The cat is out of the bag, says Diana Furchtgott-Roth in the Telegraph.
The vitriolic reaction to Congress’s plans to cut tax credits for
renewables lays bare how ‘cheap’ wind and solar really are, and how the
endless subsidies are never enough. Here’s an excerpt.
Electricity
made from renewable sources is not as ‘cheap’ as its advocates
sometimes claim. It evidently cannot survive without billions annually
in tax credits.
That’s the message from the latest skirmish over
America’s renewable energy future, where the House and Senate have
unveiled duelling visions for the rollback of energy tax credits – each
with its own tempo and tone. The vitriolic reaction from the green
lobby, and the predictions of disaster for renewables should any of
these changes be passed into law, have exposed just how economically
unsustainable even the fiercest backers of these energy sources clearly
accept them to be.
Supporters of renewable energy have assured
us for years that the wind blows and the sun shines free of charge. But
although these technologies have received hundreds of billions in
subsidies globally over the past 20 years, proponents still demand more –
for a few years, we’re told, until renewables can stand on their own
feet.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said: “Eliminating
these tax credits radically and irresponsibly rolls back all the
progress we have made in recent years. It turns America’s clean energy
boom into a bust.”
But the boom was always something of an
illusion. It is often asserted that electricity in the United States
made with wind and solar is less expensive than electricity made by
natural gas and coal. But rather than declining, average American
electricity prices have risen considerably over the past 20 years as
wind and solar have entered the electricity mix.
One dirty
little secret is that, on a state-by-state basis, nine out of the top 10
states in electricity prices in the United States in 2024 required
renewable energy as part of their electricity mix. The bottom 10 states
generally did not require renewable energy.
It can cost utility
companies more to provide people with electricity using intermittent
sources than continuous sources such as natural gas, coal and nuclear
power. The utility company is likely to need to put other energy sources
in place, to provide back-up should demand not be met when the wind
doesn’t blow and the sun doesn’t shine. …
Taxpayers are paying
multiple times for renewables. In their electricity bills, they pay not
only for wind and solar, but for the backups to the wind and solar. In
their tax bills, they pay for the energy tax credits. They also give up
faster economic growth when electricity prices rise....<<<Read More>>>....
Welcome to "A Light In The Darkness" - a realm that explores the mysterious and the occult; the paranormal and the supernatural; the unexplained and the controversial; and, not forgetting, of course, the conspiracy theories; including Artificial Intelligence; Chemtrails and Geo-engineering; 5G and EMR Hazards; The Net Zero lie ; Trans-Humanism and Trans-Genderism; The Covid-19 and mRNA vaccine issues; The Ukraine Deception ... and a whole lot more.