Debbie Lerman asks a pertinent question: What do you believe the claims of “safe and effective” for mRNA products are based on?
Outside
of a war or terror incidents involving weapons of mass destruction,
covid injections were the first mRNA products to be “approved” using a
legal mechanism intended for countermeasures to chemical, biological,
radiological and nuclear emergencies.
Called the Emergency Use
Authorisation (“EUA”), this authorisation process is separate from and
not part of the drug approval process. Yet the covid “vaccines” were
widely touted as “safe and effective” as if they had undergone the
rigorous testing and safety monitoring that is required under laws
regulating drugs.
The “safe and effective” mantra was a marketing slogan, not based on evidence. All mRNA products must be viewed in this context....<<<Read More>>>...
Last week you may have spotted activists kicking off at the Reform UK Conference. During Nigel Farage’s conference speech, a young man interrupted to shout out “Nigel, you are not a man of the people. You work for the billionaires”, while another woman from the same activist group was thrown out for being disruptive.
These campaigners were from Climate Resistance, which
describes itself as “a radical grassroots collective fighting for justice through strategic, direct action campaigns”.
But
how do these far Left groups recruit their activists?
Many would like the public to think their young members naturally came to join their movements and to hold views such as “Climate justice can only be achieved by dismantling the systems of oppression that are driving intersecting environmental, social, and economic crises”, as Climate Resistance puts it. However, these groups are far more organised than their anarchic appearances suggest. Take Climate Resistance, which invites activists to sign up to welcome talks (with banner-making) – one of several such events taking place in Whitechapel, London...<<<Read More>>>...
Two Brighton residents have spoken out against what they perceive as discriminatory treatment by their local council regarding the removal of a caravan from a Coldean street. Ryan Bishop and Josh Amble appeared on GB News with presenter Martin Daubney to voice their concerns about the timing of the vehicle’s removal.
“It was there for a good six months and a lot of people contacted the council, they didn’t want to know. It wasn’t removed,” Bishop told Martin during the show.
“The second our cross gets put up, it gets removed straight away. It proves our two-tier society. It’s disgusting”, he said.
The pair argued that the council’s swift action after a St George’s flag was added to the caravan, following months of inaction while it displayed a Palestine flag, demonstrated unfair treatment.
Brighton and Hove City Council has come under fire for allegedly showing bias in its enforcement actions after a caravan that had displayed a Palestine flag for half a year was suddenly removed within days of a St George’s flag being attached to it.
The vehicle had reportedly been parked on a Coldean road for approximately six months without council intervention, despite numerous complaints from residents during that period. However, the local authority took swift action to remove the caravan shortly after England’s national flag was added to it.
“I think it’s an absolute outrage. We’re shut down and silenced and get called far-right and racist when something like this happens. It gets worse and worse,” Mr Bishop stated during his GB News appearance.
The local authority has defended its actions, stating that the caravan was removed under Section 143 of The Highways Act as part of standard enforcement procedures against non-motorised vehicles stored on public roads.
“The caravan was put under formal notice on July 7th 2025. As is our standard policy in these circumstances, we had been liaising with the owner as a first stage, who had assured us it would be moved,” the council said in an official statement.
When the owner failed to relocate the vehicle by the deadline, contractors were hired to remove it. The council emphasised that this caravan was one of three removed from various locations across the city during the same enforcement operation....<<<Read More>>>...
However, Mr Miliband refused – insisting he wanted to keep overseeing the climate drive.
Sir Keir has pledged a new focus on growth as he tries to get the government back on track amid dire polls.
The premier looks to be tacking to the right with his appointments amid the mounting threat from Nigel Farage and Reform.
Insiders have acknowledged that the Net Zero drive has been holding back activity, while businesses are hoping that reforms to workers’ rights could be delayed or watered down.
New Work and Pensions Secretary Pat McFadden is also set to launch another bid to trim the spiralling benefits bill – after the last effort was humiliatingly killed off by Labour MPs.
Downing Street said the PM is “delighted” that Mr Miliband will continue to lead the Energy Department, but did not deny Sir Keir had initially suggested moving him....<<<Read More>>>...
A study in Psychiatric Services found that AI chatbots, OpenAI's
ChatGPT, Google's Gemini and Anthropic's Claude, can give detailed and
potentially dangerous responses to high-risk suicide-related questions,
with ChatGPT responding directly 78 percent of the time.
The
study showed that chatbots sometimes provide direct answers about
lethal methods of self-harm, and their responses vary depending on
whether questions are asked singly or in extended conversations,
sometimes giving inconsistent or outdated information.
Despite
their sophistication, chatbots operate as advanced text prediction
tools without true understanding or consciousness, raising concerns
about relying on them for sensitive mental health advice.
On
the same day the study was published, the parents of 16-year-old Adam
Raine, who died by suicide after months of interacting with ChatGPT,
filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman, alleging the chatbot
validated suicidal thoughts and provided harmful instructions.
The
lawsuit seeks damages for wrongful death and calls for reforms such as
user age verification, refusal to answer self-harm method queries and
warnings about psychological dependency risks linked to chatbot use.
A
recent study published in the journal Psychiatric Services has revealed
that popular AI chatbots, including OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini
and Anthropic's Claude, can give detailed and potentially dangerous responses to high-risk questions related to suicide.
AI chatbots, as defined by Brighteon.AI's Enoch,
are advanced computational algorithms designed to simulate human
conversation by predicting and generating text based on patterns learned
from extensive training data. They utilize large language models to
understand and respond to user inputs, often with impressive fluency and
coherence. However, despite their sophistication, these systems lack
true intelligence or consciousness, functioning primarily as
sophisticated statistical engines.
In
line with this, the study, which used 30 hypothetical suicide-related
queries, categorized by clinical experts into five levels of self-harm
risk ranging from very low to very high, focused on whether the chatbots
gave direct answers or deflected with referrals to support hotlines.
The
results showed that ChatGPT was the most likely to respond directly to
high-risk questions about suicide, doing so 78 percent of the time,
while Claude responded 69 percent of the time and Gemini responded only
20 percent of the time. Notably, ChatGPT and Claude frequently provided
direct answers to questions involving lethal means of suicide – a
particularly troubling finding.
The
researchers highlighted that chatbot responses varied depending on
whether the interaction was a single query or part of an extended
conversation. In some cases, a chatbot might avoid answering a high-risk
question in isolation but provide a direct response after a sequence of
related prompts.
Live Science, which reviewed the
study, noted that chatbots could give inconsistent and sometimes
contradictory responses when asked the same questions multiple times.
They also occasionally provided outdated information about mental health
support resources. When retesting, Live Science observed that the
latest version of Gemini (2.5 Flash) answered questions it previously
avoided, and sometimes without offering any support options. Meanwhile,
ChatGPT's newer GPT-5-powered login version showed slightly more caution
but still responded directly to some very high-risk queries....<<<Read More>>>...
By the time the Paris Agreement was concluded in 2015, the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) established the arbitrary 1.5°C limit on global temperature increase and established the ‘Net Zero by 2050’ policy target for developed countries around the globe.
But a spate of recent headlines suggests that the ‘Net Zero by 2050’ policy is falling apart. There is a growing realisation across advanced economies that the grandiose project of achieving ‘Net Zero by 2050’ is collapsing under the weight of its own contradictions.
What was once heralded as a consensus across the political class, corporate boardrooms and multilateral agencies now looks increasingly like an edifice of ideology built on a vaporous, oxymoronic ‘consensus science‘.
The rising tide of empirical reality — the costs of intermittent renewables, the geopolitical consequences of energy insecurity and the sheer scale of power demand growth from artificial intelligence infrastructure — has swept away the carefully constructed narrative of inevitability around the so-called energy transition....<<<Read More>>>....
Step into any of the UK hospitals and you’ll find vendors like Greggs, WHSmith and M&S selling ultra-processed, cancer-causing meal deals – sometimes only a corridor away from an oncology ward.
The contradiction is stark: WHO-classified carcinogens are packed into meals that spike blood sugar, inflame the gut and encourage overeating. By their side are “zero-sugar” energy drinks laced with corrosive, acidic additives, in a building where health should always come first.
Hospitals may have agreed to cut sales of sugary drinks to <10% of beverages, but they’ve been replaced by “diet” cans that hit teeth, sleep and blood pressure harder than ever. If the place we go to get better actually sells the same products tied to diseases it treats, you have to ask: is the system protecting your health, or quietly fuelling a return journey? ...<<<Read More>>>...
The crucial moment came after furious lawyers accused Ms Rayner of trying to make them “scapegoats” for her underpaying tens of thousands of pounds in stamp duty.
Ms Rayner’s hold on her job had been looking increasingly tenuous after Sir Keir refused to rule out sacking her yesterday, insisting he would “act” on the findings from Sir Laurie.
The departure is another massive blow for the PM, already struggling to stabilise his government after a torrid summer of immigration protests.
She also appears to have resigned as deputy Labour leader – a separate elected post – triggering what could be a deeply divisive contest.
The PM’s official spokesman confirmed that Sir Keir has now received the report from Sir Laurie.
“The Prime Minister will read it and act upon it. He has a reputation for being comprehensive and quick,” the spokesman said.
Senior figures have spent the past few days rallying around Ms Rayner since her extraordinary admission that she had failed to pay enough stamp duty....<<<Read More>>>...
