Believe Them At Your Peril

 The climate change fear mongering frenzy is reaching its climax now.

According to the UK media the last decade has seen its top ten hottest years on record. That's easy to see when you are using TAMPERED and ALTERED weather data! this where the something must be done ... gives way to the solution. Zero CO2 emissions by 2050. Total extinction of virtually all biological life on planet earth!

They still claim the, heavier than air, gas carbon Dioxide is the culprit. Its being drummed into everyone, and so few of us even question the lie!

Carbon Dioxide is not the main constituent of 'greenhouse gases' and the weather cycle we are experiencing is nothing to do with climate change. Geoengineering and deliberate weather manipulation is; and water vapour makes up over 95% of greenhouse gases. Carbon Dioxide rarely reaches the upper atmosphere; volcanoes are the main reason it is in the upper atmosphere. And its effect up there is to COOL the atmosphere, not heat it up.

Real scientists are coming out of their silence and admitting that the data being banded about that 'proves' climate change, and is sealing mankind's return to the stone age, is TAMPERED with and deliberately misleading. It has been rehashed to suit the crazy globalist's plan to create a Carbon tax to make mankind on a whole poor, and also 'prove' their insane AGENDA to impose MANDATORY GENOCIDE on mankind.

They are tampering with the world weather to create these crazy weather systems. It's not man made climate change in the sense they claim due to too much CO2. Not at all. And anyone who falls for their lies and deceit are playing into the hands of the grim reaper.

They've spent trillions upon trillions of dollars on their agenda; so they can fool mankind and have the world for themselves. The basic truth is believe them at your peril because the current claims of climate change are total fucking lies .... deception and deceit on a crazy, mad and desperate scale by a bunch of mentally unstable families who are completely insane. Believe them at your peril ... because they are about to force governments, their playthings, to declare mandatory genocide laws to help save the planet.

The earth plane is NOT over crowded, there is NO food shortages other than the deliberate agendas THEY create. What they say about the earth and reality are total fabrications ... they are lying through their bad asses about nearly everything!

Starmer announces intention to implement facial recognition and digital ID to access social media

 The UK government, reinforced by Keir Starmer at a press conference today, has announced its intention to ban social media access to under-16s from early next year.

The ban will be enforced using facial recognition software and digital IDs. To enable this, everyone wishing to use social media will be subject to facial recognition and digital IDs.

Aside from the obvious destruction to online privacy and freedom of speech, and the totalitarian control over every aspect of our lives which will ensue, how accurate is the technology that the UK government is imposing on the entire population?

Today, the UK government announced a ban on social media access for all children under the age of 16. Starmer is hoping the regulation will be passed through Parliament before Christmas and the ban enforced in the Spring of 2027.

Described as an “Australia plus” policy, this measure is one of the strictest online crackdowns in the democratic world and goes beyond the limits previously imposed in Australia.

The government plans to use “highly effective” age assurance systems, including age-recognition facial scans and digital IDs, to verify user ages.

We should note that everyone, not just under-16s, will be subjected to facial scans and digital IDs – “to protect children online” is a ruse to implement control over the entire population using whatever digital technology they have at their disposal.

Apart from ending online privacy and aiming for complete control over the information we can share and have access to, their digital tools are not as fail-safe as they like to pretend....<<<Read More>>>...

Food for Thought #1124

 

Starmer Poised to Ban Under-16s From Social Media in ‘Australian-Plus’ Crackdown

 Sir Keir Starmer is preparing to announce a ban on under 16s using social media in the next 10 days.

The Prime Minister has been considering what action to take after a three-month consultation on an Australian-style social ban on children under 16.

There is growing speculation that Sir Keir will opt for a so-called “Australian-plus” model with a ban on a wider range of sites combined with restrictions on “addictive” features and tougher age checks to prevent children circumventing the rules.

Sir Keir is said to be carving out policies to provide him with a “legacy” as he faces the threat of a leadership challenge from Andy Burnham, the Greater Manchester mayor who is favourite to secure a return to Parliament in the Makerfield by-election in less than two weeks’ time.

However, the children’s commissioner has proposed that any social media ban should be extended to 16- and 17-year-olds

Dame Rachel de Souza has said that any ban must apply “equally to all children” up to 18.

She also urged Sir Keir Starmer to draw up a list of features that tech firms would be forced to ban because they encourage children to stay online, put them at risk of seeing harmful content or enable them to be contacted by strangers.

The Prime Minister is expected to announce the first stage of the crackdown on Monday with tech companies being forced to install software that makes it impossible for children to take or share nude images.

If businesses including Google and Apple fail to comply within three months, Sir Keir will say legislation will be introduced that would mean the companies could face fines, regulations on phone sales to children or criminal sanctions....<<<Read More>>>....

Disclosure, HantaVirus, and What They're Not Telling You

 

 

 

A new virus scare, oil shock, and alien disclosure — all at the same time? David Icke explores how major fear narratives may be used to overwhelm public attention and shape perception. From Hantavirus headlines to UFO revelations.

Hantavirus: The fear machine is starting again; this time, you should recognise it, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny says

Corporate media is creating fear around a hantavirus outbreak, following a familiar pattern of creating fear before providing context, similar to previous “outbreaks” like covid, monkeypox (MPOX) and bird flu.

Hantaviruses are a class of viruses that can infect humans, typically through inhalation of aerosolised rodent urine, faeces or saliva, with human-to-human spread being very rare.

Despite the low number of cases and deaths worldwide over decades, there are already 13 documented hantavirus vaccines and gene therapy programmes in active development.

Once again, it’s the Hegelian dialectic: problem, reaction, solution....<<<Read More>>>...

Global problem + global solution + censorship = scam

If they tell you there’s a global problem for which they have a global solution, and they suppress and censor dissenters – it is a scam.

Propaganda is the systematic dissemination of information designed to shape public perception toward a specific goal or agenda. Such information is typically false or designed to misdirect, and a key sign of it being false is that dissenting narratives are suppressed. Throughout history, governments and industries have used propaganda to create and defend large-scale false narratives. This is an utterly unremarkable thing to say. No historian on the planet would contest it.

The pattern is that of a latent agenda driving the generation of false propaganda, seeking to culminate in the distillation of an ideology. Once the ideology is firmly rooted in the public imagination, the latent agenda can become patent, meaning it can be implemented in the broad light of day without material objection.

This framework has close historical analogues. The Hegelian Dialectic, the favourite of Marxists, talks about thesis, antithesis and synthesis. The so-called PRS model talks about problem-reaction-solution.

Before the distillation of an ideology is achieved, the false narrative must be protected from dissent by way of censorship. Those who try to expose the latent agenda are derided as “conspiracy theorists” or “deniers” of a purported problem. During the covid phenomenon, I framed this as a law dubbed Hudson’s Razor, stating that anything that is (1) presented as a global crisis (2) admitting only global solutions (3) amid suppression of dissent, is definitively a scam.

This is, of course, not to say that there can never be any such thing as a global crisis. If a volcano bigger than Krakatoa blew its top, we’d all know about it for years. But global solutions would be very unlikely. People in one place might prioritise buying blankets; in another, building greenhouses. And suppression of dissenters would be completely pointless. We wouldn’t need to call a blind man who couldn’t see the ash cloud a volcano-denier, or censor anyone who said the ash actually came from a different source. People would just get on with the job of dealing with less sunlight in multiple different ways.

It is difficult to fake a physical crisis with a tangible, visible threat. Telling people a volcano had gone boom when it hadn’t wouldn’t work if you lacked the capacity to fake an enormous ash cloud. So, the default pattern is to pretend there is an invisible threat that is a global crisis. The global solution can then be a form of “safety” whose efficacy exists only in a theory or in a model, and the suppression of dissent can include the customary allegation that all sceptics are “deniers” of the invisible threat. If the fear generation is implemented properly, nothing about the solution needs to make any sense. People will clamour for it....<<<Read More>>>...

Food for Thought #876

 

Restricting Jury Trials Will Undermine Free Speech, Lammy Warned

 Government plans to scrap jury trials for most crimes will undermine free speech, David Lammy has been warned, with research showing juries are twice as likely to acquit on free speech grounds. The Telegraph has the story.

Campaigners claim the Justice Secretary’s proposals will mean defendants who use free speech as a defence for ‘offensive’ language are less likely to be acquitted.

Research by the Free Speech Union (FSU) found defendants justifying their actions on the basis of free speech were almost twice as likely to be found not guilty in a crown court, where juries determine verdicts, as they were in magistrates’ courts, where there are no juries.

The research followed high-profile ‘hate speech’ cases such as that of Jamie Michael, a former Royal Marine. A jury took just 17 minutes to acquit him of stirring up racial hatred with a Facebook post urging people to exercise their democratic rights over illegal immigration following the Southport murders.

Lord Young, the Director of the FSU, said his organisation would be campaigning against Lammy’s plans. “Trial by jury is a bulwark of British liberty and if people charged with speech offences are denied that right, they’re more likely to be convicted,” he said.

In an attempt to tackle a record backlog of 80,000 cases, Lammy will on Tuesday use a Commons statement to set out the Government’s ‘once in a generation’ plans to scrap the right to jury trial for defendants facing offences likely to result in prison sentences of under five years.

Under the proposals, only defendants facing charges carrying a possible jail term of more than five years, such as murder, rape and other serious sexual offences, terrorism, manslaughter, GBH and possession of firearms, will be entitled to jury trials....<<<Read More>>>....

Food for Thought #831

 

British government urged to BAN nitrites amid rising bowel cancer cases

We know what is causing the rising bowel cancer case don't we? And it sure ain't bacon and salami. The elephant in the room is what was forced into billions of people's bodies .... 

+++++++++++++++++++

A U.K. coalition led by Prof. Chris Elliott warns that nitrites in processed meats have contributed to 54,000 bowel cancer cases in the past decade, costing the NHS £3 billion in treatment.

The WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified processed meats as Group 1 carcinogens (like tobacco and asbestos) in 2015, yet U.K. regulators have failed to act.

Nitrites react in the stomach to form nitrosamines, potent carcinogens linked to 5,400 annual bowel cancer cases in the U.K. alone.

The British Food Standards Agency (FSA) claims nitrites prevent botulism, but the coalition counters that nitrite-free bacon exists without any botulism outbreaks.

69 percent of Britons support banning nitrites and France has already moved to reduce nitrite levels by 20 percent, while the U.K. lags behind despite cross-party political backing.

A coalition of leading scientists, medical professionals and politicians is demanding an immediate ban on nitrites in supermarket bacon and ham, citing a devastating public health toll they link to over 54,000 bowel cancer cases in the United Kingdom over the past decade.

The newly-formed Coalition Against Nitrites led by prominent food safety expert, Professor Chris Elliott, represents a direct challenge to both government regulators and the food industry, arguing that the continued use of these chemicals constitutes a preventable crisis with a staggering human and financial cost. The current campaign is rooted in a pivotal scientific declaration made a decade ago....<<<Read More>>>....

Bill Gates: Climate Change is Not the End of the World

 Bill Gates has rejected a “doomsday view” of climate change, saying it will not lead to humanity’s demise, in the latest example of elite backtracking on Net Zero following public backlash at the rising costs and harms. The Times has more.

The billionaire philanthropist and co-founder of Microsoft, who has long supported efforts to combat global warming, advocated a more measured approach to fighting climate change in a lengthy memo published on Tuesday.

Gates, 70, warned that the climate community was overly focused on “near-term emissions goals”, while diverting resources away from efforts to improve humans’ lives in a warming world. The doomsday narrative that predicted climate change would decimate civilisation was wrong, he said.

“Although climate change will have serious consequences — particularly for people in the poorest countries — it will not lead to humanity’s demise,” he said.

“People will be able to live and thrive in most places on earth for the foreseeable future. Emissions projections have gone down, and with the right policies and investments, innovation will allow us to drive emissions down much further.”

Gates called for a renewed focus on preventing human suffering, particularly for those “in the toughest conditions who live in the world’s poorest countries”.

“Although climate change will hurt poor people more than anyone else, for the vast majority of them it will not be the only or even the biggest threat to their lives and welfare,” he said. “The biggest problems are poverty and disease, just as they always have been. Understanding this will let us focus our limited resources on interventions that will have the greatest impact for the most vulnerable people.”

Okay, so it’s not a recognition that carbon dioxide is not a harmful pollutant that is having negligible impact on global temperatures while boosting plant growth. But by dialling down the catastrophism and regaining a semblance of perspective, it’s a step in the right direction...<<<Read More>>>...

Teenagers Must Be Warned About the Dystopia Being Built Around Them

The following is the introduction to Mike Fairclough’s new book 2030 – a dystopian novel aimed at teenagers.

I want to speak to you directly, before the story begins.

When I was your age, the books we studied at school were dangerous in the best sense of the word. We read George Orwell’s Animal Farm and 1984. We read William Golding’s Lord of the Flies. We were exposed to stories of mythological heroes – ordinary men and women who faced extraordinary challenges. These books didn’t come with ‘trigger warnings’. They weren’t wrapped in cotton wool. They were meant to disturb, to challenge, to wake you up.

I grew up in a time when boys were boys and girls were girls. Our fathers, and our grandfathers before them, had fought in wars or been raised in the shadow of those who did. They taught us grit, resilience, and the courage to stand up when something was wrong.

We were also raised with pride in our British heritage. Our history, our culture, our traditions and our flag were things to respect, not to be ashamed of. We learned that our nation had stood up against tyranny, twice, and paid the price in blood. We sang songs that carried our past. We flew the Union Jack as a symbol of unity, freedom and identity.

Today, children and young people are told to see their history not as a source of pride or strength, but as a catalogue of guilt. They are taught that the victories of their ancestors were crimes, that courage was cruelty and that sacrifice was oppression. They are urged to turn away from their heritage, to treat their own flag as a symbol of shame, and to believe that the culture which once defended freedom is now too offensive to exist.

Much of what shaped us has been stolen from you. Books that once inspired rebellion are now treated as dangerous objects. Classrooms have become indoctrination centres. Children are drilled to fear the weather, to doubt their own identity, to repeat slogans about ‘inclusion’ while real truth is erased. Men are called ‘toxic’ simply for being men. Women are told that men can be women and therefore women are redundant....<<<Read More>>>...

Food for Thought 802

 

Mysterious interstellar visitor spotted above Mars appears as 'massive cylindrical craft'

 And right on cue (It seems) .... the MSM jumps on the story and is working on the alien spaceship agenda .... the fake alien invasion agenda .... madness for the gullible sheeples to embrace and become fearful. 

Problem - the apparent alien ship arriving; 

Reaction - the gullible falling for the myth and demanding help ... 

Solution - enter the New World Government control system just in time for the digital ID bullshit ....

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 

New extraordinary images of the interstellar object flying through our solar system have been released, sparking fresh theories about its origins. 

Although most scientists have concluded that the mysterious object is a comet, NASA's Perseverance rover on the Martian surface sent back photos showing what appears to be a massive cylindrical shape.

Stargazers on social media shared color-enhanced images of the object, dubbed 3I/ATLAS, which showed the interstellar visitor having a green glow as it passed Mars and heads closer to the sun. 

Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb, who has been convinced that the object could be an alien craft or probe, analyzed the Perseverance rover's photos by calculating its distance, speed, and camera settings.

According to his initial study, Loeb was not convinced 3I/ATLAS is actually a massive cylindrical object, noting that the strange shape might have been a trick of the rover's camera stretching out its shape.

He explained that the apparent cylinder from the rover's 'Navcam' was likely caused by the camera stacking hundreds of images of 3I/ATLAS over a period of about 10 minutes, making it look more like a log than a ball.

The professor added that 3I/ATLAS is likely smaller and rounder, but still massive, with a potential diameter of more than 28 miles across.

Dr Horace Drew, a retired senior researcher at Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), noted that the mysterious green glow seen in some images could be a result of the object being an interstellar spacecraft coated in nickel....<<<Read More>>>...

Food for Thought #798

 

Food for Thought #797

 

The Totalitarian Nature of ID Cards

Food for Thought #791

 

Problem, reaction, solution: Starmer’s digital ID is a solution looking for a crisis

 Prime Minister Keir Starmer is set to announce plans for a compulsory UK-wide digital ID scheme in a speech today, 26 September 2025. Dubbed the “Brit card,” the digital ID is expected to be rolled out by the end of the current Parliament.

An article from 2017 demonstrates that Starmer’s digital ID is a solution that has been waiting for a crisis.

In his announcement today, Starmer will claim his nationwide digital ID is necessary to tackle illegal working and migration by requiring all adults to have a digital ID to prove their right to live and work in the UK.

The excuse today may be to tackle the immigration crisis, but it is the same idea that has been planned for years. As the 2017 article below shows, eight years ago, digital IDs were being pushed by commercial banks in the UK. And a global digital ID programme was being planned as a solution for a refugee crisis.

Starmer’s digital ID is a solution that has been waiting for a crisis which could be used to implement it. It is the Hegelian Dialectic: Problem-Reaction-Solution. Instead of tackling the illegal immigration crisis, Starmer is pushing their pre-conceived “solution” that has been on the cards for years....<<<Read More>>>...