The imaginary “climate crisis” is a product of climate activists and click-bait media

 The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) reports don’t define what a “climate crisis” is. The crisis that supposedly requires society to achieve zero carbon emissions or, at least, “net zero.”

On the contrary, the IPCC’s latest Assessment Report (“AR6”) published in 2021 points out that corporate media’s opinion of climate change has moved away from a neutral position by adopting and promoting terms like “climate crisis,” “global heating” and “climate emergency.”

Such a statement by the IPCC should leave no doubt that the concept of an ongoing “climate crisis” is a joint product of climate activists and the click-hungry media, lacking a solid scientific basis, Aivar Usk writes.

So, what does science tell us about the climate? Usk details his research into climate models, catastrophe scenarios and the imaginary climate crisis while giving us a reality check of what climate records do show, without the media hype. For example, “July 2023, dubbed the ‘Earth’s hottest month on record’, may have had almost the same number of warmer and cooler regions in the world in comparison with the time one decade earlier,” he writes....<<<Read More>>>...