The book opens with an intriguing examination of the incentive structures within the scientific community. Michaels and Knappenberger suggest that there is a bias toward alarmism, driven by the need to attract funding and attention. They point to the U.S. National Climate Assessments as examples, claiming that these reports often exaggerate the impacts of climate change to support specific policy agendas. As Michaels states, "The incentive to be alarming is strong, as it garners more funding and media coverage."
One of the most compelling aspects of "Lukewarming" is its exploration of the historical context of climate science. The authors highlight that the concept of lukewarming is not new, with contributions from scientists like Judith Curry and Will Happer over the years. They emphasize the importance of skepticism and critical thinking, arguing that the current climate change narrative often lacks these essential elements.
Michaels and Knappenberger also delve into the role of sulfate
aerosols in climate models. They argue that these aerosols have been
used as a "Band-Aid" to help models simulate past climate conditions
more accurately. However, they question the validity of this approach,
suggesting that it allows modelers to hold onto their paradigms longer
than they should. "The use of sulfate aerosols in models is a
double-edged sword," Michaels explains. "While it helps reconcile models
with past data, it also masks the uncertainties inherent in our
understanding of the climate system."...<<<Read More>>>....