What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S.PCR test. We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as wedid, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which CDC said they could not provide as they did not have any samples. We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious.
The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema etc. and they then got the flu which further weakened their immune system and they died. I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid 19 to work with. We at the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid 19 fraud. the CDC has yet to send us a single viable, isolated and purifed sample of Covid 19. If they can't or won't send us a viable sample, I say there is no Covid 19, it is fictitious. The four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples. All the four papers written on Covid 19 only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which is NOT A VIRUS. A viral genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs.
With as bad as Covid is supposed to be all over the place, how come no one in any lab world wide has ever isolated and purified this virus in its entirety? That's because they've never really found the virus, all they've ever found was small pieces of RNA which were never identified as the virus anyway.
So what we're dealing with is just another flu strain like every year, COVID 19 does not exist and is fictitious. I believe China and the globalists orchestrated this COVID hoax (the flu disguised as a novel virus) to bring in global tyranny and a worldwide police totalitarian surveillance state, and this plot included massive election fraud to overthrow Trump.
A 60 minutes interview with the Army General in charge of the vaccine’s distribution finds that the vaccine was already manufactured and stockpiled, long before it was even remotely tested and “approved” by the Food and Drug Administration. The FDA’s three phase “gold standard” testing protocol wasn’t even observed. The vaccines were manufactured and stockpiled in advance, in anticipation of approval, because vaccine makers get what they want, and they are held to no real scientific standard whatsoever. The vaccine makers also enjoy full legal exemption from liability when their products injure people. The new vaccines are untested instruments of force just waiting to be unleashed by the U.S. military.
General Gus Perna spoke with 60 Minutes about the biggest obstacle in the coming months: convincing Americans to get the vaccines. That’s right, it’s not about science. It’s about coercion, about looking at people as if they are manipulatable pawns who have no dignity or self-decision. The final covid-19 vaccine is not a single dose shot, either. The first rollout requires Americans to submit to two shots, spaced out three weeks apart. Preliminary studies show up to six shots will be needed annually to maintain an illusion of immunity.
The military is strategizing the most effective ways to distribute the vaccines when they get the final nod of approval from the FDA. The federal government’s biggest problem is, admittedly, the American people. More specifically, Perna is concerned about “anti-vaxxers.” Anti-vaccine sentiments and vaccine refusal is “what keeps him up at night” – according to the interview.
The military is strategizing a way to vaccinate 300 million Americans, as if consent and self-decision is not part of the process. America is being turned into Big Pharma’s plantation, an experimental playground that turns its own military against the rule of law. Basic ethics are being cast aside as concepts like medical privacy, parental rights and informed consent are quashed. Now, Americans as a whole are being viewed as a military target, and those who refuse the shots are being pinpointed as the enemy....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
[SOTT]: A small but key UK study has found that "cellular immunity" to the pandemic SARS-CoV-2 virus is present after six months in people who had mild or asymptomatic COVID-19 - suggesting they might have some level of protection for at least that time.
Scientists presenting the findings, from 100 non-hospitalised COVID-19 patients in Britain, said they were "reassuring" but did not mean people cannot in rare cases be infected twice with the disease.
"While our findings cause us to be cautiously optimistic about the strength and length of immunity generated after SARS-CoV-2 infection, this is just one piece of the puzzle," said Paul Moss, a professor of haematology at Britain's Birmingham University who co-led the study.
"There is still a lot for us learn before we have a full understanding of how immunity to COVID-19 works."
Experts not directly involved with the study said its findings were important and would add to a growing body of knowledge about potential protective immunity to COVID-19.
The study, which has not yet been peer-reviewed by other experts but was published online on bioRxiv, analysed the blood of 100 patients six months after they had had either mild or asymptomatic COVID-19. It found that while some of the patients' antibody levels had dropped, their T-cell response - another key part of the immune system - remained robust.
"(Our) early results show that T-cell responses may outlast the initial antibody response," said Shame Ladhani, a consultant epidemiologist at Public Health England who co-led the work....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
Wehenkel analyzed data sets from 39 countries with more than 500,000 people to determine the link. The results of Wehenkel’s analysis did not appear to support earlier studies that showed getting the influenza jab could reduce the risk of dying from COVID-19.
One such study
by researcher Guenther Fink and his colleagues pointed out that “the
innate immune response induced by recent vaccination could result in
more rapid and efficient SARS-CoV-2 clearance,” preventing the virus
from reaching deeper into the lower areas of the lung....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...
According to the study, “The results showed a positive association between COVID-19 deaths and IVR (influenza vaccination rate) of people ≥65 years-old. There is a significant increase in COVID-19 deaths from eastern to western regions in the world. Further exploration is needed to explain these findings, and additional work on this line of research may lead to prevention of deaths associated with COVID-19.”
To determine this association, data sets from 39 countries with more than half a million people were analyzed.
The study was published on October 1st, and two weeks later a note from the publisher appeared atop the paper emphasizing that correlation does not equal causation, and that this paper “should not be taken to suggest that receiving the influenza vaccination results in an increased risk of death for an individual with COVID-19 as there may be confounding factors at play.”
The paper provides evidence from others
which have recently been published that ponder if the flu shot could
increase ones chance of contracting and dying from COVID-19....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...