Smart glasses could be used to covertly collect and misuse personal data

 A legal expert is warning the Australian government to get ahead of the rapid rise of AI smart glasses before having to play catch-up on privacy laws.

The devices are proving transformative for people with disabilities, but the ability to film strangers without their knowledge is raising concerns. Apart from a small, red recording light on the frame of some models, many people may not realise they’re being filmed.

Experts warn the new wave of AI technology could be smart glasses with built-in facial recognition, which could access personal information and increase the risk of identity theft....<<<Read More>>>....

Chlorine-washed and chemically soaked: The hidden truth behind America’s chicken supply

 Conventional U.S. chicken is often soaked in chlorine and other antimicrobial chemical baths to reduce contamination—a practice the European Union has banned since 1997.

U.S. regulations do not require poultry processors to disclose chemical washes on packaging, leaving consumers unaware of what their meat has absorbed.

Industrial processors prioritize speed over hygiene, with large facilities handling up to 2 million birds daily, necessitating chemical interventions to compensate for poor sanitation.

Many conventional chickens are injected with water, salt and phosphates, increasing weight by up to 15%, meaning consumers pay for liquid rather than meat.

Choosing pasture-raised, air-chilled chicken supports cleaner processing practices and higher-quality nutrition while reducing reliance on chemical interventions...<<<Read More>>>.....

Meta files patent for AI facial recognition glasses that identify people around you and record automatically

 Meta has taken a bold step toward always-on personal surveillance with a newly published patent for AI-powered camera glasses that can automatically identify people nearby, analyze their expressions, and decide which moments are worth capturing and saving.

According to a report from Tom’s Guide, the patent filing outlines camera-equipped smart glasses capable of using facial recognition, expression analysis, and data about a wearer’s personal relationships to recognize individuals in the field of view and generate curated highlights without constant manual input.

The system, first reported by 404 Media, is designed to scan for what the patent calls “points of interest” within whatever the wearer sees. In one detailed example, the technology could recognize a user’s spouse at a dinner party and automatically keep that person centered in the frame while cropping or blurring other guests....<<<Read More>>>....

The Climate Debate Was Never About Saving the Planet vs Doing Nothing – it Was Always About Statism vs the Free Market

 In a recent monologue on climate change, LBC radio host James O’Brien hit out at politicians opposing Net Zero, framing them as in denial of objective reality. To many on that side of the debate, a simple opposition to EV mandates, dietary changes, ULEZ, accelerated deindustrialisation, or any other harmful policies associated with Net Zero is a rallying cry of climate denial. They tell us how many jobs the Government is creating, and how good for everyone the Climate Change Committee’s advice will be.

Anyone suffering high energy costs and industry layoffs can see that promises of Net Zero bringing prosperity are plainly untrue.

While niche left-wing blogs might accuse us all of climate vandalism, the reality is far removed from this. I am not a climate denier, nor have I ever been one. Millions of Net Zero sceptics aren’t either; many realise that what was once an aspirational target has now hardened into a stifling reality. Some of us didn’t grasp it in 2019, when the Climate Change Act amendment was passed, but the blatant statism that goes along with a statutory target of Net Zero by 2050 is now hard to deny....<<<Read More>>>...

Don’t Date Someone Who Took the mRNA Jab… That’s Not Shallow, It’s Survival

 Some choices in life are matters of taste. Others are matters of survival. Who you choose to date, marry, and build a family with is the single most consequential biological decision you will ever make -- because it determines the genetic future of your children. That's why many informed people won't date someone who took the mRNA jab. That's not shallow, it's discernment.

We are living through the largest uncontrolled gene-therapy experiment in human history. The mRNA injections were rushed to market without long-term safety testing, driven by pharmaceutical profit and regulatory capture. The long-term consequences remain unknown and potentially extremely risk for genetic integrity and reproduction.

Every intimate relationship is a potential bloodline merger. And when one half of that merger carries experimental mRNA instructions that were never tested for generational safety, the verdict writes itself: this is not a romance; it's a roll of the dice.

The science is no longer hidden. Scientists at Lund University discovered that mRNA from the Pfizer shot can be reverse-transcribed into DNA in human liver cells. Biodistribution studies show mRNA complexes travel throughout the body, entering cell nuclei and causing chromosomal alterations in liver cells. This is not immunity. This is genetic modification (gene therapy). And when germ cells are exposed to these synthetic instructions, the damage does not stop with the person who volunteered -- it becomes a family inheritance.

Refusing to date the injected is not hate. It is self-respect. It is the only sane response to a technology that turns human beings into genetically modified spike protein factories....<<<Read More>>>....

 

Why They Destroyed Unlimited Free Energy Before 1900

 

 

 

What explains how humanity abandoned a worldwide energy infrastructure — buildings architecturally engineered to interact with atmospheric electricity, equipped with copper spires and metal finials tuned to the electromagnetic relationship between the earth and the ionosphere — and replaced it with a centralized, commercially metered electrical grid, without a single serious public reckoning about what that exchange actually cost us? 

 

The standard explanation — that modern electrical infrastructure simply won out through scientific advancement and institutional logic — collapses when you examine what it actually replaced: not a primitive or superstitious tradition, but a system apparently built around the relationship between conductive architecture and the natural charge of the atmosphere. Buildings so deliberately designed that their rooftop elements corresponded to principles Nikola Tesla spent his entire career trying to rediscover. Spaces engineered not merely for shelter, but to draw something from the sky. 

 

As I investigated the architectural and historical record — from the undocumented renovation programs of pre-1860 civic buildings across Europe to identical demolition patterns appearing simultaneously in South America, India, and Australia — a disturbing pattern materialized. These weren't parallel coincidences across unconnected cultures. They were the same underlying erasure, executed within the same sixty-year window following the Carrington Event of 1859, across every continent where this older infrastructure had taken root. 

 

And the spires came down with the buildings. Simplified. Removed. Gone — with gaps in the archive that cluster, with unsettling precision, around three geomagnetic events: the Carrington Event of 1859, the Chapman-Silverman storm of 1872, and the Solar Storm of 1921. Each one followed by another quiet pulse of architectural simplification. Each one followed by another wave of silence in the official record. 

 

Because here's what the replacement also did. It didn't just reorganize how energy was produced and distributed. It may have severed something older. The relationship between the built environment and atmospheric electricity — between conductive architecture, electromagnetic resonance, and freely available energy — that appears embedded in pre-industrial construction across dozens of cultures was quietly superseded. Not debated. Not disproven. Just demolished. Made institutionally invisible. And the generations that had maintained that system, the caretakers whose job titles vanish from institutional records sometime in the 1870s, died without passing the knowledge forward. 

 

This investigation examines whether the energy infrastructure we inherited was designed not to serve humanity's access to power — but to replace a system that may have understood something about that access we are only now beginning to consider. And whether something older, something that cannot be metered or commercially distributed, was deliberately lost in that replacement. The exact same year Tesla lost everything. 

 

The material on this channel presents exploratory interpretations of history and imaginative speculation, conveyed through narrative storytelling rather than precise historical documentation. Viewpoints and visual representations are dramatized or intentionally constructed to support alternative narrative exploration. Visual elements may at times be created using automated or generative tools. The content shared should not be considered factual.

Why the Global Elite is Panicking Over Open Source AI That Can Set Humanity Free

Pinch of salt anyone? Why would the so called global elite be panicking about something they have brought out from the shadows? 

++++++++++++

I believe we are living through the most thrilling time for creative expression in all of human history, yet it is matched by an unprecedented assault on human life. The very same establishment that has spent decades centralizing control over knowledge, medicine, and "official narratives" is now scrambling to contain a force it cannot comprehend: open source artificial intelligence. This is not an accident of timing. The convergence of liberating technology and accelerating depopulation is a direct response to the threat of human freedom.

Open source AI hands the power to create, learn, and communicate to individuals without any gatekeepers. This terrifies the globalist establishment. As I have stated before, the power to produce knowledge and art that rivals Hollywood or the corporate media is no longer a privilege of the elite; it is a birthright that can be exercised by anyone with a decent computer (and GPU). The establishment’s panic is real because they understand that a decentralized, informed, and creative populace is impossible to control. Their entire edifice of power relies on keeping the masses dependent on censored, controlled sources of limited information. And open source (open weights) AI obliterates that prison....<<<Read More>>>...

AI Isn’t the Bubble, The Speculation Is… Here’s Why You Can’t Afford to Wait For It To Pop

 The AI investment bubble is real -- I've been warning about it for months. But conflating that bubble with AI technology itself is a dangerous mistake that will leave you behind. Wall Street's speculative mania is a financial phenomenon, not a measure of what this technology can actually do. Bridgewater Associates founder Ray Dalio recently "highlighted classic bubble dynamics - sky-high valuations, rampant speculation, and 'paper wealth' vastly outpacing actual cash flows - while drawing direct parallels to the 2000 dot-com era" ^[1]. Yet even he understands the crucial distinction: the technology endures when the speculation collapses.

AI capability is accelerating while market hype inflates valuations. When the correction comes -- and it will -- the technology stays and keeps improving. Dismissing AI because "bubble" is in the headline means ignoring the most powerful tool advancement of our lifetime...<<<Read More>>>....

ENSO events, not CO2, are a driver of global temperatures

 On the natural climate driver side, we disagree, which fuels debate. No one marches in lockstep toward an agenda-driven goal where the only disagreement is over how to doom-and-gloom each other.

Recently, a movement to discredit the global temperature has arisen on the premise that it’s not truly a physical or thermodynamic process as a climate variable. I see where these people are coming from, and why, but I disagree that statistical measurement is meaningless. The hype is the problem, as it tries to portray the planet as something boiling away and then jumps to man-made emissions without considering other factors, as I will show below.

But to me, and most meteorologists and climate people, [statistical measurement is] far from meaningless; it supplies a view of the scorecard of the duel between warm and cold. And if we know what drives that, then we can conclude heat is being added to the atmosphere.

The upcoming El Niño exposes the idea that it is man-made emissions driving the climate. Those pushing that idea are all drooling at the temperature spike that is coming. So right there, the visible real-world evidence of the oceans warming the air is in front of them. They don’t even know they set up their own circular firing squad.

Here, in a nutshell, is their claim: Man-made emissions warm the atmosphere and trap heat. The oceans warm because of that, and then, El Niño releases the warmth back into the air....<<<Read More>>>...

Home Office Plans to Spend £4.5 Million on Electric Car Chargers While 250 More Migrants Arrive

 Ministers and civil servants tackling the small boats crisis are being slammed for planning to spend millions on electric car chargers. The Mail has the story:

Nearly £4.5 million has been earmarked for the Net Zero gadgets to be installed at Home Office buildings to help staff go ‘green’.

But it sparked a furious backlash as critics said officials, who have struggled to get to grips with relentless Channel crossings, should focus all their resources on tackling the crisis.

It came as another 250 migrants on three boats arrived on Monday, taking the total since Andy Burnham became Prime Minister around a month ago to nearly 3,500.

In recent weeks a string of ‘mega-dinghies’ carrying more than 100 migrants at a time have also reached UK shores as smugglers shift their tactics.

One vessel arrived last week carrying a staggering 230 migrants, comfortably smashing the previous record of 165 aboard one vessel on July 23rd.

The spend came to light today in a written Parliamentary question, with Home Office minister Sarah Jones saying more than £500,000 was splurged on installing electric car chargers in 2024/25.

The department plans to ramp this up to £1 million this year and annually until 2029, bringing the total earmarked spend to £4.4 million. …

Mr Burnham has revealed little about what his strategy is for stopping the boats, choosing to leave the issue out of his maiden speech on the steps of Downing Street on July 20th.

But he has said ministers will look at “changing our tactics” to tackle the rise of mega-dinghies being used.

The average number of migrants crammed onto small boats has more than doubled over five years to a record high under Labour, from 28 per vessel in 2021 to nearly 70 so far this year....<<<Read More>>>..

The Deadliest Lab on Earth: How AI Warfare Turns Human Lives Into Training Data

Do we believe any of these storylines that are being propelled deep into social media ....?? How true is this one .... a script in the pantomime or fact?  There is so much disinformation and fear factor bullshit being put out there; all designed to scare the shit out of the sheep and also to distort and confuse the truth.

 ++++++++++++++++++

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt let the mask slip. When he described Ukraine not merely as a war but as a data collection event for the AI era, he wasn't confiding a secret -- he was confessing a crime against humanity. Ukraine has emerged as the world's first active combat laboratory for AI-enabled autonomous weapons systems, generating an unprecedented dataset of battlefield footage used to train AI for target recognition and autonomous navigation ^[1]. The deadliest conflict in Europe since World War II has become, in the cold calculus of Silicon Valley, a calibration exercise for the machines.

I believe this is a moral catastrophe. NATO nations utilized Ukraine as a testing ground for advanced military technologies, with Western companies like Palantir and Maxar integrating intelligence operations directly into Ukrainian military targeting ^[2]. Every soldier bleeding in the trenches of the Donbas is not merely a casualty of war -- he or she is also a data point, a pixel in the training set of the next generation of killing machines. Here's why this is so atrocious: once human suffering becomes training data, all wars become laboratories, and every battlefield becomes a research facility where the dead are the price of admission....<<<Read More>>>....

Live and Let (the State) Die

 I want to make an exact argument here that I think is fundamental. 

There is a relation between: “Climate change,” “Net Zero,” Green, Environmental politics, and
Immigration, Colonisation, Decolonisation, Cultural Problems.

The death of Rod Liddle algorithmed me back to the Ray Honeyford story and it was musing on that disgraceful episode that made me think about this. For there is a relation between these two. There is a relation between the issue of global warming / climate crisis / extreme weather events and the issue of race and immigration that we have associated for almost 60 years with the name of Enoch Powell. Both of these issues are discussed at maximum volume now.

For both Left and Right there is an existential crisis.

For the Left it is about the Planet.

For the Right it is about the State.

First on the state.

I have said it before and I’ll say it again. Until we have some grand theory of global order and an international treaty, or a subsumption of states into a World State or, more likely, a subsumption of them into Schmitt’s Grossraüme or Orwell’s Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia (China, Russia, America): until any of that happens, then we will have states. And, as Machiavelli put it in the Prince, the major interest and activity and necessity of the prince (i.e., any government) is mantenere lo stato – to maintain the state....<<<Read More>>>..

70% of the British public say immigration is “too high”

 For more than a decade, the political and media establishment in Britain has told itself a comforting story.

The shock vote for Brexit, more than a decade ago, was just the “last gasp” of an older, more conservative Britain that struggles to accept the modern world.

Yes, some 17 million people might have voted to leave the European Union and given the establishment a bloody nose. But this was only a temporary revolt – a brief interruption on Britain’s inevitable journey towards a far more “liberal” [as in hard or far left-wing] future.

And in the years since – they continually tell us – new generations of younger, more diverse and “better educated” British people have arisen to continue pushing Britain towards this far more socially “liberal,” cosmopolitan, or “progressive” horizon.

Ever more supportive of immigration. Ever more supportive of demographic change and rising diversity. Ever more relaxed about “modern Britain.” And ever more embarrassed about the vote for Brexit and the desire to “take back control.”

This is the narrative that countless politicians, academics and columnists push.

Alastair Campbell. Rory Stewart. Emily Maitlis. Polly Toynbee. Owen Jones. Former Times columnist David Aaronovitch. “Liberal” pollster Peter Kellner. Academic activists like Jon Portes and Rob Ford. They have all made variations of this argument.

You know the type.

Smug illiberal “progressives” who think the future belongs to them, who preach about the wonders of diversity but refuse to tolerate genuine diversity of thought, who portray anybody who holds a different view as some kind of fascist, and who probably look at a newsletter like ours as representing a fringe minority.

Well, take a look at what is happening now.

A few days ago, a remarkable new study by the polling company YouGov completely dismantled this argument by comparing what the British people think today with what they thought at the time of the Brexit referendum, a decade ago.

And what did they find?

Contrary to all the talk and all the predictions about the British people embracing things like immigration and diversity, the pollsters found a very different story and one that reveals just how badly the establishment continues to misread Britain.

For a start, they found that over the last decade the British people have not become more supportive of immigration over the last decade. Far from it.  They are just as likely today as they were a decade ago to think immigration into Britain has been “too high” – a view which, consistently, seven in ten people hold....<<<Read More>>>...

EU Net Zero Regulations Are Killing Off British Agriculture – And we Slavishly Enforce Them, Even Though We’ve Left the EU

 The UK is still beholden to EU emissions standards, which, like most things under the purview of the European Union, have become bureaucratic and are applied in ways that are detrimental to both efficiency and productivity, without doing a proper cost – benefit analysis. Vehicles in high-traffic residential areas should rightly be given greater weight when it comes to pollution reduction, but should a tractor working on a farm or in the middle of a field, miles from the nearest village, be subject to the same conditions?

EU emissions regulations for non-road mobile machinery have become more and more stringent over the last decade, to the point where the demands on the technology have led to runaway costs and new machinery has essentially become emissions-regulation equipment with an engine attached. The cost of emissions-regulation technology can account for 20–30% of the total list price for a new vehicle such as a tractor, excavator, bulldozer, or any other type of non-road mobile machinery. The technology required to bring emissions into compliance with the Stage IV and Stage V standards places huge burdens on manufacturers and end users. Failures of the emission-monitoring components result in large warranty bills for manufacturers, which are pushed onto end users through eye-watering extended warranty programmes. Those who cannot afford these, or whose machine has reached an age where the manufacturer’s warranty has expired, can be left with a ticking time bomb. A single component failure can result in bills of several thousand pounds which, for a small family farm often with only a single tractor, can cause significant financial hardship...<<<Read More>>>...

EVs in the USA head for bust while sales globally are artificially propped up

 Doug Field, the head of Ford’s EV unit … had good reason to be optimistic. Buoyed by billions of dollars in federal investment in charging infrastructure and a generous $7,500 consumer tax credit, the electric vehicle market in the United States had recently hit historic highs, climbing from annual sales of roughly 490,000 in 2021 to more than 800,000 in 2022 – an increase of approximately 60 per cent.

Yes, it was government-enabled and woke-driven. A false boom – and a colossal economic mistake in retrospect.

[Ford’s early EV model] seems to have been cursed from the outset. Unlike many of the earlier Ford EVs, the “bullet train” was not merely a retrofitted version of an existing vehicle with an internal combustion engine … It was an entirely new car, requiring a large and complicated battery to match the vehicle’s projected heft.

The early reaction to Ford’s ambition (wokeness) was green-is-great and the auto-transition-is-on. But reality set in....<<<Read More>>>...

Cloud cover, not CO2, is a driver of global warming

 

A July 2026 Environmental Research Letters paper authored by Bellocchi et al. attributes ~80% of the rise in Earth’s absorbed solar radiation since 2000 to declining high-reflectivity cloud cover, primarily from circulation-driven contraction of storm-cloud zones.

The study highlights the climate’s “albedo governance,” suggesting a 1% shift in Earth’s albedo corresponds to a 1°C surface temperature change.

With more cloud cover, more solar radiation is reflected and the surface cools. With declining cloud albedo, which has been observed since 1980, less solar radiation is reflected and the surface warms.

Cloud cover changes are driven by natural atmospheric circulation modes and internal variability. This is supported by reconstruction data showing cloud cover decline has for centuries occurred independently from “greenhouse-gas forcing.”....<<<Read More>>>....

Defra, Not Climate Change, is Turning England Into a Tinderbox

 How bad is the situation? Satellite analysis shows that six times more land was burnt in the UK over the last decade than in the previous one (151,954 hectares in 2016-2025 against 24,805 in 2006-2015). Do not be fooled by those who say this catastrophe is simply down to climate change. Sure, hot days drive moisture out of plants. But globally wildfires are down by a quarter because humanity has become better at creating firebreaks.

Defra hasn’t. Its response to climate change has been to sharply increase vegetation. Over the last 20 years its cuts in upland cattle and sheep grazing led to a 25% increase in highly flammable grass.

Another genius move has been stopping preventative burns of heather. Why do I care about this? Because during damp winter months these burns safely prune the dead material which is then replaced by younger plants. It is the dead heather which is combustible. And thanks to Defra we now have 74% more of it.

The winter burns used to create firebreaks. Now we have huge expanses of continuous, ageing vegetation....<<<Read More>>>...

Tempering The Blade

  We may well be faced with what is likely to be the hardest challenges in human existence in the last two hundred years. For many this is an awful experience. It's heart breaking; desperate; horrendous. That's understandable ... for the most part, human beings are not aware of what is happening to them.

For others, it appears to be a fantastic opportunity (I'm not talking about the globalist parasites as they do not fit the category of human any more). There is an understanding of what is being presented to them by the universe.

It's not the first time this has happened. If you are aware of the disappearance of the Tartarians; then you'll know what is being talked about here. Prior to around 1780 - 1800 approx, mankind lived in relative peace with natural healing, free energy and a society that was not parasitic in nature. Sadly, there was darkness growing ... and it seized its chance to rid the world of the last great advanced civilisation. Then rewrite history, science and the true nature of life. They hid the Tartarian race in plain sight .... butchering billions of people; keeping the kids and making them orphans to start a new human civilisation after a deliberately created massive flood ... 

Anyway, I digress. We are all likely recycled Tartarians in one form or another. The parasites have fooled us into walking back into their ritual field to provide them with the energy to survive and minds to use to help manifest their desires. 

That cannot be refuted. But in truth, this is the 'tempering of the blade' .... a process of strengthening the spirit by forcing it onto the brink of oblivion. Let it see everything it is by showing it what it is not. Let it see what it stands to lose. To let it be jolted into a realisation.

We've all been kidnapped ... and forced into this slavery. We have a chance to break free. Those who fail to see this and are permitting the black ritual to manifest an eternal hell for them ... that is their weakness for not realising what is going on.

For those that can see what is going on. We need to refuse to comply. To ignore the conjuring that is going on. For the black magic castings need our attention to be created into a reality. If our minds are elsewhere and ignoring what is apparently unfolding then we cannot have our minds used. The media and the MSM are used by black magicians to steal away our freewill to think what we want to think. By watching things unfold we are letting our attention go where they want it to go,

IGNORE. And buckle up for the rough ride ahead. We win this. The blades will be sharpened to a razor sharp edge and our truth will sever the connections with the dark ones .....! - Matthew James

AI Is Now Engineering Pathogenic Proteins That Could Threaten the Entire Human Race

 Anyone got any salt? We need just a pinch or two when reading this post. 

++++++++++++++++++++++  

Artificial intelligence has crossed a line that should alarm every living human being. Researchers at Stanford University and the Arc Institute used generative AI models to produce 16 novel bacteriophages -- complete, functional viral genomes that successfully infect and kill bacteria in the laboratory. The BBC reports this marks "the first time whole genomes have been successfully designed by AI" ^[2]. The researchers insist these creations "pose no threat to people".

I believe that is dangerously naive. This isn't a scientific breakthrough; it's more like a bioweapon prototype announced in academic robes.

Here's why this matters: AI lets one person do the work of ten, and that applies to bioweapons just as much as coding or translation. What once required government laboratories and billions in funding can now be accomplished by a single researcher with a generative model. And the same institutions that brought us gain-of-function research are celebrating this achievement as if it were a gift to humanity, rather than a threat to our existence...<<<Read More>>>...

ECB is intensifying its war on humanity using climate regulations, despite a global collapse in “green” finance

 Last weekend, as wildfires continued to scorch parts of southern Europe, Frank Elderson of the European Central Bank’s (“ECB’s”) Executive Board took to the pages of The Guardian to warn that the “climate and nature crises” now pose a direct threat to “core financial stability” and even “core price stability.” The destruction of ecosystem services, he insisted, is not some “flower-power, tree-hugging exercise” but “core economics.” The ECB, he added, is already deepening its scrutiny of banks’ exposures to nature-related risks, with further analysis due later this year.

This is the same institution that, only 10 days earlier, quietly expanded its “climate factor” in the “Eurosystem collateral framework” to cover non-financial corporate loans. From the end of 2027 at the earliest, loans to companies deemed exposed to “transition shocks” from climate change will face an additional haircut of up to 5%. The July decision and Elderson’s August rhetoric are of a piece: the ECB continues to weaponise climate (and now nature) policy even as the empirical, political and market ground shifts decisively under the alarmist camp....<<<Read More>>>...