On NASA’s website is a tab labelled “Facts.” Clicking on “Facts”
displays various menu options alongside a quote from the UN’s
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPPC”): “Scientific evidence
for warming of the climate system is unequivocal.”
The term
“climate system” is vague and subject to the occasional reinterpretation
as required. But on another webpage, NASA is more specific. ‘Scientific Consensus: Earth’s Climate is Warming’ is the title of the webpage listing selected quotes from selected institutions, including two from the IPPC
On another webpage, NASA shows a graph titled ‘A World of Agreement: Temperatures Are Rising’. The graph depicts the latest annual temperatures from 5 different research groups, working independently.
“Collectively, the past five years are the warmest years in the modern record,” NASA states.
In a short video titled ‘‘Imaginary Heat Record’, Heller discusses the graph above.
“The
[lines] show five different [research] groups which have generated
nearly identical graphs from 1880 to the present,” he said.
Showing
NASA’s map of the world where temperature data is collected from,
Heller said: “NASA uses this map to convince people that they have very
good global coverage of the temperature record but unfortunately this is
propaganda, not reality.”
For temperatures in 1880, there are
temperature records from only a few areas and so there is very little
coverage of the Earth, Heller explained. “Almost none in Africa and very
little in Asia,” he said.
Data for 1880 from the UK’s Climatic Research Unit doesn’t fare any better. “They have none from the southern hemisphere,” he said.
“This coverage [of 1880 data] is grossly inadequate to calculate a global temperature,” Heller said.
“The
only plausible explanation for the close agreement in these graph
[lines] is that these different [research] groups are not independent at
all, [the researchers are] actually colluding to produce the same
graph,” he said.
“[The] graph [above] is not evidence of global warming. Rather, it’s evidence of widespread fraud.”
Heller
then turned to recent temperature records. He explained how the urban
heat island effect corrupts the entire temperature record using the
example of Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s (“DRC’s”)
capital and one of the largest cities in the world. “[The] urban heat island at Kinshasa corrupts the entire DRC temperature record,” he said.
“These
five [lines on the] graph are fake at both ends. Most academic climate
science assumes the accuracy of this graph. Billions of taxpayer
dollars are diverted into climate academia to produce meaningless
reports based on fake data.”...<<<Read More>>>....