Strait of Hormuz blockade achieves the goals of WEF and Agenda 2030 – coincidence?

 On 13 April 2026, the United States imposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports in the Strait of Hormuz following the collapse of peace talks in Islamabad, Pakistan.

The true intentions behind the US’ blockade in the Strait of Hormuz are unclear, Charlie Howden writes. He speculates whether it may be part of a larger plan to create a new world order, aligned with the World Economic Forum’s goals and the UN’s Agenda 21/2030.

In an article published on Wednesday by Free Speech Backlash, Charlie Howden tries to make sense of what’s really going on with the war on Iran.

The US has blockaded the Strait of Hormuz, aiming to destroy Iran’s economy, but this move risks damaging the global economy, including the US’s own, he reasoned.

The blockade has reduced traffic in the Strait to 10 ships a day, down from the normal 120-140 vessels, causing a huge impact on the world economy, with oil prices skyrocketing and food security teetering on the brink.

“So, let’s probe the ‘logic’ behind the US blockade,” he said. And continued:

Ostensibly, [the blockade is] to kneecap Iran’s economy, starving its war chest by choking exports. Sounds ruthless, right? Except … is it? Here’s where it gets ludicrous. Slamming Hormuz doesn’t just hurt Tehran; it hammers everyone from British pump prices to Chinese factories. The world’s economy is the real casualty, with International Monetary Fund (“IMF”) forecasts slashing 2026. Why torch the village to smoke out one house?”

If the goal was pure economic warfare on Iran, precision sanctions or targeted interdictions would do the trick without igniting a global bonfire. Instead, this blunt blockade reeks, at best, of overreach, begging the question: is it really about Iran, or something grander – and more destructive?

Is Trump’s fireworks display, wittingly or unwittingly, fuelling the World Economic Forum’s (“WEF’s”) dystopian dream and the UN’s Agenda 21/2030 blueprint for “sustainable” control? Recall the WEF’s infamous line: “By 2030, you’ll own nothing and be happy” – code for centralised overlords engineering scarcity to herd the masses into digital cages – universal basic income, asset grabs and supranational rule under the guise of climate and equity fixes. Agenda 21, that 1992 UN blueprint evolving into 2030’s sustainable development goals, pushes similar themes: interconnected crises as levers for global governance, from resource rationing to behavioural nudges.

The Hormuz blockade’s shockwaves are a near-perfect match. Sky-high energy costs? They erode savings, forcing folks from car ownership to communal transport, aligning with “own nothing” mobility mandates. Commodity crunches in food and fertilisers? They spike prices, hammering small farmers and pushing reliance on corporate or state handouts – echoing Agenda 2030’s food security pacts that centralise supply chains. Global growth dips? Cue the calls for “resilient” economies via green transitions, digital IDs and wealth redistribution – WEF wet dreams all. Trump’s “America First” bluster rails against Davos elites, yet his blockade is brewing the very brew they sip: interdependence turned weapon, crises as catalysts for reset. Europe’s energy woes? Priming the pump for supranational grids. US consumers squeezed? Softening resistance to universal controls. It’s ironic poetry – anti-globalist Trump, by fracturing the old order, accelerates the one where sovereignty shrinks and elites orchestrate from afar. Is it a coincidence? Or does chaos always pave the road for the “experts”?...<<<Read More>>>...

Your ID Photos Will Power UK Facial Recognition System

The UK government’s recent digital ID consultation contains a detail that should have triggered far more alarm than it did. Ministers are proposing a national identity system built around a biometric image while openly stating that police facial recognition “may include access to biometric data held by government.”

That means this is not simply about a new app for proving your age or accessing services. It points towards a system in which photos already handed to the state for passports, visas, or other official purposes could help underpin both a national digital ID and a broader facial recognition framework. This development needs to be clearly understood.

The government is now signalling that existing biometric data will form its expanding surveillance architecture, and is no longer asking for trust in a future digital ID...<<<Read More>>>...

The Greys & the New World (dis)Order

There is speculation that the alien species known as the Greys are perhaps just as diverse and spread across the universe as are the human species. 

Therefore, it is important not to paint what appears to be a vast network of Grey species with the same brush. As with cosmic humans, it seems that the Greys run the gamut from being highly predatory using competitive win-lose tactics, to being cooperative and using win-win tactics.

Abduction researchers investigating Grey activity seem to fall into two very contradictory camps, those that see threat, like David Jacobs and those that see promise, like Steven Greer and Carol Rosin and John Mack. 

It’s possible both sides are right and both sides are wrong, because of the diversity of individuals and groups of Greys. Understanding this diversity as with cosmic humans, is complicated by processes of artificial evolution.

Investigator and probable abductee George LoBuono got me interested in the idea of a Grey Collective and he had this to say...<<<Read More>>>....

Khazaria, Rothschild Dynasty, New World Order, Ukraine and Implementation of the Nephilim Agenda

 The Khazarians were a violent, warlike people from Asia who migrated to the north end of the Caspian Sea in the 1^st century BC. The Khazars were so violent they quickly amassed nearly 1,000,000 square miles by conquering the agrarian societies in the Caucasus region. The Khazarian kingdom encompassed what is now Ukraine and parts of Eastern Europe.

The Rothschilds, who are Nephilim Hosts, and their Khazarian mafia have gained a foothold in nations across the earth since the mid-1700s. The tentacles of the House of Rothschild reach into the monetary policy of 85% of the countries worldwide but Russia broke free from the tentacles of the Rothschilds.

Putin aggressively worked at paying off the debt to the IMF, a Rothschild controlled bank, and by 2006 Russia’s debt to the IMF was paid off. Putin successfully extracted Russia from the strangle hold of the Rothschilds. For this heroic feat, Putin has been characterised as the bad guy ever since....<<<Read More>>>...

 

Canada’s euthanasia program now accounts for over 5% of all deaths, raising ethical concerns

 Canada's Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program has grown thirteenfold since 2016, now accounting for 5.1% of all deaths (16,499 cases in 2024). If classified as a cause of death, MAiD would rank as the sixth leading cause of mortality in Canada.

While 95.6% of MAiD cases involve patients with a "reasonably foreseeable" death (e.g., terminal cancer), 4.4% (726 cases) were approved for chronic, non-terminal conditions. Track 2 cases (non-terminal) face stricter scrutiny, making up 24.2% of rejected requests.

Internal physician reports reveal patients seeking MAiD due to poverty, isolation or healthcare delays (average wait time: 27.7 weeks for specialist care). Critics argue MAiD has become a default solution for government failures rather than a dignified choice.

Almost 33% of MAiD recipients self-identified as disabled, with 61.5% in Track 2 cases. Women make up 56.7% of non-terminal euthanasia cases. Advocates warn of pressure on vulnerable patients, with some labeled "selfish" for refusing MAiD.

Canada plans to expand MAiD to mental illness by 2027, raising fears of further abuse. Critics argue MAiD prioritizes autonomy over prevention, with disability rights groups calling it "abandonment, not healthcare." The debate highlights a critical inflection point for Canadian society.

More than one in 20 deaths in Canada now result from government-sanctioned euthanasia, according to a new federal report, marking a profound shift in the nation's approach to end-of-life care. Health Canada's Sixth Annual Report on Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD), released in November, reveals that 16,499 Canadians received lethal injections under the program in 2024—representing 5.1% of all deaths nationwide, a steady increase from previous years.

The findings come amid heated debate over whether Canada's euthanasia framework—originally intended for terminally ill patients—has expanded too rapidly, with critics warning that vulnerable individuals, including those suffering from mental illness or lacking access to adequate healthcare, may be choosing death out of desperation rather than dignity.

According to BrightU.AI's Enoch, MAiD is a legalized program initially intended for those with imminent death but now expanded to include individuals suffering from severe disabilities or chronic pain, even if their condition is not immediately life-threatening.

Since its legalization in 2016, Canada's MAiD program has grown more than thirteenfold, making it the fastest-growing assisted dying regime in the world. While Health Canada emphasizes that euthanasia is not classified as a cause of death under World Health Organization standards, independent estimates suggest it would rank as the sixth leading cause of mortality if included in official statistics.

The report notes that 95.6% of MAiD cases in 2024 fell under "Track 1," reserved for those with a "reasonably foreseeable" death, typically from terminal illnesses like cancer (cited in 63.6% of cases). However, 4.4%—roughly 726 individuals—were approved under "Track 2," which permits euthanasia for chronic, non-terminal conditions. Notably, Track 2 cases accounted for 24.2% of all rejected MAiD requests, indicating stricter scrutiny for non-terminal applicants....<<<Read More>>>...

Facial recognition cameras to catch criminals could make town centres 'no-go areas for minorities', Home Office study claims

 Live facial recognition cameras risk turning town centres into no-go areas for some ethnic minority people, research suggests.

Ministers launched a consultation yesterday on emerging technology that analyses 'motions and emotions' and could help catch criminals, prevent suicides and find missing people.

However, a Home Office study carried out in advance of the 10-week consultation revealed concerns about the accuracy of the cameras among certain demographic groups.

Surveys found minority groups were more likely to avoid - or consider avoiding - areas where facial recognition cameras are being used, which tends to be town centres and other busy locations.

Around one in ten (11 per cent) of ethnic minority respondents said they would avoid an area being monitored, compared to 21 per cent who said they would consider minimising the amount of time they spent there.

For black people, nine per cent said they would completely avoid the area, compared to four per cent of people overall and three per cent of white people.

Researchers found men aged 16 to 34, lesbian, gay and bisexual people and those educated to degree level or above were also more likely to avoid areas with live facial recognition....<<<Read More>>>...

Interstellar visitor 3I/ATLAS defies expectations: Mysterious tail growth, radio signals spark debate over natural vs. artificial origin

 The interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS exhibits highly unusual characteristics, including a rapidly growing and structured ion tail, seven distinct jets (some pointing toward the sun) and non-gravitational acceleration, which defy typical comet mechanics.

The detection of a faint, consistent radio signal with an unusual emission pattern, combined with the object's massive size and erratic jets, has led some scientists like Avi Loeb to hypothesize that it could be an artificial construct rather than a natural comet.

While officially classified as a comet, its unprecedented nature has captivated astronomers who are scrambling to study it. Its appearance has also fueled speculation, with some drawing parallels to biblical prophecies describing a celestial "sword."

NASA confirms the comet poses no threat to Earth but acknowledges its unique properties. The scientific community is preparing for further observations to determine the object's true composition and origin.

Regardless of its origin, 3I/ATLAS challenges existing understanding of interstellar objects and raises profound questions about what exists in deep space, with the core mystery of whether it is a natural phenomenon or something artificial remaining unresolved.

A newly discovered interstellar comet, 3I/ATLAS, has captivated astronomers and conspiracy theorists alike with its unusual behavior – rapidly growing tail, unexplained radio emissions and jets that defy conventional comet mechanics.

As it nears Earth, scientists are scrambling to determine whether this cosmic visitor is a natural phenomenon or something far more intriguing. First detected on June 14, 2025, and officially confirmed by the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) ATLAS system on July 1, 3I/ATLAS is already proving to be unlike its predecessors, 'Oumuamua (2017) and Comet 2I/Borisov (2019).

Recent images from the Virtual Telescope Project reveal that its ion tail – formed when solar radiation strips electrons from gas molecules – has grown dramatically longer and more structured. Unlike typical comets whose tails grow steadily, 3I/ATLAS exhibits erratic behavior....<<<Read More>>>...

You are the target of a carefully orchestrated war

Are You Depressed Yet? If not, you soon will be because that’s the plan. You are the target of a carefully orchestrated war. And the weapons are fear and misery, not bullets and bombs.

The end of the world we used to know and love gets closer every day. And everything bad that is happening is happening deliberately. Nothing bad is happening by accident. And there are no coincidences. We are at war with our governments. They don’t care, of course, because the aim is to create unhappiness so that the world’s people will accept a new world government with relief.

Just look at what is happening.

In what used to be called developed, civilised countries, health care is deteriorating to the point where endless thousands are dying for the lack of very simple basic medical care.

The medical establishment is controlled and owned by the drug industry.

General practice is a sick farce – run for the benefit of overpaid, underworked doctors, most of whom don’t give a fig about their patients.

Hospitals are as dangerous today as they were in the Middle Ages. Patients who go into hospital are more likely to be killed by the staff than by their illness, and most doctors now do more harm than good. Elderly patients who are admitted to hospital are lucky if they leave.

Health care was definitely better in the 1970s than it is now. And arguably better in the 1950s.

I’d happily debate this claim live on national television with any establishment doctor.

But members of medical trade unions seem to me determined to stamp out health care by putting their own financial interests above the interests of patients. There is also an extraordinary myth that cutting down on treatment will, in some bizarre way, alleviate imaginary global warming.

But no one debates important issues any more.

Education is a disaster, too. Teachers don’t teach students how to think. They spread lies and propaganda and expect their students to accept and regurgitate the garbage without question. Indeed, students – even those at university – refuse to think or to question the lies they are told. Anyone who questions the official line will be banned, censored into silence or demonised.

Economies are being deliberately destroyed by policies which seem insane. The naïve blame it on incompetence. But no one could possibly be as incompetent as Britain’s communist government. They are deliberately destroying the economy, wrecking businesses, creating unemployment, destroying savings. They want you broke. Remember: you will own nothing and be happy.

Good, decent food is as difficult to find as honest journalists. Most of the stuff on sale is so full of chemicals and dangerous additives that it isn’t fit for human consumption. And yet prices continue to soar. Farmers are under siege.

Energy prices are rocketing too. And when energy prices go up, then the price of everything goes up. Government policies in Europe are designed to push energy prices ever higher. The absurd Net Zero policies so beloved by the utterly insane and deluded global warming cultists will result in more and more people having to choose between eating or keeping warm. 

Politicians in Europe are desperate for a war against Russia and determined, yet again, to prevent peace in Ukraine. The purpose? To push up oil prices still higher and to help depopulate Europe. And, of course, politicians such as Starmer and Macron, whose future is firmly behind them, know that only a good, old-fashioned war can revive their fallen careers. (Naturally, the politicians pushing for war won’t be doing any of the fighting themselves.) 

Blocking the sun means that winters are going to be colder than ever. Global cooling will be a deliberately man-made problem that will kill millions....<<<Read More>>>...

Universal Basic Income – Making Slavery Great Again

I once worked in communities supported mainly through a form of Universal Basic Income (UBI). Most money was received from the government for no (or token) work, or from mining royalties where others worked digging on the communities’ lands. There were walls black and heaving with cockroaches while children slept with dogs on stained mattresses below, and babies covered head to toe in pustular scabies while the mother complained about a sore back. This was not universal, but not uncommon. Other communities that stood out as strong and healthy had people working hard for a living – particularly in roles that reflected their culture – a very different economy.

Men who once worked hard to support families lose the reason to do so when it makes no real difference, when basics of life and leisure are equally available to those who work for them and those who do nothing. It is not a political issue, just a human behavioural and psychological one. Removing the need to work and the dignity that striving and succeeding brings, especially for one’s family, leads to inaction, loss of interest in the world, a loss of role, loss of dignity and depression. This is dampened by alcohol or drugs. Wives and children suffer by being beaten up by drunk, frustrated and drug-addled men. Having two frequently drunk parents ensures children are malnourished and aimless.

This is not theoretical – it is seen all over the world where people of one culture are overrun by those of another and confined to subservience, economic and societal irrelevance, and handouts. Some people and communities break out of it, usually by finding ways to grow their local economy and achieve some form of self-governance and self-reliance. Breaking out is not common and requires an opportunity, the possibility, to do so....<<<Read More>>>...

Food for Thought #827 - The Fake Alien Invasion Agenda

 

Unlimited immigration: A policy of destruction

Unlimited immigration in Western countries is causing native infrastructure to collapse, leading to overcrowding and strain on public services.

The policy of unlimited immigration is deliberate. The aim is to erase nations, families and communities, and create social unrest and conflict. The goal is to advance the New World Order.

Unlimited immigration is encouraged in all Western countries, with the result that the native infrastructure cannot cope. That is plainly quite deliberate. Back in 2004, Prime Minister Tony Blair was warned that allowing free movement into the UK from ten new EU countries (mostly Eastern and Central Europe) would put pressure on housing, benefits, hospitals and health services and infrastructure.

Blair, an unconvicted war criminal and puppet and a long-term tool or servant of the conspirators (who has become exceedingly rich by promoting their interests and betraying the people he was initially employed to protect and represent), ignored the warnings and the following explosion in immigration has done irreparable damage to race relations as well as Britain’s infrastructure. Twenty years ago, England was the most overcrowded country in the world (ignoring Monaco and Vatican City). Today, it is hardly surprising that nothing works anymore. Every aspect of public service has collapsed. I find it impossible not to believe that everything that is happening is part of their “terrifying plan.”

Mass immigration, now deliberately allowed to go out of control in most Western countries, is ignored by all left-wing politicians and defended by lawyers. Anyone who mentions the subject (and discusses the problems caused by overcrowding, infrastructure which cannot cope and so on) is attacked as a racist with their concerns dismissed and ignored....<<<Read More>>>...

Thousands say no to digital ID cards as they march through London as politicians criticise plans

 Thousands of protesters have marched through central London to oppose the Government’s planned rollout of digital ID cards.

Under tight police conditions, demonstrators chanted and waved banners as they walked from Marble Arch to Whitehall this afternoon in protest at the scheme.

Sir Keir Starmer announced in September that a mandatory digital ID system would be introduced by 2029 for anyone wishing to work in the UK, as part of efforts to curb illegal migration.

Former Conservative MP Andrew Bridgen, who was expelled from the party in 2023 for comparing Covid vaccines to the Holocaust, led the march alongside protesters carrying an effigy of the Prime Minister.

An advert for the protest by organiser Mass Non-Compliance warned: ‘If you accept digital ID now, it may be the last real choice you ever make.’

The Metropolitan Police instructed demonstrators not to stray from the agreed route and to remain on the left-hand side of the road throughout.

The Government’s digital ID plans have drawn criticism across the political spectrum.

Conservative former minister Sir David Davis, who opposed ID cards under Tony Blair, said: ‘While digital IDs and ID cards sound like modern and efficient solutions to problems like illegal immigration, such claims are misleading at best. The systems involved are profoundly dangerous to the privacy and fundamental freedoms of the British people.’

Tory leader Kemi Badenoch branded the proposal a ‘gimmick that will do nothing to stop the boats’, while Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said he was ‘firmly opposed’.

The Liberal Democrats said they would not back any system that forces people to ‘turn over their private data just to go about their daily lives.’

Public opposition has also surged online, with almost three million people signing a petition titled ‘Do not introduce Digital ID cards’ since June.

Launched by campaigner Maxim Sutcliff, it states: ‘We think this would be a step towards mass surveillance and digital control, and that no one should be forced to register with a state-controlled ID system.’

Under parliamentary rules, any petition with more than 100,000 signatures must be considered for debate, while those with over 10,000 require an official Government response....<<<Read More>>>...

Teenagers Must Be Warned About the Dystopia Being Built Around Them

The following is the introduction to Mike Fairclough’s new book 2030 – a dystopian novel aimed at teenagers.

I want to speak to you directly, before the story begins.

When I was your age, the books we studied at school were dangerous in the best sense of the word. We read George Orwell’s Animal Farm and 1984. We read William Golding’s Lord of the Flies. We were exposed to stories of mythological heroes – ordinary men and women who faced extraordinary challenges. These books didn’t come with ‘trigger warnings’. They weren’t wrapped in cotton wool. They were meant to disturb, to challenge, to wake you up.

I grew up in a time when boys were boys and girls were girls. Our fathers, and our grandfathers before them, had fought in wars or been raised in the shadow of those who did. They taught us grit, resilience, and the courage to stand up when something was wrong.

We were also raised with pride in our British heritage. Our history, our culture, our traditions and our flag were things to respect, not to be ashamed of. We learned that our nation had stood up against tyranny, twice, and paid the price in blood. We sang songs that carried our past. We flew the Union Jack as a symbol of unity, freedom and identity.

Today, children and young people are told to see their history not as a source of pride or strength, but as a catalogue of guilt. They are taught that the victories of their ancestors were crimes, that courage was cruelty and that sacrifice was oppression. They are urged to turn away from their heritage, to treat their own flag as a symbol of shame, and to believe that the culture which once defended freedom is now too offensive to exist.

Much of what shaped us has been stolen from you. Books that once inspired rebellion are now treated as dangerous objects. Classrooms have become indoctrination centres. Children are drilled to fear the weather, to doubt their own identity, to repeat slogans about ‘inclusion’ while real truth is erased. Men are called ‘toxic’ simply for being men. Women are told that men can be women and therefore women are redundant....<<<Read More>>>...

The Pandemic Agreement gives WHO the power to commandeer resources from sovereign states

 WHO’s Pandemic Accords – the Pandemic Agreement and amendments to the IHR – are based on the flawed assumption that the risk of pandemics is rapidly growing, an assumption which are not supported by evidence.

Why are they, again, attempting to misinform and mislead the public?

Because the Accords will give WHO increased powers, allowing it to declare emergencies and commandeer resources from sovereign states. It also includes clauses on “misinformation” and “disinformation” which will allow for censorship of any dissenting voices, so the public won’t be given the chance to know that they’re lying about it.

The decades-old International Health Regulations, as amended last year, came into effect on 19 September. A new Pandemic Agreement, adopted in May, will be opened for signature after a pathogens access and benefits sharing deal that is expected to be reached next year. The WHO Pandemic Accords, as the two documents are known, are a good example of the type of global governance initiatives on which there is a consensus among technocratic elites, but against which there is a rising populist revolt. 

Two other examples that were mentioned by President Donald Trump in his UN address on 23 September are immigration and climate change. The speech was a wide-ranging defence of national sovereignty against globalism....<<<Read More>>>...

Digital ID: You’ll Own Nothing and Scan Everything

 You can already hear it, can’t you? The dreary chorus of ‘nothing to hide, nothing to fear.’

Soon your neighbour, your colleague, and that bloke in the pub will all sound like NPCs reciting the gospel of Digital ID.

And if you’re happy to trade liberty for ignorance, don’t whimper when your life resembles Kim Jong-un’s playpen with a Tesco Clubcard.

Welcome to Brave New Blighty, where your papers are digital, your wallet is monitored, and your freedom is conditional. Great Britain is teetering on the brink of ushering in a national digital ID system.

Yes, the same Britain that once prided itself on civil liberties, privacy, and a general disdain for government overreach. Now, our political class, like a dodgy Carry On character with a penchant for surveillance, is dangling the shiny promise of “convenience” while quietly sliding the handcuffs into place.

Think back, if your memory hasn’t been wiped by the Ministry of Health. During the pandemic, we got a taste of digital control with those charming little vaccine passports. Want to enter a venue? Flash your app. Want to fly, work, or exist in polite society? Better have your QR code scanned, jab status verified, and obedience levels recalibrated.

That little COVID experiment was a not-so-dry run for a far more sinister project.

The digital ID being proposed is not some benign bit of modern admin. It is, quite frankly, a blueprint for technocratic control. It won’t stop with your name and date of birth. Oh no.

Soon, your biometric data, spending habits, health records, social media activity, and ideological alignment could be packed into your shiny new BritCard.

Want to buy a pint or a sausage roll? Better scan in first. Had too many pints this week? Sorry, your cholesterol’s high and your carbon credits are low. Try again next month.

Now imagine the government deciding you’ve said something “hateful” (which is Newspeak for “unpopular”). Suddenly, your car won’t start. Your social media is locked. Your travel rights revoked. It’s not a stretch of the imagination. This is a roadmap, and we’re already halfway there.

During the COVID era, the Canadian government showed us what financial control looks like in real time: freezing the bank accounts of protesters and their supporters with the flick of a bureaucratic switch....<<<Read More>>>...

Food for Thought #729

 

Globalists are aiming for a one-world religion: Education is one of their key tools to implement it

 There is a global effort to unite the religions of the world. Not around the Creator of the Heavens and the Earth, of course. That would be divisive, if not outright hateful. After all, as the late Pope Francis argued just last year, different religions are just like different languages, all expressing the divine. “All religions are paths to God,” claimed Francis. The first Jesuit pontiff, author of the deeply controversial environmental encyclical Laudato Si’ was perhaps the leading public advocate for “unity” among the world’s religions. But he was hardly alone.

The unity sought by so many religious and political leaders – the third leg of the stool for large-scale global transformation described in ‘A Climate of Tyranny’ – must be based on concern for “Mother Earth” and “common values.” Globalists in the religious realm have made that clear for many years. Everything and everyone is welcome, except those who hold extreme views that are incompatible with this global unity for the sake of the planet – views such as the idea that Jesus is the way rather than a way.

This same concern was outlined by Lucifer Publishing Company founder Alice Bailey; an occultist whose writings played a profound role in shaping the UN and today’s global spiritual movement. Bailey, who claimed to be channelling the spirits of “Ascended Masters,” believed in the unification of all religions under a “universal consciousness.” The major obstacle: what she described as the “great heresy of separateness.” Christians and Jews, of course, know this as God’s instruction to “be holy, for I am holy.”

Working with and alongside the Vatican on “interfaith” efforts to save Mother Earth is a well-funded and fast-growing global network of religious organisations. Financed by the United Nations, billionaire globalists and countless governments, these institutions span the gamut: interfaith, pagan, Islamic, pantheistic, spiritual and more. What unites them? All are openly working to bring humanity into what many global leaders call a New World Order....<<<Read More>>>...

George Soros: NATO should be used as a tool to usher in a New World Order

In 1993, George Soros penned an essay about using NATO and NGOs as tools to move the world towards a New World Order; a world of “open societies.”

The world order that prevailed since the end of World War II has come to an end with the collapse of the Soviet empire, Soros wrote in an essay in 1993, and so a new conceptual framework is needed to understand the current situation, one that considers not only relationships between states but also relationships within states.

The conceptual framework Soros was referring to was the concept of open and closed societies. As we all know, Soros has been promoting open societies and launched the Open Society Foundations in 1993 to this end. Using the word “open” is misleading. Soros’ concept of open society is not what most people think it is and not what his Foundation portrays it to be.

An open society is a dynamic system that encourages moral universalism. It contrasts with a closed society which is characterised by strict laws, moral codes or religious doctrines. The “open society” concept was first coined by French-Jewish philosopher Henri Bergson in 1932 and further developed by Austrian-born Jewish philosopher Karl Popper during World War II. Popper saw the open society as part of a historical continuum that moves from tribalism towards a system where tradition is critically examined and faces the challenge of less personal group relations....<<<Read More>>>...

Don Bell Reports: Proofs of a Conspiracy to Build a Total, Managed Global Society (1972)

 “It is our intention to prove, out of their own mouths, that there is a conspiracy to build a new social, political and economic world order, and that the purpose of that conspiracy is to concentrate the wealth, the natural resources, the production, distribution, and sale of the world’s goods, in the hands of a favored oligarchy of international financiers and industrialists.

“We further intend to prove that there is an overall plan for the accomplishment of this purpose, a plan which is already being carried out, and a plan which calls for the building of a new social order on a global scale.”—Don Bell Reports, 8 September 1972.

Don Bell Reports was a weekly commentary published by Time for Truth Press in Palm Beach, Florida, starting in 1954. It’s not clear when Don Bell stopped publishing his weekly reports, but a now non-existent website called ‘The King’s Bench’, which is archived HERE, had a section in its ‘Library’ for the ‘Don Bell Reports (1972-1993)’.

On 8 September 1972, Don Bell Reports published the first part of a report titled ‘Proofs of a Conspiracy to Build a Total, Managed Global Society’. The report was published in 17 parts, comprising a total of 68 pages; the final part was published on 29 December 1972.

The report stated that there is a long-term conspiracy financed by the Rockefeller family and programmed through the Council on Foreign Relations, with the goal of imposing a one-world Socialist government.

To support his claims that a conspiracy existed among influential figures and organisations to establish a totalitarian global society, Bell drew on historical precedents. He referenced various events and movements that he argued illustrated a gradual shift towards global governance. This includes the rise of international organisations and treaties that, according to Bell, serve as stepping stones towards a more centralised authority....<<<Read More>>>...

Defying the New World (Dis)Order: Pathways to Personal Liberation

 So that T.H.E.Y (The Hierarchy Enslaving You) can stay ahead in their New World (Dis)Order game, one essential play on you is to keep you disconnected—mentally, physically, and spiritually.

Essentially, it disconnects you from thinking for, acting and being yourself, as you remain disempowered, enfeebled, in a state of dependency and dysfunctional…

T.H.E.Y want to keep you in ignorance, take away your decision-making on your health and designate it to doctors. These doctors may be self-conceited arrogant ignoramuses, having no idea how they are tied into the agendas of a crooked medical/pharmaceutical establishment whose treatment and profit model cares more about profits than people.

T.H.E.Y want you to blindly, unquestioningly allow decision-making political responsibility to an illusory government.

Take the UK government as an example, while the same applies to other Western world governments and their respective countries: How can you say that the UK has a real democratic government when it is subordinate to the unelected WEF, WHO, and UN, which make the major decisions for them?Decisions that don’t have its citizens’ best interests at heart. If you are a UK citizen, you’re not allowed to have your say in this. Then, haven’t you been disconnected from your political sovereignty?...<<<Read More>>>...