I wrote some time ago about how figures like Anthony Fauci, Michael
Mann, Susan Michie, also Boris Johnson, Chris Whitty etc. etc., from
2020 onwards played cups-and-ball with science and politics. Ah, you
thought it was politics under this cup, but it was in fact science! If
not ‘The Science’.
Observe how no one has ever referred to such a thing as ‘The Politics’.
No one ever says, “The politics says that climate change is happening.”
No, we always say, “The science says that climate change is happening.”
Why?
Well,
politicians are either 1) unitary, our overlords: sovereign,
government, the ruling class, or 2) partial, the 24-hour-political-party
people. And either way, we don’t like it: either something is being
imposed on us from above, or it is being urged on us from one side or
the other.
Let me lay this out in textbook manner:
Politics, in modern times, depends on partiality.
Yet partiality is not authoritative.
In
those two lines we have the source of all our laments about modern
politics. That old bore Habermas always talked about “legitimation
crisis”. What does it mean? It means, if I put it in Shakespearian terms
(about antique politics), that the king is a usurper. Read Richard II
or Henry IV Part I to understand.
But the thought is incomplete.
Politics or government has always suffered from that sort of periodic
legitimation crisis: usurpation and how to refine it. That is antique
politics. But a distinctively modern politics is 24-hour-political-party
politics: which means what Machiavelli and John Stuart Mill thought was
not a negative thing (as everyone in the entire history of the world
had thought – ‘Let’s avoid civil discord at all costs’) but, possibly, a
positive thing: antagonism between rival factions being fertile for
vitality, as Machiavelli saw, and perhaps fundamentally institutionally
necessary, as Mill saw...<<<Read More>>>...