In the early 1900s, there was a Canadian doctor who experimented with
millions of the so-called deadly pathogenic bacteria of diphtheria,
typhoid, pneumonia, meningitis, and tuberculosis. Anywhere from 50,000
to several millions of these bacteria were contained within the cultures
that were ultimately swallowed by the volunteers. However, not a single
one of them ever came down with disease over the course of the five
years of experimentation.
Having satisfied himself of the fraud
of the germ “theory” of disease, the Canadian doctor set out a challenge
to the rest of the scientific community to prove that microbes can
cause disease through similar experiments. While his challenge was
largely ignored, a doctor from Minnesota eventually responded by issuing
a challenge of his own to the Canadian doctor, wanting him to subject
himself to further experiments. Thus, a germ duel was set where the
person with the positive claim regarding the existence of so-called
deadly pathogenic microbes wanted the one who challenged this belief to
prove it wrong by experimenting directly on himself.
Often times
when dealing with the defenders of the germ “theory” of disease, we are
challenged to similar “germ duels” where, in order to maintain our
honor and support our challenge to their positive claim (which they
mistakenly believe has been satisfied due to a hundred years of
pseudoscientific experimentation), we must demonstrate a willingness to
“risk our lives” for it while they get to sit back on fraudulent
evidence that they feel is sufficient. We are supposed to subject
ourselves to various so-called “pathogenic” agents in order to disprove
“infection” and “contagion.” This is a defensive tactic that is employed
once the germ “theory” defenders realize that they have no scientific
evidence on their side supporting their belief in invisible “pathogenic”
boogeymen...<<<Read More>>>...