Devasting Day in Merseyside Begs Many Questions

 A simple question (Or two) to ask ... why was a local hospital A&E department on stand by two hours before this occurrence, ready for an event of this kind?

Why were there snipers on the roofs around the celebrations?

Why did the '53 year old man' look more like someone 30 years younger than that age in the videos?

Why was the car being attacked by crowds leading up to the incident?

 Where did the car's registration plate go .... it suddenly disappeared in one of the videos?

Why was the WIFI down in the area of Liverpool that the event took place? 

 +++++++++++++++

The question I have is why many people do so right across the world seem to be completely losing their heads and doing such insane, bizarre and dangerous things. Yesterday’s events in Liverpool where a car ploughed through crowds of people injuring at least 50, including children wasn’t a carefully planned attack coordinated for a reason of some kind, it seems at least at the moment that a 53-year-old man lost himself for a few seconds, and its not an isolated case these days.

Why?

Emotions are very high across the UK today and that’s understandable, yesterday’s events have shaken people, at what should have been a day of celebrating in the city of Liverpool where thousands of fans from parading through the streets celebrating Liverpool Football Clubs recent league title win and then suddenly around 6pm the whole day changed. A 53 year old British man was stuck in traffic caused by the crowd, I mean this parade was advertised for weeks, so why you’d go out in the car knowing there it thousands of people on the streets is a question to ask first of all, but while stuck in the car with streams of fans walking past he simply decides to put his foot to the floor and drive into the crowd of people....<<<Read More>>>

Secret Underwater Military Base: Diego Garcia – A Black Project Military Base With Secrets To Hide

-Diego Garcia is a 17 sq. mile horseshoe-shaped atoll in the Indian Ocean’s Chagos Archipelago. It has a tropical climate with thick jungles and white sand beaches.

-The island’s value is its strategic location between East Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia, making it a vital asset for supplying US naval forces and projecting air power into Asia and the Middle East.

-During the Cold War, Britain agreed to lease Diego Garcia to the American military for the construction of a naval base on the island.

-To make way for the base some 2,000 native Chagossians were forcibly removed from the island by the British government between 1968 and 1973. The islanders have since sued unsuccessfully for the right to return home.

-An estimated 3,000-5,000 military and civilian personnel now live on Diego Garcia, most of them American and British.

The US military base on the island of Diego Garcia (aka Camp Justice aka ) and owned by the UK is one of the most strategically located and secretive U.S. military installations outside the United States.

It is known as a top-secret CIA prison where terror suspects are interrogated and tortured. Diego Garcia’s history includes disclosures by Washington insiders, military strategists, and exiled islanders, as well as hundreds of declassified documents.

Investigators long suspected the island was a clandestine CIA “black site” for high-profile detainees, although actions of the US and UK Military have been so covert that proof is not so easy to find, until now. The official name of the base is British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) Diego Garcia is thought to be the most environmentally pristine atolls in the world. The official name of the military base is Camp Thunder Cove.

“Today, the main island of Diego Garcia is America’s largest military base in the world, outside the US. There are more than 4,000 troops, two bomber runways, thirty warships and a satellite spy station. The Pentagon calls it an “indispensable platform” for policing the world. It was used as a launch pad for the invasions of both Afghanistan and Iraq”.

In 2007, the Pentagon granted a $32 million contract to add a submarine base to the island’s existing dock.

This small cluster of atolls was once home to some 2,000 Chagossians who had lived there for generations. The most populated island is Diego Garcia whose resident islanders lived by working the coconut plantations, farming on small plots of land, and fishing for lobster.

In 1966, the UK and the US implemented a joint military strategy and the archipelago was leased to the US for 50 years, until 2016. The purpose was to build a US military base on Diego Garcia. Although no money was ever received by the UK government, documents reveal that the US gave the UK a $14 million discount on the purchase of missiles.

However, the big problem with this plan was that the islands were already inhabited. The UK government expelled the islanders by force. The 50 year lease expires in 2016, which meant the exiled residents could now return to the island of Diego Garcia.

As if the story could not get any more evil, it took another sinister turn in 2010 when the UK government established a marine protected area (MPA) around the islands claiming that there would cease to be “”human footprints” or “Man Fridays” on the islands moving forward. This has also fostered a rare alliance between environmentalists and the U.S. military...<<<Read More>>>...

Nearly 10K Military Personnel From 110 Nations In Wuhan China Weeks Before Coronavirus Outbreak!

[David Icke]: An important update regarding Wuhan China, which is ground zero for the coronavirus / Covid-19 outbreak, now reported to have gone global, as the Chinese government has now banned people in Wuhan from leaving their homes altogether.

One aspect which is very interesting and has been covered extensively here is Event 201. The exercise simulating a global coronavirus pandemic took place on October 18th 2019 only 6 weeks before the first case of the virus was reported in Wuhan China.

What not many people are talking about is that on this exact same day, October 18th, the 2019 Military World Games held its opening ceremony followed by a U.S. men’s soccer match in Wuhan China, ground zero of the outbreak!

This report explores the possibility of a covert operation, which may have coincided with this event, using the event as cover to gain access to China, as nearly 10,000 military personnel from 110 countries were all in Wuhan China at the same time, only weeks before the outbreak began....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>....

A Must Watch (Before it disappears)

 This is a very interesting video presentation by Max Igran at Crowhouse. Instead of running with the misinformed alternative theories of CGI (Computer generated imagery), Max presents his findings (Based on pure observation) that the Christchurch event was a 'Black Ops' event undertaken by a Manchurian assassin, that went wrong somehow.... I guarantee this video will be pulled in the next few days so get watching now ...

Why was Brighteon.com threatened with “annihilation” for hosting NZ shooting videos, but Netflix glorifies mass murderers with popular documentaries?

Natural News; In the wake of New Zealand’s worst mass murder, in which avowed “eco-fascist” and Communist Chinese sympathizer Brenton Tarrant killed 50 worshipers in two Christchurch mosques, the Leftist Kiwi government has responded predictably: by limiting speech and curbing gun rights.

In other words, the reaction of the government has been to punish the vast majority of its citizens for the actions of a single madman.

Because Tarrant live-streamed his attack on social media, the video immediately became available to anyone around the world who had access to the platform. That’s a big deal in New Zealand because of a law known as the Films Videos and Publications Classification Act,” which relates to the censorship of books, films, videos, and other publications.

According to the New Zealand government website, the law targets for censorship any materials that, if published, would “be injurious to the public good.” Such material includes any that depicts “harm to a person’s body whether it involves infliction of pain or not…or self-inflicted death,” and “conduct that, if imitated, would pose a real risk of serious harm to self or others or both.” among other provisions.

Fine. New Zealand is a sovereign country. It can pass its own laws. That said, the country’s legal jurisdiction should end at its own shores, but in the ‘connected’ world, that’s not the case.

Because New Zealand forbids anyone to host or share Tarrant’s video, somehow that prohibition applies equally to American video hosting services as well — like Brighteon, the free-speech, anti-censorship platform built by Natural News founding editor Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.

In recent days, as Adams noted in a statement, Brighteon has been threatened with destruction if all versions of the video posted there were not immediately removed. The question is, why?

Is the video chilling? Yes. Does it portray unspeakable violence and death? Yes. Is it sadistic and cruel? No doubt. But it’s hosted on an American site, not a New Zealand site, so that shouldn’t be an issue. While New Zealand doesn’t have a First Amendment, America does and so as long as the end hosting site is on American soil, there should be nothing a speech Nazi from half a world away can do about it.

And yet…
Why are other platforms getting away with it?

What’s flagrantly ironic and hypocritical about this is that Netflix and other streaming services that use the same global Internet infrastructure can host and show similar content all day, every day. Whether the content that is being hosted and offered for streaming is fiction or real, Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, and others aren’t facing global Internet censorship for it.

Does that kind material exist on the servers of “mainstream” video and streaming services? You bet it does. A person can view photographs of Civil War dead on Netflix; on YouTube, you can see actual footage of fighters in Syria the moment they are shot and killed; on Amazon, you can download or stream hundreds of graphic, violent movies or war documentaries; and so on.

So what’s the problem? Is it that the Leftist New Zealand government doesn’t want to upset Muslims? Okay, but on YouTube, you can see actual footage of Islamic State fighters executing captives by shooting them in the head. Is that okay?...read more>>>...

The Christchurch Massacre - An Independent Analysis

It's time to step back and see the BIGGER picture. Not jump to the conclusions they expect us to jump to.

What Really Happened and Why The Reaction?

Wake up world, we are being played! There clearly is something VERY manufactured and pre-rehearsed about the Christchurch 'events'. it's very sad news about the apparent loss of lives that happened on that day.

But ...

There is also so much about the situation, and the media/government reaction around it, that clearly isn't right. Worldwide condemnation and widespread outrage is the reaction that those who created this. It is NOT the act of one single man.

It is a planned and staged event that was created to make the entire world react with 'something must be done' ... a classic problem-reaction-solution. Very quickly the governments are revealing the solutions they had all along, as they knew this event was going to happen. The NZ government had a 700 PAGE gun law manifesto ready days later. You know from the Brexit mess how long legislation takes to be put together. Less than a week to create a new law about guns??? Come on people ... we are being played.

I've not seen the video footage myself, but I've read dozens of comments from those that have. I seen photographs and excerpts from the video that definitely proof 100% that there was something staged about the live feed and the shooting. The evidence is compelling. There is also important parts relating to the shooters background kept hidden from the general public (He is suspected to be a hire assassin or Black Ops operative who has travelled all over the world buying weapons).

And it is also VERY scary what the governments of the world are now trying to make happen after this event YET THEY NEVER DID ANYTHING LIKE THIS when countless hundreds of life were ended by terrorist bullets & guns in the last few years. I read there was an event back in 1997 at Luxor where 62 innocent tourists where murdered ... The Luxor massacre was the killing of 62 people, mostly tourists, on 17 November 1997, at Deir el-Bahari, an archaeological site and major tourist attraction across the Nile from Luxor, Egypt . It is thought to have been instigated by exiled leaders of al-Jama'a al-Islamiyya, an Egyptian Islamist organization. Nothing like the level of control and outrage occurred then ... or since ...

So WHY this questionable event? What is really behind all of this. Is it the event that takes away all our freedoms? We need to all WAKE UP and question; not take this grab at our freedom lightly.

We need to react to the governments decision to take away our freedoms. And also question why have so many thousands of innocent lives by acts of terrorism not had a similar reaction? Why this event? What is really going on?

This is the next 9/11!  

What are they trying to hide? Out of all the violent videos on the ‘net, possessing the NZ mosque shooting video can now get you 10 years in prison

Natural News: Something is incredibly fishy about the New Zealand mosque shooting and how governments and the media have responded to it. Governments are now going to extraordinary lengths to eliminate the video from the internet while criminalizing anyone who dares possess it or distribute it.

An 18-year-old man was arrested in New Zealand for merely sharing the live stream video of the Christchurch shooting. “The live stream video of the shootings in Christchurch has been classified by the Chief Censor’s Office as objectionable,” reports Radio NZ. “Police said anyone in possession of the video of the shootings, or found to be distributing it, could face imprisonment.”

This means, essentially, that linking to content the government doesn’t like is now a crime in New Zealand.

So wait a minute. YouTube alone hosts countless murder videos covering everything from war-time military shootings to civilian gunfight videos in which people are fatally shot and killed. Yet possessing those videos — or sharing them, or posting them — apparently isn’t a crime in New Zealand or anywhere in the western world.

Assassination videos of former U.S. President John F. Kennedy being shot in the head are not censored online. They are considered part of the “historical record.” Yet wasn’t that shooting just as violent and just as hateful as the Christchurch shooting in New Zealand?

So what is it about this particular shooting that has governments in a total frenzy to terrorize citizens into deleting all the copies they might possess? Could it be that the attack was, according to this one analysis, carried out by a special ops military team that also carried out the attack on the North Korean embassy in Spain, as reported by Disobedient Media?...read more>>>...

Analysis: Were California fires set by Direct Energy Weapons? Probably not, but here’s why the idea is going viral

Natural News: The internet is abuzz with analysis of the California fires, and some observers note that the videos and photos from the fire are showing a surprising number of anomalies that don’t seem possible to have occurred through “natural” fires. This article from ChemtrailPlanet.com offers a typical description of the strangeness now being observed with these fires:

"The news tried to give the impression that the over 100 fires (in 2017) that occurred all at once were from a forest fire spreading into neighborhoods. Yet, most of the trees didn’t burn and there is no burnt path between houses that are next to or across from each other. Notice in the picture on the left how that there was no burnt path between the two buildings and how that though both buildings were surrounded by trees, none of the trees got burnt or even singed. It is plain to see from this picture that a fire didn’t go from one building to the other, but that they were both attacked from above or inside."

Many people believe the U.S. government is behind the fires, using “Direct Energy Weapons” (DEW) to target the area for destruction in a way that can be easily blamed on wildfires: The evidence that the fires were a result of directed energy weapons (DEW), at least in part, is undeniably strong. There are also theories of smart meters or transformers blowing up being a cause. They might have contributed, (but that wouldn’t explain cars also being “toasted” with no burnt path between the house and the car), and the evidence that can be seen is that of directed energy weapons. It is not at all unfathomable that more than one weapon could have been used to ensure the desired effect...read more>>>...