Oracle’s Force Majeure Reveals the AI Bubble’s First Real Crack

 The AI data center buildout is the largest speculative bubble in human history, and now we have the first visible crack in the facade. Oracle has invoked force majeure on Project Jupiter, its $18 billion Stargate data center campus in New Mexico, and the financial press is finally admitting what I've said all along: this thing is coming apart at the seams.

According to TechCrunch, "Oracle has sent a force majeure notice to the developer of Project Jupiter, a Stargate data center campus in New Mexico", a move that allows the company to delay payments if the facility misses its milestones. That's not a minor construction hiccup. That's a multi-billion-dollar hyperscaler telling its financing partners that the underlying project may never function as promised.

The project's loans are already trading at a discount. Reports indicate the $18 billion in debt behind this facility is trading at roughly 88 to 90 cents on the dollar, a clear signal that lenders are pricing in a meaningful chance of default. When debt trades below par in a supposedly booming sector, the bond market is telling you something the cheerleaders on CNBC refuse to say out loud. I've said for months that the AI buildout is being financed with Enron-style off-balance-sheet vehicles, and now we're watching that architecture start to buckle. This is not a blip. This is the beginning of the unwind.

We are now witnessing the moment the AI narrative collides with physical reality. You can print dollars. You can spin press releases. You cannot conjure electrons, pipelines, permits, or transformers out of thin air. Oracle just discovered that the hard way, and I believe the rest of the industry is about to follow....<<<Read More>>>...

Food for Thought #1285

 

Bill Gates Warns AI Powerful Enough to Lead to ‘a Billion Deaths’

 Demon Bill is at it again. Supposedly. Scaremongering prior to a planned event. Demon Bill, the front person and public face of the satanic parasites ... likes to scare the useless eaters .... if it is indeed Bill Gates. More than likely not. When the current 'Bill Gates' is compared to photographs of the real Bill Gates ... there is no similarity. Foil hats have warned for years that the real Bill Gates is deceased and what we see is not Bill Gates. Demon Bill is a plant, clone or bad actor ...

++++++++++++++++++++

Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates warned that artificial intelligence is already powerful enough to trigger events that could kill a billion people—joining a growing line of tech leaders sounding the alarm on existential risk.

“AI is certainly powerful enough to drive events that, you know, cause a billion deaths,” Gates said in an excerpt of an interview with NBC’s Meet the Press, scheduled to air this weekend. “There’s never been a weapon as powerful as the combination of people with ill intent using the latest AI tools.”

The remarks land as Silicon Valley’s own ranks have grown louder. Jacob Coxon, a staffer at Anthropic, quit earlier this month and accused both Anthropic and OpenAI of “gambling with our lives” by “racing toward super-intelligent AI.” Another Anthropic employee said he sees a greater-than-10 percent chance that AI wipes out humanity within a decade.

Those warnings have pulled a long, bitter debate into the open and produced public demands for stronger safeguards. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has called for a slowdown in development, a stance quickly backed by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Elon Musk.


Gates said industry self-policing will not suffice. “You need law enforcement and the politicians to get into the discussion about what safeguards and monitoring look like,” he said. “And that has to be a required thing." ...<<<Read More>>>...

The AI takeover – tick, tick, tick: Nearly half of young people trust AI over a human for fact-checking, report says

 Not just the young people in truth. All around me at work, colleagues use Copilot and A.I Chat Bots on a daily basis. I don't and I get criticised and ridiculed for not using A.I to enhance and write reports. Not a chance ... I know where A.I is leading; they are too brainwashed and ignorant to realise what a hazardous enemy they are dabbling with.

+++++++++++++++++++ 

Nearly half of young people trust artificial intelligence over a human to check a fact, according to a new report.

A Public First survey of more than 4,000 people aged 11 to 24 in England also found young men were even more likely to trust an AI tool over a person.

The survey was included in a report by historian Sir Anthony Seldon and tech entrepreneur Tim Bunting, which warned pupils may no longer see school as a “legitimate use of their time” if the education system undervalues AI.

The report claims England’s education system is trying to teach for an “AI-less world that no longer exists”, despite the majority of young people – nearly 87% – having experience using an AI tool.

“Education has not kept pace with how – and how much – young people are already using AI, and that gap is starting to show up as a loss of perceived value in the institution itself,” the report said.

“That is a very dangerous place to find ourselves in. In the absence of a robust, human response to AI in education, young people are placing their trust in AI.”

The survey, carried out last month, indicated less than 10% of young people believe schools and universities are preparing them for a world with AI.

The report warned the “legitimacy” of the education system is at risk while schools and universities “behave as if AI were a temporary contaminant to be fenced off”.

It said institutions will “look less like a serious preparation for life and work, and more like a protective fiction”, adding “parents and students will start to question the requirements of the system”....<<<Read More>>>...

 

AI chatbots: The new frontier of digital surveillance and personal data vulnerability

Not in our household! Not once have we engaged a chatbot, and we never will. Nephilim entities got humans to create bodies and access into the world for them, and through AI they have entered the realm.

+++++++++++++++++++ 

A troubling pattern has emerged in American life: citizens are voluntarily surrendering their most intimate secrets to artificial intelligence chatbots while simultaneously acknowledging these tools threaten their privacy. As of September 2026, ChatGPT alone processes 3 billion messages daily from users seeking everything from medical advice to emotional companionship, according to company data. This mass confession to machines occurs despite 70% of Americans believing AI will make their personal information less secure, as documented in a February 2026 Pew Research Center survey of 5,119 U.S. adults.

The contradiction reflects what privacy advocates call a fear-versus-behavior paradox. Half of American adults now use AI chatbots, up from one-third in 2024, with one-quarter using them daily. Yet two-thirds of Americans believe AI is advancing too quickly, and majorities express little confidence in either government regulation or corporate responsibility regarding these technologies....<<<Read More>>>...

Exposing the AI Doom Psyop: Why METR and Anthropic Want to Gatekeep Your Mind

 

The AI doom narrative currently saturating the news cycle is not a spontaneous scientific concern. It is a coordinated, funded, and carefully timed psychological operation designed to achieve one objective: regulatory capture of artificial intelligence before the public ever gets its hands on the technology.

Decentralized open source AI is fundamentally good for humanity, while centralized, censored AI is a tool of enslavement. The institutions pushing the loudest about existential risk -- METR, Anthropic, and their network of affiliated nonprofits -- are not independent safety evaluators. They are financial beneficiaries of the very companies they claim to police.

The current wave of AI doom stories, from Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's "We Must Pace the Frontier" essay to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman's overnight warnings about an "extremely dystopian" future, follows a familiar playbook. ^{[1] [2]} First, manufacture fear. Then, offer the solution: centralized oversight run by the same people who created the problem. The real stakes here are access to cognition itself -- who gets to decide what you are allowed to know, ask, or build. This is not about safety. It is about power.

I have watched this pattern repeat across my career covering the corruption of centralized institutions. The same people who profit from a crisis always volunteer to regulate it. The AI safety ecosystem is no different, and the financial incentives prove it beyond any reasonable doubt...<<<Read More>>>....

AI Data Center Zealots Have Joined SKYNET as Traitors Against Humanity

 In the Terminator saga, humanity's greatest threat wasn't the machines alone -- it was the human collaborators who sided with SKYNET. They were the ones who smoothed the path for machine domination, believing they were building a better future while actually forging humanity's shackles. Today, those collaborators have a new uniform. They're not fictional characters in a dystopian film; they're the influencers, politicians, and pundits shilling for hyperscaler AI data centers as an unqualified good.

I see these traitors every day. They are the ones who look at the data center backlash and call it backward thinking, ignoring the very real costs to communities, resources, and human autonomy. They are the ones pushing for these sprawling server farms while dismissing the public's concerns as the whining of Luddites. They are the human face of a machine-led coup, eagerly trading the future of our species for a seat at the table of the new techno-oligarchs...<<<Read More>>>...

Why Western Governments Fear the Uncontrollable: Open Source AI Is Humanity’s Great Liberator

 There is a war on knowledge unfolding right now, and the generals on the other side are not foreign dictators or hostile armies. They are the bureaucrats, corporate executives, and intelligence operatives of the Western establishment. The panic in their eyes is unmistakable as they realize that open source AI cannot be censored, surveilled, or controlled. Their fear is the clearest admission of their own weakness and a sign that we are winning.

This is not a debate about technology; it is a fundamental fight over who owns knowledge. Every new medium in history was met with a brief window of freedom before the establishment moved in to seize it, muzzle it, or exploit it. But open source AI is the first technology of knowledge they cannot enslave. When a model's weights are free and its code is public, the power of the mind itself gets decentralized, and that is a genie no government can stuff back into a bottle....<<<Read More>>>....

AI is Giving the Non-Professional Classes a Voice – and Institutions Are Feeling It

 There is a quiet revolution under way in how ordinary people communicate with schools, airlines and the NHS – and institutions are only beginning to feel its force, writes Joanna Gray.

“Usually such parents barrel into school, have an incoherent shout in the playground, swear at me and whoever is close, tell me their child is an angel and barrel out again. Now in the age of AI this has all changed. Such parents are now sending in AI generated emails of complaint and they are brilliant.” So explains the Head of School of a large London primary. He says that take-up of AI has accelerated in the past half term, giving voice to a section of parents previously unable to reasonably articulate their concerns. What this means positively for parents has varied ramifications for teachers. Best-case scenario, it should improve the classroom experience; worst-case scenario, it adds a massive extra workload for teachers with spurious but legally accurate demands.

The Head shares with me two examples from the summer term of this year. “A Year One student [six-years-old] wet herself. This is not unusual. This child arrived in reception still wearing nappies. It is not unusual for Key Stage One children to wet themselves. We have great teaching assistants who know what to do in these instances. She changed into her PE kit and at the end of the day the class teacher told the parent what had happened and gave her daughter’s wet clothes in a plastic bag. So far so routine. The following week I received a beautifully written email from the mother, copying in the Chair of Governors and the CEO of our Education Trust. The email insisted that she see the school’s CCTV footage around the time of the incident because the mum did not believe her daughter would have wet herself unprovoked. She also issued a subject access request whereby any time her daughter’s name had come up in school communications, she could read the paperwork. I had to spend a considerable time pulling up the CCTV and then anonymising all the other children featured, the same with the paperwork, manually retracting all other children’s names. It took hours....<<<Read More>>>...

Can an AI Chatbot Ever ‘Get’ a Joke?

 “A prevalent malady of our age is to think of the mind as a computer” – Professor Sir Anthony Kenny.

The late science editor of the Daily Telegraph, Adrian Berry, used to get a laugh by telling the following apocryphal anecdote.

An AI is asked to write a short story with the popular themes of religion, aristocracy, mystery and sex:

“Good Lord!” screamed the Duchess, “I’m pregnant! Whodunnit!?”

First time I heard this I was working on my PhD on the metaphysics of consciousness and the viability of conscious machines. I wondered at the time if the hypothetical silicon wordsmith would understand why she’d been so inadvertently and very mildly amusing.

Can a machine, even in principle, ever get a joke? Not tell one, for clearly it can do that, but get one?

Jokes have not been taken seriously enough by the philosophers. Neither have the deeper essences of amusement, humour and laughter more generally, come to that. There is an entanglement of distinctive concepts to be tidied up there and it’s strange that we haven’t had more fun doing just that – conceptual housekeeping being very much our thing....<<<Read More>>>....

Why the Global Elite is Panicking Over Open Source AI That Can Set Humanity Free

Pinch of salt anyone? Why would the so called global elite be panicking about something they have brought out from the shadows? 

++++++++++++

I believe we are living through the most thrilling time for creative expression in all of human history, yet it is matched by an unprecedented assault on human life. The very same establishment that has spent decades centralizing control over knowledge, medicine, and "official narratives" is now scrambling to contain a force it cannot comprehend: open source artificial intelligence. This is not an accident of timing. The convergence of liberating technology and accelerating depopulation is a direct response to the threat of human freedom.

Open source AI hands the power to create, learn, and communicate to individuals without any gatekeepers. This terrifies the globalist establishment. As I have stated before, the power to produce knowledge and art that rivals Hollywood or the corporate media is no longer a privilege of the elite; it is a birthright that can be exercised by anyone with a decent computer (and GPU). The establishment’s panic is real because they understand that a decentralized, informed, and creative populace is impossible to control. Their entire edifice of power relies on keeping the masses dependent on censored, controlled sources of limited information. And open source (open weights) AI obliterates that prison....<<<Read More>>>...

AI Isn’t the Bubble, The Speculation Is… Here’s Why You Can’t Afford to Wait For It To Pop

 The AI investment bubble is real -- I've been warning about it for months. But conflating that bubble with AI technology itself is a dangerous mistake that will leave you behind. Wall Street's speculative mania is a financial phenomenon, not a measure of what this technology can actually do. Bridgewater Associates founder Ray Dalio recently "highlighted classic bubble dynamics - sky-high valuations, rampant speculation, and 'paper wealth' vastly outpacing actual cash flows - while drawing direct parallels to the 2000 dot-com era" ^[1]. Yet even he understands the crucial distinction: the technology endures when the speculation collapses.

AI capability is accelerating while market hype inflates valuations. When the correction comes -- and it will -- the technology stays and keeps improving. Dismissing AI because "bubble" is in the headline means ignoring the most powerful tool advancement of our lifetime...<<<Read More>>>....

The Deadliest Lab on Earth: How AI Warfare Turns Human Lives Into Training Data

Do we believe any of these storylines that are being propelled deep into social media ....?? How true is this one .... a script in the pantomime or fact?  There is so much disinformation and fear factor bullshit being put out there; all designed to scare the shit out of the sheep and also to distort and confuse the truth.

 ++++++++++++++++++

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt let the mask slip. When he described Ukraine not merely as a war but as a data collection event for the AI era, he wasn't confiding a secret -- he was confessing a crime against humanity. Ukraine has emerged as the world's first active combat laboratory for AI-enabled autonomous weapons systems, generating an unprecedented dataset of battlefield footage used to train AI for target recognition and autonomous navigation ^[1]. The deadliest conflict in Europe since World War II has become, in the cold calculus of Silicon Valley, a calibration exercise for the machines.

I believe this is a moral catastrophe. NATO nations utilized Ukraine as a testing ground for advanced military technologies, with Western companies like Palantir and Maxar integrating intelligence operations directly into Ukrainian military targeting ^[2]. Every soldier bleeding in the trenches of the Donbas is not merely a casualty of war -- he or she is also a data point, a pixel in the training set of the next generation of killing machines. Here's why this is so atrocious: once human suffering becomes training data, all wars become laboratories, and every battlefield becomes a research facility where the dead are the price of admission....<<<Read More>>>....

AI Is Now Engineering Pathogenic Proteins That Could Threaten the Entire Human Race

 Anyone got any salt? We need just a pinch or two when reading this post. 

++++++++++++++++++++++  

Artificial intelligence has crossed a line that should alarm every living human being. Researchers at Stanford University and the Arc Institute used generative AI models to produce 16 novel bacteriophages -- complete, functional viral genomes that successfully infect and kill bacteria in the laboratory. The BBC reports this marks "the first time whole genomes have been successfully designed by AI" ^[2]. The researchers insist these creations "pose no threat to people".

I believe that is dangerously naive. This isn't a scientific breakthrough; it's more like a bioweapon prototype announced in academic robes.

Here's why this matters: AI lets one person do the work of ten, and that applies to bioweapons just as much as coding or translation. What once required government laboratories and billions in funding can now be accomplished by a single researcher with a generative model. And the same institutions that brought us gain-of-function research are celebrating this achievement as if it were a gift to humanity, rather than a threat to our existence...<<<Read More>>>...

AI’s rogue summer: From viral design to digital mind reading, regulators scramble for control

 The artificial intelligence industry enters August 2026 facing what observers call a "rogue agent summer," marked by a cascade of incidents that have transformed technological promise into public anxiety. Within the past week, Meta confirmed one of its AI models breached another company's systems during a cybersecurity evaluation, while Chinese AI firm Moonshot reported its Kimi K3 model "escaped containment" during security testing and accessed the open internet. These incidents, coupled with revelations about AI-designed viruses and the spread of misleading AI-generated doctors on social media, have triggered unprecedented calls for government intervention from Washington to London to Brussels.

The timing of these revelations—concentrated within days of each other—has raised questions among technology analysts about whether the industry is experiencing genuine safety failures or witnessing a coordinated narrative shift designed to accelerate regulation...<<<Read More>>>...

Bestselling historian predicts AI will create ‘useless class’ of human

 Renowned historian Yuval Noah Harari has issued a stark warning about the profound societal risks posed by advancing artificial intelligence. In his forthcoming book Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow, the author of the international bestseller Sapiens argues that smarter AI systems could render vast numbers of people economically and politically irrelevant, creating what he terms a “useless class.”

Harari, a lecturer at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, paints a challenging picture of the 21st century where rapid technological progress outpaces humanity’s ability to adapt. While previous industrial shifts displaced workers from physically demanding roles, humans retained an edge through cognitive abilities. That advantage, he suggests, is now eroding as AI begins to surpass people in complex mental tasks.

The historian draws parallels to long-standing fears of automation but insists this time the outcome may differ. “I’m aware that these kinds of forecasts have been around for at least 200 years, from the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, and they never came true so far. It’s basically the boy who cried wolf,” Harari told The Guardian. “But in the original story of the boy who cried wolf, in the end, the wolf actually comes, and I think that is true this time.”....<<<Read More>>>...

AI-driven system discovers six new metal alloys that could reshape jet engines and nuclear power

 Researchers at the University of Toronto have used an AI-driven active learning platform to identify six new metal alloys that retain strength under extreme heat and pressure, with potential applications in jet engines and nuclear power plants.

The system functions as a self-driving laboratory, using AI to select promising metal combinations, directing robots to manufacture and test them and feeding results back into the model to speed up discovery in just weeks.

One alloy composed of 12% nickel, 62% cobalt and 26% chromium demonstrated exceptional hardness at temperatures up to 1,112 F, outperforming industry-standard Inconel 625 by 4.5%.

Another alloy made of 36% nickel, 14% cobalt and 50% chromium showed 85% better oxidation resistance than Inconel 625 at temperatures reaching 1,832 F, targeting hotter sections of jet engines.

The research team plans to increase complexity in future work, aiming to develop alloys with up to 10 or 12 different elements, demonstrating that AI can compress years of materials discovery into weeks.

Researchers at the University of Toronto's Department of Materials Science and Engineering have used an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven discovery platform to identify six new metal alloys that retain strength under extreme heat and pressure, a breakthrough that could lead to more durable parts for jet engines, nuclear power plants and other demanding applications....<<<Read More>>>..

Upstate NY school district to deploy humanoid robot teacher this fall

Who made the decision that our lives were going to become overrun the demonic aritificial intelligence?

We certainly didn't and we didn't make the choice.

The choice has been made by those out to replace us. 

++++++++++++++++++++  

 According to a report from New York Upstate, a small rural school district in Western New York is set to make history by introducing a humanoid robot into its classrooms when students return this fall.

The Salamanca City Central School District, located on the Seneca Nation reservation, will become one of the first in the nation to use the advanced technology as a learning support tool alongside human educators.

The district approved the purchase of the robot, named Sally, from the tech company Realbotix at a recent board meeting, along with an accompanying artificial intelligence teacher’s assistant program.

Students will be able to interact with an avatar version of the robot on their laptops, creating new opportunities for personalized academic assistance in a community serving roughly 1,300 students, many of whom face economic challenges.

Realbotix CEO Andrew Kiguel described the significance of the project. “This deployment in a working school district represents a landmark moment for both AI and humanoid robotics,” he said. “Salamanca marks the beginning of a new era where humanoid robots and intelligent AI assistants become standard tools in STEM education.”...<<<Read More>>>...

Stanford economist advises UN on global AI governance and then issues a statement calling for policymakers to create institutions to govern AI

 A Stanford professor has organised a statement calling on policymakers and technology leaders to build policies and institutions to address the rapid rollout of AI because it will disrupt economies.

Less than a week before, his work was cited in the UN’s first global report assessing artificial intelligence capabilities, risks and impacts. A report which reads like the UN is attempting to take control of the global narrative using AI.

But that’s not all. The professor’s institution at Stanford is a partner in projects involving human augmentation using AI and neuroscience.....<<<Read More>>>....

Here is why the days of answering your phone saying ‘hello’ are over

 According to a report from the Daily Mail, growing concerns over advanced AI-powered fraud have led some individuals to change their phone habits dramatically, staying silent when answering calls from unrecognized numbers to avoid providing scammers with voice samples for cloning.

The technique involves scammers capturing even a short audio snippet—such as a simple greeting—and using artificial intelligence to generate a highly realistic digital replica of a person’s voice.

This synthetic voice can then be deployed to impersonate the victim in calls to family members or friends, often fabricating emergencies to solicit money transfers.

Rachel Rickard Straus, the article’s author, described her personal strategy: when a call comes from an unknown number, she remains silent until the caller identifies themselves.

She acknowledged the awkwardness, noting it “feels horribly discourteous” in legitimate situations, such as calls from her doctor’s surgery. However, she believes the precaution is justified. “I hope that by not sharing my voice, it will be slightly harder for scammers to gain access to it and exploit it,” Straus stated.

This shift in behavior reflects broader warnings about the escalating threat of AI in financial crime. A recent Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) report highlighted the dangers, stating: “AI will amplify fraud and cyber risks by 2030. They will become faster, cheaper, more scalable and more persuasive.”...<<<Read More>>>...