[Humans Are Free]: Opposition to 5G is WORLDWIDE. Cities AND countries have taken action to ban, delay, halt, and limit 5G installation as well as issue moratoriums due to serious health and safety warnings.
Since 2017, doctors and scientists have been asking for a moratorium on installation on Earth as well as in space. The majority of scientists worldwide continue to oppose 5G until studies prove it’s safe....<<< Read The Full Article Here>>>...
Welcome to "A Light In The Darkness" - a realm that explores the mysterious and the occult; the paranormal and the supernatural; the unexplained and the controversial; and, not forgetting, of course, the conspiracy theories; including Artificial Intelligence; Chemtrails and Geo-engineering; 5G and EMR Hazards; The Net Zero lie ; Trans-Humanism and Trans-Genderism; The Covid-19 and mRNA vaccine issues; The Ukraine Deception ... and a whole lot more.
Search A Light In The Darkness
Showing posts with label 5G International Appeal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 5G International Appeal. Show all posts
Wednesday, 1 July 2020
Saturday, 16 May 2020
Scientists & Doctors Make It Quite Clear That 5G Could Be Dangerous To Human Health
[Collective Evolution]: The idea that health concerns about 5G technology are a mere “conspiracy theory” is quite concerning.
How can hundreds of doctors and scientists all around the world who are publishing in vivo and in vitro studies in peer-reviewed scientific journals about this topic be considered conspiracy theorists?
How would these publications that have been raising concerns be able to get through the peer-reviewed process if they weren’t legit?
Why does mainstream media continue to constantly ignore the concerns that are being brought up all over the world with regards to 5G technology?
What is going on here? Do we really live in a democracy when the concerns of the people are constantly ignored and all of the evidence and research go unacknowledged?
If 5G was completely safe, why wouldn’t our federal health regulatory agencies require safety testing? Shouldn’t all new technologies, especially wireless technologies, be required to at least go through some sort of safety testing before it’s rolled out?
What’s really going on here?
Why is this being allowed to happen? ...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
How can hundreds of doctors and scientists all around the world who are publishing in vivo and in vitro studies in peer-reviewed scientific journals about this topic be considered conspiracy theorists?
How would these publications that have been raising concerns be able to get through the peer-reviewed process if they weren’t legit?
Why does mainstream media continue to constantly ignore the concerns that are being brought up all over the world with regards to 5G technology?
What is going on here? Do we really live in a democracy when the concerns of the people are constantly ignored and all of the evidence and research go unacknowledged?
If 5G was completely safe, why wouldn’t our federal health regulatory agencies require safety testing? Shouldn’t all new technologies, especially wireless technologies, be required to at least go through some sort of safety testing before it’s rolled out?
What’s really going on here?
Why is this being allowed to happen? ...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
Thursday, 14 May 2020
5G Judicial Review 2020
[David Icke]: This page is against wireless 5G, radiofrequency radiation (“RFR”) and electromagnetic fields (“EMFs”) generally due to their impact on the health of humans, animals and plants.
Many people are sensitive to RFR and EMFs and suffer illness, distress and financial loss due to inability to work. The balance of scientific evidence is now clear that RFR/EMFs are harmful to humans.
The UK government insist on using ICNIRP’s guidelines to set limits of radiation for public health. ICNIRP’s guidelines are not fit for purpose as, among other things, they only recognise harm from heating of the body and are set for short term exposure – 6 minutes in fact. Many people suffer harm without any heating of their bodies.
5G is the fifth generation of RFR technology used in the mobile telecoms industry and follows 1G – 4G. It dwarfs RFR from 1G – 4G because millions more masts, antennae, small cells, picocells etc have to be placed at short distances apart all around the country in order to develop the infrastructure to deliver the data speed promised by 5G.
The current electrosmog from 1G – 4G will become significantly worse and it is likely to result in more harm to humans, animals, trees and pollinators....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
Many people are sensitive to RFR and EMFs and suffer illness, distress and financial loss due to inability to work. The balance of scientific evidence is now clear that RFR/EMFs are harmful to humans.
The UK government insist on using ICNIRP’s guidelines to set limits of radiation for public health. ICNIRP’s guidelines are not fit for purpose as, among other things, they only recognise harm from heating of the body and are set for short term exposure – 6 minutes in fact. Many people suffer harm without any heating of their bodies.
5G is the fifth generation of RFR technology used in the mobile telecoms industry and follows 1G – 4G. It dwarfs RFR from 1G – 4G because millions more masts, antennae, small cells, picocells etc have to be placed at short distances apart all around the country in order to develop the infrastructure to deliver the data speed promised by 5G.
The current electrosmog from 1G – 4G will become significantly worse and it is likely to result in more harm to humans, animals, trees and pollinators....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
Monday, 4 May 2020
Health workers call for caution over 5G roll-out
[David Icke]: Some 400 doctors and 900 health care workers have signed an open letter to the government, urging them to exercise caution regarding the roll-out by Proximus of a forerunner of the next generation of mobile data, known as 5G.
The six-page letter goes out under the name of the Hippocrates Electrosmog Appeal.
Last week, Proximus began to test its “5G Light” version of the new generation in 30 communes around Belgium, the timing of which the organisation criticises.
“Even though it could be a simple coincidence, this seems indecent to us at a time when the people are fighting to overcome a human drama which concerns us all. At the same time, consumer organisations have been quick to publish articles claiming that the technology is not dangerous,” the authors write.
The population has been increasingly exposed to electromagnetic radiation over recent decades, from cordless telephones in the home to the current saturation of high-speed internet, mobile phones, wifi in the metro and the growing Internet of Things, the letter says.
Now along comes 5G – or for the time being at least, a sort of 4G+ – which promises to be many times more powerful.'...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
The six-page letter goes out under the name of the Hippocrates Electrosmog Appeal.
Last week, Proximus began to test its “5G Light” version of the new generation in 30 communes around Belgium, the timing of which the organisation criticises.
“Even though it could be a simple coincidence, this seems indecent to us at a time when the people are fighting to overcome a human drama which concerns us all. At the same time, consumer organisations have been quick to publish articles claiming that the technology is not dangerous,” the authors write.
The population has been increasingly exposed to electromagnetic radiation over recent decades, from cordless telephones in the home to the current saturation of high-speed internet, mobile phones, wifi in the metro and the growing Internet of Things, the letter says.
Now along comes 5G – or for the time being at least, a sort of 4G+ – which promises to be many times more powerful.'...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
Sunday, 12 April 2020
New York State Senator Introduces Bill To Study The Health & Environmental Impact of 5G Technology
[Collective Evolution]: Senator Anna Kaplan of New York introduced a bill on March 3rd, 2020 to study the health and environmental impacts associated with exposure to 5G wireless radiation frequencies. This has just come to our attention now.
The bill calls upon the Department of Health and the Department of Environmental Conservation, in cooperation with the Office of Technology Services, to “…jointly study and evaluate the health and environmental impacts of the implementation of fifth generation (5G) and future generation wireless systems technology and small cell distribution antenna systems in the state.”
There are many initiatives that are currently taking place, despite the fact that they’re receiving no mainstream media attention. For example, in the state of New Hampshire a 5G Bill HB 522 asks, “Why have 1,000s of peer-reviewed studies, including the recently published U.S. Toxicology Program 16-year $30 million study, that are showing a wide range of statistically significant DNA damage, brain and heart tumors, infertility, and so many other ailments, being ignored by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC)?” and, “Why have more than 220 of the worlds leading scientists signed an appeal to the WHO and the United Nations to protect public health from wireless radiation and nothing has been done?”
It’s great to see such initiatives started, as with any new technology, it can only benefit everybody if appropriate safety testing is conducted. Therefore there really should be no resistance against it. In Nigeria, for example, the government has not issued any licence for the deployment of the 5G network following growing concerns over the potential health implications. Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Dr Isa Ali Ibrahim stated that the government would always take the welfare, health and security of the public into account while considering the deployment of any technology. This should be the approach of all governments...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
The bill calls upon the Department of Health and the Department of Environmental Conservation, in cooperation with the Office of Technology Services, to “…jointly study and evaluate the health and environmental impacts of the implementation of fifth generation (5G) and future generation wireless systems technology and small cell distribution antenna systems in the state.”
There are many initiatives that are currently taking place, despite the fact that they’re receiving no mainstream media attention. For example, in the state of New Hampshire a 5G Bill HB 522 asks, “Why have 1,000s of peer-reviewed studies, including the recently published U.S. Toxicology Program 16-year $30 million study, that are showing a wide range of statistically significant DNA damage, brain and heart tumors, infertility, and so many other ailments, being ignored by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC)?” and, “Why have more than 220 of the worlds leading scientists signed an appeal to the WHO and the United Nations to protect public health from wireless radiation and nothing has been done?”
It’s great to see such initiatives started, as with any new technology, it can only benefit everybody if appropriate safety testing is conducted. Therefore there really should be no resistance against it. In Nigeria, for example, the government has not issued any licence for the deployment of the 5G network following growing concerns over the potential health implications. Minister of Communications and Digital Economy, Dr Isa Ali Ibrahim stated that the government would always take the welfare, health and security of the public into account while considering the deployment of any technology. This should be the approach of all governments...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
Thursday, 13 February 2020
FCC faces historic legal challenge for failing to protect the public from wireless technology radiation
[Natural News]: On February 2, 2020, a historic petition was filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The petition calls on the court to find out why the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has not updated their 25-year-old guidelines on wireless technology radiation.
The petition states that the FCC has “failed to promulgate rational, science-based radiofrequency emissions rules.” The FCC’s inaction, potentially deliberate, is portending a public health crisis.
The petition was filed on behalf of Children’s Health Defense, led by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and a legal team that includes telecommunications and administrative law attorney Scott McCollough. This legal battle seeks to protect the public from the non-thermal harms of wireless radiation and it also seeks to protect the public from the potential corruption between the FCC and the telecom industry, evidenced by the agency’s inept inaction.
As wireless technology rapidly expands, with 5G on the horizon and thousands of new cell towers and transmitters set to be installed across the country, the FCC has remained complacent in regulating it all.
The Children’s Health Defense will bring forward several key witnesses, including a mother whose son died from a brain tumor caused by cell tower exposure. Several parents and physicians are coming forth, bearing witness to the epidemic of sickness caused by rogue, unregulated radio-frequency emissions. Professor David Carpenter, a renowned scientist, will also produce evidence detailing the harms of radio-frequency emissions....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
The petition states that the FCC has “failed to promulgate rational, science-based radiofrequency emissions rules.” The FCC’s inaction, potentially deliberate, is portending a public health crisis.
The petition was filed on behalf of Children’s Health Defense, led by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and a legal team that includes telecommunications and administrative law attorney Scott McCollough. This legal battle seeks to protect the public from the non-thermal harms of wireless radiation and it also seeks to protect the public from the potential corruption between the FCC and the telecom industry, evidenced by the agency’s inept inaction.
As wireless technology rapidly expands, with 5G on the horizon and thousands of new cell towers and transmitters set to be installed across the country, the FCC has remained complacent in regulating it all.
The Children’s Health Defense will bring forward several key witnesses, including a mother whose son died from a brain tumor caused by cell tower exposure. Several parents and physicians are coming forth, bearing witness to the epidemic of sickness caused by rogue, unregulated radio-frequency emissions. Professor David Carpenter, a renowned scientist, will also produce evidence detailing the harms of radio-frequency emissions....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
Tuesday, 4 February 2020
It Turns Out That 5G Might Cause Cancer After All
[Waking Times]: The 5G technology roll out is not without controversy. All across the globe people—including consumers, parents, scientists, and engineers—are demanding answers about and educating others of the risks of 5G.
In fact, nearly 200,000 people from 204 countries have signed an appeal to “stop the deployment of millions of 5G antennas on Earth and 50,000 5G satellites in space, and to secure emergency high-level meetings with officials in governments and international governmental organizations including the European Union, the United Nations, and the World Health Organization.”
Next week an important lawsuit is set to go before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. As TMU previously reported, the ruling will decide whether the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) can restrict just how much local governments charge wireless providers to attach small cells to city-owned infrastructure like light-poles. As it stands, thanks to a September 2018 ruling, local and state governments have limited time to approve or deny applications for installing these small cells and limitations on what they can charge carriers.
The FCC reportedly relies on a federal law banning state and local governments from prohibiting mobile carriers from offering services to a particular area. However, many see this being used as a loophole to further advance 5G with as little pushback as possible and there is ample evidence that local governments are finding themselves losing control of their local 5G roll out...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
In fact, nearly 200,000 people from 204 countries have signed an appeal to “stop the deployment of millions of 5G antennas on Earth and 50,000 5G satellites in space, and to secure emergency high-level meetings with officials in governments and international governmental organizations including the European Union, the United Nations, and the World Health Organization.”
Next week an important lawsuit is set to go before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. As TMU previously reported, the ruling will decide whether the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) can restrict just how much local governments charge wireless providers to attach small cells to city-owned infrastructure like light-poles. As it stands, thanks to a September 2018 ruling, local and state governments have limited time to approve or deny applications for installing these small cells and limitations on what they can charge carriers.
The FCC reportedly relies on a federal law banning state and local governments from prohibiting mobile carriers from offering services to a particular area. However, many see this being used as a loophole to further advance 5G with as little pushback as possible and there is ample evidence that local governments are finding themselves losing control of their local 5G roll out...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
Thursday, 23 January 2020
Scientists & Doctors Send Letter To Donald Trump Calling For A Moratorium On 5G Wireless Technology
[Collective Evolution]: When it comes to 5G wireless technology, and wireless technology in general, doctors and scientists have been raising concerns for many years, calling for safety testing that is independent of industry-sponsored studies. You would think that safety testing for any technology that’s poised to roll out and be used by humanity at such a large scale would be subject to appropriate safety testing.
Unfortunately, wireless technology has not been subjected to this type of testing, which is why many people are becoming more and more concerned. This is evident on a global level. For example, a large portion of the Swiss population has now been exposed to 5G, and thousands of people recently showed up on the Swiss House of Parliament in Bern to protest.
This is also why why a number of doctors, scientists and advocates have sent a National 5G Resolution letter to President Trump, requesting a moratorium on 5G technology until the potential hazards for human health and the environment have been investigated appropriately by scientists independent from the telecom industry....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
Unfortunately, wireless technology has not been subjected to this type of testing, which is why many people are becoming more and more concerned. This is evident on a global level. For example, a large portion of the Swiss population has now been exposed to 5G, and thousands of people recently showed up on the Swiss House of Parliament in Bern to protest.
This is also why why a number of doctors, scientists and advocates have sent a National 5G Resolution letter to President Trump, requesting a moratorium on 5G technology until the potential hazards for human health and the environment have been investigated appropriately by scientists independent from the telecom industry....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
Friday, 18 October 2019
We Have No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe
[Scientific American]: The telecommunications industry and their experts have accused many scientists who have researched the effects of cell phone radiation of "fear mongering" over the advent of wireless technology's 5G.
Since much of our research is publicly-funded, we believe it is our ethical responsibility to inform the public about what the peer-reviewed scientific literature tells us about the health risks from wireless radiation.
The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced through a press release that the commission will soon reaffirm the radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that the FCC adopted in the late 1990s. These limits are based upon a behavioral change in rats exposed to microwave radiation and were designed to protect us from short-term heating risks due to RFR exposure.
Yet, since the FCC adopted these limits based largely on research from the 1980s, the preponderance of peer-reviewed research, more than 500 studies, have found harmful biologic or health effects from exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating.
Citing this large body of research, more than 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on the biologic and health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which calls for stronger exposure limits. The appeal makes the following assertions:
“Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.”
The scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals.
The FCC’s RFR exposure limits regulate the intensity of exposure, taking into account the frequency of the carrier waves, but ignore the signaling properties of the RFR. Along with the patterning and duration of exposures, certain characteristics of the signal (e.g., pulsing, polarization) increase the biologic and health impacts of the exposure. New exposure limits are needed which account for these differential effects. Moreover, these limits should be based on a biological effect, not a change in a laboratory rat’s behavior...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>..
Since much of our research is publicly-funded, we believe it is our ethical responsibility to inform the public about what the peer-reviewed scientific literature tells us about the health risks from wireless radiation.
The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently announced through a press release that the commission will soon reaffirm the radio frequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that the FCC adopted in the late 1990s. These limits are based upon a behavioral change in rats exposed to microwave radiation and were designed to protect us from short-term heating risks due to RFR exposure.
Yet, since the FCC adopted these limits based largely on research from the 1980s, the preponderance of peer-reviewed research, more than 500 studies, have found harmful biologic or health effects from exposure to RFR at intensities too low to cause significant heating.
Citing this large body of research, more than 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on the biologic and health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which calls for stronger exposure limits. The appeal makes the following assertions:
“Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.”
The scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals.
The FCC’s RFR exposure limits regulate the intensity of exposure, taking into account the frequency of the carrier waves, but ignore the signaling properties of the RFR. Along with the patterning and duration of exposures, certain characteristics of the signal (e.g., pulsing, polarization) increase the biologic and health impacts of the exposure. New exposure limits are needed which account for these differential effects. Moreover, these limits should be based on a biological effect, not a change in a laboratory rat’s behavior...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>..
Thursday, 17 October 2019
Thousands Protest In Switzerland As The Population Is Now Exposed To 5G Wireless Radiation
[Collective Evolution]: A large portion of the Switzerland population is now exposed to 5G, and
thousands of people showed up on the Swiss house of Parliament in Bern
to protest.
With undeniable evidence showing this type of technology has disastrous health effects, what's really going on? People are aware of this, but governments continue to ignore all of this information.
What’s happening in Switzerland might go global–it’s something that seems to be rolling out in North America at least. Switzerland’s population is now officially exposed to the new 5G networks.
As a result, thousands of people showed up in protest.
The first injuries due to 5G are already being reported in Switzerland, according to Physicians for Safe Technology...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
With undeniable evidence showing this type of technology has disastrous health effects, what's really going on? People are aware of this, but governments continue to ignore all of this information.
What’s happening in Switzerland might go global–it’s something that seems to be rolling out in North America at least. Switzerland’s population is now officially exposed to the new 5G networks.
As a result, thousands of people showed up in protest.
The first injuries due to 5G are already being reported in Switzerland, according to Physicians for Safe Technology...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
Tuesday, 15 October 2019
More 5G Satellites To Be Launched Before November — Deadline to Sign International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth in Space on 10/21
[David Icke]: The Federal Communication Commission (FCC) is supposed to protect the public by regulating the telecom industry.
Unfortunately they are exceedingly corrupt and the “Race for 5G” makes this more dangerous with every passing day. The agency is being sued by many entities for forcing its installation in communities across the U.S. They have also been allowing companies to launch satellites and similar devices into the sky and space to blast 5G and WiFi from there.
Telecom executives have admitted they have NO scientific evidence that 5G is safe and many experts say 5G isn’t. Research has proven that WiFi is biologically and environmentally harmful too. People and their pets are becoming sick where 5G is already operating.
Meteorologists, NASA, NOAA and the U.S. Navy warn 5G will reduce the accuracy of weather predictions and large urban areas will be impacted first.
Opposition to 5G worldwide is ongoing. The deadline for signing the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth in Space is next week.
More from Arthur Firstenberg:
Demonstrations against 5G on Earth have been taking place in many parts of the world (see below for the most recent events). Alarmingly, 5G in Space is being ignored. There is a reason this Appeal is called the 5G Space Appeal: the antennas on the ground will not matter if 5G in Space puts an end to all life. We have only about four months to prevent this.
I became active in 1995, not to oppose cell towers, but because Sarah Benson called me from Australia, wanting me to help her organize to stop Bill Gates and Craig McCaw from launching 840 satellites into the ionosphere for an “Internet in the Sky.” That plan never materialized, but Sarah’s fears that such a plan could destroy all life on Earth were correct.
On September 23, 1998, a company called Iridium activated 66 satellites that it had launched into the ionosphere for global cell phone service. On that morning, a majority of electrically sensitive people became suddenly ill, all over the world—so ill that many were not sure they would live. For the next two weeks, birds were not flying in the sky. Homing pigeons got lost by the thousands, and the sport of pigeon racing never recovered. Weekly mortality for the United States rose by four to five percent.
A second satellite phone service, Globalstar, began commercial service with only 48 satellites on February 28, 2000. Again came reports of nausea, headaches, leg pain, respiratory problems, depression, and lack of energy, all over the world, both from “electrically sensitive” people and from “normal” people.'...<<Read The Full Article Here>>
Unfortunately they are exceedingly corrupt and the “Race for 5G” makes this more dangerous with every passing day. The agency is being sued by many entities for forcing its installation in communities across the U.S. They have also been allowing companies to launch satellites and similar devices into the sky and space to blast 5G and WiFi from there.
Telecom executives have admitted they have NO scientific evidence that 5G is safe and many experts say 5G isn’t. Research has proven that WiFi is biologically and environmentally harmful too. People and their pets are becoming sick where 5G is already operating.
Meteorologists, NASA, NOAA and the U.S. Navy warn 5G will reduce the accuracy of weather predictions and large urban areas will be impacted first.
Opposition to 5G worldwide is ongoing. The deadline for signing the International Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth in Space is next week.
More from Arthur Firstenberg:
Demonstrations against 5G on Earth have been taking place in many parts of the world (see below for the most recent events). Alarmingly, 5G in Space is being ignored. There is a reason this Appeal is called the 5G Space Appeal: the antennas on the ground will not matter if 5G in Space puts an end to all life. We have only about four months to prevent this.
I became active in 1995, not to oppose cell towers, but because Sarah Benson called me from Australia, wanting me to help her organize to stop Bill Gates and Craig McCaw from launching 840 satellites into the ionosphere for an “Internet in the Sky.” That plan never materialized, but Sarah’s fears that such a plan could destroy all life on Earth were correct.
On September 23, 1998, a company called Iridium activated 66 satellites that it had launched into the ionosphere for global cell phone service. On that morning, a majority of electrically sensitive people became suddenly ill, all over the world—so ill that many were not sure they would live. For the next two weeks, birds were not flying in the sky. Homing pigeons got lost by the thousands, and the sport of pigeon racing never recovered. Weekly mortality for the United States rose by four to five percent.
A second satellite phone service, Globalstar, began commercial service with only 48 satellites on February 28, 2000. Again came reports of nausea, headaches, leg pain, respiratory problems, depression, and lack of energy, all over the world, both from “electrically sensitive” people and from “normal” people.'...<<Read The Full Article Here
Saturday, 28 September 2019
The 5G Pushback is Here
[Waking Times]: San Jose and 22 other cities and counties sued to overturn an FCC order restricting how much local governments can charge wireless carriers to process applications for small cell equipment that’s critical to 5G. The order also imposes deadlines for cities to grant or deny the applications. The FCC’s order essentially says that if a city makes it harder for a carrier to provide telecom services, that amounts to a prohibition.
Activists are asking city or county governments of at least seven Pacific Northwest communities to defy the federal government and stop the deployment of next-generation 5G cellular service.
Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers recently signed the 5G Bill (Act 14), despite opposition by citizens across the State and letters written to him by scientific, medical and other experts issuing warnings. Even State Representatives from Milwaukee and Madison opposed the 5G legislation.
More recently, there are pockets of push back. In the UK, the people fought the deployment of 5G, and a judge asserted that,“The public have a right to know” whether the next generation of wifi communication, relying on directed powerful microwave energy, causes cancer and other health risks.
In August of 2019, the Australian government banned a Chinese company, Huawei, from building the 5G network. The ban was made under the pretext of protecting national security. Critics say Australia has reduced the country’s supply of telecommunications infrastructure just as demand for 5G is starting to grow. But National security takes precedence over download speeds. As it should be.
No fewer than 26,000 Scientists Oppose 5G Roll Out. An international appeal to stop 5G includes 154,668 signatories from 208 nations and territories as of September 26th, 2019. Unfortunately, the petition is to the UN, WHO, Council of Europe and governments of all nations, all of which created the global law for their own reasons.
Amidst the growing protests, 5G is set to be activated on a street near you. While the media claims that 5G is not a health hazard, or that Russia is to blame, the government cannot hide the fact that these frequencies are used by the military as energy weaponry known as The Pain Ray. Still, the people will not rest. The time to activate your neighbors and community is now. The time to call out rogue governments is now. Now is the time for action or it will be time to find new ways to protect yourself against an invisible microwave weapons system as humans merge with robotics and A.I. in Smart Cities under The Internet of Things....read more>>>>...
Activists are asking city or county governments of at least seven Pacific Northwest communities to defy the federal government and stop the deployment of next-generation 5G cellular service.
Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers recently signed the 5G Bill (Act 14), despite opposition by citizens across the State and letters written to him by scientific, medical and other experts issuing warnings. Even State Representatives from Milwaukee and Madison opposed the 5G legislation.
More recently, there are pockets of push back. In the UK, the people fought the deployment of 5G, and a judge asserted that,“The public have a right to know” whether the next generation of wifi communication, relying on directed powerful microwave energy, causes cancer and other health risks.
In August of 2019, the Australian government banned a Chinese company, Huawei, from building the 5G network. The ban was made under the pretext of protecting national security. Critics say Australia has reduced the country’s supply of telecommunications infrastructure just as demand for 5G is starting to grow. But National security takes precedence over download speeds. As it should be.
No fewer than 26,000 Scientists Oppose 5G Roll Out. An international appeal to stop 5G includes 154,668 signatories from 208 nations and territories as of September 26th, 2019. Unfortunately, the petition is to the UN, WHO, Council of Europe and governments of all nations, all of which created the global law for their own reasons.
Amidst the growing protests, 5G is set to be activated on a street near you. While the media claims that 5G is not a health hazard, or that Russia is to blame, the government cannot hide the fact that these frequencies are used by the military as energy weaponry known as The Pain Ray. Still, the people will not rest. The time to activate your neighbors and community is now. The time to call out rogue governments is now. Now is the time for action or it will be time to find new ways to protect yourself against an invisible microwave weapons system as humans merge with robotics and A.I. in Smart Cities under The Internet of Things....read more>>>>...
Thursday, 1 August 2019
Governments, Scientists and Doctors Worldwide Call For a Ban on 5G
[Wake Up World]: As the world braces for the 5G rollout, we’re being sold a vision of a wonderful, tech-enabled future. Smart homes, smart business, smart highways, smart cities, smart cars – what’s not to love?
Except that governments, scientists and doctors worldwide have been stating the obvious for years now: it’s not very smart to deliberately endanger the health and wellbeing of every citizen on earth, and to endanger life on earth itself.
Why are the powers that be not listening?
5G will involve the creation of millions of new base stations on earth, as well as over 20,000 new satellites in space. Your smart home will mean harmful EMF radiation coming from your fridge, your cupboards, your heating system, even individual grocery items. Smart highways and smart cities will mean inescapable EMF radiation wherever you live, wherever you work and however you get from one to the other. Smart cars will bathe you and your family in EMF every single day.
If you’re reading this, you probably already knew the above. But unless you’ve been following closely, you may be unaware of the scale of the evidence against 5G or indeed the scale of the efforts to stop it. It’s quite breath-taking to see how much has been ignored, ridiculed or sidelined....read more>>>...
Except that governments, scientists and doctors worldwide have been stating the obvious for years now: it’s not very smart to deliberately endanger the health and wellbeing of every citizen on earth, and to endanger life on earth itself.
Why are the powers that be not listening?
5G will involve the creation of millions of new base stations on earth, as well as over 20,000 new satellites in space. Your smart home will mean harmful EMF radiation coming from your fridge, your cupboards, your heating system, even individual grocery items. Smart highways and smart cities will mean inescapable EMF radiation wherever you live, wherever you work and however you get from one to the other. Smart cars will bathe you and your family in EMF every single day.
If you’re reading this, you probably already knew the above. But unless you’ve been following closely, you may be unaware of the scale of the evidence against 5G or indeed the scale of the efforts to stop it. It’s quite breath-taking to see how much has been ignored, ridiculed or sidelined....read more>>>...
Thursday, 13 June 2019
Polish Ministry of Digitalisation Denies Polish Prime Minister Supported 5G Appeal
[David Icke]: The Polish Ministry of Digitalisation has denied (June 11) that Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki signed the Global Appeal to Stop 5G on Earth and in Space.*
The refutation was put out by the Ministry of Digitalisation, the government department that deals with telecommunications. The same department put out a related statement “The opponents of 5G are heating-up the mood, serving customers fake news – we want to give Poles a reliable source of information about 5G so that no one misleads them.”
Hopes raised that Prime Minister Morawiecki might have some genuine humanitarian concerns for his people appear to have been proved unduly optimistic.
This week, according to the present parliamentary schedule, Mateusz Morawiecki will lead his government into presenting a new Act that will annul the existing law on 'acceptable levels' of Electro Magnetic Frequencies (EMF) in order to introduce microwave frequency transmission levels 10 to 100 times more intense than current levels. This is being done to satisfy the telecommunications industry's ambition to install tens of thousands of 5G transmitters across the length and breadth of the Country.
If this Act is passed, the Prime Minister and government parliamentarians will be complicit in introducing a completely untested technology which over 2,000 scientists and 1,400 medical doctors from all over the World have described as presenting a direct threat to the health of humans, animals, insect and plant life.
The government of Poland appears determined to ignore such medical and scientific warnings. Also to ignore the safety-net known as 'the precautionary principle' in which anything judged as causing potential harm cannot be put in the public domain without first undergoing independent assessment for its safety.
This refusal to follow responsible principles demonstrates that the Prime Minister is ready to sell the freedom of Poland, the health of the electorate and the welfare of future generations, to corporate interests. The fact is that all decisions on 5G are made without any public consultation or any opportunity to object.
Awareness of the threat that 5G poses is rapidly growing. Protests in different parts of Poland are demonstrating the anger people feel at being forced to accept this highly controversial technology. Some protesters held-off for a while in the hope that Prime Minister Morawiecki had shown a human face. But since it is now officially denied that he supports stopping 5G, resistance will undoubtedly grow, with the effect that in the Autumn election the Polish government (Pis) is likely to be shown a red card for its refusal to listen to the people...read more>>>...
The refutation was put out by the Ministry of Digitalisation, the government department that deals with telecommunications. The same department put out a related statement “The opponents of 5G are heating-up the mood, serving customers fake news – we want to give Poles a reliable source of information about 5G so that no one misleads them.”
Hopes raised that Prime Minister Morawiecki might have some genuine humanitarian concerns for his people appear to have been proved unduly optimistic.
This week, according to the present parliamentary schedule, Mateusz Morawiecki will lead his government into presenting a new Act that will annul the existing law on 'acceptable levels' of Electro Magnetic Frequencies (EMF) in order to introduce microwave frequency transmission levels 10 to 100 times more intense than current levels. This is being done to satisfy the telecommunications industry's ambition to install tens of thousands of 5G transmitters across the length and breadth of the Country.
If this Act is passed, the Prime Minister and government parliamentarians will be complicit in introducing a completely untested technology which over 2,000 scientists and 1,400 medical doctors from all over the World have described as presenting a direct threat to the health of humans, animals, insect and plant life.
The government of Poland appears determined to ignore such medical and scientific warnings. Also to ignore the safety-net known as 'the precautionary principle' in which anything judged as causing potential harm cannot be put in the public domain without first undergoing independent assessment for its safety.
This refusal to follow responsible principles demonstrates that the Prime Minister is ready to sell the freedom of Poland, the health of the electorate and the welfare of future generations, to corporate interests. The fact is that all decisions on 5G are made without any public consultation or any opportunity to object.
Awareness of the threat that 5G poses is rapidly growing. Protests in different parts of Poland are demonstrating the anger people feel at being forced to accept this highly controversial technology. Some protesters held-off for a while in the hope that Prime Minister Morawiecki had shown a human face. But since it is now officially denied that he supports stopping 5G, resistance will undoubtedly grow, with the effect that in the Autumn election the Polish government (Pis) is likely to be shown a red card for its refusal to listen to the people...read more>>>...
Monday, 10 June 2019
Prime Minister of Poland Signs Global Appeal to Stop 5G
[David Icke]: In what is surely an unprecedented and groundbreaking action, the Prime Minister of Poland Mateusz Morawiecki, has personally backed an International Appeal to stop the controversial roll-out of 5G electro magnetic microwave telecommunication transmissions.
5G, a new millimetre band frequency range being introduced by the telecommunications industry worldwide, has been identified by over 2,000 scientists and 1,400 medical doctors from all over the World, as presenting a direct threat to human health, as well as to animal, insect and plant life.
There have been no safety tests carried out to ensure its safety, in spite of the fact that 5G operates at between 10 and 100 times higher frequencies than current 3 and 4G cell phone tower transmitters.
The roll-out of 5G will involve the placement of millions of transmitter boxes at distances of no more than 10 to 12 houses apart in urban areas. Scientists have established that this will subject citizens living in urban areas to an unavoidable barrage of electromagnetic pollution.
A 2017 report by more than 230 scientists and doctors from 41 countries express serious concerns about steadily expanding exposure to Electro Magnet Frequencies (EMF) . They state that even before the roll-out of 5G “Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most national and international guidelines.”
These effects include cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages,
structural and functional changes to the human reproductive system, learning and memory defects, neurological disorders and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond humans, as there is mounting evidence of deleterious affects to both plants and animals.
In Poland, the public are being used as guinea pigs in a 5G experiment to test the efficacy of the technology. The following cities are being used in the trial: Warsaw, Lodz, Gliwice.
The same procedure is taking place all over Europe, North America and many other Countries....read more>>>...
5G, a new millimetre band frequency range being introduced by the telecommunications industry worldwide, has been identified by over 2,000 scientists and 1,400 medical doctors from all over the World, as presenting a direct threat to human health, as well as to animal, insect and plant life.
There have been no safety tests carried out to ensure its safety, in spite of the fact that 5G operates at between 10 and 100 times higher frequencies than current 3 and 4G cell phone tower transmitters.
The roll-out of 5G will involve the placement of millions of transmitter boxes at distances of no more than 10 to 12 houses apart in urban areas. Scientists have established that this will subject citizens living in urban areas to an unavoidable barrage of electromagnetic pollution.
A 2017 report by more than 230 scientists and doctors from 41 countries express serious concerns about steadily expanding exposure to Electro Magnet Frequencies (EMF) . They state that even before the roll-out of 5G “Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most national and international guidelines.”
These effects include cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages,
structural and functional changes to the human reproductive system, learning and memory defects, neurological disorders and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond humans, as there is mounting evidence of deleterious affects to both plants and animals.
In Poland, the public are being used as guinea pigs in a 5G experiment to test the efficacy of the technology. The following cities are being used in the trial: Warsaw, Lodz, Gliwice.
The same procedure is taking place all over Europe, North America and many other Countries....read more>>>...
Saturday, 8 June 2019
Louisiana Becomes First State to Call for Study on Health Impacts of 5G
[Waking Times]: On May 29, the Louisiana House unanimously voted to have the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality and the Department of Health study the effects of 5G technology on the environment and public health.
The Louisiana legislature passed House Resolution 145 with a vote of 103 in favor and zero representatives voting against the measure.
The bill calls for the results of the study to be submitted to the Louisiana House Committee on Natural Resources and Environment as well as the House Committee on Health and Welfare no later than sixty days prior to the start of the 2020 Regular Session of the Louisiana Legislature.
5G—or 5th generation cellular technology—is the name for the latest telecom technology upgrade. The new technology is expected to herald the beginning of Smart Cities, where driverless cars, pollution sensors, cell phones, traffic lights, and thousands of other devices interact in what is known as “The Internet of Things.” However, there have been a number of health and privacy concerns raised by opponents of the rapidly advancing 5G expansion. Louisiana is the first state to call for their own independent study of the technology.
The language of HR 145 outlines the reasons that Louisiana state representatives felt the need to pass such a resolution. For example, the bill states that 5G “may pose risks to the environment due to increased radio-frequency radiation exposure,” and “peer-reviewed studies on this topic show the potential for wide-range effects,” therefore “a study is necessary to examine the advantages and risks associated with 5G technology.” The resolution also notes that “the insurance industry may have placed exclusions in policies to exempt damage caused by this technology,” a reference to reports that various insurance companies have excluded coverage related to damages acquired via electromagnetic frequency radiation.
The resolution also acknowledges that 5G technology requires small cellular towers—or small cells—to be placed every 200 to 500 feet—closer than existing towers—for the network to operate correctly. Not only is the installation of small cell sites taking place across the nation as the U.S. government and telecommunications companies roll out 5G cellular technology, this new infrastructure is being built on top of already existing 3G and 4G technology infrastructure....read more>>>...
The Louisiana legislature passed House Resolution 145 with a vote of 103 in favor and zero representatives voting against the measure.
The bill calls for the results of the study to be submitted to the Louisiana House Committee on Natural Resources and Environment as well as the House Committee on Health and Welfare no later than sixty days prior to the start of the 2020 Regular Session of the Louisiana Legislature.
5G—or 5th generation cellular technology—is the name for the latest telecom technology upgrade. The new technology is expected to herald the beginning of Smart Cities, where driverless cars, pollution sensors, cell phones, traffic lights, and thousands of other devices interact in what is known as “The Internet of Things.” However, there have been a number of health and privacy concerns raised by opponents of the rapidly advancing 5G expansion. Louisiana is the first state to call for their own independent study of the technology.
The language of HR 145 outlines the reasons that Louisiana state representatives felt the need to pass such a resolution. For example, the bill states that 5G “may pose risks to the environment due to increased radio-frequency radiation exposure,” and “peer-reviewed studies on this topic show the potential for wide-range effects,” therefore “a study is necessary to examine the advantages and risks associated with 5G technology.” The resolution also notes that “the insurance industry may have placed exclusions in policies to exempt damage caused by this technology,” a reference to reports that various insurance companies have excluded coverage related to damages acquired via electromagnetic frequency radiation.
The resolution also acknowledges that 5G technology requires small cellular towers—or small cells—to be placed every 200 to 500 feet—closer than existing towers—for the network to operate correctly. Not only is the installation of small cell sites taking place across the nation as the U.S. government and telecommunications companies roll out 5G cellular technology, this new infrastructure is being built on top of already existing 3G and 4G technology infrastructure....read more>>>...
Sunday, 2 June 2019
UK’s First 5G Court Case — And The People Won
[Principia Scientific]: New court ruling in Britain upholds right of people to know of the dangers of unproven 5G microwave technology. In Gateshead, UK Recorder Nolan QC refused to ‘gag’ anti-5G campaigner, Mark Steele.
5G is the fifth generation cellular network technology that provides broadband access for mobile phone users and others.
The judge asserted that “The public have a right to know” whether the next generation of wifi communication, relying on directed powerful microwave energy, causes cancer and other health risks.
The concern is that there is very little, if any, scientific research into how the powerful microwaves from the cell network can impact human health. To work a vast network of local antennas are connected with the telephone network and the Internet by a high bandwidth optical fiber or wireless backhaul connection.
Like existing cellphones, when a user crosses from one cell to another, their mobile device is automatically “handed off” seamlessly to the antenna in the new cell.
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem has discovered in a recent investigation that human skin acts as a type of receptor for 5G radiation, drawing it in like an antenna.
No fewer than 26,000 Scientists Oppose 5G Roll Out.
The outcome is a bitter blow to Gateshead Council. They had hoped to use the court appearance to ridicule Steele’s status as an ‘expert’ despite his claims that prestigious Harvard University now support his 5G fears....read more>>>...
5G is the fifth generation cellular network technology that provides broadband access for mobile phone users and others.
The judge asserted that “The public have a right to know” whether the next generation of wifi communication, relying on directed powerful microwave energy, causes cancer and other health risks.
The concern is that there is very little, if any, scientific research into how the powerful microwaves from the cell network can impact human health. To work a vast network of local antennas are connected with the telephone network and the Internet by a high bandwidth optical fiber or wireless backhaul connection.
Like existing cellphones, when a user crosses from one cell to another, their mobile device is automatically “handed off” seamlessly to the antenna in the new cell.
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem has discovered in a recent investigation that human skin acts as a type of receptor for 5G radiation, drawing it in like an antenna.
No fewer than 26,000 Scientists Oppose 5G Roll Out.
The outcome is a bitter blow to Gateshead Council. They had hoped to use the court appearance to ridicule Steele’s status as an ‘expert’ despite his claims that prestigious Harvard University now support his 5G fears....read more>>>...
Wednesday, 17 April 2019
5G: The Dominoes Are Starting To Fall
[David Icke]: Long-time United Nations staff member Claire Edwards summarizes worldwide developments in the 5G situation. While still far from a victory claim, there is much to be hopeful about as millions around the world deepen involvement and take a stand for our shared future.
How do you stop the rollout of a 12 trillion dollar technology promoted by one of the most profitable industries on the planet and bulldozed through by the EU, FCC and the whole UN, most notably its WiFi enablers, WHO and ITU?
Many people have said it’s impossible. But even as the Trump administration attempts to ram through 5G in the United States, the dominoes are indeed falling around the world, as cities and entire nations are coming to their senses and putting the brakes on 5G.
Lawmakers hitting the brakes on 5G...read more>>>...
How do you stop the rollout of a 12 trillion dollar technology promoted by one of the most profitable industries on the planet and bulldozed through by the EU, FCC and the whole UN, most notably its WiFi enablers, WHO and ITU?
Many people have said it’s impossible. But even as the Trump administration attempts to ram through 5G in the United States, the dominoes are indeed falling around the world, as cities and entire nations are coming to their senses and putting the brakes on 5G.
Lawmakers hitting the brakes on 5G...read more>>>...
Sunday, 7 April 2019
5G Frequencies in the UK
This information comes straight from the horses mouth - 5G.Co.Uk. It appears innocent enough until you look closer at what is being said here. We've highlighted in red some interesting points. We'll be researching the spectrum bands ourselves to see what effects these spectrum bands might have on the biological lifeforms on planet earth.
Interesting what 'delivers its full potential' means?
Also its interesting to learn that the 2.3GHz and 3.4GHz spectrum bands were used previously by the Ministry Of Defence. What for? A valid question is it not??? Military spectrum bands being released to the public ... sounds like the USA here ... and what spectrum bands is the M.O.D working on now? Doing what?
Don't believe the shit that 5G hasn't been tested before being rolled out. This report from 5G.Co.UK kind of confirms that someone in the UK MOD knows that they frequency bands do .... that's why they are now being released for the public to use. Doesn't sound like its for the good of the UK public does it?
(5G.co.uk): 5G needs to be able to access enough spectrum to keep up with the super high demands that are expected of it. But the spectrum also needs to be versatile enough for all different usage scenarios, which will likely mean using multiple different frequency bands.
Each operator will need a wide block of spectrum in the different bands in order to allow the data throughput required for 5G. Furthermore, mobile spectrum will need to be globally harmonised to ensure 5G delivers its full potential.
While not all the 5G spectrum bands have been finalised yet there’s a lot of research taking place and we’re narrowing down on the bands we’re likely to see used.
Ofcom, its European counterparts and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) have worked with other international organisations to ensure there is global harmonisation over the spectrum to be used for 5G. There is no indication that Ofcom will move away from any agreements already reached for 5G frequencies within Europe once the UK leaves the EU. So far, three main spectrum bands that have been specified for use in 5G:
Sub 1GHz, dubbed the ‘coverage layer’, will provide wide area and deep indoor coverage, and in Europe encompasses the 700MHz band. These frequencies will combine with the next band to enable operators to roll out 5G quickly and more cost-effectively.
1GHz-6GHz, aka the ‘coverage and capacity layer’, relies on C-band spectrum around the 3.5GHz mark to deliver the best compromise between capacity and coverage.
European regulators have identified the 3.4-3.8GHz band and plan to harmonise it to make it suitable for 5G. It will be the main frequency band for the launch of 5G.
Above 6GHz, aka the ‘super data layer’, uses higher frequency millimetre-wave (mmWave) spectrum to deliver high data rates for specific use cases. Europe has agreed to harmonise frequencies in the 24.25-27.5GHz band, although it’s commonly referred to the 26GHz band. It will be the key enabler of future 5G services and be critical to 5G networks.
It is highly like that additional spectrum will be opened up or auctioned for 5G use, and work is ongoing to identify what that spectrum might be. For example, Ofcom plans to put the 37-43.5 and 66-71GHz bands forward for discussion at the World Radio communications Conference 2019 (WRC-19) in late 2019. It may also raise the 32GHz (31.8 – 33.4GHz) band for further discussion.
The first auction of 5G spectrum concluded in April 2018 when Ofcom sold 150MHz of 3.4GHz spectrum previously used by the Ministry of Defence. All four operators secured spectrum, although the fifth bidder, Airspan Spectrum Holdings, failed in its bid. The 3.4GHz spectrum will be used for – and central to – rolling out 5G networks.
Ofcom also auctioned off 40MHz of 2.3GHz spectrum (also recovered from the MoD) for immediate use to provide additional capacity for existing networks, which can also be used for 5G in the future. O2 won all the available 2.3GHz spectrum.
Interesting what 'delivers its full potential' means?
Also its interesting to learn that the 2.3GHz and 3.4GHz spectrum bands were used previously by the Ministry Of Defence. What for? A valid question is it not??? Military spectrum bands being released to the public ... sounds like the USA here ... and what spectrum bands is the M.O.D working on now? Doing what?
Don't believe the shit that 5G hasn't been tested before being rolled out. This report from 5G.Co.UK kind of confirms that someone in the UK MOD knows that they frequency bands do .... that's why they are now being released for the public to use. Doesn't sound like its for the good of the UK public does it?
(5G.co.uk): 5G needs to be able to access enough spectrum to keep up with the super high demands that are expected of it. But the spectrum also needs to be versatile enough for all different usage scenarios, which will likely mean using multiple different frequency bands.
Each operator will need a wide block of spectrum in the different bands in order to allow the data throughput required for 5G. Furthermore, mobile spectrum will need to be globally harmonised to ensure 5G delivers its full potential.
While not all the 5G spectrum bands have been finalised yet there’s a lot of research taking place and we’re narrowing down on the bands we’re likely to see used.
Ofcom, its European counterparts and the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) have worked with other international organisations to ensure there is global harmonisation over the spectrum to be used for 5G. There is no indication that Ofcom will move away from any agreements already reached for 5G frequencies within Europe once the UK leaves the EU. So far, three main spectrum bands that have been specified for use in 5G:
Sub 1GHz, dubbed the ‘coverage layer’, will provide wide area and deep indoor coverage, and in Europe encompasses the 700MHz band. These frequencies will combine with the next band to enable operators to roll out 5G quickly and more cost-effectively.
1GHz-6GHz, aka the ‘coverage and capacity layer’, relies on C-band spectrum around the 3.5GHz mark to deliver the best compromise between capacity and coverage.
European regulators have identified the 3.4-3.8GHz band and plan to harmonise it to make it suitable for 5G. It will be the main frequency band for the launch of 5G.
Above 6GHz, aka the ‘super data layer’, uses higher frequency millimetre-wave (mmWave) spectrum to deliver high data rates for specific use cases. Europe has agreed to harmonise frequencies in the 24.25-27.5GHz band, although it’s commonly referred to the 26GHz band. It will be the key enabler of future 5G services and be critical to 5G networks.
It is highly like that additional spectrum will be opened up or auctioned for 5G use, and work is ongoing to identify what that spectrum might be. For example, Ofcom plans to put the 37-43.5 and 66-71GHz bands forward for discussion at the World Radio communications Conference 2019 (WRC-19) in late 2019. It may also raise the 32GHz (31.8 – 33.4GHz) band for further discussion.
The first auction of 5G spectrum concluded in April 2018 when Ofcom sold 150MHz of 3.4GHz spectrum previously used by the Ministry of Defence. All four operators secured spectrum, although the fifth bidder, Airspan Spectrum Holdings, failed in its bid. The 3.4GHz spectrum will be used for – and central to – rolling out 5G networks.
Ofcom also auctioned off 40MHz of 2.3GHz spectrum (also recovered from the MoD) for immediate use to provide additional capacity for existing networks, which can also be used for 5G in the future. O2 won all the available 2.3GHz spectrum.
Wednesday, 3 April 2019
Brussels Becomes First Major City to Halt 5G Due to Health Effects
So, why is this NO surprise at all? The city which houses the EU HEADQUARTERS becomes the first city to halt 5G due to health effects. Really? How coincidental is that??? We can't have the EU parliamentary members and staff having brain tumours, heart attacks and worse can we? Someone has to be there to control the decimated population of the European Union?
(Take Back Your Power:) Great news. A Belgian government minister has announced that Brussels is halting its 5G plans due to health effects. The statement was made by Céline Fremault, the Minister of the Government of the Brussels-Capital Region, responsible for Housing, Quality of Life, Environment and Energy. From an interview last Friday, with L’Echo:
"I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must protect the citizen, are not respected, 5G or not. The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything to doubt.” – Céline Fremault, Minister of the Government (Brussels-Captial Region), responsible for Housing, Quality of Life, Environment and Energy
Ms. Fremault accurately identified that a 5G pilot project is not compatible with Belgian radiation safety standards (9 V/m, or 95 mW/m2 according to this online converter), and stated that she does not intend to make an exception. (In the Building Biology guidelines, the threshold for extreme concern is 1 mW/m2. However, many government agencies still only consider thermal effects, instead of the cumulative body of thousands of peer-reviewed scientific studies.)
Perhaps with Brussels heading up the European Union, and with one of the two major 5G appeals being addressed to the EU, officials there are better informed and motivated to protect themselves...read more>>>...
Still think it coincidence???? By the way 'Too far Gone' by Status Quo is playing at this exact moment with very poignant lyrics:
You've been looking like a low down liquor drinking money grabber
I don't wanna see you looking this way
It's a crime the way you're carrying on
You'll keep it up till you're too far gone
Yeh yeh, yeh yeh
You took off with a no-good double dealing money maker
It's too bad your head was up in the clouds
It's a shame you didn't get what you want
Don't wait forever, it's too far gone
You said goodbye, you'd never listen
You couldn't be wrong
And now it's over it's not so easy
To say it's all gone
If you wanna play a bad game, you've got to be a good player
It don't matter if you win or you lose
No one cares if you're right of wrong
You only win when you're too far gone
You're running wild living out your fantasy life
And ev'rybody knows the game by the look in your eyes
(Take Back Your Power:) Great news. A Belgian government minister has announced that Brussels is halting its 5G plans due to health effects. The statement was made by Céline Fremault, the Minister of the Government of the Brussels-Capital Region, responsible for Housing, Quality of Life, Environment and Energy. From an interview last Friday, with L’Echo:
"I cannot welcome such technology if the radiation standards, which must protect the citizen, are not respected, 5G or not. The people of Brussels are not guinea pigs whose health I can sell at a profit. We cannot leave anything to doubt.” – Céline Fremault, Minister of the Government (Brussels-Captial Region), responsible for Housing, Quality of Life, Environment and Energy
Ms. Fremault accurately identified that a 5G pilot project is not compatible with Belgian radiation safety standards (9 V/m, or 95 mW/m2 according to this online converter), and stated that she does not intend to make an exception. (In the Building Biology guidelines, the threshold for extreme concern is 1 mW/m2. However, many government agencies still only consider thermal effects, instead of the cumulative body of thousands of peer-reviewed scientific studies.)
Perhaps with Brussels heading up the European Union, and with one of the two major 5G appeals being addressed to the EU, officials there are better informed and motivated to protect themselves...read more>>>...
Still think it coincidence???? By the way 'Too far Gone' by Status Quo is playing at this exact moment with very poignant lyrics:
You've been looking like a low down liquor drinking money grabber
I don't wanna see you looking this way
It's a crime the way you're carrying on
You'll keep it up till you're too far gone
Yeh yeh, yeh yeh
You took off with a no-good double dealing money maker
It's too bad your head was up in the clouds
It's a shame you didn't get what you want
Don't wait forever, it's too far gone
You said goodbye, you'd never listen
You couldn't be wrong
And now it's over it's not so easy
To say it's all gone
If you wanna play a bad game, you've got to be a good player
It don't matter if you win or you lose
No one cares if you're right of wrong
You only win when you're too far gone
You're running wild living out your fantasy life
And ev'rybody knows the game by the look in your eyes
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)