Ordinary Wi-Fi Networks Can Identify People With Near-Perfect Accuracy

 Researchers at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) reported that ordinary Wi-Fi networks can identify individuals with nearly 100% accuracy using unencrypted signals routinely exchanged between routers and connected devices.

The findings were presented at the ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security in Taipei, according to a KIT release dated Aug. 12, 2026. The system identified people in tests involving 197 participants, regardless of viewing angle or walking style, the researchers said. The method requires no cameras, no specialized sensors and no connected device carried by the person being observed, according to the release.  

The widespread availability of Wi-Fi has raised surveillance concerns for years. The prevalence of Wi-Fi "has led to the development of innovative surveillance methods that are both ingenious and unsettling," according to NaturalNews.com, which reported in 2020 on techniques using Wi-Fi signals to map rooms behind walls and identify human targets...<<<Read More>>>...

WHO Finds Mobile Phone and WiFi Radiation Causes Cancer

In what appears to be an astonishing volte-face, a WHO systematic review has found reliable evidence that radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) increase the risk of cancer in animal experiments. The WHO has a long history of downplaying the health risks of RF-EMFs from smart devices, WiFi and mobile communications base stations. Indeed, up until two weeks ago, when a correction to a different WHO review forced an admission that RF-EMFs do after all have a negative impact on male fertility, this history seemed to be repeating itself.

The WHO EMF Project had commissioned 12 separate reviews to assess existing studies on the health effects of EMFs and indeed, many of these were true to form, finding little harm from wireless radiation. Take, for example, the systematic review on ‘The Effect of Exposure to Radiofrequency Fields on Cancer Risk in the General and Working Population’, by Karipidis et al. (2024). This concluded that exposure to mobile phones or phone masts is unlikely to cause brain cancer or childhood cancer and that occupational exposure may not cause brain cancer, with one of the authors, Ken Karipidis, being quoted in the Guardian as saying, “concerns around links between cancer and mobile phones should be put to rest”.

However, in a complete turnaround, this latest review, ‘Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure on Cancer in Laboratory Animal Studies’ (Mevissen et al.), published on April 25th, concludes that there is “evidence that RF-EMF exposure increases the incidence of cancer in experimental animals with the [certainty of evidence] being strongest for malignant heart schwannomas and gliomas” (brain tumours). The review also found moderate certainty of evidence of an increased risk of rare tumours in the adrenal glands and in the liver. Although the study states that extrapolating the level of human risk of cancer from animal studies can be complex, the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF) has said in its press release: “Notably, the same types of tumours have also been observed in human studies, adding significant confidence that the associations observed in human studies are real.” (The ICBE-EMF is an independent “ international consortium of scientists, doctors and researchers with expertise and peer-reviewed publications on the biological and health effects of electromagnetic fields including wireless RF radiation.” ] ...<<<Read More>>>...

Wi-Fi has the potential to influence brainwaves making people vulnerable to suggestibility

 Wireless-fidelity (“Wi-Fi”) is harmful due to radio-frequency radiation exposure, pulse-modulated RF carrying data, extremely low frequency (“ELF”) effect on the brain and the Wi-Fi memory effect in body tissues.

One of the unwanted effects of ELFs, Keith Cutter believes, is brainwave entrainment, where an external stimulus synchronises brainwaves with its frequency.

ELF refers to electromagnetic fields with frequencies between approximately 3 to 30Hz, which is the same range as our brains. Our brains operate within a range of frequencies, with different brainwave states corresponding to specific activities: 

Delta Waves (0.5-4Hz): Associated with deep sleep, relaxation, and healing.
Theta Waves (4-8Hz): Linked to meditation, daydreaming, and increased creativity.
Alpha Waves (8-12Hz): Correspond to relaxation, closed eyes and decreased cortical activity.
Beta Waves (13-30Hz): Related to attention, mental activity and cognitive processing.
Gamma Waves (30-44Hz): Involved in sensory processing, working memory and higher-order cognitive functions.

Cutter is most concerned about ELFs at 10Hz from Wi-Fi and other sources.

In the presence of a persistent 10Hz signal, due to entrainment, the brain can shift toward that frequency. As noted above, at 10Hz the brain has decreased cortical activity.

Cortical activity refers to the electrical and chemical signals generated by neurons within the cerebral cortex, the outer layer of the brain responsible for, among other things, cognition.

“This entrainment effect, over time, could create a state where you’re more easily influenced – a ‘suggestible state’. In this state, the brain is more receptive to external input, whether it’s media, marketing or even subconscious influences,” Cutter writes. “We’re talking about the possibility of mind control.”...<<<Read More>>>....

Generation Zapped: The health hazards of wireless technology

A documentary titled ‘Generation Zapped’ took a hard look at the hazards and regulation of the wireless technology that permeates modern life – from cell phones to smart neighbourhoods – and its links to breast cancer, brain tumours and electro hypersensitivity.

Released in 2017 and directed by Sabine El Gemayel, the documentary investigated the growing body of research on the alarming health risks associated with wireless technology. Today, we encounter more than 100,000 times the levels of Radio Frequency (“RF”) exposure from wireless technologies than we did decades ago.

Generation Zapped also explained how wireless technology was brought to market with no safety testing, and how the government agency responsible for establishing public radiation exposure limits has no mandate to ensure those limits are biologically safe. It also discussed the cancer classification given by the World Health Organisation....<<<Read More>>>...

 

Atmospheric Spraying and 5GHZ Wi-Fi Disrupting Oxygen

A reader has written to us describing how he overcame lethargy which he believes was caused by particulates from atmospheric spraying in combination with 5GHz Wi-Fi. If any reader has experienced or can further explain what is described below, please feel free to let us know in the comments section.

To The Exposé,

I’m contacting you because I think I’ve made an important discovery which I’d like to share. It’s not quite on topic for your website but certainly part of the same anti-human conspiracy. That is of possible interaction happening between some chemicals used in atmospheric aerosol spraying and 5GHz Wi-Fi radiation.

Ever since a major geoengineering aerosol spraying (with clear weather/climate effects) over my town of residence, I’ve been feeling very lethargic, apathetic and powerless. It’s been like the air got harder to breathe and I’ve had to open several windows or else it’s felt like I was going to choke.

I did figure it was due to the spraying but now I’ve figured out that there’s more to the story. You see, I got the idea that perhaps Wi-Fi is unhealthy and to test I turned off the higher frequency, 5GHz, signal. Almost right away I began feeling more alert, energised and motivated. It started feeling easier to breathe as well. I told someone else about it as well and was allowed to turn off her 5GHz Wi-Fi signal to test. She then experienced the same as I did, that it got easier to breathe. Before shutting it off it was stuffy even with the balcony door open, after it became airy even with it closed.

So, what I figure is that something in the aerosol spray must be interacting with 5GHz radio signals and distorting or in some other way harming the oxygen.

I’m sure it’s not a placebo effect as these two days since shutting off 5GHz I’ve gotten more done than I did in over a month before. It’s like a night and day difference. As well, as I wrote above, another person experienced it the same.

Thanks for all your hard work in informing and raising awareness. It’s thanks to people like you that we might still stand a chance. Anyway, I hope you find this interesting and useful. To me, it seems like a truly vital piece of info to share. Also, it may be a good way to jolt people awake, since the results are evident even to those not awake. Anyone living in an area that’s subjected to aerosol sprayings and experiencing the symptoms I described should notice almost instant relief after shutting off 5GHz and benefit immensely from it.

I’m also thinking that possibly some of the increased illness can be attributed to this, in addition to the vax, as oxygen deprivation weakens the immune system. I’m sure it causes lots of other health problems as well, though I don’t know specifics. I certainly was feeling weaker than I ever had and had terrible headaches as well.

Are we winning? Telecom companies losing ground in their battle to impose 5G

[Natural News]:It’s easy to feel powerless when 5G towers are being installed right next to people’s homes, sometimes right outside their bedrooms, putting their families at untold risk from a technology that all signs indicate is very dangerous.

However, there are some promising signs that telecommunication companies may be losing their battle to impose 5G against people’s will, at least in some places.

For example, the Swiss government has appointed a group of experts tasked with probing the risks of introducing 5G. Meanwhile, the Swiss Federation of Doctors urged caution, saying that “as long as there is no scientific proof that raising the radiation limits will not impact health, one must refrain from raising them.”

In France, 60 mayors and other officials have petitioned to halt 5G, with the country’s federal health agency investigating the technology. In Lithuania, cell antennas have been banned on hospitals and kindergartens. The Health Council of the Netherlands has recommended against 26 GHz for 5G on account of a lack of safety data, and 600 Italian municipalities have passed resolutions halting 5G. Israel, meanwhile, has required cell tower setback of 100 meters from homes and schools.

Meanwhile, the European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks announced that the lack of compelling evidence informing exposure guidelines for 5G means the possibility of unintended biological consequences cannot be ruled out....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

 

Snowden Says Don’t Use WiFi — Here’s Why

Cell Phone Radiation is Associated with DNA Damage

[Wake Up World]: During the 5G rollout process, 5G will continue to use the lower frequencies of 2G and 3G, which are known to penetrate up to four inches into the body. With 5G being almost inescapable across the planet, this suggests a clear health risk.

5G will also use much higher frequency radiation, up to 60,000 MHz.

The NTP has announced that they will now work on further short-term studies in an effort to isolate the biomarkers of DNA damage from RFR. By studying results across a matter of weeks and months, scientists hope to be able to isolate behavioural changes or molecular cell changes which could be predictive of cancer.

This will help to establish quickly the full level of danger which 5G may pose, and the results, if significant, may underline the short-term damage these frequencies can do even with intermittent exposure, long before cancer can develop.

The NTP study was rigorous in ensuring that no tissue heating occurred, so it is clear that the currently outdated safety standards are not fit for purpose. “This study adds to the large body of ever-growing research showing that non-ionizing radiation that does not heat tissue can and does cause harm to humans”, said Anthony Miller MD, former Director of the Epidemiology Unit of the National Cancer Institute of Canada. Devra Davis, President of the Environmental Health Trust agrees, stating that “It’s time for federal action to reduce exposure to the public.”

As Ron Melnick, PhD, lead designer of the NTP study, says, “An important lesson that should be learned from this study is that we can no longer assume that any current or future wireless technology, including 5G, is safe without adequate testing.”...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

Polish Minister of Health Proposes Carcinogenic 5G Emission Levels as National Norm

[Waking Times]: Hundreds of letters are pouring into the office of Polish Minister of Health, Lukaz Szumowski, from Polish citizens and people all over the world, responding to Mr Szumowski’s proposition to exponentially raise the officially recognised limit for cell phone emissions.

Under the proposed change, new emission levels will be aligned with the introduction of 5G high frequency microwave pulsed radiation technology, with the acute dangers to the health and welfare of people, animals, insects and plant life, that 5G has been revealed to transmit.

The irony of a Minister of Health subjecting his own constituency to a barrage of highly toxic microwaves, has not been lost on those commenting from abroad. Many cite their fondness for the unspoilt nature of the country and the fact that this could soon be reversed, with tourists reacting unfavourably should the government introduce toxic 5G radiation telecommunications’ systems.

In their rush to get 5G telecommunications networks rolled-out, the Polish government has cut the time available for public reaction to just two weeks, thereby restricting any potential consultation process to an unworkable sham.

The Coalition for a 5G Free Poland and and the International Coalition to Protect the Polish Countryside are calling for a ban of 5G microwave transmissions based on the evidence of thousands of doctors and scientists worldwide – that 5G represents a serious threat to human, animal, insect and environmental health...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

WiFi and EMF exposure causes DNA damage through peroxynitrite production in the body

[S.O.T.T]: A thorough review of the available published science on wireless (WiFi) and electromagnetic frequency (EMF) exposure has identified at least seven different ways that WiFi and EMF microwave pollution actively harms the human body.

Published in the journal Environmental Research, the peer-reviewed paper explains that exposure to WiFi signals, which are everywhere these days, can lead to: oxidative stress, sperm and testicular damage, neuropsychiatric effects including EEG (electroencephalogram) changes, apoptosis (programmed cell death), cellular DNA damage, endocrine changes, and calcium overload.

As many as 16 different reviews also show that exposure to other microwave EMFs is directly associated with these same effects as well as others, proving that living in the wireless age isn't nearly as safe as health authorities in collusion with the telecommunications industry would have us all believe.

Experts say that the predominant mechanism of action with EMFs - meaning the primary way that these invisible pollutants can harm your body - is through what's known as voltage-gated calcium channel (VGCC) activation.

According to science, VGCC activation caused by EMFs can eventually lead to cancer - though the general public isn't being told any of this, of course.

There are also said to be numerous other mechanisms through which WiFi and other forms of EMs can cause bodily harm, including through the activation of other voltage-gated ion channels, as well as via the geomagnetic magnetoreception mechanism and through calcium cyclotron resonance...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>>

Other Countries Have Banned or Restricted Cell and WiFi Radiation to Protect Children and Pregnant Women

[Natural News]: In 2015, France joined a growing list of countries which have banned or restricted potentially harmful radio-frequency radiation (RF-EMF) from schools, nurseries, and other locations where the most vulnerable people in society inhabit.

According to the Environmental Health Trust (EHT), France has banned WiFi in “the spaces dedicated to home, to rest and activities of children under 3 years.” The country also required that telecom companies provide equipment that reduces exposure to RF-EMF for individuals under 14 years.

It might be hard for us to imagine these types of restrictions in America, where the telecom industry has such a broad influence in government, but many countries around the world have taken steps to mitigate the dangers of EMF.

As reported by Collective Evolution, countries such as Belgium, Spain, Israel, Australia, Italy, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, India, Finland, and Cyprus have all passed some meaningful restriction on wireless technology.

Cell phone radiation follows an inverse-square relationship, meaning that the closer the source (or intermediary such as a cell phone) gets to your head, the more damage it can do. Studies have shown that children are the most susceptible to WiFi radiation because a child’s head absorbs 10 times more radiation than an adult...read more>>>...

To bee, or not to bee, that is the five “G” question – Olle Johansson

[David Icke]: The collective evidence we can draw from the current scientific status regarding adverse health and biological effects of artificial electromagnetic field exposures, such as from cell phones, antennas/base stations, TV and radio towers, baby alarms, smart meters, powerlines, and WiFi routers, points to that we may be jeopardizing more than our own health and behaviour.

Bacteria, plants, birds, frogs, and pollinating insects, may all be targeted, and it is obvious we must proceed with the highest caution before immersing the citizens and our wildlife in more and more artificial electromagnetic fields.

We may, as a matter of fact, already be gravely endangering our current as well as coming generations. To not act today, may prove a disaster tomorrow, and such lack of action may again result in the classical “late lessons from early warnings”, or – even worse – “too late lessons from early warnings”.

By Olle Johansson, former head of The Experimental Dermatology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, and former adjunct professor of The Royal Institute of Technology, also Stockholm, Sweden, now retired and leading The Institute of Common Sense for Common Sense, Utö/Stockholm, Sweden....read more>>>...

Wi-Fried! Cellphones, Electrosmog, Blue Lights, and 5G

GBM Brain Tumor Cancer Rising. Impacts of RF Radiation from Wireless Devices?

[David Icke]:GBM is going up in Denmark too. The steady rise is very similar to what has been seen in England.

New government data, released in May by a member of the Danish Parliament, show a near doubling of this fatal brain tumor, glioblastoma multiforme, since the year 2000.

• Are these trends real?

• Is the incidence of aggressive tumors truly going up in England, Denmark, Sweden and other countries?

• Can RF radiation from wireless devices promote less aggressive tumors into GBM?...Read More>>>...

13 Reasons 5G Will Be a Catastrophe for Humanity

[Humans Are Free]: 5G (5th Generation) is now being actively rolled out in many cities around the world.

Simultaneously, as awareness over its horrific health and privacy impacts is rising, many places are issuing moratoriums on it or banning it, such as the entire nation of Belgium, the city of Vaud (Switzerland) and San Francisco (USA).

Radiofrequency radiation (RF or RFR) and electromagnetic fields (EMF) are being increasingly recognized as new types of pollution – environmental pollution.

Here are 13 reasons exposing the 5G danger, which could turn into an unmitigated health and privacy catastrophe if enough people don’t rise up to stop it...read more>>>...

Unseen health dangers: 5G is exceptionally harmful to children

[Natural News]: It’s arguably the biggest existential threat to life on this planet, and it’s only been around for a mere blip in time, historically speaking. We’re talking about wireless communication technologies such as 5G, which a growing number of experts warns is a human health nightmare, especially for kids.

Despite its “blazing fast” speeds, 5G and its soon-to-be ubiquitous presence throughout the world will, in many ways, spell the end of life as we currently know it. Unlike 2G 3G, and even 4G, 5G functionality necessitates a massive grid of very densely-packed transmission towers and equipment, which means that exposure to it will be virtually inescapable.

“Far from a simple ‘next-gen’ upgrade, powerful 5G (fifth-generation) networks and technology are about to subject everyone, on a continuous basis, to unprecedented forms and amounts of … mandatory irradiation – without prior study of the potential health impact or any assurance of safety,” warns Children’s Health Defense (CHD).

“Considering that young people (with their smaller body mass and developing brains) are particularly vulnerable to radiation, the Environmental Health Trust has termed 5G ‘the next great unknown experiment on our children’ – and the entire human population.”

For more related news, be sure to check out 5GAlert.com.

UK’s First 5G Court Case — And The People Won

[Principia Scientific]: New court ruling in Britain upholds right of people to know of the dangers of unproven 5G microwave technology. In Gateshead, UK Recorder Nolan QC refused to ‘gag’ anti-5G campaigner, Mark Steele.

5G is the fifth generation cellular network technology that provides broadband access for mobile phone users and others.

The judge asserted that “The public have a right to know” whether the next generation of wifi communication, relying on directed powerful microwave energy, causes cancer and other health risks.

The concern is that there is very little, if any, scientific research into how the powerful microwaves from the cell network can impact human health. To work a vast network of local antennas are connected with the telephone network and the Internet by a high bandwidth optical fiber or wireless backhaul connection.

Like existing cellphones, when a user crosses from one cell to another, their mobile device is automatically “handed off” seamlessly to the antenna in the new cell.

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem has discovered in a recent investigation that human skin acts as a type of receptor for 5G radiation, drawing it in like an antenna.

No fewer than 26,000 Scientists Oppose 5G Roll Out.

The outcome is a bitter blow to Gateshead Council. They had hoped to use the court appearance to ridicule Steele’s status as an ‘expert’ despite his claims that prestigious Harvard University now support his 5G fears....read more>>>...

Letter to doctors: It's time to redefine 'EMF sensitivity'

[S.O.T.T]: Even though I too am hypersensitive to EMF, I am concerned that the terms EMF Sensitivity and Hypersensitivity may be too compartmental, when the ramifications are so profound and universal. By identifying our symptoms as somehow unique to us alone, we are separating ourselves from the rest of humanity.

We become "those" people, different from all the rest. However, there are at least two other categories: Those who are experiencing symptoms, but neither they nor their doctors are aware of the issue, and there could be millions of them. Then there those who are aware, but are not experiencing symptoms, so they feel free to ignore the issue, thinking it's just "those" people who have a problem.

Unfortunately, EMF Sensitivity is not the same as an allergic reaction. Without intervention, those allergic to peanuts would likely die, while others can eat peanuts to their hearts content, with no ill effects, ever. But with EMF, the reality is that every living thing on the planet suffers damage when exposed to non-ionizing Radio Frequency radiation, whether you experience symptoms or not, whether you know it or not. If you are exposed, the damage is happening.

The first known study of EMF Sensitivity was published in the German Medical Weekly, 1932, by German physician Erwin Schliephake. He compiled scientific data about patients who were experiencing unusual symptoms around radio towers. He called this condition "microwave sickness" or "radio wave sickness."

The symptoms he observed were, in his words: Headaches to the point of intolerability. Severe tiredness and fatigue during the day. Fitful sleep at night. And high susceptibility to infection. The patient numbers, at that time, were few. However, by the 1950s, '60s, and '70s, the numbers, and list of symptoms, had grown enough to alarm scientists and militaries around the world. Numerous studies were undertaken, all showing biological harm from non-ionizing RF radiation.

By the 1990s and early 2000s, a new wave of patients, and an even longer list of symptoms, spurred independent institutions, scientists, and physicians to initiate their own studies, studies that continue to this day, and most of which result in an appeal to every government, industry and regulatory body on the planet to stop the proliferation of microwave radiation technologies. The biological effects result in life-threatening illness. Period.

Since 1932, when there were just radios and electric lights, the estimates for those with EMF Sensitivity have risen from statistically insignificant, to 2-5%, to 10-20%, to as much as 30% today. The obvious reason is that exposure to microwave radiation has grown exponentially, and has given rise to new dangers, such as pulsed, non-ionizing RF radiation, or modulated microwaves, produced by smart meters, as well as dirty electricity, which studies have shown to be just as harmful as the smart meters themselves.

Dirty electricity comes primarily from two sources, Solar System Inverters, converting DC power to AC power, and smart meters, which send pulsed, non-ionizing RF radiation to the powerlines, and send customer data over the powerlines, by adding additional frequencies. In addition, we now have a proliferation of WiFi gadgets, cell towers, and small cells on every empty surface imaginable, sometimes clusters of them. And as we speak, 5G and over 200 orbiting satellites are preparing to saturate the entire planet in microwave radiation. It's frequency mayhem.

Every living thing, the earth itself, is an electromagnetic being, and functions optimally via a narrowly defined, predictable and consistent set of frequencies. In the human body, brain and heart function, chemical reactions, and cell communication are dependent on a defined set of frequencies. You cannot bombard it, with aberrant frequencies, every nano-second of every single day, without consequence. There is no Conspiracy Theory too outrageous to explain the monumental stupidity that is upon us.

It appears that EMF Sensitivity is not limited to a few "sensitive" people, but rather, the numbers are dependent on the amount of exposure, and the increasing distribution throughout the population at large. Also, EMF Sensitivity may not be a discrete affliction at all, but a precursor to serious illness, dependent as well on the cumulative effects of ever-increasing exposure to microwave radiation.

Certain cancers, and cancer clusters are on the rise. And according to one mother, where a cancer cluster emerged, the students at San Diego State University, in California, suffered symptoms of EMF Sensitivity prior to a diagnosis of brain and breast cancer. And another mother stated that the children at Weston Elementary, in Ripon, California, experienced symptoms of EMF Sensitivity prior to their diagnosis of cancer. EMF Sensitivity is a warning sign, not an anomaly.

What is also alarming about these two incidents is the rapid onset of illness after exposure to cell towers....read more>>>...

Verizon Fighting To Install 100’s of 5G Networks on Syracuse Street Lights

[David Icke]: The city of Syracuse, New York is embroiled in a fight over whether or not to allow Verizon to install 5G wireless networks throughout the city. Some city officials are citing 5G health risks as a cause for concern, while others believe that 5G will put their city in a position of technological progression.

The Syracuse Common Council is currently debating Verizon’s potential 5G license approval. If approved, Verizon would install 5G networks on urban streetlights. In Rhode Island, telecommunication companies have quietly installed 5G networks on streetlights.

Verizon’s regulatory manager, Mark Coon, is fighting the notion that 5G is a risk to public health.

“Wireless technology for wireless communications transmits radio frequency signals over the airwaves, no different than your garage door opener, or a baby monitor or a Wi-Fi router in your home,” Coon said via wrvo. “5G is no different than 4G, is no different than any of the generations of wireless services, as far as that radio frequency transmission.”

However, the council says it is experiencing internal rife over the matter, with some members fully opposed to 5G. Some councilors have pointed out that places such as Portland, Oregon have attempted to blocked 5G network installation until more studies are accomplished.

“I think it’s worth exploring that further, because I don’t think we have a great view, at this point, what the consensus is,” Councilor Bryn Lovejoy-Grinnell said. “We have an obligation to make sure that our citizens are safe and that this technology doesn’t pose a risk of danger to them.”

If Verizon triumphs, at least 100 5G networks are expected to be installed throughout the city. Officials who back Verizon claims this would help Syracuse become a leader in technologies such as autonomous cars.

The public trust in government agencies to make responsible decisions in concern with public health is embattled and nearly eroded. The 5G controversy is expected to be a long and hard fight between activists/citizens and government agencies/telecommunications companies. The motivation for cities and telecommunications companies to install 5G runs high. It stands to be an extremely profitable venture for all involved. The issue, of course, is whether or not such profitability and technological advancements come at the costs of public health and safety...read more>>>...

WiFi may interact with signaling pathways in the brain, causing irreversible damage

[S.O.T.T]: The effects of repeated WiFi exposure on human health have been widely debated. A recent study reviewed evidence from 23 controlled scientific studies which investigated the health effects of WiFi on animals, human cell lines, and humans to determine once and for all, whether WiFi has a detrimental effect on human health.

WiFi or a wireless network consists of an antenna that is connected to the internet and several wireless devices, such as laptop, phone, etc. The electromagnetic frequency of WiFi is pulsed rather than continuous. This is a critical issue, as pulsed electromagnetic frequencies have a larger biological impact.

A 2015 study argued that more pulsed an electromagnetic frequency, more harmful they are for biological specimens. Researchers have also tried to determine the dose relationship between WiFi exposure and biological effects, and found that a specific intensity range of electromagnetic pulses may produce maximum effects, and this may drop off at lower and higher intensities...read more>>>...