Remember in May this year when the Daily Sceptic ran a piece about
people not reading anymore and the Spectator published its own version
in August and the Atlantic finally caught up and ran a variation on the
theme this month? Well, here’s another think piece for them to follow up
in a few months’ time: teenagers are not bothering with the internet
either.
Way back in 2023, while teaching a confidence class in a
secondary school, I first had an inkling of this latest generational
calamity. We were discussing ChatGPT and what was then Bard. I asked
GCSE age students how they were using them. Blank looks all round.
Eventually one boy explained why he doesn’t: “I have to log on.” I put
this down to classic teenage laziness and thought nothing more of it.
But the evidence of largescale internet ignorance is growing: a
conversation with a 15-year-old girl who has had a smartphone since she
was five (yes five) about learning to cook. “Where do I find recipes?”
she asked… A similar aged girl who spends nine hours a day on her phone
but didn’t know there were yoga exercises on YouTube… The teenage boy
who had no idea how to book train tickets… The girl who was visiting
London and didn’t know “what do to there?”… the child baffled that we
could watch a video to teach us how to remove permanent marker from skin
– and so on.
I’ve been asked variously by teenagers: does the
death penalty exist in Britain? Who is President of America? When was
the Second World War? Where is Turkey? What do they eat in Scotland?
What are sausages made from? When I’ve suggested that the children could
Google the answers, I’m met with a shrug and shake of the head: “I hate
searching it up,” they reply. They don’t want to know that much to
actually initiate a question of the internet. If pushed, they might ask
Alexa at home but they hardly go to the bother of typing out a question.
And this, I have finally worked out, is the reason for
teenagers’ disinterest in the possibilities of the internet: the current
generation of children are passive users, not active ones. They look at
their phones and entertainment is presented to them via their specific
feeds: reams and reams of the stuff on Snap or TikTok. Teenagers have no
need to actively look for anything, as everything has already been
perfectly curated for their specific needs (generally beauty for girls,
fitness and jokes for boys – disappointing but there it is). Internet
use is a bit like reading a magazine of old, someone else has done all
the hard work for you and all you have to do is sit back and scroll.
The
wider internet and its wealth of possibilities has receded to the same
wallpaper effect as books: it’s there, but the majority of children are
not curious to find out what it has to offer. For non-digital natives
like me who still carry memories of completing their Civil War history
homework by trudging up the lane to Great Uncle Allen’s house hoping
that his Chambers Encyclopaedia had something to say about General
Fairfax, or turning up backpacking as a 19 year-old girl in Mexico City
with nowhere to stay, the wonders of Google will never cease to amaze.
But for digital natives, the internet is as ordinary as tarmac....<<<Read More>>>...
Welcome to "A Light In The Darkness" - a realm that explores the mysterious and the occult; the paranormal and the supernatural; the unexplained and the controversial; and, not forgetting, of course, the conspiracy theories; including Artificial Intelligence; Chemtrails and Geo-engineering; 5G and EMR Hazards; The Global Warming Debate; Trans-Humanism and Trans-Genderism; The Covid-19 and mRNA vaccine issues; The Ukraine Deception ... and a whole lot more.