Digital ID: You’ll Own Nothing and Scan Everything

 You can already hear it, can’t you? The dreary chorus of ‘nothing to hide, nothing to fear.’

Soon your neighbour, your colleague, and that bloke in the pub will all sound like NPCs reciting the gospel of Digital ID.

And if you’re happy to trade liberty for ignorance, don’t whimper when your life resembles Kim Jong-un’s playpen with a Tesco Clubcard.

Welcome to Brave New Blighty, where your papers are digital, your wallet is monitored, and your freedom is conditional. Great Britain is teetering on the brink of ushering in a national digital ID system.

Yes, the same Britain that once prided itself on civil liberties, privacy, and a general disdain for government overreach. Now, our political class, like a dodgy Carry On character with a penchant for surveillance, is dangling the shiny promise of “convenience” while quietly sliding the handcuffs into place.

Think back, if your memory hasn’t been wiped by the Ministry of Health. During the pandemic, we got a taste of digital control with those charming little vaccine passports. Want to enter a venue? Flash your app. Want to fly, work, or exist in polite society? Better have your QR code scanned, jab status verified, and obedience levels recalibrated.

That little COVID experiment was a not-so-dry run for a far more sinister project.

The digital ID being proposed is not some benign bit of modern admin. It is, quite frankly, a blueprint for technocratic control. It won’t stop with your name and date of birth. Oh no.

Soon, your biometric data, spending habits, health records, social media activity, and ideological alignment could be packed into your shiny new BritCard.

Want to buy a pint or a sausage roll? Better scan in first. Had too many pints this week? Sorry, your cholesterol’s high and your carbon credits are low. Try again next month.

Now imagine the government deciding you’ve said something “hateful” (which is Newspeak for “unpopular”). Suddenly, your car won’t start. Your social media is locked. Your travel rights revoked. It’s not a stretch of the imagination. This is a roadmap, and we’re already halfway there.

During the COVID era, the Canadian government showed us what financial control looks like in real time: freezing the bank accounts of protesters and their supporters with the flick of a bureaucratic switch....<<<Read More>>>...

How state-sponsored spooks meddle with free speech

 A SHADOWY state agency used to monitor lawful but dissenting speech during the covid lockdowns has now been implicated in efforts to suppress online criticism of immigration policy, multiculturalism and ‘two-tier policing’ during the Southport riots in August last year.

Emails disclosed in the US by Congressman Jim Jordan, chair of the House Judiciary Committee, as part of an investigation into transnational censorship, reveal that officials within a Whitehall monitoring unit flagged social media posts to major platforms, warning that certain content was ‘exacerbating tensions’ during a period of widespread civil unrest.

The unit, the National Security and Online Information Team (NSOIT), operates within the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) under the authority of minister Peter Kyle. Formerly known as the Counter Disinformation Unit (CDU), it was established to monitor foreign influence campaigns but saw its remit expanded during the covid pandemic to include lawful domestic speech, including public health criticism and lockdown scepticism. Conservative MP David Davis was among several public figures cited in CDU files as ‘critical of the Government’ after questioning the mathematical reasoning behind Imperial College London’s pandemic modelling.

 One of the messages released by the US House Judiciary Committee was sent on August 3, 2024 – the worst weekend of the riots – and warned of ‘significant volumes of anti-immigrant content’ as well as ‘concerning narratives about the police and a “two-tier” system that we are seeing across the online environment’. The email listed several examples of social media content, including one said to ‘misrepresent the government’s response to further a sense of division’. Although none of the posts was alleged to breach the law, DSIT pressed TikTok to confirm ‘what content you are seeing across your platform’ and ‘any measures you have taken in response’, adding: ‘We’d be grateful if you could come back to us on those two points as soon as you are able to.’...<<<Read More>>>....

Age-Restricted Taxi Tracking? The Absurd Consequences of the Online Safety Bill

 I was recently travelling in the UK and, after a lot of sightseeing on foot, decided to order a taxi to go back to my hotel.

I searched the internet for a local taxi firm and found one with relative ease. I called the number and went through an automated process which worked well. I managed to book a taxi quickly. The computer-generated voice told me that my taxi was on its way. I was sent a link so that I could monitor the progress of my taxi. The message also said that I would know the taxi driver’s name and the type of vehicle and registration number that was on its way.

When I clicked on the link I was forwarded to this:

Australian Senate rejects age verification for search engine users in surprise bipartisan push

 An urgent motion to block the rollout of mandatory age verification for search engine users has passed Australia's Senate with overwhelming cross-party support.

The motion, spearheaded by United Australia Party Senator Ralph Babet, stems from a recommendation by the federal eSafety Commissioner, who in early July urged the government to consider age verification requirements for users signed into search engines like Google and Bing. Verification methods under discussion included ID checks, biometric scanning, credit card authentication, parental vouching, AI-powered estimations or third-party verification services, raising immediate red flags for privacy advocates.

In a speech to the Senate on July 29, Babet acknowledged the importance of child safety but warned that the proposed measures posed a fundamental threat to Australians' civil liberties.

"Let me say from the outset that protecting children online is a moral imperative," he said. "Measures like safe-search filters for minors, better parental controls and the restriction of harmful content are of course welcome, but let's not kid ourselves – this is not about protecting children, it is about building a surveillance infrastructure under the cover of safety."...<<<Read More>>>....

Parents 'shell-shocked' after being arrested for complaining about daughter's school

The parents of a nine-year-old girl have said they were held at a police station for 11 hours because they complained about their daughter's primary school.

Maxie Allen and his partner, Rosalind Levine, said they were arrested and detained on suspicion of harassment, malicious communications and causing a nuisance on school property.

The couple said they had previously been banned from entering Cowley Hill primary school in Borehamwood, Hertfordshire after criticising the school's headteacher and leadership in a parents' WhatsApp group, according to the Times.

The school said it had "sought advice from police" after a "high volume of direct correspondence and public social media posts" that they claimed had become upsetting for staff, parents and governors.

Hertfordshire police said the arrests "were necessary to fully investigate the allegations as is routine in these types of matters".

"Following further investigations, officers deemed that no further action should be taken due to insufficient evidence," they added....<<<Read More>>>...

Online Safety Act: The truth behind one of UK’s most authoritarian pieces of legislation yet

 The Online Safety Act, which originated in 2017 after the death of 14-year-old Molly Russell, has evolved to include provisions which introduce a new criminal offence for “knowingly sending false information” that causes harm and criminalising sending “seriously threatening messages” online. Not just for content targeting children but adults as well.

The Act also grants significant power to Ofcom, the government-approved regulator, and exempts “recognised news publishers” from fines for potentially harmful material, while independent journalists, citizen journalists and social media commentators face content restrictions.

It gives significant censorship powers to a single civil servant, Ofcom’s Melanie Dawes, and grants police chiefs the power to arrest citizens for sending “false communications” or “threatening messages” online, which has been used to restrict free speech.

The Act compromises privacy rights by forcing online platforms to deploy technology that detects and removes illegal content, even within end-to-end encrypted messages, and requires age verification for users....<<<Read More>>>...

Another Removal

 Another post has been taken down by Blogger due to 'misleading content' - Misleading content related to harmful health practices: misleading health or medical content that promotes or encourages others to engage in practices that may lead to serious physical or emotional harm to individuals, or serious public health harm.

YET ... the post in question was written by an eminent source and relates to an accurate diagnosis of the mRNA vaccines ....

THEREFORE - big brother does not wish this information to appear on blogger yet it is still available on the original web site ...

Australia’s social media age verification bill is a Trojan Horse to implement Government controlled biometric digital ID

Yesterday, the Australian government introduced legislation in Parliament that would ban children under 16 from accessing social media platforms. The claim is the bill is to protect young people from the negative impacts of excessive social media use, including mental health concerns, body image issues and exposure to harmful content. But this is the excuse, not the motive.

The proposed law is an amendment to Australia’s Online Safety Act. It sets a minimum age limit of 16 for accessing social media platforms. If passed, the law would outline some of the toughest controls so far on social media platforms imposed by a country.

The obvious problem with such a bill, without seeing any details, is what’s to stop the Government from expanding the law into other areas? Nothing. As Freezenet explains a very familiar maxim that is well known among those who work for the Government, “Once you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail.”

Until the bill was introduced into parliament, details of how the ban would actually work had been scarce. “Today’s bill provides a more complete picture. But many ambiguities – and problems – still remain,” The Conversation noted.

Under the proposed law, social media companies will be required to demonstrate they are taking “reasonable steps” to prevent access for under-16s. Penalties will be imposed on platforms that fail to comply. The eSafety Commissioner will be responsible for enforcing the new laws and monitoring compliance. The bill proposes a fine of up to AU$50 million on social media platforms if they fail to uphold the ban.

Interestingly, platforms which are most likely to be used by children without adult supervision are exempt. According to The Conversation the bill “includes an exclusion framework that exempts messaging apps … online gaming platforms and services with the ‘primary purpose of supporting the health and education of end-users’.” Some platforms that will be exempt include Google-owned YouTube, Google Classroom, Meta’s WhatsApp and Headspace, a non-profit organisation for youth mental health established by the Australian Government in 2006.

Additionally, “the bill won’t stop people under 16 from watching videos on YouTube or seeing content on Facebook – it is primarily designed to stop them from making an account.”...<<<Read More>>>...

Disinformation Isn’t the Problem. Government Coverups and Censorship Are the Problem

 In a perfect example of the Nanny State mindset at work, Hillary Clinton insists that the powers-that-be need “total control” in order to make the internet a safer place for users and protect us harm.

Clinton is not alone in her distaste for unregulated, free speech online.

A bipartisan chorus that includes both presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Donald Trump has long clamored to weaken or do away with Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which essentially acts as a bulwark against online censorship.

It’s a complicated legal issue that involves debates over immunity, liability, net neutrality and whether or not internet sites are publishers with editorial responsibility for the content posted to their sites, but really, it comes down to the tug-of-war over where censorship (corporate and government) begins and free speech ends.

As Elizabeth Nolan Brown writes for Reason, “What both the right and left attacks on the provision share is a willingness to use whatever excuses resonate—saving children, stopping bias, preventing terrorism, misogyny, and religious intolerance—to ensure more centralized control of online speech. They may couch these in partisan terms that play well with their respective bases, but their aim is essentially the same.”

In other words, the government will use any excuse to suppress dissent and control the narrative....<<<Read More>>>...

The Foreboding UN Convention on Cybercrime

The UN committee approved the text of the Convention on Combating Cybercrime. Human rights organizations and information technology experts have called it a threat to democracy and the free world.

“One of the world’s most dangerous surveillance treaties was approved with a standing ovation,” wrote Austrian digital rights group Epicenter Works.

The UN General Assembly is now due to vote on the adoption of the Convention in September.

“It can be assumed that the treaty will be accepted without difficulty at the UN General Assembly in September, and will thus be officially considered a UN convention. After that, it will be available for signature and subsequently it can be ratified,” said political advisor Tanja Fachathalerová. “It can be assumed that it will not be a big problem to achieve the necessary forty ratifications, which are necessary for the treaty to enter into force.”

Legitimization of Repression against Journalists and Opponents
The proposed international treaty aims to combat cybercrime and improve international cooperation between law enforcement agencies. However, more than a hundred human and civil rights organizations around the world have warned of a serious threat to human rights and criticized the fact that the text of the treaty lacks adequate safeguards. According to them, the planned agreement would oblige UN member states to introduce comprehensive measures for the supervision of a wide range of crimes.

“The contract is really a surveillance agreement with too few provisions on data protection and human rights. In practice, it legitimizes the more repressive measures against political opponents or journalists that we now see in authoritarian states,” writes the netzpolitik.org server.

China and Russia Stood at the Beginning of the Convention
It all started with a UN resolution initiated in 2019 by Russia, China, and other countries (such as Iran, Egypt, Sudan, and Uzbekistan) with 88 votes in favor, 58 against, and 34 abstentions.

European states have proposed changes, but according to experts, the resulting compromise does not even meet the conditions necessary to preserve privacy and protect human rights.

Unfortunately, a data access treaty has been drawn up that will allow governments around the world to exchange citizens’ personal information in perpetual secrecy in the event of any crime the two governments agree is ‘serious.’ This would include eavesdropping on location and real-time communications around the world, and force IT workers to divulge passwords or other access keys that would compromise the security of global systems that billions of people rely on every day. And it’s not just private sector systems – government systems are also at risk,” said Nick Ashton-Hart, Digital Economy Policy Director at APCO, who is also leading the Cybersecurity Tech Accord delegation to the Convention negotiations.

The Threat of Criminal Prosecution of Journalists and White Hackers
The Ashton-Hart treaty also puts journalists and whistleblowers at risk of prosecution. The International Press Institute was so concerned about this risk that it placed a full-page ad in the Washington Post. Independent security experts around the world also warned in February that they could face criminal prosecution for their work protecting IT systems from cybercriminals under the draft Convention....<<<Read More>>>...

Courts are increasingly linking “climate change” with human rights

 The fabricated effects of climate change are being tied to so-called human rights in law cases across the world. Legal precedents are being set. They may pretend it is to “save the world” but the real target is our rights and freedoms.

On 29 March, the United Nations General Assembly (“UNGA”) adopted the resolution A/77/L.58 requesting an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice (“ICJ”) on the obligations of countries that are members of the United Nations (“UN”) regarding climate change.

Part of the request relates to the human rights implications of climate change. It references to international human rights instruments, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.

Commenting on the recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights in favour of a small group of elderly Swiss women who were backed by Greenpeace, the Off Guardian offered an explanation of why climate change is being linked to human rights.

By tying climate change to human rights, governments can justify enforcing increasingly strict climate change policies while simultaneously making it appear that the judiciary is forcing their hand.

Now they can effectively claim “You’ve got to switch to an electric car, or you’re infringing other people’s human rights”, but also, “don’t blame us our hands are tied by judges.”

It also enables a propaganda campaign of escalating divisive language, mirroring the vaccinated vs unvaccinated messaging during the “pandemic.”

Remember how we were told, “The unvaccinated are filling ICUs and making another lockdown more likely”? Well, in the future, that will become “climate change deniers are violating your human rights by refusing to use a smart meter.”...<<<Read More>>>...

British government mulling SOCIAL MEDIA BAN for teenagers 16 and younger

The British government under Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is considering a crackdown on social media use for teenagers aged 16 and younger – with a ban said to be one of the options on the table.

Despite bringing new controls with the Online Safety Act (OSA) which received Parliament approval in October, ministers are considering the pros and cons of further actions to limit children’s exposure to social media’s harmful content.

British Science Secretary Michelle Donelan said the legislation meant the U.K. would become "the safest place to be online in the world." She added that the OSA's passage "will go down as an historic moment that ensures the online safety of British society not only now, but for decades to come."

The British government is reportedly ready to begin a consultation in January of next year to look at the evidence of social media harm to young teens. According to Bloomberg, a ban on social media use by those under 16 and improved parental controls are two options under discussion.

"We're looking at ways to empower parents, rather than crack down on anything in particular," said a government spokesperson. "We've identified that there is a gap in research, so we'll be looking at what more research into it needs to be done. But nothing is yet signed off by ministers."...<<<Read More>>>...

THOU SHALT NOT CRITICIZE ISRAEL: Social media giants now CENSORING CONTENT that supports people of Gaza and opposes indiscriminate bombings by Israel

In today's edition of "Here's another thing so-called Israel controls," the social media gamut – Facebook Instagram, X (Twitter), YouTube, TikTok and the like – are systematically censoring user content that is critical of the government of the geopolitical nation state they call Israel's plan to commit genocide and ethnically cleanse the open-air concentration camp it previously created for the people known as "Palestinians," whom Israel forced off the land it stole back in 1948 and stuffed into the world's densest prisoner of war ghetto.

That sure was a mouthful, but it is intended to paint an accurate picture of what actually happened there when pasty-white people from Siberia, claiming to be real Jews, stormed the land and took it as their own with the Balfour Declaration in 1917, followed by the actual resettlement in 1948.

It is a history that many of today's Christians are never told, at least not accurately, but one that gives new insight into what Revelation 2:9 and 3:9, for those who follow end times prophecy. Anyway, whoever these people really are do not want to be criticized online, about anything, especially if you support the 2.3 million people, nearly half of whom are children, who currently live inside the Gaza Strip.

According to reports, the tech giants, also known as Big Tech, are silencing users from Europe, India and even the United States, who express any kind of support for, or speak up on behalf of, the embattled residents of Gaza who, save for God's supernatural protection, are slated for extermination in the coming days....<<<Read More>>>....

Extreme Censorship of Truth by Fascist Government and Private Partnerships: A Death Warrant to Freedom

 First and foremost, let it be known that even this very essay will be censored and algorithmically hidden from view, by the multitude of government pay-rolled employees and ‘private’ tech companies whose mission in life is to make sure that the plotted State narratives are all that are seen by the lowly proletariat class. I know this from firsthand experience, as over the past three years, finding my articles on a normal internet search has become very difficult. I fully understand that my modest site is not relevant to the big picture by any standard, but if my work is being censored, then most everything of value concerning the actual truth is certainly being heavily censored as well.

The State narrative has replaced the truth at almost every level possible, due to military grade artificial intelligence, algorithmic manipulation, mass. media collusion, and government restriction and regulation control measures. The most recent example of this atrocious silencing of free speech, has been the U.S. Senate’s RESTRICT Act (S-686),  which is ultimately so much more dangerous than will ever be explained by any government agent or bureaucracy,  mainstream media, or any fascist technological entity partnering with the State. It was written under the deceitful guise once again, of protecting the assumed ‘weak and stupid public’ from national security threats due to any release of information that could possibly get into the hands of any so-called foreign enemy. This, as described, by the real enemy of this country, the U.S. government, all its members, all its enforcement arms, its controlled media, and all the corporate and communication companies in bed with this totalitarian governing system.

This total censorship insanity is aimed at all internet publications that are exposing reality and truth, and is using TicToc as the scapegoat in order to censor, heavily restrict speech, and shut down all criticism and dissent, by claiming of course a ‘China’ connection. This is simply the U.S. Patriot Act model, being used as a way to control all speech by controlling all  internet communication and reporting. These efforts have been growing exponentially since the 9/11 false flag hoax, but were expanded beyond reason due to the long-plotted fake ‘covid pandemic’ fraud. This is just the latest attempt by this heinous governing structure to silence all of us. In other words, people openly discussing issues via any form of speech, is considered by the controlling elite and its governing system, as a direct threat to its power structure. Therefore, a censorship war is being waged by this government, its enforcement arms, and its partners, against that segment of the  American population concerned with liberty...<<<Read More>>>....

How The U.S. Government Works With Big Tech To Censor Information On Social Media

One of the latest explorations of censorship comes from The Intercept who revealed internal Department of Homeland Security documents that confirm their plans to continue censoring opinions about COVID-19, “racial justice,” and US support for Ukraine going forward. Their documents effectively show that the government agencies work to control American public discourse online.

One of their major revelations is that tech companies – including Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Discord, Wikipedia, Microsoft and LinkedIn – met with the FBI and other government agencies every month, before and since the 2020 election to talk about this. Facebook even set up a special portal for “takedowns” that requires a law enforcement email to access.

One of the authors of The Intercept report, Lee Fang, tweeted the following on Monday,

Facebook and Twitter created special portals for the government to rapidly request takedowns of content. The portals, along with NGO partners used to censor a wide range of content, including obvious parody accounts and content disagreeing w gov pandemic policy. pic.twitter.com/Jth0WUfXAI— Lee Fang (@lhfang) October 31, 2022

The recent COVID pandemic is a great example of how this partnership was likely in place. During the pandemic, any science showing that natural immunity to COVID-19 was quite robust was subjected to this type of censorship. Scientists and scientific papers were met with “fact checks” or content removals on emerging and evolving topics that were not actually false. If their findings did not align with Big Government, they were shut down....<<<Read More>>>....

“We Own The Science” – United Nations Partners With Google To Increase Censorship

 During a World Economic Forum (WEF) anti-disinformation panel last week, the United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Global Communications, Melissa Fleming, announced that they “own the science,” in reference to their climate initiative, as seen in the clip posted below.

She brought up their partnership with big tech companies including TikTok and Google that contribute to controlling the narrative on climate change information.

Yes, you read that correctly, they had an “anti-disinformation panel.” The idea that disinformation regarding major issues like climate change and COVID-19 for example, is running rampant. It has sparked censorship initiatives all over the world. Big Tech companies have partnered with various international organizations as well as numerous federal agencies to combat this so called “disinformation.”...<<<Read More>>>....

The Big Secret: Many Medicine Practices, As Well As Popular Foods and Drugs, Are Designed to Make Money, Not Protect Public Health

 The 2016 documentary ‘The Big Secret’ explores the truth behind some of the most widely-accepted medical practices and sought to expose how the focus on corporate profits influenced traditional medical treatment in the United States.

Dr. Joseph Mercola noted in an article published on Friday that, along with many other alternative healthcare documentaries, it has been removed from Amazon Prime. “The tech giants are going all-in with pharma drug cartels,” he wrote.

Fortunately, it is available on other platforms and we have included a link below where you can still watch it.

Released in 2016, ‘The Big Secret’ was the work of five-time Emmy Award-winning producer Alex Voss and multi-award-winning filmmaker, and integrative physician and President of Silicon Valley Health Institute, Susan Downs. What started as a personal journey to regain his health, Voss came face to face with the sad reality concerning the influence that big money has on our health and well-being.

Voss and Downs look at the history of medicine in the US and the influence that wealth and power have on the decisions that your doctor makes concerning your medical care. This shocking documentary is the result of research and personal interviews with leading experts in the fields of medicine and nutrition. “Our goal is to empower people with knowledge and start a conversation that will ultimately lead to life-saving changes to our personal health, and reform in our healthcare system.” The Big Secret is only the beginning....<<<Read More>>>...

The Great Reset Aims to End Freedom of the Press, Speech, and Expression

Governments, corporations, and elites have always been fearful of the power of a free press, because it is capable of exposing their lies, destroying their carefully crafted images, and undermining their authority.

In recent years, alternative journalism has been growing and more people are relying on social media platforms as sources of news and information.

In response, the corporate state, digital conglomerates, and the mainstream media have been increasingly supportive of the silencing and censoring of alternative media outlets and voices that challenge the official narrative on most issues.

At the recent World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland, “Australian eSafety commissioner” Julie Inman Grant stated that “freedom of speech is not the same thing as a free for all,” and that “we are going to need a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online—from freedom of speech … to be free from online violence.”

Meanwhile, the Canadian government is seeking to restrict independent media and the freedom of expression via the implementation of Bill C-11, which would allow it to regulate all online audiovisual platforms on the internet, including content on Spotify, Tik Tok, YouTube, and podcast clients.

Similarly, the UK is seeking to introduce an Online Safety Bill, the US “paused” the establishment of a Disinformation Governance Board following backlash, and the European Union approved its own Digital Services Act, all of which aim to limit the freedom of speech. Attempts by elites and politicians to silence dissenters and critical thinkers is not something new. In fact, history is full of examples of “the persecution of men of science, the burning of scientific books, and the systematic eradication of the intelligentsia of the subjected people.”...<<<Read More>>>...

 

All criticism of government and establishment media types now called “cyberbullying” as Orwellian censorship efforts rapidly expand

  If author George Orwell were alive today, he would have the opportunity to see just how accurate he was when he wrote the dystopian novel “1984.”

That said, it’s unlikely that many people alive at the time the book was published (circa 1949) actually believed there could ever be “thought police,” a “Ministry of Truth,” and so much media complicity in altering reality for the tiny minority deep state types who are in charge of it all.

And yet, that is precisely where we are today: Western-style democratic republics and democracies are collapsing under a crush of lies, deceit, misinformation, disinformation, and relentless psychological warfare that it is virtually impossible today to tell what is real and what is fake.

Case in point: The recent demise of Joe Biden’s ‘disinformation czarina,’ Nina Jankowicz. Earlier this month while providing congressional testimony, Alejandro Mayorkas, head of the Department of Homeland Security (a massive bureaucracy now serving as just the opposite of what it was allegedly designed to be), let it slip that the agency was standing up a “Disinformation Governance Board” to be led by Jankowicz — a creation immediately panned by mostly GOP critics as an Orwellian Ministry of Truth empowering government to decide for the rest of us what is and is not ‘true’ — despite what we may have seen and hear with our own eyes and ears.

It wasn’t long before Jankowicz revealed herself to be a nut job — too unstable, even, for the Marxists running Biden’s regime to pass off as legitimate. So she has been dismissed from consideration for the job and replaced by two other ‘inner circle’ political elites, including Michael Chertoff, one of the first DHS secretaries who served under George W. Bush shortly after the agency was created following the 9/11 attacks....<<<Read More>>>...

The suppression of the truth

“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;”

Webster’s defines “hold” as “to refrain; to stop; to restrain; to withhold. hold your laughter. hold your tongue.”

Suppress is a synonym of “hold” and it is defined as “To retain without disclosure; to conceal; not to tell or reveal; as, to suppress evidence.”

The Message Bible interprets Romans 1:18 as “But God’s angry displeasure erupts as acts of human mistrust and wrongdoing and lying accumulate, as people try to put a shroud over truth.”

So, correct me if I am wrong, but a fair interpretation of the meaning of Romans 1:18 would be that what we are seeing is how ticked off God is with all of the foolishness going on in this country because the TRUTH is being held down, censored, and suppressed.

Notice that it is not the DENIAL of Truth that is the problem, but the SUPPRESSION of the Truth. We are in this mess because the TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH, is no longer presented.

It is hidden…covered over…incomplete…politicized. Picture trying to hold a fully inflated beach ball under water…it takes a lot of effort to hold that ball under the water because the TRUTH keeps trying to come up for air.

The Luciferian Left hates the Truth. They are “of their father the Devil and the works of their father they will do.” They suppress the Truth. That is their job. That is their only pathway to victory. They can’t counter the Truth, or argue it away, they can only suppress and hide it....<<<Read More>>>...