A document published by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010, titled “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.”, described the possible ramifications of a Pandemic.
The “Lock Step” 
scenario imagined a world where national governments imposed strict 
top-down control and authority in response to a global pandemic, with 
citizens complying with government restrictions. 
The “Lock Step”
 section detailed how countries might react to a global crisis, such as a
 pandemic, with varying degrees of government control. It discussed how 
more authoritarian governments might succeed in containing the virus by 
enforcing strict lockdowns, surveillance, and control measures, while 
other countries with less centralized control might struggle to manage.
Covid-19
 was used as a Catalyst for Authoritarian Control. The scenario in this 
booklet stated that during a pandemic, some governments could impose 
strict regulations and lockdowns, requiring citizens to comply without 
question. This centralized control would be successful in containing the
 pandemic. Over time, these control measures would become permanent, 
leading to increased government surveillance, biometric IDs, and 
restrictions on freedoms, even after the pandemic ended. This scenario 
also emphasized that the public would largely comply with these 
restrictions, following all orders given, viewing them as necessary to 
protect public health and safety. 
This “Lock Step” scenario was 
used as a forebearer of a planned agenda for a future authoritarian 
world government. Also pushed by WEF and the puppets that had been 
placed in different government departments across the world, used under 
the guise of a reset, as a way to test people’s breaking point. 
There
 are considered 3 phases that governments would use during the pandemic 
to roll out increasing levels of authoritarianism. They look something 
like this: 
 Phase One: The outbreak of a virus and the initial 
government responses, such as lockdowns, travel restrictions, and social
 distancing measures, often referred to as a “trial run” to test public 
compliance. 
 Phase Two: Escalation of fear through media 
coverage, leading to increased government control measures, such as 
extended lockdowns, mandatory vaccinations, and the restriction of civil
 liberties.
Phase Three: This phase would involve a more 
permanent state of control, where extreme government measures (such as 
police and military enforcement, forced vaccinations, and digital IDs) 
would become the norm. In this phase, there is a high level of poverty 
and a chance of economic collapse, food shortages, and further erosion 
of people’s freedoms, leading to a more authoritarian, 
surveillance-heavy world. The WEF has been very brazen about this phase,
 using the pandemic opportunity to supercharge their agenda, stating 
that the control of people’s liberties is a positive step for us all....<<<Read More>>>...
