The Billionaire-Funded Networks that Draw Young People into the Nutty World of Doctrinaire Far-Left Activism

 Last week you may have spotted activists kicking off at the Reform UK Conference. During Nigel Farage’s conference speech, a young man interrupted to shout out “Nigel, you are not a man of the people. You work for the billionaires”, while another woman from the same activist group was thrown out for being disruptive. 

These campaigners were from Climate Resistance, which describes itself as “a radical grassroots collective fighting for justice through strategic, direct action campaigns”.

But how do these far Left groups recruit their activists? 

Many would like the public to think their young members naturally came to join their movements and to hold views such as “Climate justice can only be achieved by dismantling the systems of oppression that are driving intersecting environmental, social, and economic crises”, as Climate Resistance puts it. However, these groups are far more organised than their anarchic appearances suggest. Take Climate Resistance, which invites activists to sign up to welcome talks (with banner-making) – one of several such events taking place in Whitechapel, London...<<<Read More>>>...

Online Safety Act: UK government’s global censorship has turned up a notch

 This week, the UK government has openly moved from using the Online Safety Act for age verification to using it for censorship.

On Monday, the Government announced urgent action to strengthen the Online Safety Act by amending it to classify content encouraging or assisting serious self-harm as a “priority offence” for all users, not just children.

This change will legally require tech companies to proactively use cutting-edge technology to hunt down and remove such material before it can reach users, rather than simply reacting after it has been published.

As with all these nefarious schemes, who decides what content causes “self-harm”? It is open-ended and can be applied to just about any content – which is the intention.

The following are extracts from the article ‘UK OSA moves past age assurance into censorship with self-harm content designation’ published by Biometric Update on 9 September 2025.

The UK government continues to build out the Online Safety Act (“OSA”), this week announcing tighter legal requirements for platforms to locate and remove material that encourages or assists serious self-harm.

The change means that platforms will have the responsibility to ensure content previously subject to age assurance regulations, which is also being made illegal, is intercepted and removed before reaching children or adult users.

The move is just the first in what is expected to be a series of amendments toughening the OSA by new Technology Secretary Liz Kendall. Ofcom is expected to publish a register of regulated services soon, MLex reports, after the government’s approach to categorisation was upheld in court.

A release from the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (“DSIT”) says the OSA will be amended to classify self-harm content as a “priority offence.” It specifies that, while the measure is partly to protect children from content that promotes suicide, eating disorders and “online challenges or hoaxes that may encourage someone to take part in an activity that could cause them harm,” it also aims to help adults with mental health challenges avoid bogus medical advice and potential triggers....<<<Read More>>>...

We’re about to enter ‘false flag’ season

 You probably haven’t even heard of it, because that is what happens when the government and their lapdog mainstream media want something to pass without public scrutiny.

They simply don’t talk about it until it’s already well on the way to becoming law, or in some cases, already has.

Big Brother Watch in the UK were one of very few voices pointing out the obvious implications of such a bill coming into law.

Nearly all the bills that the government gets over the line, are there with the sole intention of giving them more control, and giving you and I less control over our own lives, less freedoms, and less money in our pockets,

Some bills are about laying the groundwork for something else.

They are about taking away the checks and balances that would prevent the government, from doing something they already have planned for further down the line.

For instance, the World Health Organisation changed the definition of a pandemic to remove the words “with enormous numbers of deaths and illness”, meaning the powers that be, could later push the Covid button without the need for the deaths and illness to create a ‘pandemic’.

The definition of vaccine has also subtly changed to accommodate the introduction of mRNA technologies.

The newly adopted Data (Use and Access) Bill works on the same principle....<<<Read More>>>...

Your last chance to stop politicians introducing euthanasia to the UK

Sometime this month (September 2025), members of the House of Lords (possibly the most undemocratic and unrepresentative body in the world) will decide whether to approve the Leadbeater Bill to allow doctor-assisted suicide.

The House of Lords can stop this Bill dead in its tracks. It is a private member’s Bill, and the Government cannot force the Bill through.

The evidence showing that doctor-assisted suicide won’t be painless, dignified or quick is overwhelming.

And you’d have to be naïve and ignorant not to believe that if this Bill is passed then within a short time, doctor-assisted suicide will be available to children, the mentally ill, the poor, the unemployed, the disabled and the elderly.

That’s what always happens.

This is your last chance to have a voice.

Please buy a copy of Jack King’s book `Anyone who tells you that doctor-assisted suicide is always dignified and painless is lying: here’s the proof.’ Once you’ve read it, you will understand the terrifying truth about doctor-assisted suicide....<<<Read More>>>...

The left’s covert “dirty war” in Britain could lead to civil war – it’s not by accident, it’s their strategy

 Britain’s descent into civil war is not accidental, but rather a result of the country’s embrace of liberal dogma and the actions of its self-anointed managerial and political elite, Professor Michael Rainsborough writes.

The elite’s actions, which began as the Labour government’s policy of demographic transformation under Tony Blair, demonstrate a deliberate strategy to fracture society and rule by division.

The aim of imperial governance, Prof. Rainsborough says, “is to rule by division: to fracture society into communities, reward loyal in-groups and discriminate against the majority through a two-tier system of justice, policing and social policy. The new imperialists are ‘diversity coordinators’, anti-racism activists, curriculum de-colonisers, climate campaigners and their mission is unchanged: to manage society by division.”....<<<Read More>>>...

Imperial Predicted Hundreds of Heatwave Deaths – But Deaths Actually Went Down This Summer

To most of the population, this year’s spring and summer have somewhat mitigated the pain of the Government’s collision with reality – an unstoppable slow motion train wreck. 

A glorious spring was followed by weeks of sunshine, consistent with the theme of Britain’s regression to the politics and economy of the mid-1970s. 

There are those who have not enjoyed the burp of 1976, of course. Farmers, struggling with drought, report a disappointing harvest. And then there are the weather worriers – the climate alarmists who would turn any hint of joy into a harbinger of doom. And so it was this year – as was reported back in June – when heatwave hysteria set in. This summer’s heatwaves would be “deadly”, the worriers claimed. And they produced stats to prove it.

Following the June heatwave, Sky News reported that “London would have seen many fewer deaths in a world without climate change”. Based on analysis provided by the Grantham Institute at Imperial College London, a scary graph was produced, along with the claim that “263 people are thought to have lost their lives between June 23rd and July 2nd, as the sun roasted flats, tarmac and care homes”....<<<Read More>>>..

 

US Companies Take Ofcom to Court Over “Unlawful” Censorship Under Online Safety Act

 The implementation of the latest phase of the UK’s Online Safety Act (OSA) last month is already impacting on US tech firms, with X imposing age-restrictions on content relating to the grooming gangs in order to comply with its so-called child protection provisions. Elsewhere, tensions have been rising, with President Donald Trump needling Sir Keir Starmer over free speech on his recent visit, and a delegation of US lawmakers led by Republication Representative Jim Jordan blasting the state of UK free speech earlier this month. A State Department human-rights report has likewise warned of “serious restrictions” on free speech in Britain in the past year.

Now US firms and free-speech activists are taking the fight to Ofcom, the communications regulator, directly. Lawyers for 4chan, the anonymous image-board site, and Kiwi Farms, a “website and discussion forum that focuses on Internet culture”, have today filed a lawsuit against Ofcom in US federal court, the first of its kind.

As part of its enforcement regime for the new OSA rules, Ofcom has been issuing escalating compliance notices to the two sites over the past few months regarding their regulation of speech for UK users. But for a notice to be served by a foreign power against a US company, typically it would have to go through the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) to be valid, passing through both the US State Department and the Department of Justice....<<<Read More>>>...

Why Do Governments Keep Lying About Net Zero?

 Politicians keep repeating that Net Zero initiatives will save the planet, creating a cleaner, greener future, with cheaper bills and better jobs. The reality for ordinary people, however, is clear for all to see: higher household costs, more rules, and a creeping sense of control.

So, why does it always feel like there are other motives at play with all the Net Zero talk in the West? And, if so important, why aren’t major powers with huge populations, like China and India, following suit? Let’s untangle what’s going on, and how the story you’re being told doesn’t quite line up with the facts.

Net Zero plans continue getting more and more expensive as the years pass, yet people are told it won’t bankrupt their country. For example, the Climate Change Committee in the UK claims the long-term cost will average just 0.2% of GDP by 2050. In the US, Biden’s administration told us the Inflation Reduction Act signed in 2022 aimed to reduce inflation by investing in clean energy, as the “largest investment in climate jobs in history” which benefits “all Americans”.

So, why don’t the numbers match up? By 2030, Net Zero policies are expected to add £389 per year to every UK’s household energy bills, totalling £22.8 billion annually 

A 2025 report identified that if the UK had stuck with gas since 2006, consumers would have been £220 billion better off 

 In the US, the Inflation Reduction Act set aside $369 billion for subsidies, yet the cost of retrofitting a family home with insulation, solar panels, EV chargers and a heat pump is still estimated at $30,000 per property

Everyone’s paying more, so who’s getting the money? Energy companies, construction firms, renewable developers and global financial industries that trade in carbon credits. You’re continuously told that your costs are going to fall, but most reports point to further increases....<<<Read More>>>....

On The Verge

Starmer is deliberately breaking the country in order to force a backlash, after which he could invoke Blair's Civil Contingencies Act 2004. This act allows the the de-facto imposition of martial law, the seizing of property and assets, the freezing of bank accounts and the cancellation of elections. 

 Most importantly, the act does not preclude the utilisation of foreign "persons" should the "emergency" so demand. Such "persons" could be from NATO, the UN, EuroGendFor (Europe's paramilitary force) and Interpol. I strongly suspect a 250k strong UN army is already here, strategically garrisoned across the country. I also note Starmer will soon allow Blackrock to take over three main British ports. 

It need hardly be said that those who control the ports control the safe passage of containers bulging with smuggled AK-47s and such like. Blair's Civil Contingencies Act 2004 simply needs an "emergency" in order to enforce genuine totalitarianism, backed up by foreign soldiers. If we had patriotic senior military officers we would not be in this catastrophic position. .....<<<Read More>>>....
 

Home Office tenders for mass fatality tents – ‘what are they expecting?’ (planning)

 The Home Office has awarded a series of contracts to prepare for a ‘mass fatality’ scenario where casualties will need to be treated or stored in huge coronavirus pandemic-style marquees. In a chilling echo of the darkest days of the Covid-19 crisis, large structures are being ordered in preparation for what the department calls “a major incident resulting in a large number of fatalities which could overwhelm existing body storage capacity”.

During the pandemic, the Government and military constructed a series of enormous so-called Nightingale Hospitals after fears were raised that massive casualty numbers from Covid would overwhelm the NHS. As well as treatment beds, huge morgue facilities were also hastily constructed to bolster capacity.

Thankfully, many of the Nightingale facilities remained underused, but similar preparations now appear to be happening once again as part of the Home Office’s “Mass Fatality Capability Resilience Storage Framework”. Reacting to the publication of some of the contracts, Lee Nallalingham, the Interim Branch Chairman of Reform UK, Newham and Tower Hamlets, wrote on X: “This week the Home Office awarded contracts worth over £1m to prepare for a mass fatality event, including capacity to store up to 700 bodies.

Mr Nallalingham added: “What exactly are they expecting?”

One social media user added, “Logistically speaking, this is a good thing, in principle, in terms of progressing with storage in the eventuality something happens…however, it is equally terrifying that someone has assessed current storage and is predicting it is not enough.”...<<<Read More>>>.

...

The Truth About Britain’s Wildfires

 As you can see, about three quarters of the wildfire areas to date occurred in February and March, which as we know were very dry months this year. Clearly, however, this cannot be blamed on climate change because the Met Office keep telling us that winters are supposed to be getting wetter as a result!

But more to the point, that big spike in the first week of April was accounted for by a series of gigantic fires in the Mountains of Mourne, believed to have been started deliberately:

Since that outbreak, nothing out of the ordinary has occurred.

But behind all of this data, a real problem seems to be emerging, which has been picked up on X

Labour’s rewilding plans risk sparking a surge in wildfires across Britain, gamekeepers have claimed.

The Government is proposing to ban winter burning – a traditional upland management technique that reduces the amount of fuel for potential fires – from more than half of all peatland in England.

It is claimed the changes will help to “re-wet” Britain’s peat bogs, reduce the risk of wildfires and cut carbon emissions.

Environmentalists want to preserve peat bogs because they soak up vast quantities of carbon. But landowners and gamekeepers have claimed that, far from protecting the environment, the burning restrictions will instead leave Britain’s moors and heaths at the mercy of wildfires that will be “too large to fight”....<<<Read More>>>....

VPNs Now a Red Flag as Age-Check Lobby Cracks Down on Privacy

 A trade group representing companies that build age verification systems is now lobbying to extend these checks to anyone using a VPN in the UK. The Age Verification Providers Association (AVPA) wants online platforms that fall under the UK’s censorship law, the Online Safety Act, to not only detect VPN usage but also analyse user behaviour to guess whether someone might be a minor in disguise.

If flagged, users would face a prompt: prove your age, or allow a one-time geolocation to confirm you’re outside the UK.

According to the AVPA, this process is necessary because VPNs can mask users’ actual locations, allowing them to appear as though they are in countries where age verification laws do not apply. The association points to data showing a dramatic increase in VPN use around the time the UK’s new internet rules were enforced, suggesting people are using these tools to bypass restrictions.

This approach treats privacy tools as a form of defiance. Here, VPNs, once considered sensible and essential for online security, are being rebranded as suspicious.

Under the new logic, using a VPN could mean you are trying to break the rules. As the UK’s censorship machinery rolls out, AVPA wants to make sure even those trying to shield their data are pulled back into the system.

The justification is familiar: VPNs can hide user locations, letting people appear as though they are accessing the internet from places where the UK’s new rules do not apply. But rather than address the backlash driving VPN usage, AVPA is proposing a dragnet approach that monitors traffic patterns, assigns risk scores based on vague behavioral signals and then forces users to identify themselves or prove their physical location.

Privacy protections are being reclassified as regulatory gaps. VPNs, proxies and other location-masking tools are not illegal, but under the current model, platforms are discouraged from even mentioning them. And while Ofcom has stopped short of an outright ban, it has created a climate where using a VPN can make you a target for further scrutiny.....<<<Read More>>>...

Tommy Robinson and the Free Speech Festival: The establishment wants it stopped or disrupted

 Tommy Robinson is planning a large-scale demonstration in London on 13 September 2025, which he has dubbed a “free speech festival” and “Unite the Kingdom” event.

The event is being organised in the wake of his recent release from prison, and the establishment is still doing whatever it can to stop him.

As is becoming the norm in the UK, instead of pursuing the perpetrators, the establishment is pursuing those who speak about the perpetrators and their crimes.

In response to Robinson’s plans, multiple “anti-racist” groups, including Stand Up To Racism (“SUTR”), are organising a national mobilisation against the “far-right” and are hiring a coach to bus “protestors” to London for its “protest against Tommy Robinson.”

As we have previously noted, SUTR is a fringe communist organisation which stokes racism and xenophobia in the UK to overthrow parliamentary democracy. In a 2018 article, Politicalite exposed that local councils were funding this nefarious organisation.

But SUTR are not the only government-affiliated organisation that is organising counter-protests, and no doubt itching to cause trouble on the day. In an almost comical way, if it wasn’t so pathetically childish, the Public and Commercial Services Union (“PCS”) is calling its counter-demonstration a “march against Tommy Robinson.” ....<<<Read More>>>...

The Hypocrisy Of The Parasite Class

 No, it’s nothing to do with Ukrainian male escorts.

That’s still being kept under wraps.

No doubt a career ending revelation to be saved for the front pages should he cease to follow his masters orders.

No, this time the embarrassment comes as a result of his chief of staff, and apparent mastermind behind his rise to power, Morgan McSweeney.

You may recognise the name McSweeney as he is the man that formed the CCDH, the Center For Countering Digital Hate.

McSweeney kept his involvement with the CCDH behind closed doors, while their CEO and mouth Imran Ahmed gobbled on every microphone known to man.

I say ‘gobbled’ rather than ‘gobbles’, because he seems to have done a Lord Lucan in recent months, himself.

Maybe because the ‘Online Safety Bill’ that has nothing to do with safety, and everything to do with censorship, that the CCDH fought so hard to pass into law, has now done just that.

Imran and the CCDH have achieved their objective so maybe now they get to relax in the sunshine.

You see, the introduction of the Online ‘Protect the official narrative’ Bill isn’t the only objective achieved by the Morgan McSweeney founded CCDH.

They are the organisation that coined the term ‘The Disinformation Dozen’ to smear prominent medical professionals that were telling what has now been shown to be the truth, about the Covid 19 lockdowns, mask mandates, and poisonous injections.

In 2020 they suddenly morphed into an attack dog on behalf of big pharma, and the pro-lockdown tyrants in government.

They proudly had vast numbers of people who were rightly questioning the official Covid narrative deplatformed, including my father.

They openly gloated about it too.

After my speech in Trafalgar Square went viral in 2020, who did the Times newspaper go to in an attempt to smear me for telling the truth?

The CCDH.

After Covid, they morphed into peddlers of climate hoax propaganda, and silencers of dissenters in that arena, too.

Now, I say morphed because pro big pharma, and pro climate hysteria wasn’t their original gig.

Oh no, that you’ll be shocked to hear, was more related to Israel, and more specifically targeting those that dared to speak against the genocidal middle eastern state....<<<Read More>>>...

Driving Out The Poor: Dirty Truth Behind UK Emissions Zones

 Emission zones were introduced to city centres around the UK, sold as vital public health measures, to clean the air, save lives, and make polluters pay. 

Across the various schemes, over £1 billion has now been made in fines and fees since 2019, with London’s ULEZ generating over £250 million in a single year. 

With compliance rates now exceeding 96% in most areas, the air quality improvements are stagnating – or, in some cases, totally non-existent – but the cameras, charges, and penalties continue. 

Are they still reducing pollution, or have they evolved into something else entirely? ...<<<Read More>>>...

The new gulag: Mental health detentions and the criminalization of dissent

First, President Trump issues an executive order empowering federal agencies to clear out homeless encampments and lock up the homeless in mental institutions using involuntary civil commitment laws intended for dealing with individuals experiencing mental health crises.

Days later, a gunman allegedly suffering from a mental illness opens fire in New York City, killing four before turning the gun on himself.

Coming on the heels of Trump’s executive order aimed at “ending crime and disorder on America’s streets,” the shooting has all the makings of a modern-day Reichstag fire: a tragedy weaponized to justify allowing the government use mental illness as a pretext for locking more people up without due process.

An Orwellian exercise in doublespeak, Trump’s executive order suggests that jailing the homeless, rather than providing them with affordable housing, is the “compassionate” solution to homelessness.

According to USA Today, social workers, medical experts and mental health service providers say the president’s approach “will likely worsen homelessness across the country, particularly because Trump’s order contains no new funding for mental health or drug treatment. Additionally, they say the president appears to misunderstand the fundamental driver of homelessness: People can’t afford housing.”

And then comes the kicker: Trump wants to see more use of civil commitments (forced detentions) for anyone who is perceived as posing a risk “to themselves or the public or are living on the streets and cannot care for themselves in appropriate facilities for appropriate periods of time.”

Translation: the government wants to use homelessness as a pretext for indefinitely locking up anyone who might pose a threat to its chokehold on police state power....<<<Read More>>>...

Gas is Dirt Cheap. Only Politicians Make Energy Expensive

 The first homes in the UK to be supplied with electricity from a public network were connected in the 1880s. Over the next century, electrification became something we rightly took for granted but marked an entirely new epoch in human history. Then progress began to falter. The high point of civilisation was in fact its darkest turn, claimed environmentalists, whose ideas began to erode the very fabric of the grid. 

The primary fuels of electricity – coal and gas, in turn – had turned the skies against us. The idea of a continuous source of abundant and cheap power has become unfashionable in decision-making centres. And fundamental to their claim is that gas is too expensive and too environmentally damaging. We must accept greater cost and lower levels of service if the planet is to be saved, claim greens. When it is unpicked, what this mythology shows is that the virtues of the grid have already been dismantled....<<<Read More>>>...

Islamo-communism is used by Islamists to gain power – and then they turn on the communists

 Younes Sadaghiani grew up in Iran and has seen firsthand how the Islamic regime has poisoned Persian culture. He believes the Middle East is now at a turning point, with many countries in the region like the UAE and Saudi Arabia taking a softer approach to the Muslim faith.

Drawing from his personal experiences and understanding of the Islamification of Iran, Sadaghiani highlights how a similar process is occurring in the UK. One key indicator of this trend is communists collaborating with Islamists who are pursuing power.

Unfortunately for the leftists, once the Islamists achieve power, they turn against the communists, as evidenced in Iran after the Islamic Revolution, when many communists were executed by the then newly installed Islamic Republic.

Sadaghiani warned that people in Europe are starting to lose their identity as Islamic extremists are more prevalent in cities like London than in some Middle Eastern cities. “There are more Islamic extremists in London than there are in Tehran. Europe is losing this identity,” he said...<<<Read More>>>...

Labour to Reintroduce Grants for Electric Cars to ‘Bribe’ Motorists

 Labour will give out new grants for electric cars, the Department for Transport has confirmed, despite a previous scheme that failed to spark enthusiasm for EVs being scrapped three years ago. The Telegraph has more.

Drivers will be able to reduce the purchase cost of a new electric car by up to £3,750 for vehicles priced up to £37,000.

Officials hope the measure will encourage more drivers to switch to electric motoring, after Labour pledged to ban the sale of new fully petrol or diesel cars and vans from 2030.

The DfT said 33 new electric vehicle (EV) models were available for less than £30,000.

Heidi Alexander, the Transport Secretary, said: “This EV grant will not only allow people to keep more of their hard-earned money, it’ll help our automotive sector seize one of the biggest opportunities of the 21st century.

“And with over 82,000 public charge points now available across the UK, we’ve built the infrastructure families need to make the switch with confidence.”

Drivers buying electric cars can benefit from tax breaks if their employer has a company car scheme, but there have been no universally available grants since they were axed by the Conservative government in June 2022.

Labour has been criticised for its pledge on electric cars, with some motorists reluctant to switch to them for fear of being stranded on long journeys.

The grants will be funded through a new £650 million scheme, and the amount buyers can claim will be based on a car’s “sustainability criteria”, the DfT said.

The greenest vehicles will be in band one and eligible for grants of up to £3,750, while band two vehicles will receive up to £1,500.

Car manufacturers will be able to apply for the money through the electric car grant from Wednesday....<<<Read More>>>...

UK Parliament debates geoengineering and chemtrails; they are gaslighting us

 In December 2024, a petition to the UK Parliament was started requesting that all geo-engineering in the UK be outlawed. The petition was debated in the House of Commons on 23 June.

As expected, the debate, led by Liberal Democrat MPs, was used as an opportunity to push the climate change scam and deny that solar radiation management techniques, which include chemtrails, were being deployed in the UK.

One important thing to come out of the debate, as indicated by Roz Savage MP, is that there really is a cult belief that underpins the “climate change crisis” narrative....<<<Read More>>>....