COVID-19 vaccines risk shedding toxic particles to unvaccinated people, expert reveals

One of the earliest concerns about COVID-19 vaccines was the possibility of shedding, which authorities quickly dismissed and claimed was not possible based on how mRNA shots work. Although that concern has now been overshadowed by the many other negative effects of these jabs, it has now emerged that shedding can occur with the vaccines, putting people around those who have been recently vaccinated at risk.

Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance Co-Founder Dr. Pierre Kory, who has treated more than 1,000 patients experiencing symptoms after vaccination and those with long COVID, claimed at a recent conference in Phoenix: “Shedding is unfortunately real. The FDA knows that.”

When it comes to the concept of vaccine shedding, the common understanding of it involves the release of bacteria, viruses and other components from live vaccines. Since mRNA and adenovirus vaccines are not considered live vaccines, it is technically true that they therefore cannot shed, which is something fact checkers have been quick to point out online.

However, these vaccines function in a similar manner to gene therapy products, all of which, by the FDA’s own admission, do have a risk of shedding...<<<Read More>>>....

Is vaccine shedding possible? Over 1,000 reports say it’s real and it’s happening

 An analysis of over 1,000 reports of covid vaccine shedding reveals that the most common symptoms, by far, are gynaecological.

Outside of menstrual abnormalities, the most commonly reported symptoms include headaches, tinnitus, nosebleeds, bruising, dizziness, skin rashes and reactivation of latent conditions such as shingles.

The analysis also revealed that there are varying degrees of susceptibility to the effects of vaccine-shedding, different routes of exposure, different timings of the onset of symptoms after exposure and that young and healthy people tend to shed more frequently than the elderly.

In early 2022, A Midwestern Doctor (“AMD”) had personally come across a few compelling cases of menstrual-related vaccine-shedding injuries which were very difficult to ascribe to anything else. At the time the idea of vaccine shedding seemed to be a “radical idea.”

The world has changed a lot since that time, AMD wrote. “I believe the reality of ‘shedding injuries’ now has a similar degree of acceptance to what covid-19 vaccine injuries had two years ago.”

Adding, “I regret that it’s taken this long to get to this point and I feel really bad for the people who are suffering from this (e.g., a few of my patients), as it’s almost inevitable healthcare professionals will assume they are crazy and gaslight them about shedding.”

Covid vaccine shedding – becoming ill from vaccinated people – represents the one way the unvaccinated are also at risk from “vaccines” and hence still need to be directly concerned about them.

Speaking about vaccine shedding can be difficult for scientists and medical professionals because the topic runs the risk of causing division within the “freedom movement.” Resentful unvaccinated members of the public who have been subjected to vitriol can easily turn to using cutting comparisons such as “pure blood” versus “the vaccinated.” Another reason that makes vaccine shedding difficult to openly discuss is the risk of causing fear....<<<Read More>>>...

FDA Has Known About Vaccine Shedding for Years and Has Even Issued Guidance on How to Evaluate the Risk

 In 2015 the US Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) issued guidance on how to conduct shedding studies during the preclinical and clinical development of virus or bacteria-based gene therapy products. Shedding, as described by the FDA, is the excretion or release of a product from a vaccinated person’s body. The shed gene therapy product may be infectious and so raises safety concerns “related to the risk of transmission to untreated individuals.”

Various studies and documents, including a study by Pfizer, indicate vaccine shedding and transmission are occurring. Would you trust anything that’s shed from a Covid injection as good for you or anyone around you?

A University of Colorado study published in May provided evidence “for a new mechanism by which herd immunity may be manifested – the aerosol transfer of antibodies between immune and non-immune hosts.”

Consistent with the results reported by others, the researchers detected antibodies in both vaccinated people’s saliva and their face masks. “Given these observations, we hypothesised that droplet/aerosolised antibody transfer might occur between individuals, much like droplet/aerosolised virus particles can be exchanged by the same route.”

To test whether the transmission was occurring, the researchers took nasal swabs from unvaccinated children of vaccinated parents and tested them for SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies and found a significant positive relationship....<<<Read More>>>...

A New Study Provides Evidence of Vaccine “Shedding”

 A pre-print study, yet to be peer-reviewed, by the University of Colorado provides evidence of aerosol transfer of antibodies between Covid vaccinated and unvaccinated people. In other words, evidence of person-to-person vaccine transmission or what some may call “vaccine shedding.”

The study ‘Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity’ was published in medRxiv on 1 May 2022. It set out to investigate whether constituents of the nasal or oral fluids, other than infectious particles, can be passed between “hosts.”

The study notes that high levels of antibodies, IgG and IgA, are found within the nasal cavity and saliva of vaccinees and hypothesised that droplet or aerosolised antibody transfer might occur between people, similar to the transfer of aerosolised virus particles from one person to another.

The researchers tested nasal swabs of parents and their children at a vaccine centre in Aurora, Colorado, who were attending vaccine appointments, not limited to Covid “vaccination.”

Using data from 34 adult-child pairs, they detected the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG in the nasal swab samples acquired from children living in vaccinated households. Importantly, some of the nasal swabs obtained from children living in unvaccinated households revealed an absence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies.

Not only was this finding evident in the data, but it was also strongly statistically significant with a p-value of 0.01. This means that this was not a chance finding, wrote Igor Chudov who has written an easy-to-read article describing the study, read HERE.

However, the study is small and needs to be replicated and findings researched further....<<<Read More>>>...

Introduction to the Spike Protein and it’s potential negative effects on your health

A Word On 'Vaccine shedding'

[Mercola]: When you're infected with a virus that causes an illness, that virus is shed in your saliva and other bodily fluids, and sometimes also via skin lesions. This means that a person who comes into direct contact with the shed virus may also become infected. The same holds true for live attenuated viral vaccines.

While inactivated vaccines use a killed version of the pathogen, live viral vaccines use a weakened (or attenuated) version of the virus. Typically, the live virus used in vaccine production is passed through a living cell culture or other host, such as chicken embryo, many times over until it becomes weakened to a point that it's not likely to make you sick when it's injected or, in the case of live oral vaccines, swallowed.

That being said, a live vaccine strain virus is still active and strong enough to trigger an inflammatory response in your body, prompting the creation of vaccine-acquired antibodies. There are a few problems with this, such as the possibility that the weakened vaccine-strain virus can revert to virulence, leading to serious complications identical or similar to complications of the natural disease the vaccine is supposed to prevent in the vaccinated person.1

Another noted problem is that the person who is given a live attenuated viral vaccine can asymptomatically shed and transmit vaccine-strain virus for a period of days, weeks or months and potentially infect close contacts, who can also experience symptoms of the very disease the vaccine was intended to prevent...read more>>>...