Since then the story has grown, and I just wanted to do a quick update and ask a question that's nagging at me, but we'll get to that.
Firstly the good news - the widespread disgust. People all over the country have objected to the "low emission" drug, leading to boycotts of the dairy giant Arla and their associated brands.
Social media users are posting pictures of stacked shelves of unsold Lurpak butter and Cravendale milk.
Smaller farms and organic dairy producers have jumped on the chance for good publicity and released statements declaring themselves "Bovaer free" (Some people have made lists)
Some are even taking potshots and Bill Gates, which is always fun.
The BBC has turned Marianna Spring loose to do a fact-check, and "experts" have reassured her that Bovaer is safe...which was pretty much always going to happen.
A stranger development can be found in The Daily Mail, which has run a few stories on this issue, including publishing a full list of all the products Arla is involved with to enable boycotts.
Why would they do that? Appeasing their audience? Hopping on the bandwagon?
Perhaps.
But there's more. The story isn't actually new, Bovaer was approved by the UK government back in December of 2023 and was already being trialled by Marks & Spencer in April of this year.
So why the big fuss now, a year later?
And now a little itch is asking questions at the back of my mind.
Is it possible this whole story was deliberately cultivated to gauge people's reaction to the planned nationwide roll-out in the future?
Or could it be even subtler than that?
After all, if you wanted to discourage people from eating dairy products and red meat, then advertising the fact you've put potentially toxic additives in the cows' food wouldn't be a bad strategy, would it?
Just an idea...<<<Read More>....