Mark Zuckerberg’s REAL NAME is Jacob Greenberg and he is the GRANDSON of DAVID ROCKEFELLER, hence the POWER of FAKEBOOK

Still think Facebook was created by some no-name "wiz-kid" college student? Wrong. Did you know that the Rothschilds own nearly 10 percent of all Facebook shares and that Facebook was funded with $500 million from a CIA-owned bank? 

True story. 

Zuckerberg is a Jewish surname of Germany and has Yiddish origin meaning "sugar mountain,” which is a clandestine term for the mountain of information everyone plugs into Fakebook for the CIA to extract, analyze, categorize, classify, and use against the populace for control, money, mass censorship, brainwashing youth, persecution, invasion of privacy, and political warfare.

Zuckerberg is a pseudonym name derived from his great grandparents, Corinne Zuckerman Greenberg and Maurice Greenberg. Mark “Zuckerberg’s” entire story is fake about his (real) age and being a Harvard dropout and was part of the scheme to hoodwink investors. Of course, all of fake news media, across the board, including Big Media, Big Tech, Google and all of social media (except for maybe X) will outright deny this and publish counterarguments and shilling excuses trying to debunk it. That’s all funded by Zuck bucks and the Rockefeller empire war chest (and probably some USAID billions)....<<<Read More>>>...

Technocracy: The system of control that makes reality engineering possible on a global scale

 The world’s “reality” is being engineered through sophisticated technological systems and digital barriers. These create a manufactured environment controlled by technocracy, a system of control passed down through institutions and bloodlines, involving key figures such as the Huxley brothers and the Rockefeller family.

The technocratic agenda has shifted from creating compliant workers to managing population reduction, with a focus on artificial intelligence, automation and climate change messaging.

Joshua Stylman suggests that resistance to the technocratic grid can be achieved through actions such as implementing strong privacy practices, developing critical media literacy skills and building local support networks. He also recommends supporting decentralised technologies and creating parallel systems for education and information sharing.

Yesterday, Brownstone Institute published an essay by Joshua Stylman titled ‘The Technocratic Blueprint’. We have paraphrased Stylman’s essay below but we encourage our readers to take the time to read the full essay which you can find HERE or HERE.

The world is increasingly engineered through sophisticated technological systems and invisible digital constraints, creating a manufactured environment that is similar to the one depicted in The Truman Show, where reality itself is manipulated and controlled.

The driving force behind this manufactured world is technocracy, a system of control that has been passed down through institutions and bloodlines, with key figures such as Thomas Henry Huxley, known as “Darwin’s Bulldog,” and his descendants, including Aldous and Julian Huxley, playing important roles in shaping the modern world order.

The connections between these people and other influential families, such as the Darwins and the Rockefellers, have created a powerful nexus of influence that spans science, culture and governance, and has evolved to incorporate new technological capabilities.

Rockefeller once declared that “we need a nation of workers, not thinkers.”

Today, the focus of the technocratic agenda has shifted from creating compliant workers to managing population reduction, as artificial intelligence and automation eliminate the need for human labour, with BlackRock CEO Larry Fink explicitly stating that countries with declining populations will be more easily able to substitute humans with machines.

The evolving agenda is reflected in various developments, including climate change messaging, declining birth rates and the normalisation of euthanasia, which are not random but rather logical extensions of the technocratic plan to manage and control the population....<<<Read More>>>...

Connecting the Agenda: Rockefellers and the United Nations

Connecting the Agenda published a video in 2016 describing the significant connections between the Rockefellers and the United Nations.

John D. Rockefeller Jr. provided $2 million to the League of Nations in 1927, which later became part of the United Nations Office in Geneva.

Additionally, the Rockefellers purchased the land for the United Nations Headquarters in New York, with John D. Rockefeller Jr. donating $8,515,000 in 1946, and Nelson Rockefeller negotiating the deal with the landowner, William Zeckendorf.

David Rockefeller, Nelson’s brother, benefited financially from the deal, as he owned land in the area that increased in value after the UN Headquarters was built, and he also invested in a building project across from the UN building through the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

The Rockefeller family has continued to support the United Nations, with the Rockefeller Foundation providing grants and the Rockefellers Brothers Fund funding the United Nations Foundation.

According to David Rockefeller’s autobiography, the family’s ultimate goal is to build a “more integrated global political and economic structure – one world,” which aligns with the United Nations’ Agenda 21 programme....<<<Read More>>>...

Operation Lockstep: Is Phase Three Being Put In Motion?

 A document published by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010, titled “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.”, described the possible ramifications of a Pandemic. 

The “Lock Step” scenario imagined a world where national governments imposed strict top-down control and authority in response to a global pandemic, with citizens complying with government restrictions.

The “Lock Step” section detailed how countries might react to a global crisis, such as a pandemic, with varying degrees of government control. It discussed how more authoritarian governments might succeed in containing the virus by enforcing strict lockdowns, surveillance, and control measures, while other countries with less centralized control might struggle to manage.

Covid-19 was used as a Catalyst for Authoritarian Control. The scenario in this booklet stated that during a pandemic, some governments could impose strict regulations and lockdowns, requiring citizens to comply without question. This centralized control would be successful in containing the pandemic. Over time, these control measures would become permanent, leading to increased government surveillance, biometric IDs, and restrictions on freedoms, even after the pandemic ended. This scenario also emphasized that the public would largely comply with these restrictions, following all orders given, viewing them as necessary to protect public health and safety.

This “Lock Step” scenario was used as a forebearer of a planned agenda for a future authoritarian world government. Also pushed by WEF and the puppets that had been placed in different government departments across the world, used under the guise of a reset, as a way to test people’s breaking point.

There are considered 3 phases that governments would use during the pandemic to roll out increasing levels of authoritarianism. They look something like this:

Phase One: The outbreak of a virus and the initial government responses, such as lockdowns, travel restrictions, and social distancing measures, often referred to as a “trial run” to test public compliance.

Phase Two: Escalation of fear through media coverage, leading to increased government control measures, such as extended lockdowns, mandatory vaccinations, and the restriction of civil liberties.

Phase Three: This phase would involve a more permanent state of control, where extreme government measures (such as police and military enforcement, forced vaccinations, and digital IDs) would become the norm. In this phase, there is a high level of poverty and a chance of economic collapse, food shortages, and further erosion of people’s freedoms, leading to a more authoritarian, surveillance-heavy world. The WEF has been very brazen about this phase, using the pandemic opportunity to supercharge their agenda, stating that the control of people’s liberties is a positive step for us all....<<<Read More>>>...

The Rockefellers created 990 "Climate Change" institutions, foundations, and activist groups

 In the climate change arena, the Rockefellers call the shots. The whole thing was their idea, they took a silly but interesting theory and amped it up with hundreds and hundreds of million of dollars. They founded institutions and linked the survival of those institutions to promoting climate change and population reduction. They adopted one likely politician after another.

The Rockefellers have created 990 Climate Change activist organizations. They give them directions, financing, and launch them on the world. The Green Movement was started, financed, organized, and militarized by the Rockefellers. By the late 40's the family was all in, on the same page. In the 50's they began to stand up countless institutions, committees, university departments, university institutes, foundations, and policy shops gathered around this one idea.

Let's just pause here and recognize that the United States and Canada are 5% developed. If it were 50%, then maybe we would have reason to worry about the effects of trace gas that takes up .04% of the atmosphere, of which 3% is currently contributed to by humans. But were we to have that level of development, our science would have long ago solved the problem. Our sense of proportion, size and consequence has been twisted, propagandized via hundreds of billions of purposed dollars. And all of it is exaggerated science done by scientists compromised by Rockefeller money....<<<Read More>>>....

The Rockefellers’ long-standing battle with the climate change cult is not what it seems

 Almost 15 years ago Jacob Nordangård began researching the politics behind climate change. Sceptical scientists were being discredited with accusations that they were paid by oil companies to discredit anthropogenic global warming. Nordangård set out to establish if this was indeed the case. But he discovered something else instead.

In 2008 in his quest to establish if scientists who questioned the climate change narrative were funded by oil companies, Nordangård found these allegations, with a few notable exceptions, were unfounded. But what he did uncover, surprised him.

“I, instead, much to my surprise, found that oil companies were actually pumping money into projects which embraced Al Gore’s doomsday message! And had done so since early 1960s!” he said.

This led to questions such as where did the idea of a climate change threat come from, where did it start? He couldn’t find an answer.

“No one at the Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research (to which I was affiliated at the time) knew,” he said. “There were many who did research on climate-related issues without having the faintest idea about the origin of their mission. But if the [United Nations] had declared that it is a crucial issue for humanity it must be true, seemed to be their reasoning; “everyone thinks so.” There were always references to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The debate was over.”

Unanswered questions led Nordangård to do further research. In a book published by the Royal Institute of International Affairs (commonly known as Chatham House) he found information relating to the development of climate change as it is sold to us today.

“A few key events were listed, which I used as a starting point: the International Geophysical Year 1957-58; a climate conference organised by the Conservation Foundation in 1963; the UN Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm in 1972; and the Conferences in Villach, Austria in the first half of the 1980s,” he said.

He was able to discover which actors were involved, what documents they used, who financed them and what policy suggestions they came up with to solve the alleged climate change problem.

He originally planned to write a 5-page essay on his research. However, the 5 pages turned into almost 50.

“The result was surprising and somewhat shocking. A clear pattern emerged. I knew it would be controversial to communicate these findings. They contradicted the views preached by the believers. Especially concerning the fact that a number of U.S. oil billionaires had gotten involved at an early stage. This was especially the case with most prominent oil family of them all. The founders of Standard Oil/Exxon. The Rockefellers,” he said...<<<Read More>>>...