Further Reading

Friday, 17 March 2023

The Agenda’s “Net Zero” could mean “zero” of anything and everything

 What does the term “Net Zero” actually mean? That nothing will be left once zero carbon has been achieved?

By reducing carbon dioxide to nil, zero carbon, all plant life dependent for its growth on this natural gas, will die. By extension, all humans and animals dependent upon the oxygen that plants produce, via the conversion of carbon dioxide into oxygen, will also die. Basic biology reveals that is indeed the case.

So, what the inventors of “Net Zero” seem to be suggesting is that the objective is to end all plant, animal and human life by 2050. Or have I got something wrong? Have ‘they’ quietly dropped CO2 as the arch baddie of the past three decades – and are now trying to make simple “carbon” the source of all our woes?

This is, after all, what they did by surreptitiously shifting “global warming” into “climate change” a couple of decades ago. A classic sleight of hand by the cabal spin doctors.

Let’s scrutinise the history a little more thoroughly. The World Economic Forum (“WEF”) is acting as the lead player in the project known as “Stop Global Warming.” A project which states that a deadly form of anthropogenic “warming” is being caused by the burning of fossil fuels and that the stated need is therefore to completely dispense with all fossil fuels by 2050.

But doing a little elementary research reveals that what one sees coming out of factory chimneys, in ubiquitous media photographs, is not CO2. It is mostly water vapour, plus nitrous oxides, carbon monoxide, methane, water vapour and various forms of particulates, with noxious CO2 forming less than 5% of these emissions.

This corroborates with scientific tests done on the composition of the upper atmosphere, which find that man-made CO2 makes a contribution of just 0.04% above natural atmospheric CO2.

So, what the perpetrators of “Net Zero” are doing is taking an essential component of nature, without which neither we nor plant life could survive, and make it into a demon, responsible for causing catastrophic changes to the world’s climate.

This is, of course, an outrageous conclusion to come to; but should its outrageousness cancel out its logic? Could it be that all two thousand “scientists” employed by the International Commission on Climate Change’ (“IPCC”) failed to get a pass in biology at secondary school – and then went on to become Emeritus experts on climate change?

The fact is that “Net Zero” is telling us that “we the people” are to be wiped out, along with the flora and fauna of the planet; while the elite cabal running this deception racket has created their own unique CO2 subterranean storage ecosphere, of thriving plants, pure water and all the nutrients needed to carry on pretty much as before. Maybe better?

If psychopaths form a majority of the cabal that runs this planet – and that looks probable – then announcing that The Great Reset/Green New Deal has adopted “Net Zero” by 2050, has a certain logic. Because to a psychopath, sentient people are strange unreal beings, their emotions and feelings being incomprehensible and alien.

Therefore, looked at from the perspective of the psychopath, among the first thing to be done to “save the planet” would be to find a good reason to get rid of the anthropogenic (human) causal agent behind the “destruction of the planet” wouldn’t it?...<<<Read More>>>...