To see why Physicalism fails to explain experience, notice that there is
nothing about physical parameters—i.e., quantities and their abstract
relationships, as given by, e.g., mathematical equations—in terms of
which we could deduce, in principle, the qualities of experience. Even
if neuroscientists knew, in all minute detail, the topology, network
structure, electrical firing charges and timings, etc., of my visual
cortex, they would still be unable to deduce, in principle, the
experiential qualities of what I am seeing. This is the so-called ‘hard
problem of consciousness’ that is much talked about in philosophy....<<<Read More>>>...
Welcome to "A Light In The Darkness" - a realm that explores the mysterious and the occult; the paranormal and the supernatural; the unexplained and the controversial; and, not forgetting, of course, the conspiracy theories; including Artificial Intelligence; Chemtrails and Geo-engineering; 5G and EMR Hazards; The Global Warming Debate; Trans-Humanism and Trans-Genderism; The Covid-19 and mRNA vaccine issues; The Ukraine Deception ... and a whole lot more.
Further Reading
▼
Saturday, 4 January 2025
The true, hidden origin of the so-called ‘Hard Problem of Consciousness’
Philosophers of mind talk much about the so-called ‘Hard Problem of
Consciousness.’ But is it a real, objective problem to be solved, or
just the subjective reflection of a confused way of thinking? And in the
latter case, where and how, precisely, does the problem arise? In this
essay, you will be surprised at how obvious and quaint the thought error
is that underlies the hard problem, and flabbergasted that so many
otherwise smart, educated people can consider the whole business a
mystery of some sort.