Utah becomes first US state to ban fluoride in public drinking water

 Utah has become the first state to ban fluoride in public drinking water, pushing past opposition from dentists and national health organizations who warn the move will lead to medical problems that disproportionately affect low-income communities.

Republican Gov. Spencer Cox signed legislation Thursday barring cities and communities from deciding whether to add the mineral to their water systems.

Florida, Ohio and South Carolina are considering similar measures, while in New Hampshire, North Dakota and Tennessee, lawmakers have rejected them. A bill in Kentucky to make fluoridation optional stalled in the state Senate.

The American Dental Association sharply criticized the Utah law, saying it showed "wanton disregard for the oral health and well-being of their constituents."

Cavities are the most common chronic childhood disease, the ADA noted. Fluoride strengthens teeth and reduces cavities by replacing minerals lost during normal wear and tear, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

"As a father and a dentist, it is disheartening to see that a proven, public health policy, which exists for the greater good of an entire community's oral health, has been dismantled based on distorted pseudoscience," the association's president, Denver dentist Brett Kessler, said in a statement....<<<Read More>>>....

New Zealand district council rejects fluoridation of water supply

 Whangarei District Council, New Zealand, is seeking an injunction against the Director General of Health’s dictate to add toxic fluoridation chemicals to its public water supply.

Last week the Whangarei District Council reconfirmed its decision to reject the Director-General of Health’s (“DG”) directive to fluoridate the Whangarei water supply with toxic fluoridation chemicals sourced from industrial waste.

The council originally voted to reject the directive on the 28th of November, however, it was brought back to council to reconsider after the DG replied that she would still be considering enforcement if the Council did not comply.

Cr Gavin Benney reviewed the suggestion from council to reverse the decision, and presented his own motion to write again to the DG asking for an extension until the outcome of the New Health New Zealand v Director-General of Health case was decided. If the DG still denies that extension, then the council will write to the Governor General and if the Governor General does not grant the extension then the council will seek an interim injunction from the High Court to protect children from neurotoxic harm, now established by the preponderance of reliable scientific research. (Council’s letter to the DG).

The international research, reviewed by a US Federal Court and found to substantiate that water fluoridation poses “an unreasonable risk to human health,” has led to the Surgeon-General of Florida describing fluoridation with today’s knowledge as “public health malpractice.”...<<<Read More>>>...

Florida's surgeon general advises against adding fluoride to drinking water

On Friday, Florida's Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo announced that communities in the state shouldn't add fluoride to drinking water because of what he called the "neuropsychiatric risk associated with fluoride exposure."

Fluoride has long been proven to drive down tooth decay by strengthening teeth, which Ladapo acknowledged in the guidance. But he added that there are also possible "safety concerns related to systemic fluoride exposure," including reductions in IQ. While some studies have suggested potential links, the research is considered preliminary and far from definitive.

The American Dental Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention support the use of fluoridated water, calling it one of the top 10 public health achievements of the past century. All cite studies that show it reduces tooth decay by 25%.

Once its benefits were proven, fluoride was also added to toothpaste and some mouthwashes. Dentists began giving kids fluoride treatments. Some communities are restoring fluoride to their water systems after seeing a rise in children's cavities.

The anti-fluoride drumbeat has become louder in recent years. Communities have increasingly opted out of adding it to water, citing possible health risks. There are ongoing, active investigations about safe levels of fluoride exposure...<<<Read More>>>...

RFK Jr. says a Trump White House would immediately push to remove fluoride from water

 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said Saturday that a Trump administration would, on its first day, "advise all U.S​. water systems to remove fluoride from public water."

Kennedy linked fluoride to various illnesses, despite major medical associations supporting water fluoridation, which they say is safe and a benefit to public health.

"President ​@realDonaldTrump and First Lady @MELANIATRUMP want to Make America Healthy Again," the former Democratic presidential hopeful wrote in a post to X, tagging Michael Connett, an attorney who has led litigation that opposes the fluoridation of public drinking water. 

Kennedy, a vaccine skeptic who has a history of pushing conspiracy theories, is primed to play a key role in a future Trump administration's health policy. Since dropping out of the presidential race and endorsing Trump, Kennedy has frequently appeared on the campaign stumping for the former president, and Trump said at a rally this week that if he is elected, Kennedy is "going to work on health and women's health."

Trump has embraced Kennedy. At an event in Arizona earlier this week, the former president said that Kennedy "can do anything he wants" in a potential Trump administration.<<<Read More>>>...

Fluoride finally declared an 'Unreasonable Risk'

A seven-year battle between the EPA and the public interest regarding the fluoridation of public drinking water has finally concluded. This is an excellent result by Siri & Glimstad partner Michael Connett in securing a court order against the EPA. Great job, Michael!

U.S. District Court Judge Edward Chen concluded the following in his ruling: 

 "[T]he Court finds that fluoridation of water at 0.7 milligrams per liter ("mg/L") - the level presently considered "optimal" in the United States - poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children.... [A] risk sufficient to require the EPA to engage with a regulatory response...."

"There is little dispute in this suit as to whether fluoride poses a hazard to human health. Indeed, EPA's own expert agrees that fluoride is hazardous at some level of exposure. And ample evidence establishes that a mother's exposure to fluoride during pregnancy is associated with IQ decrements in her offspring. The United States National Toxicology Program ("NTP") - the federal agency regarded as experts in toxicity.... concluded that fluoride is indeed associated with reduced IQ in children, at least at exposure levels at or above 1.5 mg/L (i.e., "higher" exposure levels)...."

"In all, there is substantial and scientifically credible evidence establishing that fluoride poses a risk to human health; it is associated with a reduction in the IQ of children and is hazardous at dosages that are far too close to fluoride levels in the drinking water of the United States. And this risk is unreasonable under Amended TSCA. Reduced IQ poses serious harm. Studies have linked IQ decrements of even one or two points to e.g., reduced educational attainment, employment status, productivity, and earned wages."...<<<Read More>>>...

Court rules against the EPA’s longstanding water fluoridation practices, provides compelling evidence that fluoride damages children’s brains

 A landmark federal court ruling has found fluoride levels in U.S. drinking water to pose unnecessary risks to children’s IQ and cognition.

The decision, which supports the science-backed claims of the Fluoride Action Network and other health advocacy groups, found that current fluoride levels endorsed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) pose an unreasonable risk to children's cognitive development. 

The court found that fluoride levels of 0.7 mg/L – the level recommended by the EPA – can lead to a significant reduction in children's IQ. Fluoridated water affects approximately 75 percent of Americans. 

This ruling is compelling because it confirms what "conspiracy theorists" have been saying for many years. Populations are being intentionally poisoned without consent...<<<Read More>>>...

Government report links fluoride intake to lowered IQ in children

The United States government has once again found that consuming fluoride is really dangerous, especially for children.

A new report from the National Toxicology Program (NTP), a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), reveals that exposure to fluoridated water at levels twice the recommended limit of 0.7 milligrams per liter (mg/l) of water is linked to lower IQ. Keep in mind that prior to 2015, the government-recommended fluoride level for drinking water was 1.5 mg/l.

For many decades – and still in some U.S. cities today that have not adjusted their fluoride levels to the new 0.7 mg/l standard – children across the U.S. have been forced to consume and bathe in water that was fluoridated at levels of 1.5 mg/l, which the NTP now admits causes brain damage and lowers IQ in children.

The new study, which includes data and analyses from previously published research, marks the first time that a U.S. federal agency has determined "with moderate confidence" that fluoride damages children's brains.

"While the report was not designed to evaluate the health effects of fluoride in drinking water alone, it is a striking acknowledgment of a potential neurological risk from high levels of fluoride," The Associated Press (AP) reported...<<<Read More>>>....

The UK Public’s chance to object to FLUORIDE which is proven to be a NEUROTOXICITY and is injuring the population at current levels

 As you probably know the North East of England and North Yorkshire is intending to fluoridate the water and the government are having an ‘open consultation’, which anybody in the country can express their concerns. This consultation finishes on the 17th of June, so we have approximately a month. The PDF document linked below describes the consultation and also has a link for the general public to complete the consultation.

Possible answers have been included, which the public can use to voice their concerns over fluoride toxicity.

We are now in the 9th week of Public Consultation (PC) period for Water Fluoridation for the North East of England including North Yorkshire and have only 4 weeks to respond up to the 17th of June 2024. 1.6 million residents are likely to become fluoridated if we fail to submit our concerns to the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC). To submit your concerns please follow the link to the government’s questionnaire and fill out your consultation form specifying your objections. Try and make simple legal arguments for example that fluoride is a ‘poison’ and demonstrates harm at government levels. In order to help you we have published our replies to the government’s consultation below, which we suggest that you read and include in your own answers. For interested parties there are also further cogent arguments to be found at UK Free Fluoride Alliance. The link to complete the Public Consultation is as follows and is open to ALL MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WITHIN THE UK...<<<Read More>>>...

Fluoride does NOT protect teeth from cavities, large-scale government study proves

A recently published and very large government study has revealed that there is zero benefit to drinking fluoridated water as far as dental health is concerned.

The paper out of England states that fluoridation results in a mere two percent fewer cavities than non-fluoridation, two percent being a statistically insignificant figure that might as well be zero percent. Also, fluoridation does not prevent teeth from falling out.

The longstanding claim that artificially fluoridating water results in net economic benefits by lowering public dental costs is also a myth, the study states. To the contrary, fluoridating water results in a net economic loss when considering the capital costs of doing it.

Using the dental insurance records of 6.4 million adults living in England, the study found that those living in fluoridated areas show no reduction in tooth decay compared to those living in non-fluoridated areas.

"It's the largest ever study of the effects of fluoridation on the dental health of adults," wrote filmmaker and architect Robin Monotti on X.

"The LOTUS study, funded by the UK Department of Health, was intended to inform policy-makers of what to expect for future dental and economic outcomes from the current plan to expand fluoridation to all of England. Currently, only 10% of England is fluoridated. The study found 'exceedingly small' reductions in caries most people would not consider meaningful."...<<<Read More>>>...

A Forgotten Fluoride Letter, from a Government Scientist

 I wrote and posted this article about eight years ago, and then again six years ago. It concerns a shocking letter written by an EPA scientist in 1999.

The letter shouldn’t be forgotten.

Here we go:

It’s no surprise that the US government would look the other way when lower IQ and cancer are business as usual.

One of the major agencies that would look the other way is the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

—But suppose scientists within the EPA spoke out, revolted, and issued official rebukes to their own Agency’s position on fluorides?

Talk about cognitive dissonance. Contradiction. “We at the EPA know fluorides are wonderful and safe and beautiful. Of course, our own scientists disagree. Strongly. But don’t worry, we’re ignoring them. And we’re keeping their statements out of the press. Our position on fluorides is administrative. It has nothing to do with science. Anyway, we support cancer and plummeting IQ. They’re wonderful.”

Case in point, going back 17 years. Buckle up. Here is what the EPA Union of scientists had to say about fluoridation:

Quoting from a May 1, 1999, statement— “Why U.S. Environmental Protection Agency scientists opposes artificial water fluoridation”—written by William Hirzy, PhD, [Union of Scientists] Senior Vice-President, Chapter 280:

“…our opposition to drinking water fluoridation has grown, based on the scientific literature documenting the increasingly out-of-control exposures to fluoride, the lack of benefit to dental health from ingestion of fluoride and the hazards to human health from such ingestion. These hazards include acute toxic hazard, such as to people with impaired kidney function, as well as chronic toxic hazards of gene mutations, cancer, reproductive effects, neurotoxicity, bone pathology and dental fluorosis.”

“In support of this concern are results from two epidemiology studies from China that show decreases in I.Q. in children who get more fluoride than the control groups of children in each study. These decreases are about 5 to 10 I.Q. points in children aged 8 to 13 years.”

“Another troubling brain effect has recently surfaced: fluoride’s interference with the function of the brain’s pineal gland. The pineal gland produces melatonin which, among other roles, mediates the body’s internal clock, doing such things as governing the onset of puberty. Jennifer Luke has shown that fluoride accumulates in the pineal gland and inhibits its production of melatonin. She showed in test animals that this inhibition causes an earlier onset of sexual maturity, an effect reported in humans as well in 1956…”

“EPA fired the Office of Drinking Water’s chief toxicologist, Dr. William Marcus, who also was our local union’s treasurer at the time, for refusing to remain silent on the cancer risk issue. The judge who heard the lawsuit he [Marcus] brought against EPA over the firing made that finding—that EPA fired him over his fluoride work and not for the phony reason put forward by EPA management at his dismissal. Dr. Marcus won his lawsuit and is again at work at EPA.”

“…data showing increases in osteosarcomas in young men in New Jersey, Washington and Iowa based on their drinking fluoridated water. It was his [Dr. Marcus’] analysis, repeated statements about all these and other incriminating cancer data, and his requests for an independent, unbiased evaluation of them that got Dr. Marcus fired.”

“Regarding the effectiveness of fluoride in reducing dental cavities, there has not been any double-blind study of fluoride’s effectiveness as a caries preventative. There have been many, many small scale, selective publications on this issue that proponents cite to justify fluoridation, but the largest and most comprehensive study, one done by dentists trained by the National Institute of Dental Research, on over 39,000 school children aged 5-17 years, shows no significant differences (in terms of decayed, missing and filled teeth) among caries [cavities] incidences in fluoridated, non-fluoridated and partially fluoridated communities. The latest publication on the fifty-year fluoridation experiment in two New York cities, Newburgh and Kingston, shows the same thing. The only significant difference in dental health between the two communities as a whole is that fluoridated Newburgh, N.Y. shows about twice the incidence of dental fluorosis (the first, visible sign of fluoride chronic toxicity) as seen in non-fluoridated Kingston.”

“John Colquhoun’s publication on this point of efficacy is especially important. Dr. Colquhoun was Principal Dental Officer for Auckland, the largest city in New Zealand, and a staunch supporter of fluoridation—until he was given the task of looking at the world-wide data on fluoridation’s effectiveness in preventing cavities. The paper is titled, ‘Why I changed My Mind About Water Fluoridation.’ In it Colquhoun provides details on how data were manipulated to support fluoridation in English speaking countries, especially the U.S. and New Zealand. This paper explains why an ethical public health professional was compelled to do a 180 degree turn on fluoridation.”

“…mutation studies…show that fluoride can cause gene mutations in mammalian and lower order tissues at fluoride concentrations estimated to be present in the mouth from fluoridated tooth paste. Further, there were tumors of the oral cavity seen in the NTP cancer study…further strengthening concern over the toxicity of topically applied fluoride.”

“So, in addition to our concern over the toxicity of fluoride, we note the uncontrolled – and apparently uncontrollable – exposures to fluoride that are occurring nationwide via drinking water, processed foods, fluoride pesticide residues and dental care products…For governmental and other organizations to continue to push for more exposure in the face of current levels of over-exposure coupled with an increasing crescendo of adverse toxicity findings is irrational and irresponsible at best.”

“We have also taken a direct step to protect the [EPA] employees we represent from the risks of drinking fluoridated water…the union filed a grievance, asking that EPA provide un-fluoridated drinking water to its employees.”

“The implication for the general public of these calculations is clear. Recent, peer-reviewed toxicity data, when applied to EPA’s standard method for controlling risks from toxic chemicals, require an immediate halt to the use of the nation’s drinking water reservoirs as disposal sites for the toxic waste of the phosphate fertilizer industry.”

That last sentence lets you know where the fluorides are coming from.

So…an employees’ union of scientists within the EPA has made its position clear.

Quite clear.

The mainstream press has refused to cover this story in any significant way for at least 17 years.

In 2013, the EPA denied a petition from Dr. Hirzy calling for the removal of fluorides from water supplies. In a pinch, I guess the Agency can find scientists hanging around bus stations and bars and crack houses and get them to say what they want them to say and stamp it official.

—Scientists who’ve been guzzling fluoridated water themselves and thus have microscopic IQs. (SOURCE)

Healing Your Third Eye – How to Decalcify & Strengthen the Pineal Gland

 The third eye, scientifically known as the pineal gland, is our doorway to psychic awareness.  Unfortunately, environmental factors affect pineal gland health greatly.  Here is a very simple and efficient way to stop damaging the gland, reverse any damage done, and strengthen it to a high state of health so that you can work on developing your psychic abilities with significantly improved results.  Here is to healing and expanding your awareness!

The contributors to calcification are:

• Halides: Fluoride, Chlorine, and Methyl Bromide.
• Calcium in the form of Calcium Carbonate, Phosphate, and Dicalcium Phosphate.
• Tap Water has Fluoride and other calcifying substances mixed into it.
• Pesticides in the air ingested into the lungs and eating foods not grown organically.
• Sugar, Caffeine, Alcohol and Tobacco.

There are many different ways to decalcify your pineal gland.  Here are my top two suggestions:

Apple Cider Vinegar Method:  Drink 1 tablespoon of raw apple cider vinegar twice a day on an empty stomach and wait 30 minutes before ingesting anything else.  You can put it in 2 oz of water and add some cinnamon to make taking the dose a little easier.  Do this for 30-60 days.  You can continue on from that point if you wish.

MSM Superdose Cleanse:

• Vitamin C - Take 1,000mg per day of Vitamin C.  I like using natural sourced Acerola Cherry as it assists with the removal of toxins.  The particular brand I show here uses both this and Camu Camu and is about 650mg per capsule so you can take two.  What your body doesn’t use when it comes to Vitamin C you literally will urinate out so there is no overdosing on Vitamin C.  A great source is from www.rawpower.com
• Colloidal Silver - This will also act as a detoxifier during the cleanse.  Follow the recommended dose on the bottle.  A good source is www.purehealthdiscounts.com (make sure it is colloidal, not ionic).
• MSM - Make sure to use vegetable sourced MSM as some cheap MSM products are petroleum sourced.  A great source is from www.rawpower.com.  Start with 3,000mg of MSM per day with plenty of good quality water.  You can split this amount up if it’s easier and take it with meals.  Then add 1,000mg to your daily dose each day until you reach 20,000mg per day of MSM.  Stay at this dose for 3-7 days until you feel your body is flushed of toxins (trust your intuition on this, you will sense you are clear because you usually feel amazing).  After 3-7 days, begin to lower the dose to 3,000mg per day for healthy maintenance and PH buffering to help keep your body alkaline....<<<Read More>>>....
  

Mass Poisoning With Fluoride and Mind Control

[Humans Are Free]: It has been nearly a century since the widespread implementation of fluoride in our water supply. More than 377 million unsuspecting people worldwide consume the chemical each day. World Health Organization representatives state the product prevents tooth deterioration. Authorities insist the additive is essential for oral hygiene.

However, many independent researchers dispute these claims. They meticulously analyzed data and reached a startling conclusion: there is no benevolent purpose for governments to expose citizens to fluoride. Even more chillingly, investigators conclude the synthesized substance has resulted in mass poisoning on a global scale.

Fluoride, a byproduct of fertilizer, steel, and aluminum production, can be traced back to the Third Reich. According to chemist Charles E. Perkins, Hitler desired an elixir that would create a more docile population and sterilization of certain groups. Nazi physicians discovered one particular neurotoxin which met the Führer’s demands. Concentration camp prisoners began receiving fluoride-laced medication.

Perkins dedicated his career to uncovering fluorine pathology and cautioned: “as a research chemist of established standing built within the past 22 years, and 53 chemical patents, based on my practical experience in the health and chemical fields, let me warn… fluoridation of drinking water is criminal insanity and national suicide.”...<<<Read More>>>>...

UK Wants to Add Fluoride to Drinking Water – Dr Vernon Coleman Explains Why This ‘Does Far More Harm Than Good’

 [Humans Are Free]: The UK’s four chief medical officers (including the inevitable and, to me, increasingly scary Dr Whitty of England) want to see fluoride added to all drinking water in the UK.

There is already fluoride in some areas but these people, who have I believe betrayed the British public throughout the covid-19 fraud, now want fluoride in all our drinking water.

Dr Vernon Coleman: “Putting Fluoride in drinking water does far more harm than good.”

You can read a plethora of articles on fluoride (most based on scientific studies) by following THIS LINK, and then you can make up your own mind....<<<Read More>>>...

Food For Thought #407

 

Chris Whitty Wants To Add Fluoride To UK Drinking Water

 This rather pathetic parasite puppet wants to add the neurotoxin Sodium Fluoride in order to permanently damage the pineal gland of young children. 

Not only does he want to sterilise and maim them with the deadly CV-19 shots, but he also wants to chemically lobotomise them too. 

This puppet lost its human reasoning a long time ago; within it festers a real apparent  hatred for mankind .... this monster should not be in a position of power as it is likely to abuse the position. Oh, it already has!

This is evil incarnate. Sadistic. Psychotic and totally insane.

[Richie Allen]: England’s Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty wants to add fluoride to the nations’s water supply. Whitty is a prominent member of SAGE, the group of scientists that has been advising the government since the beginning of the scamdemic.

Whitty recently overruled the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) on jabbing 12 to 15 year-olds. The JCVI said there was little benefit to the kids being jabbed. Whitty and his mates said, “We’ll just see about that.”

On Wednesday, Dr. Caroline Johnson asked Whitty why he was so hellbent on jabbing kiddies. She asked him to explain why he wasn’t testing youngsters first, to see if they’d had covid-19. Her logic being, that if they’d had the virus, they’d hardly need the jab.

Whitty floundered. He had no answer. He was also at a loss to explain why half the literature being presented to the parents of children, made no mention of the risk (1 in 6,000) of myocarditis. Whitty is desperately keen to jab the UK’s children. Whitty is one sinister and creepy little dude.

The Guardian is reporting this morning, that Whitty intends to fluoridate the UK’s drinking water. Apparently, he’s concerned about tooth decay. The Guardian reports:

Chris Whitty, the chief medical officer for England, and his counterparts in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland cited estimates by Public Health England that adding more fluoride to water supplies would reduce cavities by 17% among the richest children and 28% among the poorest.

They also dismissed safety concerns saying there is no evidence that ionised form of the element fluorine causes cancer and condemned “exaggerated and unevidenced” suggestions about health risks.

Chris Whitty and the UK’s chief medical officers represent a clear and present danger to the country’s children. Fluoride can be devastating for the neurodevelopment of youngsters. Whitty and his pals know this. They know it.

In 2012, Harvard University’s Department of Environmental Health, led by Anna Choi, published a study that claimed fluoride exposure led to lower IQ’s in children. Harvard found that on average, children with higher fluoride exposure performed poorer in IQ tests.

Nutritional psychologist Tetsuo Nakamoto published a paper in 2018, that investigated how fluoride exposure in the young can lead to disease in later life. Nakamoto’s team collated all the existing studies on fluoride and reviewed them.

He concluded that there is evidence that fluoride exposure can lead to lower IQ’s in children. He also acknowledged that fluoride accumulates in the pineal gland which can lead to calcification. The pineal gland produces melatonin, a hormone which regulates sleep.

Two years ago, a Canadian study of prenatal fluoride exposure found that there is a link between fluoride exposure during pregnancy and IQ. Expecting mothers exposed to the chemical were more likely to have children with lower than average IQ’s.

The UK’s chief medical officers know all of this. They KNOW. So why are they calling for fluoride to be added to the nation’s water supply?

200 Million Americans currently HYPNOTIZED and LOBOTOMIZED by Big Food and Big Pharma

It's not just in America ... it's here in the UK and also in countries all over the world.  And you wonder just how they managed to brainwash and mind control so many people?

[Natural News]: There are more than 200 million numb and dumb American consumers, who’ve watched TV their whole lives and believed that food advertised as healthy actually is. This two-thirds portion of all American adults have no clue that most food is literally designed to cause your body to develop diabetes, cancer, heart disease and dementia. 

Then, they also have no clue whatsoever that medical doctors and the hospitals they report to only serve up four forms of “medicine” and they’re all corrupt to the core: Lab-concocted prescription medications, vaccines, surgery and chemotherapy.

These are the “Insidious Four” that make Big Food and Big Pharma the richest industries in the world. They script and fund 99 percent of the advertising you see, and oversee 99 percent of the FDA/CDC regulatory agency decisions. Now, get ready for some mind-blowing statistics....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

Food For Thought #209

 

UK Government To Fluoridate The Nation’s Water Supply.

[Richie Allen]: Powers to fluoridate the country’s water supply will be handed to the government within weeks, according to The Times newspaper today. As things stand, only councils can add fluoride to water. Currently, six million people in the UK drink water that has been fluoridated. Health ministers want everyone to drink it. They say it’s to do with fighting tooth decay. As usual, they’re lying and fluoridation of our water is just the beginning.

A new government bill proposes that ministers take back powers ceded to the NHS in 2012, to make it easier for them to order the NHS to adopt a more preventative approach to healthcare. That sounds benign enough, but it isn’t. In reality it’ll open the door to even more state interference in our lives. One line in the white paper which contains the proposals reads: “…care that focuses not just on treating particular conditions, but also on lifestyles, on healthy behaviours and prevention.” Pay close attention to “lifestyles and healthy behaviours.”

The plan is to blame individuals for poor health and insist on sweeping lifestyle change. Our life choices are putting unnecessary strain on the health service they will say. Therefore, we must be good citizens and change our behaviour. They will implement this brave new approach to healthcare through the Chinese Social Credit model. It will be drilled into us that our health is most certainly not our own business, that in fact it impacts wider society.

They will point to Covid-19 and say that if we’d taken better care of ourselves, the pandemic wouldn’t have hit us quite as hard. The dawn of the internet of things and smart cities will make it easy for them to monitor us. Health passports are here now and here to stay. There will be consequences for those who aren’t taking care of themselves, though what exactly those consequences might be, I can’t say. Restrictions of some kind or another I’d guess....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>>...

 

 

From The Ridiculous To The Sublime: Forbes Tells Readers “You Should Not Do Your Own Research”

[Collective Evolution]: In a recent article out of Forbes, scientist Ethan Siegel suggests people should not “do their own research” on topics as they are not qualified to understand, and doing that research yourself could be dangerous. Throughout the article, Siegel cites the public health disaster that he believes ensued as a result of people questioning vaccines. He also points out that people doubt the validity of water fluoridation due to their dangerous research, and now there exists people who question water fluoridation when they shouldn’t.

To both vaccines and water fluoridation, Siegel believes there is scientific consensus on safety and effectiveness, and therefore anyone doing their own research must stop, and if they come to a different conclusion than the consensus, they must be unqualified.

This is where Siegel’s lack of digging and research is revealed. There is plenty of scientific evidence that would lead any functioning individual to question the safety of both vaccines and water fluoridation. In fact, the science is on the sides of both vaccines having inherent dangers we need to come to terms with, and water fluoridation having serious effects on brain function. Thousands of scientists see this. These are not rare, internet-driven realities, they are extremely well scientifically backed, and the only thing to points to them being untrue is unbacked mainstream scientific culture....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

The Spice That Prevents Fluoride From Destroying Your Brain

[Wake Up World]: Fluoride is found everywhere today, from antibiotics to drinking water, no stick pans to toothpaste, making exposure inevitable. All the more reason why research proving this common spice can prevent fluoride damage is so promising.

Fluoride’s neurotoxicity has been the subject of academic debate for decades, and now a matter of increasingly impassioned controversy among the general public, as well.

From ‘conspiracy theories’ about it being first used in drinking water in Russian and Nazi concentration camps to chemically lobotomize captives, to its now well-known IQ lowering properties, to its ability to enhance the calcification of the pineal gland — the traditional ‘seat of the soul’ — many around the world, and increasingly in the heavily fluoridated regions of the United States, are starting to organize at the local and statewide level to oust this ubiquitous toxicant from municipal drinking water.

A compelling study published in the Pharmacognosy Magazine titled, “Curcumin attenuates neurotoxicity induced by fluoride: An in vivo evidence,” adds experimental support to the suspicion that fluoride is indeed a brain-damaging substance, also revealing that a natural spice-derived protective agent against the various health effects associated with this compound is available....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...