A geological revelation: Earth’s hidden carbon vault

 Scientists have discovered a massive, previously unrecognized natural carbon storage system deep beneath the South Atlantic Ocean.

The system consists of porous volcanic rubble, called breccia, formed by the erosion of underwater mountains.

This rock can trap 2 to 40 times more carbon dioxide than typical ocean crust, locking it away for tens of millions of years.

The process involves seawater flowing through the rubble, reacting with the rock to form calcium carbonate minerals that permanently store CO2.

This finding reshapes understanding of Earth's long-term carbon cycle and reveals a key mechanism for stabilizing the planet's climate over geological time.

In a discovery that reshapes our understanding of Earth's climate machinery, an international team of scientists has uncovered a colossal, natural carbon dioxide storage system operating silently beneath the ocean floor. Led by researchers from the University of Southampton, the study, published in December 2025, analyzed rock cores drilled from deep beneath the South Atlantic Ocean. It reveals that vast deposits of eroded volcanic rubble, formed over 60 million years ago, act as a geological sponge, sequestering enormous amounts of CO2 for tens of millions of years and playing a critical, underappreciated role in stabilizing the planet's long-term climate....<<<Read More>>>...

Food for Thought #644

 

Global Warming is Mostly Caused By the Sun, Not Humans, Says Astrophysics Professor

 “There’s no such thing as a scientific consensus,” Nir Shaviv, a Professor at the Racah Institute of Physics at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem says in response to a question about what he thinks of the widespread claim that there is a scientific consensus on the anthropogenic nature of climate change. “In science, we deal with open questions and I think that the question of climate change is an open question. There are a lot of things which many scientists are still arguing about,” he explains.

Indeed, there are scientists who say that climate change is caused entirely by humans and the situation is very dire. But then there are those who say that although humans are causing much of the warming, the situation is not as bad as we are being told by politicians and activists through the media. Some think that CO₂ plays an important part in the current warming trend and some believe its role is insignificant.

Although Shaviv assesses that some of the warming in the 20th century is indeed the result of increasing atmospheric CO₂ concentrations, most of the change is a natural phenomenon. “My research has led me to strongly believe that based on all the evidence that’s accumulated over the past around 25 years, a large part of the warming is actually not because of humans, but because of the solar effect,” he says....<<<Read More>>>...

'Global' Warming? Little Ice Age cooling and sea ice expansion is still ongoing across Antarctica today

New research indicates there has been no reduction in sea ice in Antarctica's Robertson Bay (Ross Sea) during the last century. Instead, the frigid Little Ice Age and its expanded sea ice conditions continue unabated through the 20th and 21st centuries.

Between ~8000 and 3500 years before present the Antarctic ice sheet experienced several millennia of retreat and the sea ice extent surrounding the continent decreased throughout the Middle Holocene. For the next few millennia after that, or from about 3500 to 1500 years ago, the ice sheet and sea ice extent advanced to near modern levels.

"The East and West Antarctic ice sheets underwent rapid periods of retreat in the Ross Embayment, the continent's largest ice drainage basin, between 8 and 3.5 calkyr BP. Recent work shows that retreat was followed by a period of readvance and the ice sheets reached their modern configurations during the late Holocene."

During the Medieval Warm Period, or from approximately 1500 to 700 years before present, variations in F. curta diatom, a proxy for sea ice extent, indicate Antarctic sea ice retreated again to its much lower (<40%) Middle Holocene levels.

"...during the period between 1.5 and 0.7 calkyr BP...lower F. curta abundance in Robertson Bay (<40%) is characteristic of a reduction in spring sea ice concentration and a longer summer open water season."

Then, after the Medieval Warm Period ended, Antarctica's Little Ice Age (LIA) cooling began. The ice sheet grew and sea ice advanced to the highest levels of the last 7000 years (~60%)....<<<Read More>>>...

Leading Russian polar scientist: Cooling begins in 2030...Climate crisis a 'Globalist Scam'

A top polar scientist interviewed by the Russian Academy of Sciences says we need to prepare for serious global cooling, to begin by 2030-2035. Cites studies of Lake Baikal and historic climate epochs.

People's Voice here reports: "One of the world's top Arctic scientist's has spoken out to debunk the 'climate crisis' narrative" and warns the public that "the Earth is actually about to enter a period of 'global cooling.'"

According to leading polar scientist Andrey Fedotov of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), "the warming is about to end" and "The Earth is about to enter an 'ice age.'"

The period of "unfavorable cold" will begin around 2030. Fedotov issued the warning in a statement published by the RAS, the country's leading scientific institution.

Fedotov said the warming is about to end and the cause is not humans. The Russian scientist says the cooling will be brought on by solar activity. "Currently, we are in a favorable period, but we will inevitably transition to an unfavorable [cold] one ... around 2030-2035," Fedotov said, citing his studies of Lake Baikal and historic climate epochs.

"When the ice age comes, you will feel it immediately," he warns....<<<Read More>>>...

ALL official climate models radically over-predict warming, analysis reveals

 Well-known climatologist Dr. Roy Spencer published an article recently that exposes every single climate model out there to be dead wrong as far as the state of “warming” on planet earth.

Actual satellite temperature readings show that the planet is barely warming at all – and even the warming that is being seen could just be a statistical anomaly because it really is that small. But you would never know this from the official climate models.

“How is it possible that EVERY SINGLE CLIMATE MODEL predicts higher warming than observation?” asks the No Consensus blog.

“Climate science is one of the most gratuitously funded fields in the history of science. They get satellites, flights, conferences, an entire MASSIVE division of the United Nations, buildings, university departments, supercomputers, ridiculous paychecks, insane monetary awards, international recognition, television commercials … hugs from hot girls … on and on.”

All this nonsense is paid for with your tax dollars, by the way. None of this climate lunacy would be possible if not for tens of millions of people forking over a large percentage of their paychecks to the psychopaths in charge.

The only reason they continue to get away with fooling the world and bilking society out of true success and prosperity is because We the People are allowing them to.

The science is clear: the planet is not warming. If anything, it is cooling right now. And at some point in the future, it will start warming again because that is how the climate works....<<<Read More>>>....

New NASA satellite data prove carbon dioxide is GREENING the Earth and restoring forests

[Natural News]: The latest Vegetation Index data from NASA shows that the Earth is getting progressively “greener” and lusher over time.

The planet is 10 percent greener today than it was in 2000, NASA says, which means better conditions for growing crops. Forests are also expanding while deserts are becoming more fertile and usable for agriculture.

All in all, the global Vegetation Index rose from 0.0936 to 0.1029 between 2000 and 2021, a 9.94 percent increase.

“10 percent greening in 20 years! We are incredibly fortunate!” announced Zoe Phin, a researcher who compiled the data into a chart for her blog.

“I just wish everyone felt that way. But you know not everyone does. To the extent that humans enhance global greening is precisely what social parasites want to tax and regulate. No good deed goes unpunished.”

A separate German study found that the globe has been greening for at least the past three decades. Satellite imagery suggests that vegetation has been expanding at a growing rate, contracting the gloom-and-doom narrative being spread by the climate alarmists.

Back in 2018, research found that the Sahara Desert, the largest in the world, had shrunk by more than 8 percent over the past three decades. This is truly profound as the Sahara covers an expansive 9.2 million square kilometers of territory.

“Eight percent means more than 700,000 square kilometers more area that’s become green – an area almost as big as Germany and France combined,” reports P. Gosselin.

“So in terms of vegetation, the planet probably hasn’t had it this nice in about 1,000 years.”...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

 

Martin Armstrong Warns Of The Coming "Big Freeze"

[S.O.T.T]: The BIG FREEZE is upon us.

The volatility in weather that our computer has been forecasting on a long-term basis should result in this winter being colder than the last. In Britain, the snow has hit an already flood-ravaged country as temperatures plunged to -7C.

This is part of the problem we face. The ground freezes down and this prevents winter crops.

During the late 1700s, the ground froze to a depth of 2 feet according to John Adams. When John Adams set out to travel to Philadelphia, it was bitterly cold and there was a foot or more of snow that covered the landscape that had blanketed Massachusetts from one end of the province to the other. Beneath the snow, after weeks of severe cold, the ground was frozen solid to a depth of two feet. Packed ice in the road made the journey very hazardous...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

120 Years of Climate Scares: Global Cooling, Global Warming and Now Climate Change

[Humans are Free]: “Global cooling is going to kills us all!” “No, wait: global warming is going to kill us all!”

All that’s missing is a back-and-forth of “You shut up!” “No, you shut up!” That is reserved for those who doubt the need for panic.

And now that the world has neither froze solid, nor burst into flames, it's “climate change” — you know, because everyone will agree that climate changes.

It's been changing since the first days of our planet, millions of years before humans even existed, and will continue to change indefinitely, because that's what climate does...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

Climate change that ignores history

[Natural News]: Climate has ALWAYS changed from decade to decade. There were major swings (volatility) during the 1930s. You had the dust bowl during the summer and in 1936 you had record cold. The 1936 North American cold wave, which also hit Japan and China, still rank among the most intense cold waves in the recorded history of North America.

You cannot blame this on soccer moms driving the kids around town burning fossil fuels. Cars were a luxury in the 1930s still.

There is just no evidence of human-induced climate change. There is nobody willing to call them out on this nonsense with just showing the dramatic swings in temperature over the centuries.

We have been subjected to extravagance from climate catastrophists for close to 50 years.

In January 1970, Life magazine, based on “solid scientific evidence”, claimed that by 1985 air pollution would reduce the sunlight reaching the Earth by half. In fact, across that period sunlight fell by between 3 per cent and 5 per cent. In a 1971 speech, Paul Ehrlich said: “If I were a gambler I would take even money that ­England will not exist in the year 2000.”...Read The Full Article Here>>>....

Latest Hot Summer in The Netherlands is Not a Sign of Man-Made Global Warming

[S.O.T.T]: Late July this year, the Netherlands recorded all-time high temperatures, but has it ever been that hot before, or even hotter?

Take the summer of 1540. It was particularly hot over all of Europe. As Dutch author Jan Buisman of the book Duizend jaar weer, wind en water in de Lage Landen describes: "Harvest failed, drinking water was hardly available, and diseases were rampant. On top of that, there was also a mouse plague in the Netherlands. A chaplain from the Dutch province of Limburg kept a diary and described how farmers on the land fell dead as a result of the heat while they were mowing."

Many people in Amsterdam succumbed to heat stroke, heart attack or contaminated drinking water. We do not know the exact temperatures of the summer of 1540, but from the described dry rivers, many forest fires and prolonged heat and drought we can assume that these were certainly not lower than during the past summer. Many sources speak of seven months of sun-drenched, dry and hot weather.

The heat lasted so long that the year 1540 was recorded in the history books as the "Great Solar Year". Generations will continue to talk about the hottest summer ever, and for modern climatologists the summer of 1540 is still a fascinating benchmark. The following year, the summer of 1541, by the way, reverted straight back to the typical summers in Amsterdam: cold and wet.

Temperatures started to decline, and a cold wave from December 1586 to September 1587 was the first sharp fall into the "little Ice Age". In the second half of the 16th century, it got colder in Western and Central Europe. Winters were characterized by more snow and ice, often starting in November and lasting until March or April. Historical research from the The Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute ('KNMI' in Dutch), based on countless sources such as diaries, city accounts and tree annual rings, show that the last quarter of the sixteenth century was probably the coldest in the last thousand years.

Hot summers of today are no indication of man-made global warming, as there have been plenty in the past that are being ignored by the inconvenient-data-deniers in order to further their agenda. Considering all data, it is instead continued global cooling and a possible Ice Age that we can expect in the near future. The hot summer of 1540 was followed by a small Ice Age; the same, or worse, may be in store for us after this period of relative warming...Read The Full Article Here>>>...

Greta Thunberg: False Prophet of the Children's Crusade

This article is an amazing read. We've just added a slightly abridged version from a section towards the end of the article. 
 
[S.O.T.T]: Thunberg has been held up as the new Prophet of Doom and Gloom. Aside from the fact that her antics remind me of the Children's Crusade back in 1212 (look up what happened to them), that poor mentally ill Joan of Arc, and even the poor, exploited children of Joseph Goebbels, who were murdered by their parents when faced with the end of their Left/Nazi dreams of global domination, I am rather outraged that the Liberal/Left of this day and time has been allowed to drive their delusions so far that young people are terrified of being alive.

I obtained a transcript of Thunberg's speech here and will now comment on it. Her words were given in answer to the question: "What is your message for world leaders?" 

"My message is that we'll be watching you."

 It doesn't help at all to watch anything if you do not know what you are looking for or how to identify it. Greta and her puppet masters do not; they have lived too long in their Post-modernist YCYOR world to have a clue about what is really going on and how they, themselves, have been manipulated.

Greta continued:

"This is all wrong. I shouldn't be up here. I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean. Yet you all come to us young people for hope. How dare you!" It's true, she should not be "up there". But she doesn't even stop to think about the fact that "nothing in politics happens by accident". She is simply a tool of those driving humanity into a state of chaos so that totalitarian controls will be accepted by the masses of humanity in order to gain peace. 

"You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words. And yet I'm one of the lucky ones. People are suffering. People are dying. Entire ecosystems are collapsing. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction, and all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth. How dare you!"

Yes, it is true that the manipulation masters of this world have "stolen dreams" from about everybody on the planet, just not exactly the way Greta thinks; what's worse, she doesn't realize that she is a tool to steal even more dreams from more people!

Yes, people are suffering and dying and ecosystems are collapsing, but it has nothing to do with human technological activities and has everything to do with natural cycles driven by the Sun and other cosmic interactions.

Yes, it is probably true that we are well into a mass extinction - not just at the beginning - only it has nothing to do with the physical actions of human beings, and way more to do with the psychic/psychological and mental actions and attitudes toward one another.

Greta's very attitude is an exemplar of the psychological states that are bringing chaos to our planet. Greta's issues with money, economic growth, etc, are misguided. None of the Global Warming Cultists' ideas about how to fix the non-existent problem of man-made warming (AGW) will do anything to change the steady march of climate change to an Ice Age, and will, in fact, cause much greater suffering than presently exists on our planet today; it will only make things worse.


"For more than 30 years, the science has been crystal clear. How dare you continue to look away and come here saying that you're doing enough, when the politics and solutions needed are still nowhere in sight."

Here's where Greta's beliefs are totally orthogonal to the TRUTH. The science has NOT been "crystal clear" for 30 years, science being another tool of Post-modernist and Marxist politics for at least that long if not longer. As for whether there are any solutions about how to deal with an Ice Age, I would agree that nothing is in sight.

But perhaps that was planned by the puppet masters behind Greta's own string pullers. Is it a way-out conspiracy theory to suggest that, somewhere at the top, they know that it is an Ice Age coming and NOT Global Warming, and that all the latter is designed to do is to get scientists who are easily bought to take their eye off the ball and contribute to the ultimate chaos that will result when Glacial Rebound suddenly surges upon us?

It will be something like the whole world packing for a trip to a tropical island but being diverted to Antarctica.


"You say you hear us and that you understand the urgency. But no matter how sad and angry I am, I do not want to believe that. Because if you really understood the situation and still kept on failing to act, then you would be evil. And that I refuse to believe that."

Greta is wrong: the Puppet Masters of Deception behind the whole Global Warming Scam are certainly Evil with a capital E. So again, her beliefs are orthogonal to the Truth.

"The popular idea of cutting our emissions in half in 10 years only gives us a 50% chance of staying below 1.5 degrees [Celsius], and the risk of setting off irreversible chain reactions beyond human control."

Again, Greta is believing lies. The truth is that the Ice Age may be retarded or ameliorated by carbon emissions and we should not be worrying about them at all. That's "dressing for the tropical island" stuff.

"Fifty percent may be acceptable to you. But those numbers do not include tipping points, most feedback loops, additional warming hidden by toxic air pollution or the aspects of equity and climate justice. They also rely on my generation sucking hundreds of billions of tons of your CO2 out of the air with technologies that barely exist."

"So a 50% risk is simply not acceptable to us — we who have to live with the consequences.

"To have a 67% chance of staying below a 1.5 degrees global temperature rise - the best odds given by the [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] - the world had 420 gigatons of CO2 left to emit back on Jan. 1st, 2018. Today that figure is already down to less than 350 gigatons.

"How dare you pretend that this can be solved with just 'business as usual' and some technical solutions? With today's emissions levels, that remaining CO2 budget will be entirely gone within less than 8 1/2 years."

Oh yeah, I'm sure this came right out of the brain of this mentally challenged girl!

What we've seen in recent winters is just a foretaste of what's to come... and stay. She is of course parroting figures and claims bandied by proponents of AGW, all of which is based on a foundation of false assumptions, not least that rising atmospheric CO2 levels cause - rather than correlate with - increasingly extreme weather.

The Global Warming Scam is definitely not the truth - it doesn't even approximate objective reality. It is so severely distorted that any action taken on that basis is guaranteed to produce opposite results to what is apparently intended: greater environmental degradation, greater inequity, and greater unpreparedness for climate change!

I've got news for you, Greta: let us hope that current rates of carbon emissions help to stave off the Ice Age - though I doubt that is possible. Already the signs are appearing that it is only a short time before the silence of the ice will once again descend upon vast areas of the globe, agricultural production will suffer, people will starve, disease will run rampant over weak and starving populations and very likely up to 75% of the population of the planet will die of one thing or another related to an Ice Age.

It's happened before, it is going to happen again, and all Ice Ages are preceded by periods of Global Warming....read more>>>...

Long before global warming, a “consensus” of scientists warned that global COOLING was responsible for extreme weather events

[Natural News]: Before the global warming era, which began sometime during the 1980s, there was a different theory that had scientists around the world shaking in their boots: global cooling and an impending “ice age.” The global cooling scare of the 1970s is now proclaimed to be nothing more than an urban myth, but at one time it was indeed a very real concern.

The National Center For Atmospheric Research is the U.S. federal government’s top authority on climate science. And in 1974, Steven Schneider was at its helm. Back then, Schneider was a proponent of “global cooling,” stating that the dropping temperatures would lead to a massive food shortage. Sounds familiar, right? One solution proposed at the time was to melt the Arctic ice cap. The narrative from the 1970s mirrors that of the global warming discussion today: The planet’s temperature is changing, people will starve, and only extreme human intervention can save us from a perilous fate. Only today, scientists are exploring perhaps even more appalling options — such as blocking the sun’s rays to artificially cool the Earth’s temperature.

Despite the climate alarmists’ attempts at pretending that the “global cooling scare” never existed, evidence of its existence remain.

Global cooling is now often described as “fake,” and a quick search reveals that many mainstream media sources now say that there was little support for the hypothesis from the scientific community. A 2014 article by Gizmodo’s io9 claims that most scientists were convinced that global warming was the real problem, and that the theory of global cooling was overwhelmingly rejected. But is that really true? As Breitbart reports, “[T]he vast majority of scientific papers (220 out of 264) supported the cooling thesis.” Internal documents reveal that in the 1970s, even the federal government was looking into the problem of global cooling.

The elimination of the “global cooling theory” serves one purpose: to legitimize the theory of global warming. Of course, as Mike Adams explains in a recent article (and video), the idea that carbon dioxide causes global warming is a total farce. Not only is carbon dioxide at a global low, but it is essential for plant life to thrive.

Adams writes, “While climate change alarmists absurdly claim CO2 is a pollutant, they neglect to tell you that without CO2, we would all die of starvation because every ecosystem on the planet would almost instantly collapse. If CO2 were dropped to zero, Earth would become a barren global desert of death entirely incapable of supporting human life at all.”

Despite the climate alarmists’ attempts at manipulating science to shock the world’s populations into submission, the fact is that global warming and global cooling are all part of the same scam — they’re just at different ends of the spectrum. Global warming has become the prevailing theory in climate science purely because it’s more convenient. Proponents of global warming need the “global cooling scare” to be perceived as “fake” to maintain their authority and credibility....read more>>>...

Greenland's biggest glacier slows down and thickens, baffling scientists

[David Icke]: Jakobshavn Isbrae glacier gaining thickness of 20 metres a year. 

Greenland’s largest glacier has not only slowed its retreat, but has also thickened in recent years, surprising scientists studying the impacts of global warming on ice in the northern hemisphere.

The island is home to the second-largest ice sheet in the world after Antarctica and rapid warming in the northern hemisphere has major implications for continuing global sea-level rise.

The Jakobshavn Isbrae glacier on Greenland’s west coast used to lose more ice from this than anywhere else in the country.

It is known for the huge blocks of ice it calves into Disko Bay, which then drift south into the Atlantic Ocean. It is believed to have calved the iceberg which sank the Titanic.

Between 2000 and 2010, Jakobshavn Isbrae contributed the largest solid ice discharge in all of Greenland’s ice sheet and is estimated to have contributed to nearly 1mm of global sea rise.

But despite the trend of rising temperatures, it is no longer the place where the territory loses most of its ice.

Since 2013, when the glacier’s ice loss was at its fastest, the ice at the terminus of the glacier has stopped decreasing in height and started to thicken.

The overall effect is that it is now flowing more slowly, thickening and advancing towards the ocean instead of retreating further inland.

Measurements of the glacier’s elevation changes on its narrow trunk show that instead of losing 20 metres in height a year as it had previously, the glacier is now thickening by 20 metres a year.

New data processing techniques applied to the information gathered by satellites have given a clearer picture of the extent to which the ice is returning to the glacier, the European Space Agency (ESA) said....read more>>>....

Abrupt climate change 8,000 years ago led to dramatic population decline in South American

[S.O.T.T]: Abrupt climate change some 8,000 years ago led to a dramatic decline in early South American populations, suggests new UCL research.

The study, published in Scientific Reports, is the first to demonstrate how widespread the decline was and the scale at which population decline took place 8,000 to 6,000 years ago.

"Archaeologists working in South America have broadly known that some 8,200 years ago, inhabited sites in various places across the continent were suddenly abandoned. In our study we wanted to connect the dots between disparate records that span the Northern Andes, through the Amazon, to the southern tip of Patagonia and all areas in between," said lead author, Dr. Philip Riris (UCL Institute of Archaeology).

"Unpredictable levels of rainfall, particularly in the tropics, appear to have had a negative impact on pre-Columbian populations until 6,000 years ago, after which recovery is evident. This recovery appears to correlate with cultural practices surrounding tropical plant management and early crop cultivation, possibly acting as buffers when wild resources were less predictable," added Dr. Riris.

The study focused on the transition to the Middle Holocene (itself spanning 8,200 and 4,200 years ago), a period of particularly profound change when hunter-gatherer populations were already experimenting with different domestic plants, and forming new cultural habits to suit both landscape and climate change.

While the research shows that there was a significant disruption to population, the study highlights that indigenous people of South America were thriving before and after the middle Holocene...read more>>>...

Climate prediction models are all rigged to produce false “proof” of human-caused climate change

[David Icke]: Will global warming fear-mongering soon see its last day? A growing number of experts are speaking out about fraud within the climate science community.

Climate science is rife with statistical manipulation, data tampering and other integrity issues — and that’s before politics get involved.

While climate change alarmists claim that the science on global warming is “settled,” the fact of the matter is that this so-called consensus has been based entirely on fraudulent data and bogus prediction “models.” And that fact should render any “settled” opinions on the matter completely null and void.

The climate change debate is far from over, as climate alarmists are now doubling down on their rhetoric and taking extreme measures to ensure that their narrative reigns supreme. Mass censorship of climate change skepticism is coming down the pike, as is the the systemic suppression of any voice which questions the predetermined lie. Meanwhile, the propaganda machine is running at top-speed, pushing out all kinds of leftist tripe about how the world will end in 10 years if we don’t adopt socialist pipe dream policies, like the Green New Deal.

There is no shortage of experts who are critical of current climate change hypotheses, and there are many criticisms to be had. Marc Morano, an expert in climate skepticism from Climate Depot, has repeatedly gone on the record to debate climate change dogma and illustrate the inanity of so-called climate “science.” In a recent interview with Fox and Friends, Morano ruffled feathers by explaining the scientific reality that carbon dioxide is not, in fact, pollution.

An increasing number of scientists are daring to speak out about this biological reality.

NASA astronaut and geologist Harrison H. Schmitt is quoted as saying, “Thanks to the single-minded demonization of this natural and essential atmospheric gas by advocates of government control of energy production, the conventional wisdom about carbon dioxide is that it is a dangerous pollutant. That’s simply not the case.”

MIT climate scientist Richard Lindzen has also expressed the opinion that CO2 isn’t a threat.

“CO2 , it should be noted, is hardly poisonous. On the contrary, it is essential for life on our planet and levels as high as 5000 ppm are considered safe on our submarines and on the space station (current atmospheric levels are around 400 ppm, while, due to our breathing, indoor levels can be much higher),” Lindzen reportedly said in 2017.

Mike Adams, founder of Natural News and Brighteon.com, has repeatedly written about the benefits increased CO2 levels have had on the planet, noting that it is essential for plant life to flourish...read more>>>...

Ocasio-Cortez Claims Victory Against GOP On Climate Change Despite Green New Deal Getting Zero Votes

Climate change is man made? Now where have we heard that 'say it enough times and they will believe it' bullshit before? Oh yes ... Greta Goldilocks; Dame Emma Thompson ... and a whole host of other brainwashed members of The Lost.  

Even when its staring them in the face on a cloudless day ... they will never see that the cooling and warming cycle of the earth is a natural event caused by THE SUN...!! 

They are all puppets in a globalist script. Keep saying the same lies over and over and they will believe it enmasse. No we won't ... we are waking up to the sinister plot going on here. 

[Daily Sheeple]: New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez seemed to take a victory lap on the Green New Deal, claiming her effort proved Republicans’ “climate denial is now a losing position.”

“We chose to go on the climate offense with the #GreenNewDeal,” Ocasio-Cortez tweeted Thursday night. “As a result, climate denial is now a losing position + we got GOP (incl #WheresMitch!) to finally admit that climate change is real + man-made.”

While many Democratic presidential candidates and lawmakers endorsed the bill, moderate Democrats were less enthusiastic about the proposal. Democratic leadership largely sidestepped the matter, moving forward with alternative

In fact, not a single Senate Democrat voted for the Green New Deal when it was brought to the floor in March. On the House side, Speaker Nancy Pelosi has not brought the Green New Deal to the floor, nor have any hearings been held.

Ocasio-Cortez claimed that her Green New Deal “offensive” made “climate denial” a “losing position.” However, new polling shows that support for the Green New Deal decreased among voting groups over the last year....read more>>>....

“Goodbye Anthropogenic Global Warming” — Dr. Roger Higgs

[Electroverse.net]: “The Earth is now cooling,” says geologist Dr. Roger Higgs.

“Man-made-global-warming believers will by 2021 have to admit they were wrong and that CO2 is blameless and that Svensmark’s sun/cosmic ray/cloud/temperature link is correct.”

The IPCC’s 2013 report says the sun “cannot explain global mean surface warming over the past 25 years, because solar irradiance has declined over this period,” Higgs points out.

But the IPCC assumes Earth’s average surface temperature reacts almost instantly to solar-output changes, with a time-lag of less than 3 years. When Higgs cross-correlated solar cosmic-ray and temperature graphs, he found that massive ocean thermal inertia causes, not a 3-year lag, but a 25-year lag.

“The ‘man-made-global-warming’ idea is a fallacy whose time is nearly over,” says Higgs....read more>>>...

Climate Fraud Exposed: CO2 Doesn’t Rise Up, Trap And Retain Heat

(Humans Are Free); We have been lied to: Carbon dioxide (CO2) is an alleged ‘well-mixed gas’ also alleged to reside in sufficient quantities high in the atmosphere to cause global warming (via the so-called greenhouse gas effect).

The first damaging fact to the theory: CO2 is actually a heavy gas. It is not ‘well mixed’ in the air as per the glib claim. Just check out the NASA image (left) showing widely varying carbon dioxide concentrations. Indeed, schoolchildren are shown just how heavy CO2 is by way of a simple school lab experiment.

This heavy gas thus struggles to rise and soon falls back to earth due to its Specific Gravity (SG). Real scientists rely on the SG measure which gives standard air a value of 1.0 where the measured SG of CO2 is 1.5 (considerably heavier). Thus, in the real world the warming theory barely gets off the ground.

If you ask any climate ‘scientist’ how long CO2 traps heat they are unable to tell you. Instead you will find airy-fairy, hand-waving pronouncements like this peach:

“As humans emit greenhouse gases like CO2, the air warms and holds more water vapor, which then traps more heat and accelerates warming.”

You see, they want to convince you that CO2 is trapping heat (like a greenhouse) but then don’t tell you how much and for how long.

But take a look at any climate ‘science’ publication explaining how they quantify and explain their mechanism of carbon dioxide’s ‘heat trapping’ in the climate and you will only read about radiation effects, nothing at all on those essential laws that chemical science experts rely on. Anyway, a greenhouse works by blocking out cooling convection, not by trapping radiation.

And the greenhouse gas theory is all about radiation. But radiation is not the principle method of heat transport in a gaseous environment like earth’s atmosphere. Here. it is convection and conduction that carry heat around the system. No wonder climate computer models fail.

So, does carbon dioxide trap and retain heat? No, although it cools more slowly than some other gases, it absorbs some amount of heat and quickly cools the same amount when the heat source is removed. Does it rise up in the atmosphere? No, it does the opposite. It sinks.

It is well known that CO2 pools in the lower atmosphere – it is heavy and sinks to the ground where it forms large concentrations (e.g as carboniferous limestone)...read more>>>...

600 Million Years of CO2 Data Reveals Current CO2 Starvation

VERY INTERESTING !!

DATA THAT CERTAINLY CONTRADICTS THE 'CLIMATE CHANGE HOAX'