, you can see the difference.
On
artifacts created by an unknown civilization 16-30 thousand years ago,
even at high magnification, cracks and roughness, which are formed
during manual engraving, are not visible. This allows us to conclude
that the images on the stones were created using special equipment, and
not manually, as previously thought....<<<Read More>>>...