Bovaer Bovine Stupidity

 Late last year, Arla Foods began a trial of Bovaer in 30 farms across the country. At the time, according to BBC Very Iffy, the company claimed the additive could reduce methane emissions from cows by 30-45%. 

News of the trial caused consternation among some and led to a boycott of some Arla products. The manufacturer of Bovaer, DSM-Firmenich said these people were the subject of mistruths and misinformation and the product was “totally safe” for use.

Meanwhile, Bovaer was mandated to use across Denmark in early October this year and there have been many reports that the additive is damaging to livestock, prompting an investigation by the Danish government. By pure coincidence, Arla announced in early November it had stopped the British trial and was evaluating the results.

How did we get into this position of endemic bovine stupidity? Let’s dig in....<<<Read More>>>...

Bovaer Bullsh*t: The British public isn’t having it

 The Bovaer/burping cows scandal is bullsh*t, James Delingpole writes as he reveals that a response to one of his tweets demonstrates the public thinks it’s bullsh*t as well.

Despite what corporate media claims, the public doesn’t care if it reduces methane or not and the public doesn’t care that climate alarmists peddle methane as a powerful greenhouse gas. All the public cares about is not feeding dairy cattle with cancer-causing, testicle-shrinking poison.

The point about Bovaer is not that it may or may not be harmless and that it may or may not have a significant impact on cow methane. The point is that it is entirely unnecessary because man-made climate change is TOTALLY made up bollocks.

When they read a phrase as baldly unequivocal as “man-made climate change is TOTALLY made up bollocks,” they no longer sigh uncomfortably and murmur something rueful about “the polar bears” or “Greenland ice sheets” or about how they “can’t believe we can be pumping all that carbon into the atmosphere without making some sort of difference to climate.”

Instead, most sensible people now just nod furiously in agreement.

But obviously, you’re never going to get this from the corporate media which continues, relentlessly, to gaslight us with the message that climate scepticism is a minority activity and that people who don’t want carcinogenic, testicle-shrinking poison fed to dairy cattle in order to save the planet are just bonkers conspiracy theorists....<<<Read More>>>....

Bovaer Trial...are we being played?

We published an article last week on "Bovaer", the chemical compound, currently being trialled in the UK, which is added to cow feed to reduce methane emissions (allegedly).

Since then the story has grown, and I just wanted to do a quick update and ask a question that's nagging at me, but we'll get to that.

Firstly the good news - the widespread disgust. People all over the country have objected to the "low emission" drug, leading to boycotts of the dairy giant Arla and their associated brands.

Social media users are posting pictures of stacked shelves of unsold Lurpak butter and Cravendale milk.

Smaller farms and organic dairy producers have jumped on the chance for good publicity and released statements declaring themselves "Bovaer free" (Some people have made lists)

Some are even taking potshots and Bill Gates, which is always fun.

The BBC has turned Marianna Spring loose to do a fact-check, and "experts" have reassured her that Bovaer is safe...which was pretty much always going to happen.

A stranger development can be found in The Daily Mail, which has run a few stories on this issue, including publishing a full list of all the products Arla is involved with to enable boycotts.

Why would they do that? Appeasing their audience? Hopping on the bandwagon?

Perhaps.

But there's more. The story isn't actually new, Bovaer was approved by the UK government back in December of 2023 and was already being trialled by Marks & Spencer in April of this year.

So why the big fuss now, a year later?

And now a little itch is asking questions at the back of my mind.

Is it possible this whole story was deliberately cultivated to gauge people's reaction to the planned nationwide roll-out in the future?

Or could it be even subtler than that?

After all, if you wanted to discourage people from eating dairy products and red meat, then advertising the fact you've put potentially toxic additives in the cows' food wouldn't be a bad strategy, would it?

Just an idea...<<<Read More>....

CLIMATE CHANGE VIRUS has already “INFECTED” millions, now the sheeple wonder will the CLIMATE VACCINE save mankind from certain doom?

And so the push for the useless eaters to willingly give up meat and dairy products gets into gear. Taint the food sources and they will have to look elsewhere for food. 

It is very possible that  none of these toxins are going anywhere near cattle ... and its a huge lie ... to force the gullible into a direction they wouldn't have normally taken ... problem, reaction, solution in action .... 

 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The climate vaccine is the latest development in “medicine” funded by psychotic billionaires and being created to stop cows from farting methane into the atmosphere, which is supposedly causing all of the glaciers to rapidly melt, oceans to swallow up continents, and humans to burst into flames while walking down the street. 

Climate alarmism is a disease where gullible, brainwashed humans are completely and utterly committed (pardon the pun) to saving the earth by giving most of their time, money and energy to these psychotic billionaires, who made up the problem out of thin air (pardon the pun again).

Once a few billion cows are injected with this deadly “vaccine,” their milk and meat will be tainted, and every human who eats the meat or consumes dairy products that come from those cows will be part of the grand colon cancer experiment. Why? Because burping and farting are natural ways the body reduces gas and bloating, and people with persistent or worsening gas require medical attention for “underlying gastrointestinal conditions.” Care to know what those conditions are?

According to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, after chronic gastrointestinal conditions persist, including small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), the body may become unable to absorb sufficient nutrients from food. 

If you think Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos haven’t been informed of this by the scientists creating and implementing the “climate vaccine,” then you need to uninstall Microsoft windows now and stop shopping on Amazon.

Eventually, once you can’t fart or burp anymore or absorb nutrients, you’ll suffer extreme weight loss and anemia. You may also, during this stage of “climate change” in your intestines, develop chronic constipation, peptic ulcers, hernias, intestinal blockages, and wait for it … colorectal cancer....<<<Read More>>>...

Climate alarmists score an own goal: Bovaer’s major route of excretion is CO2

 The drug Bovaer which is described as a feed additive for dairy cows to “reduce emissions” has been disclosed as consisting of three ingredients: silicon dioxide, propylene glycol and 3-nitrooxypropanol (“3-NOP”).

Writing for UK Column, Dr. Mike Williams takes a brief look at the studies done on 3-NOP to establish if it is “safe and effective.”

The European Food Safety Authority’s (“EFSA’s”) Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (“FEEDAP”) concludes that the genotoxicity potential of 3-NOP cannot be ruled out, indicating a potential to cause cancer, he writes. 3-NOP’s impact on humans is unknown as it remains untested.

3-NOP was found to induce chromosome damage and gene mutations and an increase in benign gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumours in studies on female rats. Adverse effects on fertility and reproduction were also seen in rats, including severe reduction of spermatogenesis in males and failure to become pregnant in females at high doses.

Although studies show that 3-NOP does not transmit in dosed animals’ milk, the breakdown product of 3-NOP, 3-nitrooxypropionic acid (“NOPA”), was detected in cow’s plasma and milk, and is assumed to be responsible for testicular toxicity.

In a twist which shows climate alarmists’ plans to be self-defeating, the use of 3-NOP in cows also results in increased hydrogen emissions and the major route of excretion is as carbon dioxide (CO2)....<<<Read More>>>....

New Bovaer fears: UK Government 'commits' to giving ALL cows in England controversial feed by 2030 - amid ongoing dairy boycott over 'toxic' additive

 What a devious way to make UK folk stop eating dairy products? The government knows that people won't willingly stop drinking milk, eating yogurt or cream.... so instead they claim to have invented a toxic product to give to cattle to stop them farting, knowing damn well the products will be boycotted due to the supposed contamination ....

Devious or are they really putting this shit into our cattle?

Surprisingly in this elite owned newspaper report, there is a claim that the contaminate is harmless to humans ... yet when you study its chemical constituents you can see the truth is contrary to this gutter press lie. 

++++++++++++++++++++++

All 'suitable' British cattle will be given methane-reducing chemical Bovaer or Bovaer-like products by law by 2030, under controversial Government plans.

A Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) document that details the plan to mandate the use of 'methane-suppressing feed products' in English cattle has sparked concern on social media — due to claims the substance can leach into dairy, causing health problems. 

It comes after furious Brits have vowed to boycott more than a dozen makers of dairy products including Lurpak, over fears they are allegedly 'contaminated' with the additive, which has been questionably linked to cancer....<<<Read More>>>...

Governments don’t mind exposing people to health risks as long as it appears they are doing something about climate change (even if they aren’t)

New Zealand’s Environment Protection Authority gave the green light to register Bovaer in August 2023, the first step to approving its use in the country. Although any current New Zealand use is not documented, if biotechnology deregulation goes ahead, it is unclear if the public will ever be allowed to know about it.

In the following article, citing the public outcry about its use in a trial in the UK, Dr. Guy Hatchard highlights the potential harms and the unknown harms for consumers of products from animals who have been fed the chemical.

The New Zealand Government is deregulating biotechnology. As we have previously reported, the public relations logic (if you can call it that) underpinning their bold (idiotic?) move says: 

 - Biotechnology is generally safe, so testing may be minimal or not required.
- There is no need to label gene-altered foods (presumably because the US doesn’t).
- Biotech technology measures aimed (rather inaccurately) at reducing climate change will be welcomed by the public here and overseas.
- Kiwi biotech will produce an economic miracle.

None of the above are remotely true or plausible. Here’s some more evidence....<<<Read More>>>....

Food for Thought #532

 

Arla’s Bovaer food additive is not food, it is a drug

 Last week, we published an article about the project Arla has launched to feed cattle with Bovaer which contains silicon dioxide, propylene glycol and 3-nitrooxypropanol (“3-NOP”). According to the FDA, Bovaer is not a food, it is a drug.

There has been an enormous public backlash with the public boycotting Arla products and Arla’s partners.

There seems to be a lot that is unknown about this new drug being fed to dairy cattle. Considering it is what can only be described as an experiment on both animals and humans, it’s not surprising farmers and the public are outraged.

The UK Food Standards Agency is insisting Bovaer is “safe.” A spokesman told MailOnline: “Milk from cows given Bovaer, a feed additive used to reduce methane emissions, is safe to drink.”

On Monday, The Standard said, “On 26 November, Arla announced a new project that it hopes will cut the UK’s methane emissions. Methane is a greenhouse gas and contributes to climate change … The initiative is part of Arla’s wider commitment to reduce the environmental impact of its dairy production. The organisation is aiming to reduce its CO2 emissions by 30 per cent by 2030.”

Using the excuse “to reduce methane emissions” and “CO2 emissions” and then tying it to Agenda 2030’s deadline of 2030, should raise an immediate red flag to anyone who has done even a little research in the last few years.

There is no anthropogenic climate change crisis, and, as we mentioned in our article last week, methane is an important part of the biogenic carbon cycle. As we all know from primary school lessons, carbon dioxide (CO2) is the elixir of life, supporting plants since the world began and making virtually all life on Earth possible.

The whole false anthropogenic climate change narrative should have disintegrated in 2009 when the Climategate emails were released. But such is the determination, and money, of those who want to keep the UN’s agenda alive....<<<Read More>>>...

Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos want “climate vaccines” laced into the food supply

 More fear narratives from The Pantomime. More apparent madness from the criminally insane.

++++++++++++++++++

Billionaires Jeff Bezos of Amazon and Bill Gates of Microsoft are scheming up plans to mass-"vaccinate" the population with "climate vaccines" hidden in food.

In order to stop "global warming," Bezos and Gates feel as though livestock animals raised for meat need to be jabbed with God-knows-what in order to reduce their "methane emissions," aka flatulence, or farts.

According to Bezos and Gates, cows and other meat animals are passing too much gas, which is making temperatures too warm. As such, Bezos is personally investing nearly $10 million to develop a "climate vaccine" that will stop meat animals from farting and save the planet from a changing climate.

"The 'vaccine' is designed to reduce the number of methane-producing microbes in a cow's stomach," reports explain.

"The funding comes from his Bezos Earth Fund, a philanthropy he established with $10 billion in 2020 ... The fund intends to distribute all of its money by 2030."

According to Bezos, all $10 billion in the Bezos Earth Fund will be used to "fight climate change and protect nature."...<<<Read More>>>....

Arla’s project adding anti-methane compound to cows’ feed is another limb of the fake food agenda

 Arla has enlisted 30 farms to participate in trials of an additive to cattle feed that they claim will reduce methane gas emissions. As the safety of the product is as questionable as the dubious reasons for introducing it and the risk to humans is unknown there has quite rightly been a public backlash.

Aside from the health and environmental risks, as Dr. Lawrie highlights, this is just another instance of billionaires meddling with our food supplies. This should raise red flags for anyone who understands what, for example, Bill Gates’ aims are.

As part of its FarmAhead Customer Partnership initiative, Arla has joined forces with Morrisons, Tesco and Aldi to trial the use of Bovaer, a feed additive that reduces enteric methane emissions from cows on average by 27%. The project will also involve around 30 of Arla’s farmer owners.

Bill Gates has an unhealthy obsession with cows producing methane gas. His obsession is, of course, driven by how much money he can make out of his pandemic and climate scams. However, Newsweek reported that Bill Gates has not invested in Bovaer, he has invested in a similar bovine animal feed additive through Rumin8. Bovaer is a product developed by the Dutch company DSM-Firmenich.

Whether it is Gates, another oligarch or a large corporation attempting to corner the market and control the food supply through vaccines or feeds, the facts remain the same. There is nothing wrong with cows producing methane. On the contrary, as we noted in an article last year, methane from cattle is part of nature’s biogenic carbon cycle. Plants capture carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere, absorbing the carbon and releasing the oxygen, the carbon is converted into carbohydrates and consumed by the cow where it is digested and some of the carbon is belched from the cow as methane. After an average of 10 years, the methane is converted into CO2 and so the cycle continues....<<<Read More>>>...