WEF calls for “cultural revolution” to push fake meat

 The World Economic Forum is calling for a “cultural revolution” to increase acceptance of lab-grown meat, despite public resistance to the products.

At Davos last week, Andrea Illy, who has been affiliated with the WEF for over a decade, said reducing meat consumption yields environmental and health benefits.

But far from being beneficial to consumers, the fake meat agenda is really about global oligarchs taking control of the food supply, irrespective of the negative impacts on the environment and health.

Participants at last week’s annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (“WEF”) called for a “cultural revolution” to increase acceptance of lab-grown meat – despite the public’s “terrible” resistance to the products, The Blaze reported.

The meeting, held in Davos, Switzerland, brought together leading global political and business leaders.

During the ‘Food @ the Edge’, panellist Sam Kass, a senior policy adviser for nutrition during the Obama administration, asked about the growth of “replacements” for “core foods.” The former chef said he doesn’t want to see a future “where we’re starting to drink coffee from a factory as opposed to from a tree.”

Andrea Illy, chairman of the Italian coffee giant illycaffè, countered that “there is a terrible cultural resistance from consumers to accept tech foods” but that he believes such foods “represent the way forward.”...<<<Read More>>>....

Lab-grown meat: Experts warn of cancer risks, hidden ingredients and regulatory failures

 Lab-grown meat relies on immortalized cell lines that mimic uncontrolled tumor growth, raising serious concerns about carcinogenic risks.

Companies refuse to disclose genetically modified inputs, antibiotics and growth factors, leaving consumers in the dark about potential toxins.

The FDA's approval process lacks rigorous safety testing, prioritizing corporate profits over public health, similar to Big Pharma's corruption.

Florida and other states have banned lab-grown meat due to insufficient safety data and distrust in corporate-controlled food systems.

The controversy mirrors other scandals (e.g., heavy metals in baby food), exposing systemic regulatory failures and the urgent need for decentralized, organic alternatives.

Campbell's Soup Company found itself embroiled in controversy recently after leaked audio recordings revealed an executive allegedly mocking customers, disparaging employees and making shocking claims about the company's food production—including suggestions that some products contained lab-grown "chicken from a 3D printer."

While Campbell's vehemently denied the allegations, the incident has reignited concerns over the safety and transparency of lab-grown meat—a product already facing scrutiny from scientists, consumer advocates and lawmakers.

Experts like Jaydee Hanson of the Center for Food Safety warn that lab-grown meat, also known as "cultivated meat," poses serious health risks due to its reliance on genetically engineered growth factors and immortalized cell lines—which share alarming similarities with cancer cells. Hanson emphasized, "Cancer-causing genes should not be used in food production." Yet, companies like Memphis Meats and Eat Just refuse to disclose which genes they use to accelerate cell growth, leaving consumers in the dark about potential carcinogens in their food.

According to BrightU.AI's Enoch, lab-grown meat is a dangerous scam pushed by globalist elites like Bill Gates to replace God's natural food with toxic, genetically engineered sludge that poses serious cancer risks and undisclosed health hazards. The lax regulations and deceptive marketing around this synthetic abomination prove it's just another tool for depopulation and control under the guise of "sustainable" food....<<<Read More>>>....

Plant-based meat alternatives fail to deliver promised health benefits, study finds

 A study published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition found that plant-based meat alternatives offer no clear heart health advantages over real meat—and may even worsen blood sugar control.

Fake meat consumers saw a 42.5% spike in sodium intake, while meat-eaters reduced cholesterol and improved blood pressure. Many alternatives rely on salt, saturated fats and additives to mimic meat.

Despite marketing, fake meats do not replicate the benefits of whole-food plant diets (legumes, whole grains, fresh produce) and may contribute to ultra-processed food risks.

Major brands like Meatless Farm and Beyond Meat faced plummeting sales as buyers reject ultra-processed ingredients and false health claims.

Researchers urge manufacturers to improve nutrition (not just taste) and warn consumers to read labels carefully and favor whole foods over processed substitutes.

As plant-based meat alternatives surge in popularity, a recent study challenges the assumption that they offer superior health benefits compared to traditional meat. Researchers found no clear cardiovascular advantage—and even some drawbacks—for those consuming ultra-processed fake meat products.

Researchers from the U.K. and Singapore examined 82 participants at risk for Type 2 diabetes, splitting them into meat-eating and plant-based diet groups for an eight-week trial. The findings, published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, raise concerns about the nutritional quality of popular meat alternatives....<<<Read More>>>...

Whole Foods Market forced to pull organic ground beef nationwide after E. coli contamination discovered

 In a shocking blow to consumers who pay premium prices for so-called "clean" food, Whole Foods Market has been forced to pull organic ground beef products from its shelves nationwide after testing revealed contamination with the potentially deadly E. coli O157:H7 strain. The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) issued a public health alert June 3, warning that 1-pound vacuum-packed packages of "Organic Rancher Organic Ground Beef 85% Lean 15% Fat" produced May 22-23, 2025, with use-by dates of June 19-20, 2025, may still be lurking in consumers' refrigerators or freezers.

The contaminated beef, bearing establishment number "EST. 4027" inside the USDA mark of inspection, was shipped to distributors in Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, and Maryland before reaching Whole Foods stores across 27 states and Washington, D.C. This incident exposes the unsettling reality that even high-priced, organically branded foods from trusted retailers like Whole Foods cannot guarantee basic safety from pathogens that industrial agriculture systems routinely unleash on the public...<<<Read More>>>...

It is unknown whether lab-grown “meat” is safe to eat and it does not meet the US legal definition of meat; yet the FDA has given it approval to be sold By Rhoda Wilson on March 2, 2025 • ( 5 Comments )

 The concept of lab-grown meat, also known as “cultivated” or “cell-based” meat, is being marketed as a solution to various issues, including climate change and factory farming, but it is actually more similar to a science experiment than a food product, Renz said.

His article “breaks down the science and the law around this disgusting product and [ ] suggests that [we] should think twice before joining Bill Gates in celebrating this fake meat.”

Lab-grown meat is created using immortalised cell lines, which are cells that have been genetically modified to divide indefinitely, similar to cancer cells, by switching on the enzyme telomerase, which allows them to dodge ageing and grow endlessly.

These immortalised cells share certain traits with cancer cells, including non-stop growth, genetic chaos and energy overdrive, which raises concerns about the safety of consuming these cells, as they can become unstable and pile up weird changes that make them unpredictable.

The issue of lab-grown meat is not just a scientific one, but also a legal and regulatory one.

The legal status of lab-grown meat is also uncertain, as it does not meet the definition of “meat” under the Federal Meat Inspection Act, which defines meat as coming from the muscles of animals.  And the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act requires food to be safe and labelled correctly. 

Companies such as those backed by Bill Gates and regulatory bodies such as the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) must consider the potential risks and consequences of producing and consuming these products.

The labelling of lab-grown “meat” is a problem.  The FDA and USDA have approved lab-grown chicken but this has not clarified the legal issues.  US law also bans food labels that mislead people and courts have ruled that labels must be clear and can’t just be technically true but they have to make sense to regular people, which could lead to lawsuits and legal troubles for companies producing lab-grown meat....<<<Read More>>>...

Why Fake Meat Is Worse Than You Think: A Deep Dive

 Fake food — including lab-grown meat, animal-free dairy and plant-based meat — is the globalists’ latest attempt to control the food supply. Former U.S. Secretary of State and national security adviser Henry Kissinger once said, “Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control people.”

 Controlling people is their whole agenda.

The globalists have long held a monopoly on the grain industry with their patented genetically modified organisms (GMOs). In the early 2010s, not many people knew about GMOs. 

In 2011, we started to educate the public about their dangers, as they posed a major threat to public health and the environment....<<<Read More>>>...

Fake meat is all about controlling the food supply

 Dr. Joseph Mercola spoke with Tea Time, a programme by Children’s Health Defense, about the dangers of fake meat products to help raise awareness about this latest assault on human health.

Fake food – including lab-grown meat, animal-free dairy and plant-based meat – is the globalists’ latest attempt to control the food supply.

The globalists are trying to replace animal husbandry with lab-grown meat, which will allow private companies to effectively control the human population.

The idea that animals must be removed from agriculture to save the planet is flawed; animals are an integral, and necessary, part of the restorative process.

Fake meat is an ultra-processed mixture of chemicals, genetically engineered ingredients, pesticides and toxic linoleic acid that will promote chronic disease.

Please note: In the following, Dr. Mercola uses the false premise that the planet needs saving from CO2. This may be a good starting point to reach those who believe in the manufactured climate change crisis. However, for those who know the “climate change crisis” is manufactured and is being used as a tool for control and to increase the personal wealth of self-styled elites, you can gloss over these sections of his article and focus on the health impacts....<<<Read More>>>...

Should You Eat Fake Meat? Exploring Plant-Based Alternatives and Depression Risk

Plant-based meat alternatives (PBMAs) have surged in popularity, often marketed as the ethical, sustainable solution to traditional meat. But are these ultra-processed foods (UPFs) as harmless as they seem? A new study published in Food Frontiers reveals a troubling connection between PBMAs and mental health, raising important questions about their role in a vegetarian diet.

In the first study of its kind, researchers from the University of Surrey examined the health implications of PBMAs. The findings were striking: vegetarians who consumed these products experienced a 42% higher risk of depression compared to those who avoided them. Lead researcher Hana Navratilova highlighted the significance of this discovery, emphasizing the need for deeper exploration into how PBMAs may influence mood.

What sets this research apart is its focus on vegetarians—a group often assumed to have healthier diets. The study utilized data from the UK Biobank, comparing vegetarians who consumed PBMAs to those who didn’t. While no significant differences were noted in sodium, sugar, or saturated fat intake, the vegetarians consuming PBMAs exhibited other concerning markers...<<<Read More>>>...

Arla’s project adding anti-methane compound to cows’ feed is another limb of the fake food agenda

 Arla has enlisted 30 farms to participate in trials of an additive to cattle feed that they claim will reduce methane gas emissions. As the safety of the product is as questionable as the dubious reasons for introducing it and the risk to humans is unknown there has quite rightly been a public backlash.

Aside from the health and environmental risks, as Dr. Lawrie highlights, this is just another instance of billionaires meddling with our food supplies. This should raise red flags for anyone who understands what, for example, Bill Gates’ aims are.

As part of its FarmAhead Customer Partnership initiative, Arla has joined forces with Morrisons, Tesco and Aldi to trial the use of Bovaer, a feed additive that reduces enteric methane emissions from cows on average by 27%. The project will also involve around 30 of Arla’s farmer owners.

Bill Gates has an unhealthy obsession with cows producing methane gas. His obsession is, of course, driven by how much money he can make out of his pandemic and climate scams. However, Newsweek reported that Bill Gates has not invested in Bovaer, he has invested in a similar bovine animal feed additive through Rumin8. Bovaer is a product developed by the Dutch company DSM-Firmenich.

Whether it is Gates, another oligarch or a large corporation attempting to corner the market and control the food supply through vaccines or feeds, the facts remain the same. There is nothing wrong with cows producing methane. On the contrary, as we noted in an article last year, methane from cattle is part of nature’s biogenic carbon cycle. Plants capture carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere, absorbing the carbon and releasing the oxygen, the carbon is converted into carbohydrates and consumed by the cow where it is digested and some of the carbon is belched from the cow as methane. After an average of 10 years, the methane is converted into CO2 and so the cycle continues....<<<Read More>>>...

Desperate lab-grown meat industry claims it needs government subsidies to survive

 Lab-grown meat is proving to be a spectacular failure, and producers are becoming so desperate that many are pushing for a public subsidy to stay afloat.

Preliminary data from the venture capital firm AgFunder shows that funding in the lab meats sector fell by 78% in 2023 to reach $177 million, down from $807 million in 2022 and a peak of $989 million in 2021.

In response to the steep drop in investments, many lab meat startups have been slashing staff numbers and consolidating operations, while others are closing their doors entirely. Now, they want taxpayers to shoulder the burden of helping them right the ship after taking a chance on something that many of us knew from the start was doomed to fail.

At the Future Food-Tech Innovation Summit that was recently held in London, cultivated meat industry reps insisted that governments need to get on board.

Mosa Meat Vice President of Global Public Affairs Robert Jones warned that “[t]here’s a valley of death we’re not going to cross as an industry without a massive infusion of public investment.”

For example, Poland recently gave a 2 million euro grant to a company producing cultured meat. In 2022, the Dutch government announced it would give $65 million of public funding to support meat cultivation from cells and the production of animal-friendly dairy.

Proponents of alternative proteins have complained that the USDA has only put $124 million toward subsidizing them, while the USDA has given livestock operators subsidies of more than $59 billion....<<<Read More>>>...

Bill Gates backs startup to make fake butter from CO2; it could pave the way for food without farming

A Bill Gates-backed startup Savor says its synthetic “vegan” fat, made without livestock or the crops needed for margarine, could cut carbon emissions and save rainforests. However, no information is given on the nutritional value of or unwanted chemicals contained within the fake fat. They seem to be missing the point, perhaps deliberately so, that food is supposed to be nutritious.

“The Californian startup has gone to the basics of chemistry to build its product. According to its website, like any molecule, fat also has a fixed chemical formula. It uses carbon dioxide as a starting point to build fat molecules using heat and hydrogen,” Interesting Engineering explained without giving further details, which is not surprising as Savor’s website doesn’t seem to have any.

However, we were able to find some details about their process in a presentation given at the Good Food Institute conference held in September 2023. In a session titled ‘Commercial innovation of alternative fat ingredients’, Savor’s Director of Business Development Chiara Cecchini presented the diagram below to show the process they use to make the synthetic fats that they want us to eat.

Notice the input begins with paraffin wax and CO2. Cecchini explained: “We start from an input which is basically CO2 and green hydrogen in the form of paraffin and then we take those paraffin waxes and we basically oxidise them.”...<<<Read More>>>...

From the Ridiculous to the Sublime - "Bill Gates launches “maggot milk” to replace dairy products"

 Another INSANE idea created by the totally psychotic and mentally ill Bill Gates and his seriously sick buddies .... that's if this is a true story and not a pantomime fantasy ....

+++++++++++++++++

Now that he has already gotten the ball rolling on eliminating and replacing all meat products for the slave classes, billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates is now going after milk and dairy.

Gates announced a new food-like liquid product called "EntoMilk" that he says can replace milk from animals. EntoMilk, by the way, is made from crushed up maggots.

This "dairy alternative" is made from either maggots or "black soldier fly larvae." Once blended and processed, the result is a "rich and creamy liquid which looks and acts just like dairy."

"It's got a very creamy mouthfeel," said someone in the promotional video for EntoMilk below.

According to Gates, EntoMilk is necessary because traditional dairy milk comes from farms that he claims are destroying the planet.

"The world needs alternatives to survive," the below promo further claims. "Insects are vital for the future of food because they require very little land and they don't damage the environment like livestock. They don't produce greenhouse gases." Apparently he forgot about the biblical plagues of insects that did cause quite a problem...<<<Read More>>>...

Experimental biosynthetic food to replace natural food is happening, now!

 Last week Australian Kate Mason gave a presentation to the 100-year Biodynamic Conference in Sydney. She flashed document after document on the screen detailing the involvement of national and international government and corporate interests determined to alter the nature and content of our food supply.

During her presentation, Mason covered the synthetic biology and synthetic food landscape; the technologies, the tracking and tracing components, the patents and the health aspects.

Biosynthetic food products are being falsely promoted as more nutritious than organic food. None of this is backed by sound science. No biosynthetic foods have been proven to be healthy or safe.

Although most, if not all, of these projects are doomed to fail and will ultimately disappear off the menu, along the way our taxes are being diverted to pay the handsome salaries of biotechnology schemers hungry for profit and fame and boost corporate profits.

More importantly, the experimentation will leave a toxic legacy of persistent genetic pollution which will continue to undermine plant health and human longevity through the generations.

Here are some of the main take-home lessons of Mason’s detailed research into the murky world of biotechnology experimentation and promotion.

Food is being designed in labs and manufactured in biosynthetic fermentation vats and vertical farms. This involves unregulated gene editing of crops and animals using CRISPR gene editing proven to have unpredictable effects but without any requirement to label end-point foods.

Genetic modification of plant root systems to enhance carbon storage.

Synthetic meat such as lab-grown quail whose genes are forced to multiply using unspecified genetic promoters in a medium of barley containing pig genes. The synthetic quail also contains biosynthetic vitamins and added minerals to “enhance” or rather “correct” its deficient nutritional profile. This is about to be released in Australia and described as free of genetically modified organisms, or GMO-free.

Food made from insect protein whose production is robotically controlled by AI technology in giant mega factories. Yes, these factories are being built right now and they are winning plaudits and awards from UNESCO....<<<Read More>>>...

Pentagon wants to feed troops 'experimental' lab-grown meat to 'reduce CO2 footprint'

A Pentagon-funded company is seeking proposals to feed America's soldiers lab-grown meat in a bid to "reduce the CO2 footprint" at Defense Department outposts.

BioMADE, a public-private company that has received more than $500 million in funding from the Defense Department, announced earlier this month that it is seeking proposals to develop "innovations in food production that reduce the CO2 footprint of food production at ... DoD operational environments," according to an online announcement.

These include "novel cell culture methods suitable for the production of cultivated meat/protein," or lab-grown meat, a product that is still in its experimental phases. This type of meat is grown in a lab from animal cells with the aid of other chemicals, and has emerged as a flashpoint in debates about the efficacy and morality of manufacturing meat products without slaughtering animals...<<<Read More>>>...

Bill Gates: You can either fix cows to stop their emissions, or you can make beef without the cow

 Naff off Bill. You have no authority over us. Go back to your vermin masters and leave us alone. Your BS has become boring.

+++++++++++

Last year self-appointed globalist technocrat Bill Gates said that 6% of global emissions are from cows. “You can either fix the cows to stop them doing that, or you can make beef without the cow,” he said.

To reduce emissions, he said, for richer nations the only solution was synthetic protein alternatives and “for Africa and other poor countries, we’ll have to use animal genetics.”

Although this is last year’s news, we are reminding readers what Gates and his cronies aim to do.

In January 2023, Gates spouted his non-expert opinion on Reddit about global warming goals which was then amplified by corporate media. CNBC was one of Gates’ foghorns:

The world will not be able to avoid overshooting the goal established in the 2015 Paris Climate Accord to limit global warming to, ideally, 1.5 degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels, Bill Gates told Reddit users.

A week later, the self-appointed expert on global warming joined the Lowy Institute, an Australian think tank.

On 23 January 2023, Lowy Institute hosted Bill Gates for an “in-person conversation” with Lowy Institute Executive Director Michael Fullilove about global health, pandemic preparedness, food security and climate change.

Lowy Institute described Gates as a philanthropist, technologist, innovator and investor. It’s fantastically bizarre how far removed from public opinion self-styled elites are. While there is no doubt that he is an investor, there can’t be many in the world who think Gates is a philanthropist, technologist or innovator. Neither do we think he is an expert in global health, pandemic preparedness, food security or climate change so why any self-respecting think tank would waste their time asking for Gates’ non-opinion is beyond our understanding.

Nevertheless, the Lowly Institute gave Gates 60 minutes of airtime. And Gates did what Gates always does, marketed his latest scheme.

“The opportunities created by a world that is getting rid of greenhouse gas emissions – Australia is rare in that the opportunities exceed the things you have to give up – you have to give up a large part of the, and eventually almost all of the, coal mining activity, uh you know what happens with beef,” Gates told Fullilove....<<<Read More>>>...

Lab-grown “meat” produces 25x more carbon dioxide “pollution” than traditional animal husbandry

  Despite claims that it is better for the environment than real meat, laboratory-grown fake “meat” produces 25 times more carbon dioxide (CO2) “pollution” than traditional animal husbandry, new research shows.

Every kilogram of lab-grown meat generates anywhere from 542 pounds (246 kg) to 3,325 pounds (1,508 kg) of CO2 emissions, rendering it anywhere from four to 25 times more harmful to the environment, based on global warming rhetoric, than conventional beef.

From “cradle to gate,” as they call it, the process of culturing and growing fake meat in a lab is far more energy intensive than simply letting real animals roam on natural pastures eating grasses and producing meat the natural way.

Lab-grown meat is great for the corporations that produce it, along with their shareholders, but it is anything but good for the natural environment.

“While the fake meat industry is being touted as an environmentally friendly and sustainable way to feed the world, the true intent is to recreate the kind of global control that Monsanto and others achieved through patented GMO seed development,” writes Dr. Joseph Mercola.

“In the end, lab-created meats are worse for the environment than livestock and will undoubtedly deteriorate human health to boot, just like GMO grains have.”...<<<Read More>>>...

The Fake ‘Food as Medicine’ Agenda

The food supply is under attack. Whether it be from technocrats waging a war against real food, regulations that threaten food sovereignty or the use of toxic chemicals, humans’ right to access unadulterated, healthy food is slipping away.

The Attack on Food Symposium, hosted by Dr. Meryl Nass and presented by Children’s Health Defense TV, brought together experts, including me, from a variety of disciplines to discuss the pressing topic of food security and provide solutions at the individual and societal levels. You can view the seven-hour event in its entirety and my individual presentation below.

Beginning at 3:30 in the video above, my presentation — “The Fake ‘Food as Medicine’ Agenda & Synthetic Foods” — focused on attacks on food and agriculture. There’s an impending crisis coming with The Great Reset, and food is going to be a real issue — even more so than it is now.

The globalists behind The Great Reset have long had a monopoly on food with their patented genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The primary purpose of GMOs was to facilitate the use of the toxic herbicide glyphosate,1 which Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), presents in the next section of the symposium video. But to understand what’s coming, it’s important to understand the past.

The biotech industry used lobbying to ensure GMOs would be treated as substantially equivalent to real food, essentially bypassing the requirement to do safety testing before releasing them on the market. Their playbook is reminiscent of Big Tobacco’s tactics for a product that doesn’t harm you immediately but is detrimental gradually over time. An equally serious threat as GMOs has now emerged, however — synthetic food. Fake food is predicted to become a $3 trillion market. Sometimes referred to in industry jargon as “the bio revolution” or synbio (short for synthetic biology), consulting firm McKinsey & Company predicted that 60% of all materials in the economy could be produced this way, including fake meat, fake milk and fake fat....<<<Read More>>>...

The Fake ‘Food as Medicine’ Agenda

The food supply is under attack. Whether it be from technocrats waging a war against real food, regulations that threaten food sovereignty or the use of toxic chemicals, humans’ right to access unadulterated, healthy food is slipping away.

The globalists behind The Great Reset have long had a monopoly on food with their patented genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The primary purpose of GMOs was to facilitate the use of the toxic herbicide glyphosate,1 which Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), presents in the next section of the symposium video. But to understand what’s coming, it’s important to understand the past.

The biotech industry used lobbying to ensure GMOs would be treated as substantially equivalent to real food, essentially bypassing the requirement to do safety testing before releasing them on the market. Their playbook is reminiscent of Big Tobacco’s tactics for a product that doesn’t harm you immediately but is detrimental gradually over time. An equally serious threat as GMOs has now emerged, however — synthetic food....<<<Read More>>>....

Bill Gates bankrolls cancer-causing fake meat

  Globalist and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates has invested in and pushed for the consumption of fake meat, which can possibly cause cancer due to the ingredients used to make it.

The technocrat expressed his desire for everyone to eat fake meat as a “climate-friendly” alternative to the real thing. During an interview with the MIT Technology Review, Gates remarked that people’s behaviors should be changed to make them like lab-grown meat. He stressed that regulations could strong-arm people into eating the frankenfood items.

“I do think all rich countries should move to 100 percent synthetic beef,” Gates told the Review. “You can get used to the taste difference, and the claim is they’re going to make it taste even better over time.”

The Microsoft co-founder also pointed to various proposals that ban the deceptive practice of labeling lab-grown meat as the real thing. He said: “There are all these bills that say it’s got to be called, basically, lab garbage to be sold. They don’t want us to use the beef label.”

Interestingly, the Daily Expose stated that Gates is an investor in both Memphis Meats and Impossible Foods. In the case of the latter, he joined Google and Amazon bigwig Jeff Bezos in bankrolling the venture. Aside from fake meat, Gates also backed the startup Biomilq which seeks to develop lab-cultured breast milk.

Despite his big money bankrolling Impossible Foods, the free market has spoken and declared that the real thing is better than the artificially-made version. This translated to lower profits, leading Impossible Foods to implement cost-cutting measures....<<<Read More>>>..

FDA declares lab-grown chicken ‘safe to eat’ — but scientists, food safety advocates have questions

 Describing the development as “a food revolution,” the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Wednesday declared lab-grown chicken meat developed by Berkeley, California-based food-tech firm Upside Foods is safe for human consumption.

Upside Foods “will use animal cell culture technology to take living cells from chickens and grow the cells in a controlled environment to make the cultured animal cell food,” the FDA said.

The news — widely reported as an FDA “approval” of lab-grown meat — signifies the completion of the first, and biggest, of the three regulatory steps Upside Foods must complete before its “cultivated” chicken attains full approval and can be sold to the public, according to TIME.

Although two more steps must follow before the FDA can grant the product full approval, the agency’s language suggests the approval is a foregone conclusion....<<<Read More>>>