In a recent article, Paul D. Thacker described how the covid
mantra “follow the science” has destroyed trust in science. He used
evidence gathered by journalist David Zwieg to demonstrate how and why.
“There
is no going back to a time before covid made our world crazy. You are
right to be mistrustful of trusted officials and respected institutions.
Zweig’s writing lays out all the evidence you need to feel this way,”
he wrote.
Despite research showing that kids were at minimal risk
from the virus, Zweig records what we all now know: we ignored
objective science in favour of subjective values, locked down our
cities, shut down our schools and threw the kids on laptops pretending
they would learn. Baseless fears that children were dying in large
numbers lingered even six months into the pandemic, long after anyone
with eyes could see the virus wasn’t killing kids.
Gallup
released a poll in July 2020, finding that the public thought 40 times
the number of people younger than 25 were dying than was actually the
case.
“People were dying from a scary new disease, and my family
and my neighbours were readily compliant with the governor’s orders to
stay home, and stay apart from each other until some unknown time when
this thing was going to go away,” Zweig writes, describing the state of
his household a month into New York State’s lockdown. “And yet. This
virus, which was a terror for the old, posed almost no threat to my kids
or their friends.”
A former magazine fact checker, Zweig began
digging into scientific studies and calling up established researchers
to try and understand how state and federal governments formulated
pandemic policies that seemed to ignore scientific evidence while
harming his own children. Trusted officials, he found, were failing to
adequately explain the uncertainties of published research and closing
their eyes to documented consequences.
But the public never
learned that pandemic strategies were based mostly on values, not
objective science, because journalists had abandoned all pretence of
reporting. Instead of scrutinising the scientific literature,
journalists with legacy media outlets favoured calling up these same
trusted officials. Reporters also platformed a coterie of self-branded
experts who managed to claw their way out of scientific obscurity to
become overnight authorities on epidemics in the press and on social
media....<<<Read More>>>...
