For covid vaccines, they could have chosen to use relatively well-known
existing technology, but they didn’t. Instead, they used mRNA, an
unknown technology with zero safety profile. Why?
To find an
answer, Jonathan Engler finds following the money usually gets closer to
the truth. “In this regard … before 2020 pharma / biotech was
struggling with a dearth of new ideas and many blockbuster products
under pressure from pending patent expirations,” he notes.
This leads to a serious question which needs to be asked.
The
mRNA platform transfects cells throughout the body (since the lipid
nanoparticles, LNPs, go everywhere) and generates foreign protein4 in
uncontrolled and uncontrollable quantities for an unknown and
uncontrollable duration.
Since transfected cells then get destroyed by the body’s immune system, this is inherently dangerous.5
However, there was always a much safer means of priming the body against specific viral proteins.
Protein
subunit vaccines – e.g. the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine – have been
around for decades. They use yeast cells to make the antigen. Their use
involves the injection of a fixed and controlled quantity of the
antigen. Much is known about their safety and the “known unknowns” are
much less likely to be consequential to safety.
So: why was the mRNA platform selected instead?
They could have made the chosen viral protein using the existing subunit manufacturing technology....<<<Read More>>>...
Welcome to "A Light In The Darkness" - a realm that explores the mysterious and the occult; the paranormal and the supernatural; the unexplained and the controversial; and, not forgetting, of course, the conspiracy theories; including Artificial Intelligence; Chemtrails and Geo-engineering; 5G and EMR Hazards; The Global Warming Debate; Trans-Humanism and Trans-Genderism; The Covid-19 and mRNA vaccine issues; The Ukraine Deception ... and a whole lot more.