The petition alleges that Meta colluded with Biden administration officials to censor CHD’s content, particularly regarding vaccines and COVID-19. This move comes after Meta initially waived its right to respond, raising questions about the social media giant’s transparency and its role in suppressing dissenting voices.
The case, which dates back to 2020, has gained renewed attention following Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s public admissions that government officials pressured the company to censor content during the pandemic. CHD, a nonprofit organization advocating for vaccine safety and informed consent, was deplatformed from Facebook and Instagram in August 2022 and has not been reinstated. The Supreme Court’s decision to compel Meta to respond suggests the justices are taking the case seriously, potentially setting the stage for a landmark ruling on censorship and free speech in the digital age...<<<Read More>>>...
