Let’s not forget the harms caused by covid lockdowns

In April 2020, the UK was 18 days into the first lockdown, with two more months to endure and with two further extended periods of incarceration on the horizon. Retired clinical psychologist Dr. Gary Sidley reminds us of the harm to so many, of all ages, caused by the Government’s lockdown policies.

The ‘Covid Day of Reflection’ took place on the 9th of March 2025 to commemorate the victims of the “pandemic.” While it is right to honour the memories of those who perished as a result of a pathogen during the 2020-2022 covid event, my focus here will be on a much larger, and often forgotten, group of victims of this era: those who were harmed or killed by the range of unprecedented and non-evidenced responses to a presumed novel virus.

Because the “pandemic” restrictions imposed by governments were multiple, and the associated harms pervasive, this essay will span three articles. This one will focus on the mass casualties of lockdowns, the second on the victims of fear inflation and mask requirements, and the third upon those impacted by the escalation of ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ orders, Midazolam prescribing and the covid “vaccine” rollout....<<<Read More>>>...

BIG LIE: New C0v1d variant is DEADLIEST and MOST CONTAGIOUS one yet

 Well, folks, the fake Bird Flu narrative is falling apart at the seams, and nobody seems to be worried about it or rushing to the doc-in-the-box for some toxic jabs, so the BIG LIE must shift to a new, deadly, horrific, fast-spreading Wuhan Cave Flu narrative. Yes, the new variant is spreading around the globe faster than Fauci can remove his mask after a plandemic press conference. Run for your lives. Lock yourself down. Cover your children’s eyes, ears and nose with something, anything. This is the big one. Sure. 

Health officials in California are urging vigilance after detecting a new COVID-19 variant, NB.1.8.1, which appears to be more transmissible than current strains. First identified in China in January, the variant has since been found in six U.S. states, including California, New York, and Washington, raising concerns about a potential surge in infections. While hospitalization rates remain lower than during previous waves, some physicians have called for renewed mask mandates — a move that has reignited debates over public health messaging and pandemic-era policies.

According to the California Department of Public Health, NB.1.8.1 now accounts for nearly 20% of COVID cases in the state, up from just 2% in April. The World Health Organization reports that it dominates over half of global variants. Despite its rapid spread, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has not yet added NB.1.8.1 to its public tracking dashboard, where LP.8.1 remains the dominant U.S. strain.

Health authorities maintain that existing vaccines offer protection, but skepticism persists. “We all remember when flu cases disappeared as COVID cases ramped up,” one critic noted, referencing past debates over diagnostic accuracy. Others have accused officials of fear-mongering, pointing to conflicting data on mask efficacy and pandemic-era policies...<<<Read More>>>...

How many lives would have been saved if the MHRA hadn’t snubbed the vaccine-injured?

 OUR medicines watchdog has blamed ‘missing information’ for its failure to act on early reports of potentially fatal side effects to AstraZeneca’s covid vaccine. It did not mention that it rarely followed up victims, or contacted their GPs, to ask for the missing information it needed.

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), run by Dame June Raine during covid, has been criticised by Conservative former minister Esther McVey, who said the agency should be reformed. It is too late for many who struggled to get any meaningful response after reporting their injuries to the MHRA’s not-fit-for-purpose early warning Yellow Card Scheme.

Former BBC radio presenter Jules Serkin, 66, suffered a life-changing adverse reaction to her one and only AstraZeneca jab received on March 5, 2021. Had our health chiefs taken vaccine injury seriously, her injury may have been prevented, and she may have been able to get help.

Last week she updated the MHRA telling them: ‘Nearly four years on, I am still suffering the neurological effects caused by batch number PV46671. This one jab has ruined my life and health. Since my initial report to you in 2021, I have thought I would die many times.

‘I suffer extreme pains in my head, lightning strikes in my head and eyes. My left eye is especially scary. The brow is drooped and the NHS had to lift my eyelids as I could not see properly. The symptoms mimic a stroke, but A&E in my local hospital in Ashford, Kent, is so inundated I waited 21 hours in a chair as they wanted to admit me. They had no beds and no access to an MRI scan so now I stay at home during a vax attack and pray I won’t die.’

I first reported on the MHRA’s shambolic system for TCW in May 2021, highlighting that they received reports of no more than 10 per cent of injuries and that the public and many health professionals were unaware of the Yellow Card Scheme. Doctors and nurses were already voicing concerns.

A senior NHS board member said: ‘I know that the Yellow Card reporting system is not reflective of the amount of adverse events that are actually happening. I know of a patient who reported their extreme adverse event side effect to a nurse, and that nurse did not report it to the Yellow Card reporting system. People are told that their adverse events are normal. It is not normal to have to stay in bed for two days after a vaccine.’...<<<Read More>>>...

mRNA injections, the secret world government and Gatesian Grey skies

 A British television company seems proud of itself for “exposing” a scandal relating to the drug diethylstilboestrol. This isn’t a new scandal, of course. 

It was many decades ago, back in the last century, that I first exposed the scandal of a drug called diethylstilboestrol which was given to women in the 1960s and 1970s. It wasn’t until much later that it was found that the drug caused breast cancer in the women who took it. 

Even more worrying was the discovery that the drug caused adenocarcinoma, a type of vaginal cancer, in the daughters of women who took the drug. My worry today is that doctors are using new drugs (such as the wretched mRNA vaccines) without any idea of the short, medium or long-term consequences. Will the mRNA vaccines cause problems for the children of the people who were vaccinated with it? I don’t know and nor does anyone else. 

I am sure that the covid-19 vaccine is causing rapidly growing cancers among the generation who took the drug. But what about the next generation? (This is a smaller problem than it might have been because of the fertility problems associated with the vaccine.)

Those who are still fussing over whether mRNA vaccines can affect DNA should remember that in this world, as we race through Net Zero towards the Great Reset, the words we must live by are “when there is doubt there is no doubt.” For starters study the paper entitled `Potential health risks of mRNA-based vaccine therapy: a hypothesis’ which was published some time ago...<<<Read More>>>...

Food for Thought #568

 

Since March 2021, 81,000 people, 240 government officials and 17 professional health organisations have formally called for the withdrawal of covid “vaccines”

 At the end of last month, a peer-reviewed paper detailed more than 81,000 physicians, scientists, researchers and concerned citizens, 240 elected government officials, 17 professional public health and physician organisations, 2 US State Republican Parties, 17 US Republican Party County Committees and 6 scientific studies from across the world that have called for the withdrawal of covid vaccines from the market.

“We expect that calls for an immediate moratorium on covid-19 vaccines will continue to increase until a critical mass is reached and the products are finally removed from the market,” the authors noted.

“Due to these significant concerns,” the authors wrote, “we reviewed the literature for excess mortality, DNA contamination and negative efficacy associated with covid-19 vaccines, along with compiling a comprehensive list of all calls for an immediate moratorium.”

“Excess mortality, negative efficacy, widespread DNA contamination and a lack of demonstrated reduction in transmission, hospitalisation, or mortality have undermined the rationale for continued administration,” the authors noted. “Immediate removal of covid-19 vaccines from the market is essential to prevent further loss of life and ensure next steps are taken for accountability of the harm incurred.”...<<<Read More>>>....

The Covid Inquiry is Actively Suppressing Scientific Evidence

On February 4th the Perseus Group in conjunction with other likeminded organisations convened a press conference to discuss Module 4 (Vaccination) of Baroness Hallett’s Covid Inquiry. I attended virtually. The various presentations were depressing.

Two contributors described their experience of being at the inquiry, and from their descriptions the entire setup of the inquiry is faulty.

Questions had to be submitted in advance; many were turned down. Attempts by some witnesses to escape from the rigid format by asking their own questions, or elaborating on answers, were shut down. I hesitate to use the word ‘ruthlessly’ but it seems appropriate.

It became apparent to the above participants that their entire understanding of the inquiry was wrong; it was not designed to look at the scientific evidence (indeed at one point it was specifically prohibited) but designed to examine the official response to the pandemic predicated on the ‘truth’ that the vaccines were safe and effective. Although it was suggested that trust needed to be established, that aim manifestly failed (not least because of the now overwhelming evidence that the vaccines are neither safe nor effective)....<<<Read More>>>...

'No Consistent Patterns:' Scientists Find No Evidence that Closing Schools Materially Reduced Covid Transmission

For years, scientists and commentators who questioned COVID policies were censored, blacklisted, and canceled across the country. Many of these dissenting views have since been vindicated from the lab origins theory to the lack of efficacy of surgical masks to the opposition to the closure of schools.

Now, a new study in the Journal of Infection further undermines the once orthodox views of the pandemic, concluding that "reopening schools did not change the existing trajectory of COVID-19 rates." In other words, we shut down our schools, without any demonstrable benefit to the country. We did, however, succeed in reducing free speech in the name of combating "disinformation."

The report is based on one of the comprehensive studies to date on the pandemic:
"Data were extracted from government websites. Cases and COVID-19 hospitalization and death incidence rates were calculated during the Delta and early Omicron periods in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland and the United Kingdom, for two weeks preceding and six weeks after schools reopened. We summarized stringency of public health measures (GRI), COVID-19 vaccination rates by age and SARS-CoV-2 testing rates." In comparing these different countries, the scientists found no significant differences in reported cases: "No consistent patterns in cases, hospitalizations or deaths despite school re-openings or changes to public health measures,"

The suppression of the lab theory and the targeting of dissenting scientists show the true cost of censorship and viewpoint intolerance.

The very figures claiming to battle "disinformation" were suppressing opposing views that have now been vindicated as credible. It was not only the lab theory. In my recent book, I discuss how signatories of the Great Barrington Declaration were fired or disciplined by their schools or associations for questioning COVID-19 policies.

Some experts questioned the efficacy of surgical masks, the scientific support for the six-foot rule and the necessity of shutting down schools. The government has now admitted that many of these objections were valid and that it did not have hard science to support some of the policies. While other allies in the West did not shut down their schools, we never had any substantive debate due to the efforts of this alliance of academic, media and government figures...<<<Read More>>>...

The Vaccine Safety Questions No One is Asking at the C0v1d Inquiry

 The UK Covid Inquiry started its Module 4 oral hearings about vaccines and therapeutics on January 14th 2025. Matt Hancock appeared on January 16th. He basically got off scot-free. There is a long list of hugely important questions which were not asked, either by Hugo Keith KC for the inquiry or by any of the KCs acting for the core participants.

The Perseus Group, which I represent, helpfully included a list of questions at the end of its written evidence to the inquiry covering both the Covid vaccines and medicine regulation in general. Judging by the lack of searching questions in Module 4 so far, they have either not read our evidence or are ignoring it.

So I want to highlight a few of our questions here in the faint hope that the other witnesses, notably MHRA, will not also be given a ‘Hancock-style’ easy ride when they appear before the Inquiry over the next two weeks...<<<Read More>>>...

C0v1d Vaccine Critic Doctor Barred From Medicine

 Dr. Daniel Armstrong has had his name erased from the U.K. Medical Register after a medical tribunal hearing decided that a video he made entitled ‘Navigating the truth-deception duality‘ in 2023 was more than a legitimate expression of opinion, and was likely to undermine public confidence in the Covid vaccination programme and in health professionals in general.

The tribunal’s judgment is long and detailed. Having read it, I think that it is true that the opinions have undermined the medical consensus. But the tribunal relies in its conclusion on the belief that the consensus is correct. Given the outpouring of well-researched critiques of Covid vaccination over the last several years I don’t think that it is. On a very basic level, before even entering into those reports, we must bear in mind that the Government has not only instituted a vaccine damage compensation scheme but has already made payouts. We should also ask why, if the vaccines are ‘safe and effective’, AstraZeneca’s has been quietly withdrawn because of an unacceptable level of side-effects. Certainly that seriously undermines the argument that the Covid vaccine is safe; I will return to the ‘effectiveness’ question later.

For the moment I will gloss over the fact that the Covid vaccines are not actually traditional vaccines at all, but a form of untested gene therapy product, as that muddies the waters a bit...<<<Read More>>>...

When governments, corporations, and elitists PROFIT from an ongoing crisis, that’s what reality becomes — a series of never-ending crises of global proportions

 Most of the cash cow rackets in this world wouldn’t work if naïve people did not support them with their money and emotions. Through fake news, advertising, corrupt medicine and adulterated food, most of the populace is dumbed down and brainwashed into supported and funding their own demise, while the richest people in the world gain more power from it and make lots more money.

The ultimate example of this is the Covid plandemic. Also known as the scamdemic, the Wuhan virus was one huge fear-mongering campaign that convinced billions of people to surrender their rights, succumb to toxic mandates, and line up for the dirtiest vaccines ever created on the face of the planet.

Through disease and death, the pharma industrial complex made a fortune, killed millions of people, maimed millions of others, and removed many human rights all at the same time. It was also a great awakening for millions of people who finally realized that there ARE governments, corporations, and elitists whose main method of operation is to use crises to gain power and get richer off everyone else’s poor judgement and naivety.

Most of these crises are manufactured or simply fictional, but most of the populace is conned into believing them and supporting them anyway. For example, there is no global warming taking place, and there is no scientific proof of “climate change” that is threatening humankind, the weather, or the food supply.

Still, corrupt politicians and globalists have taken advantage of this hoax, while perpetuating it and propagating it with sensationalized journalism and the assistance of weather-altering technology, also known as weather-weapons. Many of our youth today and young adults believe 100 percent that humans and livestock are responsible for climate change, and that if we don’t give all our money to the richest people on earth, then we will all die by the weather very soon. It’s a sad state of affairs...<<<Read More>>>...

Thank You, Dr. Fauci: A documentary that investigates the origin of covid

 In early 2020, Furst was approached to direct a promotional piece on Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (“NIAID”). The project was ultimately scrapped. Three years later, Furst began investigating what had truly happened and created the documentary titled ‘Thank You, Dr. Fauci’.

Furst’s thorough examination of the international medical establishment’s long history of wrongdoing reveals that covid likely did not emerge in late 2019 but rather was a disaster decades in the making. This situation ultimately points back to Fauci, whose National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) continues to pursue the risky research he has advocated for.

We’ve gradually, bit by bit, obtained evidence supporting the lab leak theory and Fauci’s malpractice over the years. Furst interviews scientists, doctors, journalists, military officials and others to piece it all together.

Former US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) Director Dr. Robert Redfield, who was shut out of Fauci’s inner circle, is notably featured in the documentary  “Tony believed that the best way to prepare for the next pandemic, was to create it,” he said....<<<Read More>>>...

Big Media STILL LYING about the efficacy of C0v1d-19 vaccines, claiming they saved millions of lives, with ZERO SCIENTIFIC PROOF or real data

 Big Pharma likes to tell a big lie and then discredit a very small, insignificant part of it; to make it sound like they are reporting legitimate science and medicine facts. For example, vaccine manufacturers, when Covid-19 mRNA jabs were initially being administered to the panicked masses, everyone was told by Fauci, Biden and the CDC that if you got vaccinated, you would NOT catch Covid-19. Later on, down the line, they backpedaled that BIG LIE and claimed the vaccinated might still catch it, but they won’t get as bad of a case of it, meaning they most likely won’t die from it. None of this had any science to back it up. Not the first lie, not the second, and not all of the ones to follow.

Now Big Media, Big Medicine, and Big Government are claiming that the Covid jabs saved millions of lives, even though many of the jabbed people are suffering from side effects, like irregular heart rhythms and menstrual irregularities. You see, the whole claim is a lie, not just the side effects part. The first part of that says that Covid vaccines saved “millions of lives,” but that is not true. It’s a psychological trick to state a lie as fact and then talk about some sordid detail based off of that lie. The focus then becomes on the detail, and the BIG LIE is consumed as fact, without even realizing it...<<<Read More>>>...

The covid-19 pandemic was an illusion; those in power deliberately ignored science to impose their will on populations to dominate and control them

 “There’s no way that they cared about people. There’s no way that they wanted to apply methods to minimise harm. It’s the opposite. They wanted to apply methods to oppress and be dominant and impose their will on entire populations. That was the goal,” Dennis Rancourt said in a recent interview about the covid “pandemic.”

Rancourt argues that the science behind the pandemic was manipulated and the results were published in top journals controlled by those in power, with 99% of medical trials being false and funded by the industry. His research focuses on the idea of “biological stress-induced transmissionless spontaneous bacterial pneumonia,” a self-infection caused by environmental stress, as a primary aspect of the pandemic.

He offers a new perspective on the germ-terrain theory dynamic and its implications for our understanding of the covid pandemic....<<<Read More>>>...

Center for Evidence-based Medicine in Oxford says modeling study claiming COVID jabs saved millions of lives “implausible”

The widespread claim that Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) "vaccines" saved millions of lies is officially debunked.

Carl Heneghan, head of the Center for Evidence-based Medicine in Oxford, along with Tom Jefferson wrote a piece for The Spectator (United Kingdom) that outlines the "implausible" findings of the modeling study that is widely referenced as proof that COVID jabs saved upwards of 12 million people.

It was the BBC that first made the claim that AstraZeneca and Pfizer had together developed "medicines" that saved the lives of millions of people, citing the findings of a "disease forecasting company" called Airfinity. Similar claims were made here in the United States about Operation Warp Speed.

A study out of Imperial College London calculated that COVID jabs saved 20 million lives between December 2020 and December 2021, the assumption – a false one, just to be clear – being that the jabs conferred protection against COVID infection.

Heneghan and Jefferson downloaded and evaluated data from GitHub to examine the country-specific estimates procured in order to assess whether or not they are realistic. They looked at figures for the UK, Italy and the United States.

It turns out that the figures claimed as evidence that COVID jabs worked are bunk...<<<Read More>>>...

The Inventor of the PCR Test, Nobel Laureate Dr. Kary Mullis

The PCR is a process. It does not tell you that you are sick." -Dr. Kary Mullis Laureate and Inventor of the RT-PCR, passed away in August 2019.

"...All or a substantial part of these positives could be due to what's called false positives tests." -Dr. Michael Yeadon, distinguished scientist, former Vice President and Chief Science Officer of Pfizer

"This misuse of the RT-PCR technique is applied as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments to justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, ... under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients." -Dr. Pascal Sacré, Belgian physician specialized in critical care and renowned public health analyst.

"I have seen massive efforts made to deliberately inflate Covid death numbers by relabelling cancer patients and stroke victims and all manner of normal regular deaths as Covid, in fact virtually anyone getting into an ambulance. The methods used to do so were totally flawed, PCR tests for example being run on 45 cycles we all know to be worthless, yet people are being euthanised on this basis and sometimes only on the basis of a chest x-ray alone." -John O'Looney, Funeral Director, Milton Keynes, U.K.

From the outset of this crisis in January 2020, all far-reaching policy decisions upheld and presented to the public as a "means to saving lives" were based on flawed and invalid RT-PCR positive cases.

These invalid COVID-19 "estimates" have been used to justify confinement, social distancing, wearing of the face mask, the prohibition of social gatherings, cultural and sports events, the closure of economic activity, as well as the enforcement of the mRNA "vaccine" launched in November 2020. There is no such thing as a "COVID-19 confirmed case".- Michel Chossudovsky, Professor of Economics (emeritus), University of Ottawa....<<<Read More>>>...

The coronavirus spike protein encoded in mRNA injections leads to autoimmune chaos

 The human leukocyte antigen (“HLA”) system is a complex of genes on chromosome 6 in humans that encode cell-surface proteins responsible for regulating the immune system.

Tampering with HLA gene expression leads to autoimmune chaos – and this is precisely what mRNA injections called “vaccines” do. This is not a mere side effect – it’s an intentional risk built into the core of mRNA technology.

And, “the consequences could be catastrophic: aberrant immune responses, autoimmune disease, and long-term genetic instability passed down through generations,” Drs. John Catanzaro and Peter McCullough write.

The rapid rise of mRNA technology, particularly in the form of covid-19 vaccines, has been heralded as a revolutionary breakthrough in modern medicine. Yet, behind the fanfare lies a more sinister truth – the dangerous and reckless embedding of encrypted genetic code back into the human exome. mRNA vaccinology is not just altering immune responses; it is tampering with the very blueprint of our DNA. This technology represents a catastrophic shift, one that risks permanently mutating the human genome and triggering an irreversible cascade of genetic damage.

mRNA vaccines have been marketed as cutting-edge precision medicine, but they are nothing more than a reckless experiment with human biology. Unlike traditional vaccines, which already come with their own set of risks, mRNA technology takes things to a whole new level. Instead of merely stimulating an immune response, mRNA vaccines hijack the cellular machinery, instructing cells to produce spike proteins – a direct attempt to manipulate our body’s core functions.

But this is where the horror begins. These synthetic codes are far from benign. The assumption that mRNA breaks down harmlessly after doing its job is increasingly proving to be a dangerous misconception. The reality? These artificial sequences initiate rogue transcription – causing cellular processes to misfire, mutate and spiral out of control. Worse still, these rogue processes embed encrypted genetic errors into the human exome, rewriting our DNA in ways that could wreak havoc for generations...<<<Read More>>>...

Proper treatment of the seriously ill is the only Covid intervention that was ever needed

In the last two years there has been increasing evidence that the SARS-CoV-2 virus arrived across the world as the result of a laboratory leak. There has likewise been increasing evidence that neither masks nor lockdowns materially altered the transmission of the virus, and also that the vaccines (which are in truth a gene therapy product) have significant risks of side-effects. The number and nature of these remain unclear, but some very recent research even suggests that repeat vaccination increases the likelihood of major side-effects. Worse, there is no clear evidence that they decrease individual susceptibility. Thus the mantra of "safe and effective" is open to question. Added to this is the discovery from Freedom of Information requests that some of the trials were constructed and run in a questionable manner, and that vaccine manufacturers were careful to write into their supply contracts absolution from indemnity. Yet this week a new advertising campaign by the NHS is encouraging the U.K. public to get revaccinated against coronavirus.

The origin of the virus is of academic interest. Wherever it came from, it is with us and we have to live with that. The issue of management by isolation is of academic medical interest, though not of academic economic interest. It has become very clear that the processes of lockdown have been highly damaging and it seems likely that no proper analysis was done on what the effect on the national economy (and education, and mental health) might be. That the vaccines may cause significant problems has an explanation; they are designed to make the body create copies of the spike protein of the virus, which is the very part that causes the recorded issues of myocarditis, thrombosis etc. due to overstimulation of the immune system in the virally-induced syndrome commonly called COVID-19. The variability of effect between individuals, either with COVID-19 or a vaccine, may depend on genetic susceptibility. Other forms of hyperimmune syndrome, or cytokine storm (CSS), were well-known to be more common in certain ethnic groups long before SARS-CoV-2. Given the total absence of any research into who suffers vaccine complications and why, it is remarkable that politicians and managers are keen to plough on using them....<<<Read More>>>...

The ‘new’ variant variant of the variant variant variant of the ‘virus’ that doesn’t exist. The symptoms are ‘similar to a cold and flu-like’. Ah, the flu’s back then. Covid XEC: What are the symptoms of new virus strain?

 Here we go again (Here they try again to coax the incredibly gullible sheeples into another toxic jab) .... we see them out there however, even now. 

Wearing their pathetic face nappies out in the shops and flinching when anyone so much as breathes on them ... 

Homo Sheeples are still out there sadly.

+++++++++++++++++

A new strain of Covid emerging in the UK is spreading as cases increase at a high rate, the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) has said.

Called XEC, the strain is a combination of the KS.1.1 and KP.3.3 variants. Figures from the UKHSA show that the admission rate for patients testing positive for the new strain rose to 4.5 per 100,000 people in the week to October 6. This was up from 3.7 a week earlier.

It is thought the XEC strain is more transmissible due to its numerous mutations, and presents symptoms similar to those of other Covid variants including tiredness, headaches, a sore throat and high temperatures.

Although self-isolation is no longer a legal requirement in the UK, the NHS has advised anyone who tests positive for Covid to avoid contact with others for at least five days....<<<Read More>>>....

Homeschooling Numbers Continue To Climb After COVID-19 Pandemic: Report

 New data from the Johns Hopkins Institute for Education Policy’s homeschool research lab show that 90 percent of states reporting data saw an increase in homeschooling in the 2023–2024 school year.

The report examined data from 21 out of 30 states that collect or report homeschool participation information. The other nine states are expected to report data in the coming months.

The 19 states that experienced growth were Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

Only Vermont and New Hampshire showed a decline from the previous school year in the total number of homeschooled students.

The report identified two primary trends: sustained growth and rebounding growth. The three states with sustained growth, meaning they experienced no post-COVID-19 pandemic decline, were Louisiana, South Carolina, and South Dakota.

The other 16 states exhibited a rebounding trend, meaning they saw a post-COVID-19 pandemic decline, followed by an increase in 2023–2024....<<<Read More>>>...