Why does a Rothschild hold the 2015 patent for COVID-19 testing?

While many conspiracies about the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) have been revealed to be true, one stands out – the fact that a member of the infamous Rothschild family holds the patent for COVID-19 testing.

"It has been reported that … COVID-19 caught the world by surprise in 2020," wrote 100 Percent Fed Up. "Well, all of us – except the Rothschilds, according to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office."

According to the outlet, a British national named Richard Rothschild was granted a patent for "System and Method for Testing for COVID-19, with a priority date of Oct. 13, 2015 – the date when the patent was first filed.

Based on the patent's abstract, the method calls for the use of "a pulse oximeter to acquire at least pulse and blood oxygen saturation percentage." The oximeter's readings are then "transmitted wirelessly to a smartphone" equipped with an accelerometer for accuracy.

"Once accurate data is acquired, it is uploaded to the cloud (or host), where the data is used (alone or together with other vital signs) to determine whether the user is suffering from (or likely to suffer from) a viral infection, such as COVID-19," it continued. "Depending on the specific requirements, the data, changes thereto, and/or the determination can be used to alert medical staff and take corresponding actions."...<<<Read More>>>..

Unearthed emails from 2020 prove that covid PCR testing is a SCAM

  The PCR tests that the government pushed on the masses during the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “pandemic” are nothing more than a scam, unearthed emails show.

Prof. Martin Neil in September 2020 received a handful of anonymous emails that unequivocally prove the fraudulent nature of PCR tests, which were never designed to detect viruses.

“Some of the [test] sequences are found in the human genome itself,” one of the emails reads.

Further, the cycling threshold of PCR testing kits was almost uniformly set too high, resulting in lots of false positives. And were these kits ever even approved or certified for such testing in the first place? Absolutely not.

One of the biggest smoking guns is the gene sequencing that Dr. Christian Drosten used in his blueprint covid testing system, which was spread around the world. Drosten, the guy credited with inventing the screening system for covid, never isolated the virus nor even had access to it.

“Instead, he downloaded the virus RNA sequence from a Chinese database,” reports explain. “Drosten subsequently created the first commercially available RT-PCR screening kit based on this genome.”

“The Chinese researchers later claimed the isolated virus sample became unusable shortly after uploading the sequence so they destroyed all remains.” ...<<<Read More>>>...

Project Veritas & Pfizer: How Far Are We Willing To Go To Get ‘The Truth?’

 Two days ago Project Veritas released a video that shows consultant Jordan Walker, who works with Pfizer, suggesting Pfizer performed research to ‘mutate’ COVID-19 intentionally for their own benefit. He referred to it as ‘direction evolution.’

This suggestion would mean Pfizer’s mRNA product would become more profitable because the company would be artificially speeding up mutations so they could sell new iterations of their ‘vaccine.’

Project Veritas, a media company, obtained this admission (if true) from Walker by means of an undercover journalist posing as a date. The admission was recorded through a secret camera and can be seen here.

Before we go on, there has been talk that this encounter may have been inauthentic or staged, perhaps that’s worth asking, but whether it is or not doesn’t take away from what needs to be talked about here.

If what Walker is saying is true, a corporation is playing with fire to create billions on profit while not disclosing any of this to the public. We can of course argue that maybe Walker was lying, or that perhaps something was taken out of context, but given what we already know about the existence of gain of function research and the lack of moral compass on the part of pharmaceutical companies for decades, what Walker states has to be given consideration....<<<Read More

CDC finally recognizes right of “individuals” to make their own health choices – no more forced covid vaccinations or quarantines

 New guidance from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has put an end to mandatory Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccination” – at least as far as the CDC is concerned.

No longer is the CDC urging or trying to force everyone in the “herd” to get jabbed. From now on, it is up to the individuals to make the choice for themselves without the government telling them what to do.

Entitled “Guidance for Minimizing the Impact of Covid-19,” the CDC’s new release, as explained by NPR, includes the following recommendations: Those exposed to the virus are no longer required to quarantine.

- Unvaccinated people now have the same guidance as vaccinated people.
- Students can stay in class after being exposed to the virus.
- It is no longer recommended to screen (test) those without symptoms....<<<Read More>>>....

The Philadelphia Covid Experiment

[Real Raw News]: The Deep State has chosen Philadelphia as a testbed to gauge how citizens will psychologically respond to a fresh round of sweeping Covid-19 mandates, according to an April 12 Office of Military Commission report compiled by “White Hats” at Marine Corps General David H. Berger’s office.

In what the military believes is a retaliatory response to Deep State arrests, the city of Philadelphia and its malevolent mayor Jim Kenney have once again imposed upon the citizenry draconian mandates meant to cause turmoil, confusion, hardship, and financial ruin.

The city of brotherly love last week issued a new indoor mask mandate, effective April 18, citing a non-existent rise in Omicron BA.2 subvariant cases. Mayor Kenney said a “deadly” Omicron surge was sweeping the city, and Cheryl Bettigole, the city’s health commissioner, said in a news conference that Covid was sickening “thousands and thousands of Philadelphians”—a blatant lie.

In fact, people not tested for the fake virus are being told they’re Covid positive and to self-quarantine for 7 days. For example, Thelma Robinson of south Philadelphia had heard on an evening CNN broadcast that Covid had seized the city in its icy grip. At the time she had a mild cold and, for an abundance of caution, went online to schedule a Covid-19 test at a local CVS for the following day. Upon arriving at CVS, she saw a line of fearful sheeple wrapped around the building. Having other tasks to carry out that morning, she skipped the test. Forty-eight hours later she received an email saying her test results were available. It was unwelcome news. According to the test she had not taken, she tested positive for Omicron and was encouraged to self-isolate for at least seven days, and to mask-up if she went outside.

The email also encouraged her to get vaccinated, even though she was already triple-vaxxed. If Ms. Robinson’s case were an isolated incident, we could blame it on human error, call it an honest mistake. But situations such as hers have been broadly reported since the start of the plandemic....<<<Read More>>>...

The Covid Lies - What Pandemic?

 [The Expose]: THERE IS NO VALID TEST TO DETECT SARS-COV-2 virus. Yet why would that matter when there is no valid, isolated virus? We have been dancing to the tune of the corrupt globalists for the last 20 months. We now need to look at all the facts and put a stop to it. We must stop listening to the lies and stop complying with the disproportionate nonsensical measures that adversely affect us all.

While we all may laugh at the DFS furniture “sales” that are clearly not a sale, yet the marketing used tries to make consumers feel an urgency to buy a product they don’t need, in case they are too late. However, when the same cheap tactics are used by the government, it is not quite as funny. The government has a magical tool at their disposal, the PCR test that creates, what they deem as “cases” of a potentially deadly virus, therefore, used to create fear and urgency, rendering grown adults terrified and accepting of any measure that a patriarchal government proposes in order to look after them.

It is not the fault of the masses that they feel this fear, the government has relied upon it and employed behavioural scientists (SAGE) which includes communist party member, psychologist Susan Michie, to ensure it occurs almost, or exactly showing parallels to the Goebbelian methods used in WW2. Joseph Goebbels was a German Nazi politician and, chief propagandist for the Nazi Party famously said “We have made the Reich by propaganda and it is the absolute right of the state to supervise the formation of public opinion.” 

It was this propaganda and social control that kept the population in line, which demonstrably is what our own government believes too and has arguably used tactics Goebbels would be proud of, particularly through acting out one of his quotes “A lie told once remains a lie, but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth”. We know all about repetition these last 20 months! ...<<<Read More>>>...

C0v1d “rapid tests” found to contain cancer causing chemical ethylene oxide, used for medical sterilization

[Natural News]: A union group called Isotita (Equality) that represents public sector workers is calling for Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “rapid tests” to be suspended from use after it was discovered that the swabs contain ethylene oxide, a toxic substance.

The Cyprus-based union says that current requirements mandating testing every 72 hours be immediately discontinued in order to protect the health of workers who are constantly being exposed to the toxin.

The European Chemicals Agency (ECA) says that ethylene oxide, which is used to coat and sterilize both the fraudulent PCR and rapid tests for the Chinese Virus, is toxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic when inhaled.

Since the tainted swabs are being jammed up people’s nasal cavities, sometimes multiple times per week, ethylene oxide is almost certainly being inhaled and potentially planting the seeds of chronic disease.

“Ethylene oxide is a gas commonly used to sterilise many different types of medical devices, including swabs used in test kits,” reported the Cyprus Mail.

“Ethylene oxide (EtO) gas sterilisers have been used by hospitals for over 40 years to sterilise surgical equipment and supplies that are heat sensitive or that cannot tolerate excessive moisture.”

In the European Union, ethylene oxide is prohibited in food production, and under EU Regulation No. 2015/868, the highest amount allowed in residue is specified at 0.05 mg/kg.

In Fauci Flu rapid tests, however, the amount of ethylene oxide detected is around 0.36 mg/kg, more than six times the allowable level under current government guidelines....<<<Read More>>>...

COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless

[Virutron]: Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to “diagnose” Sars-Cov-2 infection, the science is clear: they are not fit for purpose.

Lockdowns and hygienic measures around the world are based on numbers of cases and mortality rates created by the so-called SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests used to identify “positive” patients, whereby “positive” is usually equated with “infected.”

But looking closely at the facts, the conclusion is that these PCR tests are meaningless as a diagnostic tool to determine an alleged infection by a supposedly new virus called SARS-CoV-2.

It is worth mentioning that the PCR tests used to identify so-called COVID-19 patients presumably infected by what is called SARS-CoV-2 do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with.

This is a fundamental point. Tests need to be evaluated to determine their preciseness — strictly speaking their “sensitivity”[1] and “specificity” — by comparison with a “gold standard,” meaning the most accurate method available.

As an example, for a pregnancy test the gold standard would be the pregnancy itself. But as Australian infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake, for example, stated in an ABC TV interview in an answer to the question “How accurate is the [COVID-19] testing?”:

If we had a new test for picking up [the bacterium] golden staph in blood, we’ve already got blood cultures, that’s our gold standard we’ve been using for decades, and we could match this new test against that. But for COVID-19 we don’t have a gold standard test.”

But instead of classifying the tests as unsuitable for SARS-CoV-2 detection and COVID-19 diagnosis, or instead of pointing out that only a virus, proven through isolation and purification, can be a solid gold standard, Watson claims in all seriousness that, “pragmatically” COVID-19 diagnosis itself, remarkably including PCR testing itself, “may be the best available ‘gold standard’.” But this is not scientifically sound.

Apart from the fact that it is downright absurd to take the PCR test itself as part of the gold standard to evaluate the PCR test, there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, as even people such as Thomas Löscher, former head of the Department of Infection and Tropical Medicine at the University of Munich and member of the Federal Association of German Internists, conceded to us [2].

And if there are no distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19, COVID-19 diagnosis — contrary to Watson’s statement — cannot be suitable for serving as a valid gold standard.

In addition, “experts” such as Watson overlook the fact that only virus isolation, i.e. an unequivocal virus proof, can be the gold standard.

The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive, which means it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA — but it cannot determine where these particles came from. That has to be determined beforehand.

And because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences (in this case RNA sequences because SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be a RNA virus), we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus. And to know that, correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed.

Hence, we have asked the science teams of the relevant papers which are referred to in the context of SARS-CoV-2 for proof whether the electron-microscopic shots depicted in their in vitro experiments show purified viruses. But not a single team could answer that question with “yes” — and NB., nobody said purification was not a necessary step. We only got answers like “No, we did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification” ...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

Food For Thought #201

Food For Thought #195

The Truth About PCR Tests

Food For Thought #176

 

WHO Calls Into Question Ability of RT-PCR Test To Detect COVID-19 (False Positives)

[Collective Evolution]: On December 14th the World Health Organization (WHO) released a notice on their website titled “WHO Information Notice for IVD Users” regarding “nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2.”

In it they state that people who test positive for COVID-19 may not actually have COVID-19, known as false positives. They state the following,

WHO has received user feedback on an elevated risk for false SARS-CoV-2 results when testing specimens using RT-PCR reagents on open systems.As with any diagnostic procedure, the positive and negative predictive values for the product in a given testing population are important to note. As the positivity rate for SARS-CoV-2 decreases, the positive predictive value also decreases. This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as positivity rate decreases, irrespective of the assay specificity. Therefore, healthcare providers are encouraged to take into consideration testing results along with clinical signs and symptoms, confirmed status of any contacts, etc. 

The idea that some people who test positive for COVID-19 may not actually have COVID-19 has been a common theme during this pandemic as many scientists and doctors have called into question the efficacy of the test for declaring a pandemic. For example, 22 researchers have put out a paper explaining why, according to them, it’s quite clear that the PCR test is not effective in for identifying COVID-19 cases. As a result we may be seeing a significant amount of false positives. False negatives are also a possibility....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

UK allowed mysterious 3-hour COVID-19 aerosol “test flight” over nation

[Natural News]: The Netherlands Aerospace Center sent a Boeing 737-800 up in the air to conduct some kind of strange Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “test flight” over England the other day. And as far as we can tell, Brits down below were never notified about the biohazardous experiment.

A German news page on Twitter revealed that Corendon Airlines partnered with the Dutch organization to supposedly “learn more about aerosols on board aircraft.” The experiment took about three hours, though nobody really knows what it involved because nothing has been publicly disclosed.

Was COVID-19 deliberately sprayed inside the aircraft, some are asking? Was it also sprayed outside the aircraft? Again, nobody seems to know the answers to any of these questions, which is ominous in and of itself.

Rumor Mill News speculated on the true nature of the flight, asking many of the same questions as we are about what really went on up at 39,000 feet.

“The question is, was this substance being sprayed to kill the flu virus or was it used as a vaccine without getting the public’s permission?” George Eaton of the site asked....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

 

Portuguese Court Rules That The PCR Test “Is Unable To Determine” A COVID-19 Infection

[Collective Evolution]: A Portuguese court has determined that the PCR tests used to detect COVID-19 are not able to prove an infection beyond a reasonable doubt, and thus determined that the detainment of four individuals was unlawful and illegal.

With no clear cut answer, and many doctors and scientists contradicting each other, should governments be allowed to take measures that restrict our freedoms? Instead of force, should they provide the science and simply make recommendations?

The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test “is unable to determine, beyond reasonable doubt, that such positivity result corresponds, in fact, to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus”, said the Lisbon Court of Appeal.

A Portuguese appeals court has ruled against the Azores Regional Health Authority, declaring the quarantining of four individuals is unlawful. One of them tested positive for COVID using a PCR test, and the other three were deemed to be high risk due to exposure, and as a result, the regional health authority forced them to undergo isolation. The appeal court heard scientific arguments from several scientists and doctors who made the case for the lack of reliability of the PCR tests in detecting the COVID-19 virus....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

The scam has been confirmed: PCR does not detect SARS-CoV-2

[David Icke]: The genetic sequences used in PCRs to detect suspected SARS-CoV-2 and to diagnose cases of illness and death attributed to Covid-19 are present in dozens of sequences of the human genome itself and in those of about a hundred microbes. And that includes the initiators or primers, the most extensive fragments taken at random from their supposed “genome” and even the so-called “target genes” allegedly specific to the “new coronavirus”. 

 The test is worthless and all “positive” results obtained so far should be scientifically invalidated and communicated to those affected; and if they are deceased, to their relatives. Stephen Bustin, one of the world’s leading experts on PCR, in fact says that under certain conditions anyone can test positive!

We have been warning you since March: you cannot have specific tests for a virus without knowing the components of the virus you are trying to detect. And the components cannot be known without having previously isolated/purified that virus. Since then we continue to accumulate evidence that no one has isolated SARS-CoV-2 and, more importantly, that it can never be isolated for the reasons we explained last month (read the report “Can you prove that there are pathogenic viruses?” on our website –www.dsalud.com-).

 And in the present report we are going to offer new data that show that RT-PCR does not detect the so called SARS-CoV-2 as it is known, but fragments of human RNA and those of numerous microbes....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

 

Shocking revelations about the ‘virus’ from the CDC itself – a must read for confirmation of what I’ve been saying since March: It’s all a scam

[David Icke]: Dr Thomas Cowan: ‘The shocking thing … is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. 

In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this “new coronavirus” is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.’

This week, my colleague and friend Sally Fallon Morell brought to my attention an amazing article put out by the CDC. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.

First, in the section titled “Whole Genome Sequencing,” we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR probes This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately 30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact virus. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.

To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

Food For Thought #126

Food For Thought #123

Food For Thought #122