SHOCKING case of state-sponsored euthanasia in Spain: Euthanasia doctor is also a transplant co-ordinator, who was under investigation for falsifying documents

 Noelia Ramos, a 25-year-old paraplegic woman, was euthanised in Spain on 26 March 2026, despite not having a terminal illness.

The doctor who oversaw the euthanasia procedure also acted as a transplant coordinator, creating a conflict of interest in that she had an institutional interest in obtaining Noelia’s organs.

But that’s not all. Since November 2025, the killer doctor has been under investigation for a legal complaint made about her for falsifying documents and abuse of power to alter the decision-making process about Noelia’s euthanasia.

The ultraconservative Catholic platform Christian Lawyers has succeeded in getting the courts to investigate two members of the committee that approved the euthanasia of Noelia, a 24-year-old paraplegic woman who requested assisted dying.

A ruling by Barcelona’s Court of Instruction Number 20 has accepted the lawsuit filed by the association for the alleged crimes of falsifying public documents and abuse of power, and has ordered preliminary proceedings against the defendants, who will have to give statements in Administrative Court Number 12. The judge does not explain the reason for the investigation, simply requesting the “clarification” of the facts.

Christian Lawyers argues that two members of the Catalan Guarantee and Evaluation Commission raised their alleged disagreement in order to bring the case before the commission, where it was decided that assisted dying could be practised. On social media, the association’s president, Polonia Castellanos, stated: “We are going to do everything possible to prevent [euthanasia] from taking place,” after concluding that the two professionals, listed as alternate members, “falsified” the report....<<<Read More>>>...

Canada’s euthanasia program now accounts for over 5% of all deaths, raising ethical concerns

 Canada's Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program has grown thirteenfold since 2016, now accounting for 5.1% of all deaths (16,499 cases in 2024). If classified as a cause of death, MAiD would rank as the sixth leading cause of mortality in Canada.

While 95.6% of MAiD cases involve patients with a "reasonably foreseeable" death (e.g., terminal cancer), 4.4% (726 cases) were approved for chronic, non-terminal conditions. Track 2 cases (non-terminal) face stricter scrutiny, making up 24.2% of rejected requests.

Internal physician reports reveal patients seeking MAiD due to poverty, isolation or healthcare delays (average wait time: 27.7 weeks for specialist care). Critics argue MAiD has become a default solution for government failures rather than a dignified choice.

Almost 33% of MAiD recipients self-identified as disabled, with 61.5% in Track 2 cases. Women make up 56.7% of non-terminal euthanasia cases. Advocates warn of pressure on vulnerable patients, with some labeled "selfish" for refusing MAiD.

Canada plans to expand MAiD to mental illness by 2027, raising fears of further abuse. Critics argue MAiD prioritizes autonomy over prevention, with disability rights groups calling it "abandonment, not healthcare." The debate highlights a critical inflection point for Canadian society.

More than one in 20 deaths in Canada now result from government-sanctioned euthanasia, according to a new federal report, marking a profound shift in the nation's approach to end-of-life care. Health Canada's Sixth Annual Report on Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD), released in November, reveals that 16,499 Canadians received lethal injections under the program in 2024—representing 5.1% of all deaths nationwide, a steady increase from previous years.

The findings come amid heated debate over whether Canada's euthanasia framework—originally intended for terminally ill patients—has expanded too rapidly, with critics warning that vulnerable individuals, including those suffering from mental illness or lacking access to adequate healthcare, may be choosing death out of desperation rather than dignity.

According to BrightU.AI's Enoch, MAiD is a legalized program initially intended for those with imminent death but now expanded to include individuals suffering from severe disabilities or chronic pain, even if their condition is not immediately life-threatening.

Since its legalization in 2016, Canada's MAiD program has grown more than thirteenfold, making it the fastest-growing assisted dying regime in the world. While Health Canada emphasizes that euthanasia is not classified as a cause of death under World Health Organization standards, independent estimates suggest it would rank as the sixth leading cause of mortality if included in official statistics.

The report notes that 95.6% of MAiD cases in 2024 fell under "Track 1," reserved for those with a "reasonably foreseeable" death, typically from terminal illnesses like cancer (cited in 63.6% of cases). However, 4.4%—roughly 726 individuals—were approved under "Track 2," which permits euthanasia for chronic, non-terminal conditions. Notably, Track 2 cases accounted for 24.2% of all rejected MAiD requests, indicating stricter scrutiny for non-terminal applicants....<<<Read More>>>...

Leadbeater’s euthanasia bill sparks further controversy; Lords continue the debate tomorrow

 Last Friday, Kim Leadbeater’s euthanasia bill was put before the House of Lords for a two-day debate. After a full day, the debate was adjourned until tomorrow.

Officially called the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, the proposed government-sponsored euthanasia bill has been mired in controversy, yet it passed three votes in the House of Commons after being introduced by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater on 16 October 2024. The controversies continue as it is debated in the House of Lords.

The House of Lords debate on the euthanasia bill last Friday centred on concerns around possible coercion, a lack of adequate safeguards and not enough time for such controversial legislation to be properly scrutinised. Labour peer Lord Falconer is sponsoring the controversial bill in the upper chamber.

Ahead of the debate, the equalities watchdog, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (“EHRC”), added to the growing number of institutions that have grave concerns about the Bill. In advice to members of the House of Lords on 8 September, the EHRC said more detail is needed on how the Bill could affect people from different backgrounds and those with disabilities.

The EHRC also raised concerns around the “great difficulty of accurately determining how long someone with a terminal illness will live.”

In her advice to the Lords, EHRC chairwoman Baroness Kishwer Falkner raised concerns about the method through which the Bill has been brought to Parliament – as a Private Member’s Bill rather than Government-backed legislation.

“We believe that a Private Member’s Bill is an unsuitable vehicle for such significant legislation, because it is not subject to the same pre-legislative scrutiny that a Government-sponsored draft bill would have undergone, with expert evidence considered earlier in the process,” Baroness Falkner said....<<<Read More>>>....

The passing of the UK’s Nazi-like euthanasia bill is Parliament’s most shameful day

 The UK’s new “assisted dying” bill has been passed despite concerns and objections from various people and organisations. 

 It’s comparable to the Nazi’s Aktion T4 euthanasia programme, which normalised and accepted the killing of innocent lives by healthcare professionals for the perceived greater good.

In the following, Jonathan Engler draws parallels between the new bill, the Nazi programme and other events, such as the euthanasia of patients in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, highlighting the dangers of diminishing the value of life and accepting killing as a legitimate part of healthcare....<<<Read More>>>....

Jacques Attali: Euthanasia will be an essential instrument for those who are costing society rather than producing

 In 1981, Jacques Attali discussed the transformation of health and education systems towards commodification. As a socialist, he viewed humans merely as units of production whose children could be bought and sold.

He believed the lives of people who were costing society rather than producing should “stop itself brutally. “Euthanasia will be one of the essential instruments of our future societies,” he said.

Attali is a French deep politician, a hidden decision-maker who treats politicians as puppet masters would treat puppets.

A translation of Salomon’s interview with Attali in 1981 was widely shared on social media a few years ago. However, this version was not correct. It quoted Attali as saying:

In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old, because as soon as it exceeds 60-65 years man lives longer than he produces and costs society dearly, then the weak and then the useless who do nothing for society because there will be more and more of them, and especially the stupid ones.

Euthanasia targeting these groups; euthanasia will have to be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases. We cannot of course execute people or set up camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe it is for their own good.

Too large a population, and for the most part unnecessary, is something economically too expensive. Socially, it is also much better for the human machine to come to an abrupt halt rather than gradually deteriorating. We won’t be able to run intelligence tests on millions and millions of people, you can imagine!

We will find something or cause it, a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the fat, it doesn’t matter, the weak will succumb to it, the fearful and the stupid will believe it and ask to be treated.

We will have taken care to have planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution.

The selection of idiots will thus be done on its own: they will go to the slaughterhouse on their own.

Attali is a socialist and, as such, he views people in terms of production and believes that humans are comparable to and competing with machines, which are more productive and will replace humans.  This in itself is a disturbing worldview and, of course, leads to even more disturbing worldviews, such as the euthanasia of those who are deemed unproductive, including those over a certain age.

“As soon as one passes 60/65 years, man lives longer than he produces and he, therefore, costs more to society,” Attali said. “Hence, I believe that in the same logic of industrial society, the objective is no longer going to be the elongation of life expectancy, but to make sure that within a determined length of life, man lives the best life possible, but of such a kind, that health expenses will be the most reduced as possible in terms of the costs for the collectivity. Therefore, giving rise to a new criterion for life expectancy: that of the value of a health system, focused not on the elongation of life expectancy, but on the number of years without illness, and particularly without hospitalisation. In fact, from the point of view of society, it is more preferable that the human machine stops itself brutally rather than it deteriorating gradually.”

“Euthanasia will be one of the essential instruments of our future societies,” he said....<<<Read More>>>...

Leadbeater’s bill to kill is defeated; Rachel from Accounts continues to kill the economy

 You may have missed the news (the corporate, Statist media pretty well forgot to mention it) but we won our battle against death by doctor. Euthanasia is not going to be legal in the UK. Our victory over this deeply dangerous euthanasia bill proves that it still possible for us to win individual battles and to defeat the evil conspirators and their acolytes. Despite massive support from the corporate media, politicians, doctors et al, the Leadbeater Bill has been put to sleep and will now be quietly buried (with as little embarrassing publicity as possible, of course). A big thank you to all those who sent books, articles and videos to MPs and journalists. Our campaign helped kill the Leadbeater Bill....<<<Read More>>>....

Leadbeater’s euthanasia bill is a step towards a slaughter of the innocent and infirm

 Last year a British Member of Parliament called Kim Leadbeater introduced a Bill to make euthanasia legal in the UK.

MPs (most of whom knew very little about the subject) voted for the Bill but probably thought that they were merely allowing the Bill to begin an arduous journey before becoming law.

The next step in turning the Bill into law was for a committee of MPs to look into the issue more closely. The committee has the responsibility of scrutinising the Bill.

But Ms. Leadbeater, who introduced the Bill, has a considerable amount of power over the committee.

In fact she has picked the members of the committee. She chose who would sit on the committee and most of the MPs she picked, and who have a known view, voted for her Bill.

And she has picked the witnesses who will give evidence.

The witnesses were picked in secret and I’d bet that a surprising number of the witnesses back euthanasia.

Doctors have been deliberately killing people for years.

First, there was the Liverpool Care Pathway – a scheme whereby doctors were allowed to kill off the elderly, the frail, the vulnerable and the sick if they were considered to be an unproductive waste of space. The Liverpool Care Pathway was supposed to have been discarded. But it hasn’t been. Doctors still use it to kill patients who are regarded as a nuisance.

Second, there were the Do Not Resuscitate notices which were and are used as an excuse to kill anyone who has an illness which needs a lot of medical or nursing care. Patients are supposed to be given the option of whether or not to agree to a DNR notice. “Sign here and if you feel poorly, we’ll put you out of your misery.” Note the word “supposed.” In practice doctors, and especially nurses, slap DNR notices on anyone they decide should be dead.

And now comes Leadbeater’s “Kill by Doctor” Bill – in my view, the official approval of genocide; the slaughter of the innocent and the infirm – the very people doctors should protect. I believe it is a Bill which will put an end to the final vestiges of dignity and decency in medical practice. Doctors are supposed to care for patients, not to kill them.

There is, I fear, one point that Leadbeater’s committee might not hear....<<<Read More>>>...

Euthanasia is not painless, peaceful and dignified

It is a myth that euthanasia is painless and dignified. There is absolutely no evidence to show that it is either. But there is plenty of evidence to show that it is neither.

It is a convenient myth (convenient for the proponents of euthanasia) that euthanasia (in its various forms and incarnations) is painless and dignified.

There is absolutely no evidence to show that it is either.

But there is plenty of evidence to show that it is neither.

Euthanasia does not provide the painless, peaceful death which its advocates claim it to be. There is no perfect way for the government to kill people. As Samuel Beckett said: “Even death is unreliable.”

Here are 25 things everyone should know:

1. A study in the journal ‘Anesthesia’ reported that there were no standardised methods for euthanasia and so, as a result, there are frequent cases of prolonged and distressing deaths. There appears to be a high incidence of vomiting, re-awakening from coma and prolongation of the dying process (with some individuals taking up to seven days to die.)

2. In America, doctors cannot access drugs to use in cases of the death penalty because of cost and availability. International drug companies are unwilling to provide drugs intended to kill people on ethical grounds. (It is unusual to see drug companies citing “ethical grounds” as a reason not to do something. I suspect that the real reason is that the drug companies are worried more about legal and reputational issues.)

3. Dr Bryan Betty, medical director of the Royal New Zealand College of GPs has warned that mixing concoctions of drugs has led to traumatic deaths.

4. There is considerable confusion about what to do if an initial attempt at euthanasia fails. Should the patient be told that they have to give their consent a second time? Or a third time? What should be done if a patient is semi-conscious and has not died? Should they then be kept alive? Or should another attempt be made to kill them?

5. A study performed in the Netherlands showed that in 21 of 114 cases, the patient did not die as soon as expected or woke up and the doctor had to kill them for a second time.

6. What happens if the doctor or nurse who is performing the euthanasia has left the building – which is likely to happen if a death takes a number of days?

7. What happens if a doctor or nurse cannot put an IV line into a vein? (This is something which often happens with elderly patients whose veins may be frail or damaged.)

8. The same drugs which are used for killing prisoners on death row are sometimes used to kill patients who have consented to euthanasia. But there is evidence that the killing of prisoners does not always go smoothly and can take longer than might be expected. (Lethal injections were introduced as more humane than the gas chamber or the electric chair. There is no evidence that they are.)

9. One of the drugs used in the authorised killing of patients is propofol which can sting as it flows through a vein when given in normal doses. No one knows what effect it has when given in large doses in euthanasia.

10. Dr Joel Zivot, an anaesthesiologist and critical care doctor, has suggested that death by euthanasia could feel like drowning. If paralysing drugs are used, the patient appears calm, peaceful and quiet – but that doesn’t tell us what the patient is experiencing....<<<Read More>>>...

Canada: Euthanasia on demand; doctors licensed to kill

 Canada’s suicide activists and euthanasia advocates promised the public that the path to “medical aid in dying” would be a narrow path with high guardrails. They were lying. It is a four-lane highway, and nobody is patrolling it.

Not a week goes by without some grim new development and our government refuses to listen to those hoarsely sounding the alarm.

On 16 October, the Associated Press covered the questions euthanasia providers are discussing on their private forums. One story featured a homeless man being killed by lethal injection:

One doctor wrote that although his patient had a serious lung disease, his suffering was “mostly because he is homeless, in debt and cannot tolerate the idea of (long-term care) of any kind.” A respondent questioned whether the fear of living in the nursing home was truly intolerable. Another said the prospect of “looking at the wall or ceiling waiting to be fed … to have diapers changed” was sufficiently painful. The man was eventually euthanized. One provider said any suggestion they should provide patients with better housing options before offering euthanasia “seems simply unrealistic and hence, cruel,” amid a national housing crisis....<<<Read More>>>...

Demonising the elderly

 Ageism is rife. Elder abuse is now common, with older citizens being bullied and harassed and demonised when they are at their most vulnerable; frail and in need of caring, support, sympathy, patience and understanding.

The elderly and the poor will be demonised and made to feel guilty if they don’t submit to euthanasia. Conditioning, propaganda and predictive programming are all being used to promote the idea that older citizens have a duty to die when they reach 70 years of age. Young people (by which I mean both the Z generation and the millennials) are encouraged to loathe anyone over 60 and to blame them for everything they feel is unsatisfactory in their own lives.

Nowhere is ageism more obvious than in health care. In the UK, the elderly have been abandoned. Women having sex change operations on the NHS are now being given free fertility treatment so that they can have babies after they become men. There is plenty of money to pay nursery school fees for rich parents but no money to provide care for the elderly. Britain’s health service has the staff, the time and the money to provide free gender ID clinics, but the elderly are not allowed to have cataract operations under the NHS until they are virtually blind (the authorities clearly hope that they will either be dead or too old for surgery). 

This absurd policy means that old people denied such surgery cannot look after themselves, and need to be cared for – usually by relatives or neighbours since the State won’t do that these days. No one in authority cares a damn about the quality of life of septuagenarians who are unable to feed themselves, read, use the internet or watch television. The politicians and the bureaucrats do not have the wit or imagination to realise that one day they too may be unable to feed themselves, use the internet or watch television....<<<Read More>>>...

The UK gov't wants to legalise 'assisted dying'. Here's what happens next.

The Parliament of the United Kingdom is moving forward with a vote on a new bill that will legalise assisted dying for those diagnosed with terminal illness.

This is the culmination of a years-long political, media and entertainment industry wide campaign to normalise euthanasia in the UK's public mind.

In that time we have been told that assisted dying is good for people, good for the NHS and good for the environment.

The bill is expected to be formally introduced on 16 October, with the first debate to take place later this year, meaning the vote will likely be held in early 2025.

I would be stunned if it doesn't pass.

Here is my prediction for what happens next...

- For the first year or so it will just be an option, you won't hear much about it except in articles with headlines like "Assisted dying saved my parent/partner/child from years of pain".

- After a year or two a report will come out claiming success via some tortured invented statistical measure like "assisted dying boosts patient well being scores in surveyed NHS hospitals".

- Another will follow claiming waiting lists have improved due to decreased overcrowding in palliative care wards. They might even claim it's decreased the NHS's carbon footprint.

- Opinion pieces will appear with titles like "Assisted dying success story shuts down conspiracy theorists".

- The minimum age to be considered for assisted dying will gradually be lowered. And the list of diseases and conditions for which assisted dying is a "recommended treatment alternative" will expand.

- Eventually non-lethal diseases will be included, then psychological illnesses too. Then physical and mental disabilities.

- Then will come an "emergency" - a fake one, obviously - and the NHS will come out of it shining thanks to resources "freed up" by euthanasia programs.

- Next will come the editorials. "Assisted dying is good for patients and saved the NHS during [fake pandemic], it's time to make it mandatory".

- A backbench MP will introduce a bill forcing anyone diagnosed with a fatal illness to be put on an assisted dying list.

- The bill will fail, and most of the press will oppose it, but the government will issue "common sense" compromise regulations where assisted dying is the default, but patients can opt out of if they want.

- It will never actually BE mandatory. But it WILL be harder and harder to get out of. If you choose to opt-in and later try to change your mind, you will be said to be mentally incompetent....<<<Read More>>>...

We’re Fighting for Our Lives

Euthanasia or “doctor assisted suicide” isn’t about an easy, quick, painless death. And it isn’t about giving people a choice. It’s about killing people. We’re literally fighting for our lives, Dr. Vernon Coleman warns.

“If euthanasia is made legal then if you’re in pain or terminally ill you will have a choice. Doctors will help you escape from your pain and distress. It will be simple, straightforward, quick and painless.”

That’s what they say.

And they’re lying through their teeth, of course.

First, you won’t have a choice. They’ll push you into euthanasia in the same way as the elderly and the disabled are being pushed into agreeing not to be resuscitated if they fall ill. And they’ll make euthanasia look like the easy way out. There is virtually no health care in Britain today. Palliative care is being cut off. Hospices are being shut. And those who say “no” to euthanasia are told they’re selfish.

When euthanasia is legal you won’t have a choice. And it will be voluntary in the same sort of way that soldiers peeling spuds are volunteers.

Euthanasia isn’t about giving people a choice. It’s about killing people.

And euthanasia isn’t about providing people with an easy, quick, painless death....<<<Read More>>>...

They want to use euthanasia to murder the disabled, the sick, the old and the unhappy – are you going to let them?

It’s difficult to open a newspaper or news website these days without finding an article promoting the joys of death. Euthanasia (aka “doctor-assisted suicide”) is as fashionable today as prettily patterned face masks were a few years ago.

The myths about killing yourself are promoted with enthusiasm by celebrities, journalists and politicians.

But the truth is very different.

There is a huge campaign in the UK to force Parliament to have a vote on changing the law to make euthanasia legal. And similar campaigns exist everywhere in the world where euthanasia isn’t allowed.

The myths are promoted with enthusiasm by celebrities, journalists and politicians. Killing yourself is, they claim, the only responsible thing to do if you have a disease which is affecting your mental or physical health. Killing yourself will spare you pain, spare your relatives’ pain, free up health services and help save the planet.

But the other side of the argument is never aired.

And the truth is very different.

Euthanasia is an essential part of the Great Reset (and the task of reducing the size of the global population so beloved by the conspirators). And it’s all about saving money and helping take us into “Net Zero.”

As Dr. Jack King shows in his important book `They Want To Kill Us – Here’s How and Why’ euthanasia isn’t efficient and pain-free. Things frequently go wrong – leaving patients and relatives deeply distressed. Euthanasia is, however, a cheap way to avoid spending money on palliative care. Hospices are already suffering funding shortages as they work hard to force us into accepting “doctor-assisted suicide” as the only option.

In countries where euthanasia is legal (and because it is part of the plan to take us into the Great Reset, euthanasia is, of course, a global phenomenon) death doctors and their assistants are “helping” people kill themselves because they are poor, disabled, elderly or merely unhappy and dissatisfied with their lives. Even children are allowed to kill themselves if they are feeling unhappy. Please read that again. Euthanasia is being used as a legal excuse to kill the poor, the disabled and the unhappy. The evidence in Dr. King’s book will startle and horrify you.politicians.

Euthanasia is an essential part of the plan to kill as many of us as possible. It has nothing to do with good medical care. No decent doctor should have anything to do with it. Doctors are supposed to save people – not to kill them....<<<Read More>>>...