Search A Light In The Darkness

Tuesday 11 June 2019

Are The Ancient Theories Of The Nature Of The Earth True?

There are two obviously conflicting 'theories' about the nature of this reality. First, we have the conventional one, the one which we are taught from the very first moment we enter a classroom. The one that is now 'the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth'.

The other theory was the enduring one, with ancient civilisations, for tens of thousands of years before the advent of modern science. A theory which is now filed away as 'disinformation' and 'hate speech' and 'total bullshit'.

That theory is that we exist on a flat earth; with the ice fields of the North Pole at the centre of the earth plane; with the out rim of the planet a concentric ring of ice; Antarctica.

This theory is extended to the earth plane having a dome or filament between the earth and 'space'. The earth is stationary with only Polaris as a stationary star. The rest of the heavens spins around the dome of the earth. The sun and the moon being within the earth's atmosphere, moving around the earth.

Beyond the filament, is an un-chartered 'sea'; space being in fact water or an ocean of indeterminable depth and size. This explains why we are bound by maritime laws and why are seen to be 'children of the sea'.

This theory then determines that NASA is lying about space and space exploration. The stars seen in the night sky being little more than light sources created by sound frequencies. Indeed the earth plane and its filament dome are created by holographic sound frequencies.

It's perhaps not hard to see why flat earth theories have been alienated from the internet. Banned from enquiry eyes. Could it be there is some truth in these theories?

After all, there are numerous holes in the conventional theory that the earth is a spinning globe that hurtles through space and orbits the sun? Just saying.