Ten Studies Detail Health Risks of 5G

 The first of these, published in September 2022 in the journal Reviews on Environmental Health, provides a good overview of the hazards 5G poses. The authors pointed out that, since September 2017, over 400 scientists and doctors have collectively submitted six appeals to the European Union, calling for a moratorium on 5G technology. All have been ignored.

The September 2021 appeal included an “extensive cover letter” in which experts argued that the EU’s reliance on guidelines by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) places public health at risk because the guidelines only consider “heating and no other health relevant biological effects from RFR.”

The letter countered the ICNIRP’s guidance with research from European and international expert groups detailing myriad adverse biological effects of RFR on humans and the environment. According to the authors:...<<<Read More>>>...

Ten Studies Detail Health Risks of 5G

 While the wireless industry is built on the premise that the only type of radiation capable of causing harm is ionizing — X-rays being one example — researchers have for a long time warned that even nonionizing and non-heating radiation can jeopardize your health. This includes not only human health, but also that of plants and animals.

5G induces cell death in the amygdala, a region of the brain involved in emotion regulation, memory and decision-making.

The amygdala is a region of the brain involved in emotion regulation, memory and decision-making. So, pyroptosis in this area could be indicative of neurological damage or inflammation, potentially affecting emotional regulation, behavior, and cognitive functions.

This could be relevant in the context of neurodegenerative diseases, brain injuries or infections that impact the central nervous system, leading to various neurological and psychiatric implications....<<<Read More>>>...

 

 

5G ushers in aggressive growth in energy consumption

 “A lurking threat behind the promise of 5G delivering up to 1,000 times as much data as today’s networks is that 5G could also consume up to 1,000 times as much energy,” IEEE Spectrum wrote in 2018.

Why? Because, as Environmental Health Trust noted, there will be an increase in the number of small cells, massive multiple-input multiple-output (“MIMO”) antennas, cloud computing and an explosion of internet-connected devices.

One 5G base station is estimated to consume about as much power as 73 households. Three years ago, it was estimated that by 2025 5G would consume more than 20% of the world’s energy.

5G is in the millimetre wave bands – 24-86 GHz. This slice of radio spectrum can carry large amounts of data, but not nearly as far as the current mobile network at frequencies from 700 megahertz to 6 gigahertz. What this means is that for 5G, a lot more equipment needs to be installed and potentially more data needs to be processed.

Additionally, it is important to note that millimetre wave communications are prone to interference. For example, radio at above 20 GHz doesn’t go through walls well. It doesn’t go through leaves well. It doesn’t play nicely with rain. What does this mean? Many, many more antennas.

Measuring networking power consumption requires the capacity to determine how much energy wired and wireless networks consume.

“A general concern is that higher data rates can only be achieved by consuming more energy; if the EE [energy efficiency] is constant, then 100× higher data rate in 5G is associated with a 100× higher energy consumption.” This is where headlines like, “Tsunami of data could consume 1/5 of global data by 2025,” come from.

In addition to transmitting or harvesting data, energy can also be moved in 5G networks. With 5G, one of the novel technologies being considered is Radio Frequency (RF) harvesting; converting energy in transmitted radio waves to user devices or even wireless infrastructure (microcells, antenna arrays, etc.). Since RF signals can carry both energy and information, theoretically RF energy harvesting and information reception can be performed from the same RF input signal. This scheme is referred to as the simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT). The hardware to support this doesn’t exist yet, but it has promise....<<<Read More>>>...

Oh, the irony. ‘Mysterious Havana Syndrome’ cause ‘finally revealed’ in declassified report (anyone paying attention knew all along) and it’s basically what 5G is doing to the population

 A government report has finally revealed what may have caused a mysterious brain disorder plaguing thousands of American diplomats and spies.

The House intelligence committee has released a declassified report on Havana syndrome, stating that ‘it appears increasingly likely’ that a ‘foreign adversary’ could be behind some of the cases.

The mysterious condition has baffled scientists since it was first reported in 2016, with more than 1,500 US officials around the globe reporting symptoms like persistent dizziness, nausea, and balance issues that have no explanation.

The subcommittee, chaired by Arkansas representative Rick Crawford, says US intelligence networks in Cuba and other affected areas could have been compromised by foreign spies in ‘adversary’ countries like China, Cuba, and Russia.

Exposure to radiation, chemical agents, and electromagnetic energy have all been blamed for the condition, though some experts have suggested the symptoms are psychosomatic.

The new report criticized the US intelligence community for ‘thwarting’ the committee’s attempts to investigate the phenomenon.

It accused the FBI and CIA of failing to properly investigate US agents’ symptoms.

‘Because of this lack of cooperation and the Subcommittee’s inability to access specific information, the Subcommittee concludes there must be something IC [intelligence community] leadership has sought to prevent Congress from discovering,’ the scathing report says.

The subcommittee said it would investigate further during the incoming Trump administration.

Earlier this year, a separate government-funded study found no signs of brain injury in 80 self-reported victims and said it was very unlikely to be caused by foreign adversaries.

However, researchers admitted the symptoms were ‘quite profound’ and ‘disabling.’

The Foreign Policy Research Institute estimates that 1,500 American officials have suffered mysterious neurological injuries since 2016.

The phenomenon was dubbed Havana syndrome after multiple government personnel stationed at the US embassy in Havana, Cuba, reported symptoms.

However, symptoms have also been reported in the US, Austria, China, Colombia, Georgia, Germany, India, Poland, Russia, and Vietnam.

According to the new report, these symptoms include vertigo, loss of balance, ear pain, headache, nausea, fatigue, and difficulty with cognitive tasks....<<<Read More>>>...

Other Countries Are Taking the Health Risks of 5G and Wireless Radiation Seriously. Why Isn’t the U.K.?

 Momentum is building in the campaign to try to protect children from harmful smartphone use. Earlier this year, Miriam Cates MP led a lively debate on this subject, while the Education Committee led an inquiry entitled, ‘Screen Time – Impacts on Education and Wellbeing’. The grassroots movement, including Smartphone Free Childhood, Safe Screens and others is gathering pace. The latter organisation is in fact actively supporting MP Josh MacAlister’s Safer Phones Bill launched earlier this month, which aims to “make smartphones less addictive for children and empower families and teachers to cut down on children’s daily smartphone screen time”.

The  dangers of smartphone use are clearly serious and encompass addiction, harmful content, exposure to sexual abuse and bullying, disruption of learning, behavioural changes through the habits adopted and the loss of previously normal childhood activities and social interactions. The movement hails Jonathan Haidt as the “world’s leading voice” on the damage caused to children by a phone-based childhood. Haidt identifies the damage as an “adolescent mental health crisis”.

The diagnosis, therefore, is overwhelmingly one of psychological damage. What I find astounding, however, is that with the exception of Safe Screens, no-one has mentioned the effects on children’s health of the wireless radiation signals emitted by smart devices, Wi-Fi or phone masts. All appear to assume that the only issue is the way children interact with screens along with the harmful social media content....<<<Read More>>>...

5G Defense Powder contains key nutritional ingredient that may help protect your body’s cells from health risks linked to 5G exposure and electropollution

 5G technology (5G), which stands for "fifth generation," is the latest generation in mobile technology and is now being used in nearly all broadband cellular networks. Its steadily increasing popularity can be traced to its fast connection speeds, which can range anywhere from 10 to 100 times faster than current 4G networks, or the fourth generation of mobile phone technology.

But unlike 4G technology, 5G technology uses "ultra high frequency" or "ultra high intensity" millimeter waves to work.

The millimeter wavelength (mmWave) uses "directed energy" instead of the "spread energy" of 4G technology. But since 5G technology uses different hardware from 4G technology to deliver signals, the former will require new and more cell towers to be built very closely to one another.

The danger lies in the inevitable and unprecedented levels of exposure to electromagnetic radiation in almost all urban and populated areas...<<<Read More>>>...

Experts raise public health fears about microwave syndrome from 5G masts

The Government would have us believe that "there may be a small increase in overall exposure to radio waves when 5G is added to an existing network or in a new area" but that "there should be no consequences for public health". Is this actually the case? On what evidence has this statement been made?

I have just read the four 5G case studies carried out this year by Professor Lennart Hardell and Mona Nilsson, in which eight people developed debilitating symptoms after the installation of 5G masts next to their accommodation, where precise radiation measurements were taken. The results put a big question mark over the Government's statement.

Has our Government ignored the worldwide appeals and consensus statements made by independent scientists and doctors, calling for a revision of safety guidelines and a halt to the rollout of 5G on the basis of research on the much lower levels of pre-5G emissions? These include:

433 scientists who have signed the EU 5G appeal. 259 scientists from 44 nations who have signed the international EMF scientist appeal. 164 scientists and medical doctors as well as 95 non-governmental organisations who have signed the EMF Call. 

There is also the compelling 2020 Consensus Statement of U.K. and international, medical and scientific experts on the health effects of non-ionising radiation, signed by organisations representing 3,500 medical doctors throughout the world, initiated by the Physicians' Health Initiative for Radiation and Environment (PHIRE).

The lead author of the four 5G case studies is Professor Hardell, an oncologist and leading researcher from the Swedish Research Foundation for Environment and Cancer. He was the first in the world to publish results on elevated cancer risks with mobile phone use. His co-author, Mona Nilsson, is Director of the Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation, which seeks, in the absence of information from the Government or the media, to inform people of the risks.

But before we look at the 5G case studies, let's take a brief look about what is already known about the health risks of previous mobile communications technology. The updated Bioinitiative Report has listed thousands of studies on the adverse health effects of pre-5G technology....<<<Read More>>>...

Recent Case of Severe Microwave Syndrome Reveals Problems With 5G

 After a 5G base station was installed within 60 meters of her second-floor apartment, a middle-aged, otherwise healthy, Swedish woman developed debilitating symptoms corresponding with radiofrequency (RF)/microwave syndrome, researchers at the Environment and Cancer Research Foundation (ECRF) in Sweden reported this month. This was the third such case the researchers had documented.

According to their case study, published in Annals of Clinical and Medical Case Reports, fifth generation (5G) wireless technology is being rolled out worldwide “despite no previous research on possible negative effects on human health and the environment.”...<<<Read More>>>...

Fifth Generation (5G) Directed Energy Radiation Emissions In the Context of Contaminated Nanometal Covid-19 Vaccines with Graphite Ferrous Oxide Antennas

 I write this expert report as a British engineer, inventor, patent writer and weapons research scientist; an engineer with a materials science background, and inventor of the world’s first binocular optical wave guides, weapons sight systems, infrared thermal imaging head up displays, molecular reactors, signal processing, and transducer design, to name a limited few.

As Chief Technology Officer (CTO) at the company that designed and brought to market the world’s first internationally approved head up display (HUD) product, accredited with a number of innovation awards, but more importantly regulated to a number of internationally recognized standards, including (DOT) Department of Transport ECE 22.05, as well as ANSI and others, I was relied upon in the establishment of international standards for augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) HUD systems.

Refer to Exhibit 2a, from patent attorney, Ex. 2b from Recorder Nolan, Ex. 2c Cyber Command, Ex. 2d Standards for HUD systems, Ex. 2di appendix.

Cyber Command USA had been made aware of my expertise and specifically requested my advice with regard to an unusual 5G antenna design deployed across the USA. I have been extremely fortunate that most (but not all) of my research and product development work has been carried out outside of the Official Secrets Acts (OSA) legislation.

I have acted as a witness and provided statements in several court cases, exposing the lack of any credible evidence that the 5G light-emitting diode (LED) network and planned neural connection to the 5G grid are safe.

This includes nano metamaterial technologies that are contaminating vaccinations, that are not legal or lawful, and that breach a number of international and domestic laws.

Judge Nolan at Newcastle Crown Court stated that “The 5G risk must be debated” and that “This is a democracy and the public have a right to know”.

The evidence I presented to the court defeated the attempt by the local authorities and actors in the British establishment to silence me from providing the published scientific evidence on the risks posed to the public and environment from the 5G urban radar network and its ultimate purpose....<<<Read More>>>...

5G is a weapon system and a crime against humanity

 “Putting tens of millions of 5G antennas, without a single biological test of safety, has to be about the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world” – Professor Martin Pall

Professor Pall is wrong, Mark Steele said in a 15-page report: “It is not a stupid idea but a heinous crime if one understands the motive behind this deployment. 5G is a compartmentalised weapons deployment masquerading as a benign technological advance for enhanced communications and faster downloads.”

“The 5G network has the capability to target acquire and attack the vaccinated due to their nano metamaterial antenna Covid-19 vaccine. Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS) require the 5G networks to maintain their geo-position and navigate their environment to the target; these weapons cannot rely on satellite communications due to the potential for inclement weather events and signal latency to disrupt their signals so they must have localised 5G networks.”

Steele clarified the definition of a weapon, it’s “a device, tool, or action that has been fashioned to cause physical or psychological harm in breach of the primary legislation.”

“The compartmentalisation of weapons systems development has played a crucial role in not alerting those within the regulatory authorities and telecommunications industry to the real purpose and intentions of those ultimately driving and funding the deployment of 5G and biological chemical weapons masquerading as Covid-19 vaccines for a planned control and command kill grid.

“The world is blindly following the plans of the technocratic elite and the military-industrial-pharma complex to terminate large numbers within populations across the world with no regard to the primary legislation.

“5G is a weapon system, a crime against humanity so monstrous that even an educated person would find it unbelievable on first inspection of the facts. The prima facie evidence of this globalist depopulation agenda is unequivocal and should be tested in the courts so that the conspirators involved in this murderous plan can be brought to justice. This is the greatest crime ever to be perpetrated on mankind and all of God’s creation.”...<<<Read More>>>...

Do UK Councils Have the Authority to Roll-Out 5G Infrastructure?

[The Expose]: UK councils, all of them no matter their size, do not have a legal duty to provide street lighting. It follows that they also have no legal duty to provide 5G equipment to residents that is being attached to those lamp posts.

The reason councils are not legally obliged to provide street lighting is purely for financial reasons: to avoid claims of negligence or failure to provide street lighting in the event a resident injures themselves under poor lighting due to broken lamps.

“Currently, it seems to me that councils may want it both ways, i.e., no responsibility in law for failing to maintain their lighting equipment, and then the facility to rebuff any potential claims should personal injury cases arise connected to the retro-fitting of non-safety tested, potentially hazardous 5G infrastructure,” Cardin says.

Paul Cardin is a former “sparker,” radio communication operator, for the Royal Navy, former local authority street lighting designer and resident of Wirral, Merseyside, UK.

There’s a crucial legal point here that I’ve never seen mentioned or covered anywhere else and I’ve been aware of it for a good few years.

All UK councils, no matter their size, have no duty to provide street lighting. So, all the lamp posts in all the streets in urban and rural locations everywhere in the UK are provided under a power. This was voluntarily taken up a long time ago, since well before I was born, anyway! The exercise of their power in this area serves them well financially because it helps them to outflank most legal claims where a loss or injury has been suffered due to faulty equipment.

Now, the important point to make is that given they have no duty in law to provide any lamp posts or associated equipment, then it would correspond that they have no duty to provide 5G facilities to customers when that 5G infrastructure is actually ATTACHED to these lamp posts. I believe they (elected AND unelected council officials) are therefore in NO position to complain that they MUST provide superfast broadband speeds to their residents – because there is no legal duty in existence requiring them do this.

Can Councils legally turn off the lights?

The Real 5G Agenda and How Covid-19 Is Helping to Achieve It. “Humanity is in extreme and imminent danger”

[The Expose]: First generation wireless was voice. Second generation wireless, 2G, allowed both talk and text. Third generation, 3G, the internet, in a limited way. And today’s internet using fourth generation wireless, 4G, completed that digital migration. Fifth generation, 5G, will connect the Internet of Everything (“IoE”).

The IoE with four pillars – people, process, data, and things – builds on top of the Internet of Things (“IoT”) with one pillar – things. With IoE, if something can be connected it will be connected – hundreds of billions of microchips connected in products from pill bottles to plant water, requiring massive deployment of small cells. Small cells, which may not be all that small size-wise, are low-cost radio access points delivering coverage indoors and out. In the 5G era small cells will be deployed in a far wider range of scenarios....<<<Read More>>>...

Report: 5G to Increase Power Consumption by 61 TIMES from 2020 to 2030

[Humans Are Free]: Cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit 5G installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums due to economic, environmental, health, and public safety risks.

Increased energy consumption is both an economic and environmental concern. 5G requires millions of small cells and/or antennas to operate.

Recently, China announced having close to 800,000 5G towers in operation. France announced having 22,000+. 170 cities and municipalities in Germany have 5G.

Of course, those aren’t the only locations where 5G has been deployed. The point is that experts keep pointing out that 5G needs a whole lot more energy to operate. Some folks are very concerned about that....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>..

City Stops 5G Deployment due to Health Concerns (Including Infertility) and Locals Opposed to Being “Guinea Pigs”

[David Icke]: Cities AND entire countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit 5G installation AS WELL AS issue moratoriums due to health, safety, environmental and economic risks.

Kalamata, Greece is now one of them due to concerns about exposure causing infertility and other health issues.

The Kalamata City Council in Greece has decided to block further development and operation of the 5G network program due to concerns that it may cause infertility in the local population.

The council held a meeting and considered the radiation of the mobile network upgrade to be dangerous and most councilors voted in favor of halting testing, adding that the network should only operate in Kalamata when corresponding networks were in place in the rest of Greece.

The proposal to terminate the contract by the end of the year was voted in by 16 members, reported the Greek City Times.

The decision calls for the termination of cooperation with Wind network “until such technology passes from the experimental stage to the full implementation stage,” announced the Council.

In the text read by representatives of the city council, the radiation of 5G from the 2G, 3G and 4G networks were referred to as “dangerous”....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

Still think 5G is harmless? Scientific American issues warnings about the confirmed and UNKNOWN DANGERS of 5G tech

[Natural News]: The oldest magazine in the United States, Scientific American, has issued a strong warning about the dangers of 5G technology. Their concerns about both the known and the potential dangers of 5G carry a lot of weight because the magazine is so influential and known for its rigorous scientific standards. 

In print since 1845, Scientific American is widely considered by modern fact checkers to be pro-science and highly credible.

Public health researcher Joel M. Moskowitz of the University of California, Berkeley, says in the article that 5G is a lot more harmful than the government and telecommunications industry want people to believe. He also said the same is true of Wi-Fi and cellular technology....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

Pentagon Releases Huge Slice Of Spectrum For 5G

[David Icke]: After a remarkably fast interagency review, the White House today announced a massive transfer of electromagnetic spectrum from military use to commercial 5G. It will be the “fastest transfer of federal spectrum to commercial use in history,” US Chief Technology Officer Michael Kratsios told reporters proudly this afternoon. But, Kratsios and Pentagon CIO Dana Deasy assured reporters ahead of the announcement, the rush won’t compromise military readiness or operations.

The 100 megahertz of spectrum runs from 3450 MHz to 3550, so-called mid-band frequencies prized by 5G developers because they allow longer-ranged transmissions than the millimeter-wave spectrum that makes up most of what’s been available in the US so far. Kratsios and other officials told reporters shortly before this afternoon’s announcement that the move would dramatically expand 5G access for all Americans – fulling a congressional mandate in the 2018 MOBILE NOW Act – and strengthen potential competitors to Chinese giant Huawei in the global market.

Currently, Deasy said, “the 3450-3550 mHZ band supports critical DoD radar operations, including high-powered defense radar systems on fixed, mobile, shipboard, and airborne platforms, [including] air defense, missile and gun fire control, counter mortar, bomb scoring [during training exercises], battlefield weapon locations, air traffic control, and range safety.”

That’s a wide range of military functions, many with life-or-death significance for either training safety or outright combat. Deasy and other officials didn’t detail how the Defense Department would work this massive transfer. Their remarks, however, suggested a mix of migrating military radars to other frequencies – a complex and costly process typically funded from a share of the FCC auction – and sharing frequencies with commercial users in specific times and places....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>....

Musk’s 5G Spy Satellite Megalomania

[Waking Times]: Keeping us preoccupied with a phony virus which was supposed to kill millions and landed-up causing no more deaths than the normal winter flu, sure was a useful way of directing attention away from the earthly and upward deployment of the 5G microwave weapon.

While billions were under home arrest in semi suffocation from airless apartments, ridiculous masks and insane social distancing, Mr. Elon Musk, megalomaniac extraordinaire, had hired Cape Canaveral and was enjoying his own private launch pad parties in celebration of his ‘Space X’ company blasting hundreds of 5G satellites into the ionosphere fifty miles above the Earth.

Multi billionaire Elon Musk likes to believe that smothering every last inch of the planet in a blanket of beamed toxic electromagnetic pulsed ‘arrays’, is exactly what we have all been praying for.

Mr. Musk claims to be the ‘inventor’ of the electric car – the forthcoming models of which just happen to need no drivers but lots of electricity – 5G electricity to be precise. Autonomous cars steered by 5G microwave beams with transmitters situated along every major road and street in the world.

Musk’s great ‘vision of the future’ is to marry his obscene wealth to the most advanced artificial intelligence technologies for the ultimate enslavement of humanity. He wears his vision just like obsessed Covid believers wear their obscene masks. Just like that other multi billionaire Bill Gates wears his vaccination death wish.

Multi millionaires have a way of smiling as they explain their dystopian visions of suffocated life on Earth. Their sad minds can only see the perfect algorithmic march of a super cyborg AI civilisation stretching out in front of them ad infinitum.

So when Mr. Musk, adored guru of ardent technophiles, tells us how his twenty thousand satellites are going to spray our planet with a perfect wall of 5G weaponised electromagnetic laser beams from satellites put into orbit in the delicate protective atmosphere of the ionosphere – we are supposed to fall on our knees and cry “Thank you, Mr Musk!...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

The dark reality of 5G technology: What is the 5G Dragnet?

[Natural News]: 5G is the fifth-generation mobile network, and telecom companies are playing up its faster speeds and greater connectivity.

In fact, it is said to be at least 10 times faster than the 4G LTE network in use now, although some experts say it could even be 100 times faster, allowing people to download a two-hour movie in under 10 seconds. They boast that it can connect virtually everyone and everything imaginable together, but it is precisely these qualities that make it so threatening.

Concerns about the dark reality of this technology are growing as it starts rolling out across the nation. There have long been worries about the danger this network may post to human health, particularly given the number of powerful transmitters that have to be placed throughout neighborhoods to make this connectivity possible.

A growing body of research shows that the EMF present in mobile technologies is amplified significantly with 5G, with experts like retired U.S. government scientist Dr. Ronald M. Powell warning that the 5G rollout will essentially irradiate everyone, with young children, pregnant women, the elderly and chronically ill being particularly vulnerable to its dangers.

However, another dark reality about 5G is also raising concerns: privacy. The big tech giants like Google and Amazon who are behind so many of the smart home products on the market have unprecedented access into people’s homes and lives thanks to these devices. Given their track record, are we sure that we want to trust them with big databases filled with sensitive and highly personal information on all aspects of our daily lives? ...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

Scientists & Doctors Make It Quite Clear That 5G Could Be Dangerous To Human Health

[Collective Evolution]: The idea that health concerns about 5G technology are a mere “conspiracy theory” is quite concerning.

How can hundreds of doctors and scientists all around the world who are publishing in vivo and in vitro studies in peer-reviewed scientific journals about this topic be considered conspiracy theorists?

How would these publications that have been raising concerns be able to get through the peer-reviewed process if they weren’t legit?

Why does mainstream media continue to constantly ignore the concerns that are being brought up all over the world with regards to 5G technology?

What is going on here? Do we really live in a democracy when the concerns of the people are constantly ignored and all of the evidence and research go unacknowledged?

If 5G was completely safe, why wouldn’t our federal health regulatory agencies require safety testing? Shouldn’t all new technologies, especially wireless technologies, be required to at least go through some sort of safety testing before it’s rolled out?

What’s really going on here?

Why is this being allowed to happen? ...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

5G Judicial Review 2020

[David Icke]: This page is against wireless 5G, radiofrequency radiation (“RFR”) and electromagnetic fields (“EMFs”) generally due to their impact on the health of humans, animals and plants.

Many people are sensitive to RFR and EMFs and suffer illness, distress and financial loss due to inability to work. The balance of scientific evidence is now clear that RFR/EMFs are harmful to humans.

The UK government insist on using ICNIRP’s guidelines to set limits of radiation for public health. ICNIRP’s guidelines are not fit for purpose as, among other things, they only recognise harm from heating of the body and are set for short term exposure – 6 minutes in fact. Many people suffer harm without any heating of their bodies.

5G is the fifth generation of RFR technology used in the mobile telecoms industry and follows 1G – 4G. It dwarfs RFR from 1G – 4G because millions more masts, antennae, small cells, picocells etc have to be placed at short distances apart all around the country in order to develop the infrastructure to deliver the data speed promised by 5G.

The current electrosmog from 1G – 4G will become significantly worse and it is likely to result in more harm to humans, animals, trees and pollinators....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...