On Tuesday, the UK’s Office for National Statistics (“ONS”) released
data compiled using a new method that “will give us a better
understanding” of excess deaths. But who benefits from publicising
excess deaths using this “new method”? Who is it that will gain the
most?
In a video tweeted on Tuesday, Julie Stanborough,
ONS Deputy Director for Data & Analysis for Social Care &
Health, explained their side of the story. It’s worth noting that
previously, from April 2020 to April 2021, Stanborough was the Deputy Director of the Covid-19 Press Data Team at the Cabinet Office. Before that, she worked as a statistician for HM Revenue & Customs and Department for Work and Pensions.
“We’ve
been working with independent experts and those across government and
the devolved nations to develop a common UK-wide approach,” she said.
She
noted that the new method is “in development” and will change when and
as required, which perhaps allows for confusion and no meaningful
comparison to previous periods. It would also provide a useful way to
explain away any future excess deaths that they don’t want to be
publicly known or independently investigated.
According to the Office for Statistics Regulation,
the label of “official statistics in development” can be replaced by
the label of “official statistics” once the evaluation has been
completed. The producer should have decided that the statistics are
suitable and of public value and explained their strengths and
limitations. The producer may wish for the statistics to become
accredited official statistics to demonstrate their compliance against
the Code of Practice for Statistics.
So,
what has been the effect of ONS’ new “official statistics in
development” data? They have managed to hide a large portion of excess
deaths....<<<Read More>>>...