It’s Time to Prepare for Armageddon (or at least hide in the Shed): Ferguson is Back

 Neil Ferguson, the man I think of as possibly the most laughably inept scientist in the world, is back with a prediction that dairy herd outbreaks of avian influenza will continue to be a significant public health challenge. 

There is, inevitably, a call for urgent biosecurity interventions and targeted surveillance schemes. Doubtless, there will be calls for cows to stand 12 feet apart in fields and socialising for cows will be banned completely. Cows with feathers, or those which fly around in the evenings, will be quarantined. Schools for calves will be shut.

This is what I said about Ferguson in my book `Truth Teller: The Price’:

Early in 2020, Antoinette and I realised that governments around the world were over-selling the risks associated with the coronavirus. Widely quoted predictions based on mathematical models were clearly outrageous, and everyone in government and the medical profession seemed to have forgotten that the ordinary, common or garden flu can (and does) kill many hundreds of thousands every year.

The warnings and predictions were clearly exaggerated, and the epidemiology of what was being promoted as a new and deadly plague was clearly identical to the epidemiology of the annual flu.

Neil Ferguson, the man most widely recognised as being behind the mathematical models had a terrible track record, and it was difficult to see why anyone in authority was taking any notice of his warnings. Ferguson was professor of mathematical biology at Imperial College in London and on the basis of his advice, the politicians decided we should be locked in and subjected to social distancing rules.

But this is what the Government knew about Ferguson when they decided to put their trust in him and his team:

– In 2001, the Imperial team did the modelling on foot and mouth disease which led to a cull of six million sheep, pigs and cattle. The cost to the UK was around £10 billion. But the Imperial’s work has been described as “severely flawed.”

– In 2002, Ferguson predicted that up to 50,000 people would die from mad cow disease. He said that could rise to 150,000 if sheep were involved. In the UK, the death total was 177.

– In 2005, Ferguson said that up to 200 million people could be killed by bird flu. The total number of deaths was 282 worldwide. That’s 282, not 282 million.

– In 2009, Ferguson and his chums at Imperial advised the Government which, relying on that advice, said that swine flu would kill 65,000 people in the UK. In the end, swine flu killed 457 people in the UK.

– Finally, Ferguson admitted that his model of the covid-19 was based on undocumented 13-year-old computer code that was intended for use with an influenza epidemic.

No one seemed to question Ferguson’s work on covid-19 – despite the fact that if he was wrong again (which I believed he was) the nation would be pushed back into the Dark Ages as a result of his work.

In February and March of 2020, I questioned the claim that we were at the start of a major plague. In the early months of 2020, I started writing articles for my websites about what I called then “The Coronavirus Hoax.” I could see that bad things were about to happen and I knew I had to do whatever I could to share my fears with as many people as possible.

My comments (all of which were entirely accurate and based on fact) proved deeply unpopular with the medical and political establishment. Overnight, without any evidence, I was labelled as a conspiracy theorist, a discredited doctor and a danger to mankind. I believe that I was subsequently targeted more than anyone (and I know of no other doctor or author in the world who has been as completely banned as I have) and I suspect this was simply because I have a medical degree, a good deal of experience in writing and a large, global audience of loyal readers. So, what are the odds of Ferguson being wrong again?

And, more importantly, why is anyone listening to this bozo? Why isn’t he cleaning drains and digging ditches for a living?

Ferguson, the reliable purveyor of garbage science, is, remember, also infamous for breaking his own lockdown rules....<<<Read More>>>...

Professor Lockdown Ferguson returns. This time to “predict” the spread of bird flu in US cattle

Yesterday, Dr. Tom Jefferson and Professor Carl Heneghan highlighted two papers. One is a pre-print (not peer-reviewed) paper published on 28 January 2025 and the other is a paper published in 2001: A mathematical model of H5N1 influenza transmission in US dairy cattle, MedRXiv, 28 January 2025.The Foot-and-Mouth Epidemic in Great Britain: Pattern of Spread and Impact of Interventions, Science, 12 April 2001 (The paper is behind a paywall but you can read from page 2 of the paper uploaded onto ResearchGate HERE.)

The authors of the 2025 pre-print paper on bird flu wrote, “Our model suggests that dairy herd outbreaks [of H5N1 avian influenza] will continue to be a significant public health challenge in 2025 and that more urgent, farm-focused, biosecurity interventions and targeted surveillance schemes are sorely needed.”

What is notable about the two papers above is that Professor Lockdown, also known as Neil Ferguson, was one of the authors of both. For those who may need reminding, who is Neil Ferguson?

Professor Neil Ferguson is an epidemiologist whose mathematical modelling of pandemics predicted huge death rates.

In 2001, as foot and mouth disease (FMD) broke out in parts of Britain, Ferguson and his team at Imperial College produced predictive modelling which was later criticised as “not fit for purpose.” At the time, however, it proved highly influential and helped to persuade Tony Blair’s government to carry out a widespread pre-emptive culling which ultimately led to the deaths of more than six million cattle, sheep and pigs. The cost to the economy was later estimated at £10 billion.

Separately, Ferguson predicted that up to 150,000 people could die from bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE, “mad cow disease”) and its equivalent in sheep if it made the leap to humans. Per 2020, there have been fewer than 200 deaths from the human form of BSE and none from sheep to human transmission. The result was an EU ban on British beef exports; and the eventual killing and incineration of over 3.7 million cattle.

In 2005, Ferguson claimed that up to 200 million people would be killed by bird flu or H5N1. By early 2006, the WHO had only linked 78 deaths to the virus, out of 147 reported cases. Neil Ferguson, Wikispooks

Ferguson’s involvement in dodgy modelling doesn’t stop there. As Wikispooks notes, “In 2009, Ferguson and his team at Imperial College advised the government that Swine flu (H1N1) would probably kill 65,000 people in the UK. He was also one of 16 experts for the emergency committee of the WHO which recommended the declaration of the swine flu pandemic. At the time he declared consultancy fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Baxter and Roche. In the end, swine flu claimed the lives of 457 people in the UK.”

The swine flu event was a falsified pandemic declared by the World Health Organisation in June 2009. The swine flu fraud was uncovered and exposed by Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a German pulmonologist, physician, epidemiologist and public health expert, who at the time of the 2009 swine flu “pandemic” was a Member of the European Parliament. In 2010, Channel 4 aired an expose calling the swine flu “pandemic” one of the greatest medical scandals of the century....<<<Read More>>>...

Did Neil Ferguson’s modelling of the covid pandemic prove once and for all that epidemiology is useless?

 The UK and Imperial College London were the intellectual nerve centre of the global covid pandemic response. As you will recall, it was Neil Ferguson, a physicist at Imperial College, who developed the main epidemiology model behind the justification to shut down economies.

However, Ferguson’s model was undocumented 13-year-old code that needed to be “cleaned up” and his assumptions were garbage. This is been known since at least March 2020, around the same time that the UK government implemented its first shutdown of the economy spuriously called “lockdowns.”

The American Institute for Economic Research (“AEIR”) noted in April 2021, “Ferguson predicted catastrophic death tolls back on 16 March 2020 unless governments around the world adopted his preferred suite of non-pharmaceutical interventions (“NPIs”) to ward off the pandemic. Most countries followed his advice, particularly after the United Kingdom and United States governments explicitly invoked his report as a justification for lockdowns.”

Yet Ferguson’s model was written using some 13-year-old undocumented code which then needed to be “cleaned up” with the help of Microsoft to make it reusable by anyone else. That isn’t even the worst of it – key assumptions forming the inputs to the model were garbage, Jonathan Engler writes introducing an article written by Mike Hearn in March 2020....<<<Read More>>>...

All UK Airports must close within the next 10 years, beef and lamb will be banned, and construction of new buildings will cease in the name of “Climate Change” according to Government Report

Fear mongering; desperate scare mongering by agencies of the deep state to scare the shit out of the gullible human sheep. 

++++++++++++++++

A report produced by Oxford University and Imperial College London for the UK Government reveals that all airports will be ordered to close, eating beef and lamb will be made illegal, and construction of new buildings will not be permitted in order to meet the legal commitment of zero emissions by 2050.

The report states that all airports must close between 2020 and 2029 excluding Heathrow, Glasgow and Belfast airports, which can only stay open on the condition that transfers to and from the airport are done via rail.

All remaining airports must then close between 2030 and 2049 as to meet the legal commitment of zero emissions by 2050 every citizen of the United Kingdom must “stop using aeroplanes” for a significant period of time.

In addition, the report states that to obey the law of the Climate Change Act the public will be required to stop doing anything that causes emissions regardless of its energy source. According to the report this will require the public to never eat beef or lamb ever again.

To do this national consumption of beef and lamb will drop by 50% between 2020 and 2029. Then between 2030 and 2049 beef and lamb will be “phased out”.

The report also confirms that construction of new building must cease by 2050 –

The underlying point is that any asset which uses carbon will have essentially zero value in 2050. This in turn may encourage greater use in the run up to 2050 – for example, putting up new buildings at a much faster rate for the next 30 years, knowing that construction must then halt.

The report was released in November 2019 and was authored by ‘UK Fires’, a collaboration between the Universities of Cambridge, Oxford, Nottingham, Bath and Imperial College London – the home of Professor Neil Ferguson....<<<Read More>>>....

Bird flu infections ‘likely’ to spark next global health crisis

 Bird flu could cause the next global health emergency, warned one of the UK’s leading microbiologists. Dr Simon Clarke added that “we are overdue a flu pandemic” and that it is “almost likely” to be avian influenza.

It comes as health officials prepare a Covid-style plan for dealing with bird flu if the deadly virus starts spreading rapidly between humans.

The announcement came after an 11-year-old girl in Cambodia died from the illness.

Dr Clarke, a University of Reading associate professor, warned there is a “real possibility” that bird flu could cause the next global health crisis.

He also wanted to dispel the idea that a pandemic will not take place because of the recent Covid ordeal.

He said: “It’s worth pointing out, just because we’ve had Covid that doesn’t mean that we’ve sort of banked our pandemic.

“They’re different things and just because we’ve had Covid doesn’t mean we’re not going to get flu coming along.”

The UK Health Security Agency said there was “no evidence” the bird flu virus is getting better at infecting humans.

But it warned that high levels of transmission among wild birds globally meant there was a “constant risk” of infection spreading to people.

Among those working on the planning models is Professor Neil Ferguson, an epidemiologist whose projections of the Covid outbreak led to the first lockdown strategy. The UKHSA said that to date there was little evidence of “sustained” transmission between humans but said it was modelling two scenarios in case that changed.

It is also looking at how it could detect outbreaks in humans, including using lateral flow tests.

Last summer, National Trust rangers were forced to clear scores of dead birds from Staple Island, off the coast of Northumberland, where bird flu had a devastating effect on one of the UK’s best-known seabird colonies....<<<Read More>>>...

Matt Hancock Squirms, Runs & Hides when asked for Evidence for Asymptomatic Transmission and that Lockdowns work

 Matt Hancock, former UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, was confronted by Heiko Khoo on 12 July at the Royal Statistical Society, London. Khoo asked Hancock what evidence he based the narrative that asymptomatic transmission occurred and lockdowns slowed the spread of a virus:

“The entire principles you started the lockdowns with, the measures with, were based, effectively, on an unproven, at least that time, a totally unproven argument that asymptomatic infections were a significant factor driving transmission. And there was no evidence for that whatsoever. The only evidence was based on one German woman, sorry one Chinese woman in Germany, who was taking large amounts of ibuprofen in order for her to prevent her from having symptoms. Now, I’m not saying that pre-symptomatic people who are just becoming ill couldn’t transmit, at least in that first phase. But there was actually no evidence backing that up.

“The second point … you mentioned the lockdown measures forecasts. You said there wasn’t 40 years of data, Neil Ferguson has been working on forecasting for decades and the fact of the matter is: all his epidemiological forecasts have been wrong – every single one of them. And not by a factor of one or two but by a factor of 10 or 20 or 30 or 40 … every single case he was vastly incorrect. And the argument that there would be 500,000 dead had there not been a lockdown has no basis in fact. It’s pure speculation. But because you can compare it with other countries around the world you can see … there’s no evidence whatsoever that the lockdowns made any beneficial difference to the number of deaths.”

After fudging answering the point about forecasts, Matt Hancock responded: “The second point, asymptomatic, is really important … there was not the formal evidence of asymptomatic transmission on a clinical trial basis and therefore it didn’t get into the formal advice to me. But we knew there were a lot of, um, uh, there were a lot of stories of it happening.” ...<<<Read More>>>...

Did vaccines really save 500,000 lives in the UK?

It would be fair to say that, over the last two years, Imperial College has not built a reputation for unimpeachable epidemiology. For those who've forgotten, the university is home to Professor Neil Ferguson - the scientist who, perhaps more than any other, convinced our leaders to impose lockdown.

The latest study to come out of Imperial College isn't the work of Neil Ferguson. But its conclusions have the just same ring of implausibility. Published in Lancet: Infectious Diseases, the study estimates that - from December 8th 2020 to December 8th 2021 - the vaccines averted 19 million deaths, including 500,000 in the U.K.

While both these figures are implausible, I want to focus on the latter - just because there are so many more unknowns when dealing with global-level Covid statistics.

The authors' conclusion is based on a mathematical model, which was applied to national data on excess deaths. I'm not going to pretend I've taken the time to understand the details of their model. But I don't have to. The 500,000 number is just too implausible, and I'll explain why.

Before doing so, how many actual excess deaths were there in the UK during the relevant time period? If we take the numbers for England and Wales, and ignore age-standardisation, there were about 60,000. Add 14% for the other UK nations, and we get to 68,000. So what the Imperial College researchers are saying is that, in the absence of vaccines, excess deaths would have been eight times higher.

There are several ways of showing this figure couldn't possibly be right, and the true number of deaths averted must be much lower....<<<Read More>>>...

Cut the bullshit and this means Ferguson is a Gates-owned liar who must go to jail for the rest of his life.

[David Icke]: Scientists did not have accurate Covid data when they predicted that 500,000 people could die if the UK took no action during the first wave of the pandemic.

Modelling from Professor Neil Ferguson and colleagues at Imperial College London published on March 16, 2020, predicted the NHS would be overwhelmed within weeks and a terrible death toll would arise if nothing was done to stop the spread of the disease.

Prior to the ‘Report 9’ paper, the Government’s initial Covid strategy had been to ‘mitigate’ the spread and build up ‘herd immunity’ rather than suppress the first wave.

However, sticking to these plans – allowing the spread to continue but slowing it down with limited measures such as home isolation – would still have resulted in 250,000 deaths, according to Imperial’s mathematical model.

The stark modelling is understood to have single-handedly led to the decision to move away from herd immunity to a national lockdown on March 23.

But minutes from a SPI-M (Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling) meeting released to The Telegraph following a Freedom of Information request have shown that, a week earlier, the modellers remained ‘uncertain’ of case numbers ‘due to data limitations’.

Modellers were still waiting for more comprehensive data on mortality from Public Health England and then best estimates on infection fatality rate, hospitalisation rates and the number of patients requiring ICU care were still uncertain.

The team is also understood to have believed that the modelling only showed ‘proof of concept’ that lockdowns could help deal with Covid, before warning that ‘further work would be required’.

Following the release of its model, Imperial College held a press conference, followed by Prime Minister Boris Johnson ordering the public to avoid pubs, restaurants and non-essential social gatherings later the same day.

At the briefing, Prof Ferguson said new conclusions had been drawn as ‘the last few days’ had provided ‘refinements’ in estimates of intensive care and hospital demand.

 

March 2020 Lockdown Based On “Inexcusable” Erroneous Data

[Richie Allen]: The decision to lock down the UK in March 2020 was based on poor modelling and inaccurate case numbers. The Telegraph newspaper used a Freedom Of Information request to see the minutes of SPI-M (Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling) meetings. The minutes show that by mid-March 2020, modellers were still “uncertain” of case numbers “due to data limitations.”

According to The Telegraph:

The minutes show that members were waiting for comprehensive mortality data from Public Health England (PHE) and said that current best estimates for the infection fatality rate, hospitalisation rates, and the number of people needing intensive care were still uncertain.

They also believed that modelling only showed “proof of concept” that lockdowns could help, and warned that “further work would be required”.

The team was also encouraged to look for collaborators and resources outside of the infectious diseases network.

Imperial College held a press briefing about its model on the afternoon of March 16, and on the same day, Boris Johnson ordered the public to avoid pubs, restaurants and non-essential contact and work from home if possible.

At the briefing, Prof Ferguson told journalists that the new conclusions had been reached because “the last few days” had provided “refinements” in the estimates of intensive care demand and hospital surge capacity.

But the minutes now show that SPI-M did not believe the data were complete.

Bob Seely, the MP for the Isle of Wight, who has been critical of modelling throughout the pandemic, said: “The arguments for and against lockdown are complex, but what is becoming clear is that the evidence that the Government saw was incomplete and potentially inaccurate.

“This is a national scandal. No question about it. The data that petrified politicians was inaccurate.”

Of course it was inaccurate! We knew that then. And it must never be forgotten, ivy-league university scientists were telling anyone who would listen that lockdowns were futile and would do more harm than good.

Carl Heneghan is a Professor of Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford University. Speaking to Talk Radio this morning, he said it’s “inexcusable.”

New Meta-Analysis Concludes Lockdowns “Have Had Little To No Effect On COVID Mortality”

[The Pulse]: If lockdowns were so effective, why would the mainstream need to ignore the data showing otherwise? Why would they ridicule and censor scientists showing the opposite? Why wouldn't they just have an open public debate for everybody to see?

A new meta-analysis regarding the effectiveness of lockdowns examined evidence to determine if there is actually any empirical evidence to support the belief that lockdowns reduce COVID-19 mortality.

The paper points out that researchers at the Imperial College London early on in the pandemic (Ferguson et al. (2020)) predicted that lockdown strategies would reduce COVID-19 mortality by up to 98%. This is what motivated the researchers to look into this deeper. Another big motivation was the fact that “there was no clear negative correlation between the degree of lockdown and fatalities in the spring of 2020.”


“Given the large effects predicted by simulation studies such as Ferguson et al. (2020), we would have expected to at least observe a simple negative correlation between COVID-19 mortality and the degree to which lockdowns were imposed.”

Overall, despite that the topic still seems to remain an open debate with no clear answers, this meta analysis found that lockdowns, school closures, border closures, and limiting gatherings have had and no effect on COVID-19 mortality. They did however find that business closures may have reduced COVID-19 mortality, “but the variation in estimates is large and the effect seems related to closing bars.” ...<<<Read More>>>...

A Call To Action​ – We Must Fight To Stop The Assault On Our Freedoms – While We Still Can.

[The Expose]: We are at a point in UK history where future generations may ask why no one did anything to stop the government leading us into an authoritarian, dystopian reality through the proposal of the “Police Crackdown Bill” putting too much power into the hands of the state.

Apart from a handful of dissenters, we have been allowing this to happen, but this is the time we must fight against it, we must take a stand and speak out before we are legally unable to do so.

The country is still reeling over the audacity of the government to attend Christmas parties at number 10, while the people were abiding by the coronavirus rules causing many to feel isolated from family and friends.

While the anger is of course justified, the shock coming from the public is surprising. The government has been showing us since early in the plandemic, that they themselves do not fear the COVID and therefore, do not have to abide by their own rules.

We have seen obvious displays of their rule-breaking from Neil Ferguson’s bed-hopping antics with his mistress, Cummings visit to Barnard Castle, to the G7 event, including a cocktail party in June 2021, where world leaders ignored the social distancing rules, the mask-wearing and their “save granny” message.

Not only should this be alerting the people to the fact that those making the rules are themselves do not fear a virus but should also anger them. According to journalist and author of Double Down News, George Monbiot “This is how dictatorship works and we are sliding towards it at the moment.

“The motive power of dictatorship is that there is one rule for the elite and a completely different rule for the people”.

He continues “We have a situation in this country where the Prime Minister and his cronies are mocking us, as we abide by the COVID rules they just ignore them and laugh in our faces, and while they’re doing so they impose, the most draconian legislation in living memory on the rest of us”. ..<<<Read More>>>....

The Imperial College finally acknowledges pre-existing immunity to COVID-19. What took it so long?

[SOTT]: T-cells from common cold coronaviruses can provide protection against COVID-19, an Imperial College London study has found. Reuters reports on the findings, which were published in Nature.

The study, which began in September 2020, looked at levels of cross-reactive T-cells generated by previous common colds in 52 household contacts of positive COVID-19 cases shortly after exposure, to see if they went on to develop infection.

It found that the 26 who did not develop infection had significantly higher levels of those T-cells than people who did get infected. Imperial did not say how long protection from the T-cells would last.

"We found that high levels of pre-existing T cells, created by the body when infected with other human coronaviruses like the common cold, can protect against COVID-19 infection," study author Dr Rhia Kundu said. The researchers suggest vaccines based on imitating the internal virus proteins that T-cells target may be more resilient to mutations and new variants as those proteins, unlike the spike protein targeted by the current vaccines, "mutate much less".

Cross-immunity to SARS-CoV-2 from other coronaviruses has been proposed since early on in the pandemic as an important element in reaching herd immunity and endemicity (for example, it was mentioned in this Scientist article from March 2020), and became a particular focus of interest in the autumn of 2020 as evidence of it accumulated (see here, here and here). It's good to have further confirmation of this from Imperial (and also recently from UCL), but it has to be said it's pretty late to the party, and it's not clear why a study which began in September 2020 during a public health emergency has taken 16 months to report, particularly when vaccines were brought to market in 10 months. The emphasis of the researchers is on the potential usefulness of the findings for developing new and more resilient vaccines, which contains a tacit admission that the existing vaccines are failing, but also leaves one wondering whether the research has only been published now that it is useful for making new pharmaceutical products. It might be added that the studies on the efficacy of generic off-label medicines against Covid are taking an awfully long time to report.

As Dr. Mike Yeadon explained in his October 2020 piece for the Daily Sceptic, "What SAGE Has Got Wrong", the assumption of a lack of pre-existing immunity and hence universal susceptibility was one of the great errors made by Government advisers throughout the pandemic and which led to an over-reaction that continues to this day. Now that Imperial researchers have acknowledged the existence of prior immunity, will Neil Ferguson's modelling team update its assumptions? ...<<<Read More>>>...

Professor Liar Predicts ‘5,000 Omicron Deaths a Day’ Unless We Lockdown – Yes it’s Cult-owned Ferguson and the ludicrous media is still taking him seriously.

Another of Pinocchio's finest bullshitters at work. Believing this imbecile's predictions is in the same league as believing the moon is made of cheese .....

[David Icke]: Gloomy modelling from ‘Professor Lockdown’ today suggested there could be 5,000 Omicron deaths a day this winter without more restrictions as Britain’s overall Covid cases rocketed to record levels for the third day in a row.

A total of 93,045 people tested positive for Covid in the past 24 hours, up 60 per cent in a week, but the ultra-virulent variant is thought to be doubling nationally every two days and spreading faster than testing can keep up.

In an early warning sign, coronavirus hospitalisations in Omicron hotspot London have spiked by more than a third in a week — although they are rising from a small base with just 199 admitted on Tuesday.

Around a quarter of today’s cases were in London alone, where infections have risen fivefold since the world was alerted to Omicron’s existence on November 24. Meanwhile, another 3,201 new cases of Omicron were confirmed in Britain today, taking the total number to 14,909 as it becomes the dominant strain nationally. This is a vast underestimate due to the time it takes to analyse positive samples for variants and experts say up to 400,000 Brits could be catching it per day.

The surging statistics came as Professor Neil Ferguson — whose projections have spooked No10 into lockdowns before — called for curbs to be tightened by New Year on the back of his latest modelling of the mutant strain.  His team at Imperial College London found that even in a best case scenario, there could be roughly 3,000 daily Omicron deaths at the peak in January without further curbs — much higher than the previous record of 1,800 during the second wave.

Leaked doc reveals UKHSA advises harsher restrictions over risk of 'NHS being overwhelmed' by Omicron

More media 0-micron (MORONIC) variant fearmongering BS that truly needs to be taken with a huge pillar of salt. Considering there is NO evidence presented that Covid-19 or any of its variants exist (Except in a computer simulator) why should anyone take this Moronic Variant poppycock seriously??? 

There is no proof of these incredibly long Pinocchio nose lies ..... the stories are getting crazier and crazier as the parasites become more and more desperate.

[SOTT]: Britain's top public health officials have advised ministers that "stringent national measures" need to be imposed by 18 December to avoid Covid hospitalisations surpassing last winter's peak, according to documents leaked to the Guardian.

Sajid Javid, the health secretary, received a presentation from the UK Health and Security Agency (UKHSA) on Tuesday warning that even if the new Omicron variant leads to less serious disease than Delta, it risks overwhelming the NHS with 5,000 people admitted to hospital a day.

Comment: UK hospitals weren't overwhelmed last year, during some months they had 15% less patients than previous years. Nightingale Covid hospitals across the country closed due to a lack of patients.

In an interview with the Guardian, the epidemiologist Prof Neil Ferguson said the total could be double that number.

No 10 insisted there were no imminent plans to bring in more measures after plan B measures were announced for England this week but cabinet minister Michael Gove, who chaired a Cobra meeting on Friday, said the government had been presented with some "very challenging information" about the speed of the spread.

Comment: The government had no reason to enforce the first raft of lockdown restrictions, never mind any more.

The Guardian has seen leaked advice from UKHSA for Javid marked "official, sensitive" saying: "The key point is that under a range of plausible scenarios, stringent action is needed on or before 18 December 2021 if doubling times stay at 2.5 days. Even if doubling times rise to around 5 days, stringent action is likely still needed in December."

Comment: None of the 'plausible scenarios' that necessitated lock downs have ever come to pass.

It adds: "The rapid spread of Omicron means that action to limit pressures on the health system might have to come earlier than intuition suggests."

Comment: It's well known that as viruses mutate, and they tend to cause milder illness. And indeed the doctor who discovered Omicron has documented just that, therefore the 'rapid spread' does not justify any restrictions. It may instead be beneficial because it will likely confer immunity against any other variants.

Its calculations suggest that even if Omicron causes a less severe hospitalisation rate of 1% or 0.5% compared with Delta's 1.5%, then "stringent national measures'" would be needed by 18 December at the latest.

On the current trajectory of 2.5 days doubling time, and without any further restrictions, the document warns that Omicron cases could be at 248,000 cases a day by 19 December. It also stresses that the figures are not a projection but an estimate of Omicron prevalence and doubling times seen in the UK so far.

The document does not detail what the necessary curbs would be but defines "stringent national measures" as those that bring the R (reproduction) number below 1.

Boris Johnson triggered plan B this week including more wide-ranging mask mandates, asking people to work from home and Covid passports for big venues but a senior Whitehall source said few inside UKHSA believe this will have much effect on slowing the spread of the variant.

Comment: Which basically confirms that mask wearing and Covid passports don't work at containing a virus....<<<Read More>>>...

Professor Lockdown the Cult-owned, Gates-owned, liar Ferguson says ministers may need to resort to winter Covid ‘Plan B’ if daily admissions breach just 1,200 – which could see Brits forced to wear masks and carry vaccine passports.

 It's getting to squeaky bum October, November and December. The satanic parasites are itching to enforce Australian-esque mayhem on the UK Streets. 

Manchester will cop it. It's on the same list of cities as Melbourne and Sydney. Expect sheer desperation on the part of the shit scared globalists as they desperately try to bring their doomed plan together. 

We say stock up with paintball guns and pellets .... and hit em' where it hurts when the rubber bullets are fired in the UK!

[David Icke]: England may have to resort to its winter Covid ‘Plan B’ if daily hospital admissions for coronavirus breach 1,200, ‘Professor Lockdown’ Neil Ferguson said today.

Boris Johnson announced last month that face masks, social distancing and vaccine passports might need to be brought back if the NHS comes under unsustainable pressure.

Ministers said the trigger point will be hospital rates now that the jabs have made case numbers less important — but they have not put a threshold on admissions.

Professor Ferguson — a key Government adviser whose modelling prompted the first lockdown last March — suggested England should not tolerate more than 1,200 daily hospitalisations. For comparison, Covid admission levels breached 4,000 during the darkest days of the second wave in January.

Speaking to a cross-party committee of MPs today, he said that the country was currently recording around 600 Covid admissions per day.

He added: ‘If that figure were to double, we’d need to think about moving to “Plan B”.’ The epidemiologist, based at Imperial College London, called for ‘more intense’ curbs if there is a sharp rise in admissions.

UK Cases Fell by 40 Percent Immediately After COVID Restrictions Were Lifted

  87% partially vaccinated? Nay ... utter bullshit. NO vaccine has ever reached 80%. Try around 40%. The rogue Boris government WANT its people to believe the 87%.

[Humans Are Free]:The sky has not fallen in the United Kingdom now that the nation’s draconian Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) restrictions have been lifted. To the contrary, new “cases” of the Wuhan Virus have plummeted ever since the lockdowns were lifted.

With about 87 percent of its population at least partially “vaccinated,” Great Britain eased up on the stay-at-home orders and mask mandates. The move conjoined with the U.K.’s “Freedom Day.”

“We want people to take back their freedoms as they can today,” Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced on July 18 in a bizarre speech.

It was on that day that for the first time in 18 months, Brits were allowed to return to bars and night clubs. Many were seen partying in the streets and celebrating the transition into a “new normal.”

CNN was, of course, outraged. The floundering fake news outlet called the celebrations a “huge gamble” amid media reports about the scary new “delta variant” that is supposedly spreading.

Labour Party leader Keir Starmer called the parties “a reckless free-for-all,” which prompted Imperial College London mathematical biology Prof. Neil Ferguson to declare that it was “almost inevitable” that 100,000 new daily cases of Chinese Germs would emerge in the aftermath.

“The real question is do we get to double that – or even higher?” Ferguson fearmongered to BBC News. “And that’s where the crystal ball starts to fail. I mean, we could get to 2,000 hospitalisations a day, 200,000 cases a day – but it’s much less certain.”

Well, Freedom Day came and went and none of Ferguson’s predictions came true. Cases of the Wuhan Flu are on the decline all across the U.K. In fact, cases dropped dramatically the moment the restrictions were lifted ...<<<Read More...>>>...

What really happened to ‘Midazolam Matt’ Hancock?

[The Daily Expose]: Various theories continue to surround “what really happened” to Matt Cocksure. I reject the idea that he deliberately died by his own hand: a source close to the Sun’s dirt-diggers insists he was apoplectic with rage when they rang to tell him of his starring role in a porn short; and within 90 minutes of Hancock’s resignation, Sajid Javid was confirmed as his replacement…impossible to do unless the candidate has already said yes. I think the Sun clearly had help in setting him up, but Hankywanky himself wasn’t a willing participant.

There is still the question of why he had to go, and for me the answer is simple: like Bill Gates before him, Saint Matthew had become a liability. It was, after all, becoming clear that his personal skills gave off a whiff of dystopian excrement, and his affair was well-known among an inner circle. Don’t pay any attention to the “six weeks together” codswallop: he’s been giving her one for years, and promoted both her and her family interests while Secretary of State.

He remains, however, potentially involved in stuff that goes beyond the risible Contrick and on into the dimensions of what’s really going on here. One of these is a drug called Midazolam.

Midazolam is a very old drug similar to those featured and condemned in One flew over the Cuckoo’s Nest. Originally designed to keep mental patients “under control”, as long ago as 1985 there were complaints by relatives that old people in care homes and NHS hospitals were being quietly bumped off with overdoses of the drug, under the cuddly name of ‘the Liverpool Pathway’, aka euthanasia without permission, aka genocide.

Some of the civil cases have been running for years: at the infamous Gosport War Memorial Hospital in Hampshire, it now sems that, between 1989 and 2000, more than 450 people had their lives shortened at the hospital while another 200 were “probably” similarly given opioids ‘without medical justification’. That was the conclusion reached by the Gosport Independent Panel report released in 2018. But this year, it has been revealed that Plod is now investigating over fifteen thousand incidents: the report said there was “a disregard for human life and a culture of shortening lives of a large number of patients” at Gosport. Another interesting euphemism, perhaps – have we seen super-spreading of this deadly ethical virus?

There’s no way Hancock didn’t know about the existence of the scandal. During the expected “acute shortage of NHS hospital beds” predicted by Neil “Everrong” Ferguson in early 2020, Matt had no second thoughts about dumping Covid-infected oldies into Care Homes, condemning practically all of them (and the existing residents) to death. But even in that context, there was still panicked urgency among the F**kwhitties about overwhelmed hospitals...<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

From Pandemics to Aliens: The Evolutionary Narrative Towards Global Order

[Waking Times]:When enforced narratives , abrupt U-turns are inevitable. The global Ministry of Truth is now openly promoting the Wuhan lab leak theory when they are not savaging the darlings of yesteryear’s “coronapocalypse”.

One such fall guy is the British mathematical epidemiologist Prof Neil Ferguson whose COVID-19 contagion model paralleled the 3.5 hour-long pandemic simulation exercise called Event 201 in October 2019. Up to 65 million people were projected to die from this contagion. Unsurprisingly, the common denominator between both projections was the omnipresent Microsoft which helped “tidy up” Ferguson’s code. Experts and politicians the world over naturally “listened to the science”, mirroring a teenager’s hysterics over another ostensibly existential issue.

Now, however, shadow-banned links are emerging from Google’s search limbo to inform us that Ferguson’s code was a “buggy mess” that looked “more like a bowl of angel hair pasta than a finely tuned piece of programming.” This is what our endless lockdowns and coercive vaccinations programs were based on!

The “unity through crises” model of the ruling class is backfiring; and the credibility of their political marionettes is plumbing new depths. The World Economic Forum’s prophesied “cyber pandemic”, if it ever transpires, will only to serve to harden growing public scepticism. Besides, such an event will only prove that the building blocks of the WEF’s Great Reset were built on the “pastafarian” codes of Big Tech. Blaming Russian or Chinese bogeymen may not work anymore.

It is not just our cybersystems that are wobbling on dodgy foundations; our entire global systems are primed for a mighty fall. Instead of unity, manifold planetary crises are leading to social fissures of an unprecedented proportion. Mankind can no longer be unified through internally generated crises. The Great Reset project needs to be salvaged by something more exogenous… perhaps something extraterrestrial? Coincidentally, the mainstream narrative has been veering in that direction.

Many years ago, the author had gamed out two interlinked scenarios that could engender global order in an elitist-induced chaos. We will now delve into that bizzaro world…<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

Did Hancock jump or was he pushed … under a bus?

[The Daily Expose]: After a week of the media building up to it, on Saturday Matt Hancock, the now ex-Health Secretary, informed the public he had resigned. He did so by recording a statement and posting it on Twitter.

At first glance his video seems touched up – his skin tone enhanced and the leafy background added as an afterthought. If it wasn’t for a tuft of his hair blowing in the wind in time with the background foliage we would have been forgiven for thinking he was sitting in front of a green screen in an attempt to cover up his true location.

By the end of Monday the BBC reported Downing Street had denied Boris Johnson put pressure on Hancock to resign, and three hours later, The Guardian reported Johnson tried to claim credit for Hancock’s departure. So, which is it? Did he, or didn’t he? While legacy media battles it out to reach a consensus on the Hancock affair, let’s consider events they aren’t reporting on.

Last year, a contract VIP lane was set up by the Government to enable PPE purchases to be fast-tracked. When questioned Hancock said it was ‘absolutely appropriate’ to help an ex-minister secure £178mn contract. Since June 2020 the Good Law Project has been taking legal action regarding the PPE fiasco and the more they scratch the surface, the more serious questions that arise. Their legal action has culminated in a court hearing which is now over and we are now awaiting the judgment.

In March, the People’s Union of Britain (“PUB”) filed a private criminal prosecution (“PCP”) against Hancock, Chris Whitty, Patrick Vallance and Neil Ferguson for pandemic fraud. After a brief hiccup in early June, when the papers were passed to Westminster Magistrates Court but the Statement of Case had somehow been separated from the three evidence files, the Judge proceeded to review the evidence. Last week the Judge rejected the case setting aside expert witness testimony as mere “hearsay”. PUB has announced it’s launching an appeal in the High Court.

In April, a request for investigation of the UK Government and its advisers, for genocide, crimes against humanity and breaches of the Nuremberg Code, was issued to the International Criminal Court at the Hague.

In June, retired police officer, Mark Sexton, submitted a criminal complaint to the police against the Government for misconduct and misfeasance in public office. Others have been taking similar action and yet more are doing so in support of Sexton’s efforts: including a lawyer, Clare Wills Harrison, and prominent doctors who have written to the police in their professional capacities, giving support and weight to Sexton’s complaint.

For more than a year a small team of lawyers and others have been gathering information on the misuse of midazolam. And, we need to talk about midazolam. Midazolam is a commonly used drug in palliative care and is considered one of the essential drugs needed for the promotion of quality care in dying patients.

It depresses respiration and hastens death – it changes end-of-life care into euthanasia. In March 2020 the Government stockpiled two years’ worth of midazolam and by Oct 2020 the stockpile was low. Evidence shows that misuse of midazolam was the real ‘first wave’ of the so-called pandemic.

What legacy media is not reporting is that the Government is coming under increasing pressure over the illegality of their policies since the beginning of 2020. It’s largely irrelevant whether Hancock jumped or was pushed and it’s no wonder calls from the public to “arrest Matt Hancock” have been growing louder.

The question we should be asking is, not who or how he departed from office but, why? Has he been side-lined, his public profile diminished, to keep upcoming legal action out the media? Or is he the fall guy in a much larger game?

Food For Thought #341

 This is pretty damning if its true. A screenshot obtained of an e-mail from 'Dr Lockdown' Neil Ferguson to all his fellow partners in crime, regarding plans for a TOTAL lockdown in the UK from July 2021. 

Plans include ELECTRONIC TAGGING of every single UK citizen from August 2021. He admits that the latest Covid variant is NOTHING MORE THAN HAYFEVER RE-BRANDED. 

Read it all yourself and decide is it hoax or fact?