How to get to a parallel universe: the answer from physicists may surprise

 If parallel universes exist, then there is at least one way to get to a place that is different from our reality.

So far, the existence of parallel universes is mostly associated with science fiction. But there are scientific theories that suggest that other universes exist. If so, how can we get there?

The existence of parallel universes is suggested by at least two well-known theories in physics. One of them is called the inflation theory and describes an extremely early universe.

Soon after the Big Bang, not one, but a huge number of universes could have been created, which began to expand at an accelerated rate. Moreover, each universe has different physics and distribution of matter.

But getting to other universes is extremely difficult, because they are beyond the visible space and are moving away from us faster than the speed of light.

Another theory, known as the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, says that when some random quantum process occurs, one universe gets one of the possible outcomes, while other universes get other outcomes. This creates a multiverse with all possible quantum outcomes....<<<Read More>>>...

Could the Universe Be a Fractal?

 For decades cosmologists have wondered if the large-scale structure of the universe is a fractal: if it looks the same no matter the scale. And the answer is: no, not really. But in some ways, yes. Look, it’s complicated, writes www.universetoday.com.

Our universe is unimaginably vast and contains somewhere around two trillion galaxies. These galaxies aren’t scattered around randomly, but are assembled into a series of ever-larger structures.

There are the groups, containing at most a dozen galaxies are so. Then there are the clusters, which are home to a thousand galaxies and more. Above them are the superclusters, which twist and wind for millions of light-years.

Is this the end of the story? ....<<<Read More>>>...

Why did modern humans replace the Neanderthals?

Why did humans take over the world while our closest relatives, the Neanderthals, became extinct? It’s possible we were just smarter, but there’s surprisingly little evidence that’s true.

Neanderthals had big brains, language and sophisticated tools. They made art and jewellery. They were smart, suggesting a curious possibility. Maybe the crucial differences weren’t at the individual level, but in our societies.

Two hundred and fifty thousand years ago, Europe and western Asia were Neanderthal lands. Homo sapiens inhabited southern Africa. Estimates vary but perhaps 100,000 years ago, modern humans migrated out of Africa.

Forty thousand years ago Neanderthals disappeared from Asia and Europe, replaced by humans. Their slow, inevitable replacement suggests humans had some advantage, but not what it was.

Anthropologists once saw Neanderthals as dull-witted brutes. But recent archaeological finds show they rivalled us in intelligence....<<<Read More>>>...

How Can Scientific Misconceptions Shape Our Worldview?

 There are a few scientific misconceptions that affect all of us and have shaped our culture in unhealthy ways that most of us may not be aware of. Science is always evolving but it’s common for people to become dogmatic about it and resist new information.

As new information is presented we will be liberated if we have the courage to change our belief systems and worldview to evolve our lives accordingly. This requires a certain degree of mindfulness, humor, and humility but the results can bring a profound transformation in the way we live....<<<Read More>>>...

Top 10 reasons “climate change” is a complete HOAX and Ponzi scheme run by the globalists and DC Democrats

 Everyone remembers the first Al Gore world tour promoting fake global warming, talking about how the shorelines of America would all recede as the great glaciers of the world melt and the oceans rise. 

We heard fibs about the ozone layer and trapped greenhouse gases. Even statistics of the hottest years since 1935 made it seem as though every human might be bursting into flames soon if we don't stop all the cows from farting and start car-pooling in the H.O.V. lanes on the highways. 

Once everyone realized the sun isn't getting hotter, and the world's ice isn't melting, Al Gore and his conspiracy theory cohorts changed the name to "climate change," so that every hurricane, tornado, and weather "event" could be blamed on those pesky gas-guzzling, hamburger-chomping humans (taxpayers the globalists want to rob)....<<<Read More>>>...

No, carbon dioxide is NOT a pollutant and it DOESN’T control the planet’s temperatures

 The Light, an "uncensored truth" magazine based out of the United Kingdom, published a powerful exposé this month all about the alleged climate crisis, which its editors say does not exist.

Entitled "No climate crisis: carbon dioxide has zero effect on temperatures," the piece blows to bits the myth that carbon dioxide, a natural substance that all plants need in order to produce oxygen so we can breathe, has absolutely nothing to do with planetary temperatures.

Using two graphs and less than 300 words, the front-page story demolishes the climate hoax, exposing it as a sinister tool for stripping humans of their basic freedoms, including the right to work, travel and access public places.

Under the guise of promoting "ecological responsibility," the globalists and their roving bands of climate fanatics aim to shift the world away from freedom and tradition into the tyrannical hands of corporate greed and control.

"The climate hoax is an attack on farming and food production – documentaries bemoan the methane production of cows, while the growth and transportation of soya beans destroys rainforests and requires an immense amount of water," the article states.

"In terms of CO2, little is done to prevent celebrities and world leaders from flying in private jets from London to Inverness, while we must cycle to work, turn off the lights and eat bugs, while none of it makes any difference ..."...<<<Read More>>>...

What Will People Look Like After Moving To Mars?

 The misleading lies told to the human race by both the official story and by NASA is horrendous. If only they knew that Mars is so much closer than is claimed ... and it is not what people are wrongly taught.

The speculation on this article is based on the official story about Mars. It is plain BS as Mars is not as far away as it claimed AND it is not what it is claimed to be.

+++++++++++++++++++

Around the end of the 2030s, humans will fly to Mars for the first time in history. The journey will be long – according to NASA calculations, overcoming 55.76 million kilometers will take about 500 days.

During this time, the muscles of the astronauts will weaken due to the lack of gravity, and at first they will have to travel in a special car. If all goes well, flights to the Red Planet will become regular and eventually a human colony will be established there.

Since the human body is adapted to live on Earth, Martian conditions greatly affect the health of migrants. Some scientists believe that people who remain on Mars will evolve over the course of many hundreds of years and eventually cease to be like earthlings....<<<Read More>>>...

Rising Nonsense About Sea Levels From the BBC

 There was a report on the BBC Breakfast programme today about the threat of rising sea levels to historic castles on our coast. The BBC bleated that these castles, which had protected Britain’s coasts for hundreds of years, were now being destroyed by rising sea levels due to climate change. The BBC claimed that “scientists have predicted that sea levels could rise by a metre by the end of this century”.

This reminded me of a BBC documentary, Earth Under Water made by the BBC in 2010. In this documentary the BBC presented two scenarios – a two metre sea-level rise by 2100 and a five metre sea-level rise by 2200. Using these two ‘scenarios’, the BBC showed the terrifying consequences for coastal cities and low-lying land from these predicted sea-level rises.

I guess the one positive one can take from the two programmes is that the BBC has reduced its prediction of sea-level rise by 2100 from two metres to a mere one metre.

But let’s test whether a sea-level rise of two metres or even one metre by 2100 is credible...<<Read More>>>...

The Left is now openly abusing mentally disabled children to push climate change propaganda

[Natural News]:The sudden rise of Greta Thunberg to the forefront of the climate change hoax has proven once again that the Left only cares about children when they can be effectively manipulated and used as pawns to push leftist agendas for profit.

The Left specifically prefers mentally disabled children for such tasks because they’re much easier to control, which is also the case for Greta, who has Asperger’s. While it might be slightly more difficult to convince a normal child that the world is ending in 12 or seven or five years, depending on which climate activist you ask, someone on the autism spectrum is more likely to believe it and spread it to others.

This is definitely the case with Greta, who’s traveling the world on George Soros’ dime indoctrinating anyone who will listen into the cult of climate change. And it would appear as though Greta fully believes everything she’s saying, which is probably why she was chosen in the first place.

We’ve seen similar child abuse against not only autistic children but also children with Down syndrome, who are now being actively recruited by the LGBTQ mafia to become “transgenders.” Children with Down syndrome, in case you aren’t aware, are much more “innocent” and tend to believe what they’re told, which makes them ripe targets for leftist abuse.

As for Greta, she appears to be a victim of abuse by her own parents, both of whom identify as members of the domestic terrorist group Antifa. Greta the eco-fascist also appears to have come out of nowhere just as her mother Malena was releasing a memoir, suggesting that Greta is being used by her parents to rake in the cash....<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...

More UN Claims of Impending Climate Doom

[Natural News]: In late September, The Weather Channel website published an article about the latest IPCC report entitled The Ocean And Cryosphere In A Changing Climate. This report was released by the UN on September 24th, and claimed climate change is accelerating, which will create conditions even more catastrophic than had been thought.

The IPCC report said oceans are becoming more acidic and polar regions are losing ice ever faster, resulting in accelerated sea-level rise. In typical IPCC fashion, the report claims to be ‘conservative’, and that sea-level rise may well be twice what is predicted. Also predicted was the death of coral reefs.

Ocean Acidification is one of those things that makes my blood boil. The public are actually being told the oceans are an acid, and going by some of the comments I’ve seen and heard, they are believing it. To me this beggars belief, so let’s be quite clear, the oceans are NOT acidic, they are an alkaline.

The oceans have a Ph of between 7.9 and 8.3, which makes them well into the range of alkalinity. Neutral Ph is 7, so only below 7 does water become acidic. If the oceans warm, they absorb less CO2 and they become slightly less alkaline, but at no time do they become acidic. Below is the pH scale. 0 – 6.9 are the acids, 7 is pH neutral, 7.1 – 12 are the alkalines.

Seawater is quite clearly an alkaline, and it should be noticed that ‘normal’ rain is slightly acidic; with a pH of 6, and some soils are quite strongly acidic, with a pH of 4, as are many of the foods we eat. Climate alarmists’ computer models have predicted a reduction in the Pacific pH to 7.8 by 2100, but the ocean around Peru is already at 7.7, and the population of anchovies fished there for us to eat is thriving...Read The Full Article Here>>>...

Climate change that ignores history

[Natural News]: Climate has ALWAYS changed from decade to decade. There were major swings (volatility) during the 1930s. You had the dust bowl during the summer and in 1936 you had record cold. The 1936 North American cold wave, which also hit Japan and China, still rank among the most intense cold waves in the recorded history of North America.

You cannot blame this on soccer moms driving the kids around town burning fossil fuels. Cars were a luxury in the 1930s still.

There is just no evidence of human-induced climate change. There is nobody willing to call them out on this nonsense with just showing the dramatic swings in temperature over the centuries.

We have been subjected to extravagance from climate catastrophists for close to 50 years.

In January 1970, Life magazine, based on “solid scientific evidence”, claimed that by 1985 air pollution would reduce the sunlight reaching the Earth by half. In fact, across that period sunlight fell by between 3 per cent and 5 per cent. In a 1971 speech, Paul Ehrlich said: “If I were a gambler I would take even money that ­England will not exist in the year 2000.”...Read The Full Article Here>>>....

‘Lies are being pedalled’ to our children on climate change

Jeremy Corbyn’s brother calls climate protesters ‘deranged’ as he holds a counter demonstration and denounces global warming as a ‘hoax’

 Someone speaking the truth at last! 'A gas of life' YES. CO2 is essential to life. It is not the enemy ... human greed in the form of The Hidden Hand is the enemy. Global Warming is a sinister hoax!

[Daily Bullshit Mail]: Jeremy Corbyn's brother has called protestors who glued themselves to the Labour leader's house this week 'deranged'.

Piers Corbyn staged a tiny counter-protest at the Extinction Rebellion occupation at Waterloo Bridge yesterday.

He waved one banner that denounced global warming as a 'hoax' and another calling greenhouse gas carbon dioxide a 'gas of life'.

Protestors challenged his climate change denial and made it clear he was not part of the group.


Piers Corbyn, who is the Labour leader's older brother, believes that accepted science on man made climate change is a 'cover up' that exists to push up fuel prices.

Asked about the Extinction Rebellion activists, who targeted his brother's home on Wednesday, he said: 'I think it was deranged.'...read more>>>...

Experts claim climate change activists altered findings and used “arbitrary adjustments” to exaggerate sea level rise

Natural News: Remember the days when one could read a newspaper article or scientific journal with complete conviction that the contents were accurate? Sadly, we have reached a point where we have fewer and fewer reliable touchstones, and virtually all the information we are fed needs to be scrutinized carefully before it can be accepted.

The latest example of this, perhaps unsurprisingly, comes from the sphere of “climate change” science, with a new study claiming that activists have been manipulating data to make it seem that sea levels are rising at an alarming rate in the Indian Ocean.

Drs. Albert Parker and Clifford Ollier, researchers from the University of Western Australia, recently published a study in the journal Earth Systems and Environment, in which they questioned claims by the Permanent Service of Mean Sea Level (PSMSL) that there has been a dramatic and alarming rise in the sea level of the Indian Ocean. The PSMSL based their claims on raw data collected from sites in Yemen, Pakistan and India.

The Australian researchers asserted in their study that the PSMSL figures were skewed because only higher sea level readings were included, while readings that reflected lower sea levels were ignored...read more>>>....