How can we effectively study "successful" psychopaths? It's easy enough
to study the unsuccessful ones: prisons provide a captive audience for
researchers. But what about the elusive corporate psychopath? The
corrupt but charismatic governor? The well-respected bank exec who is
also a pedophile? Maybe we can gain access to one or a few for close
study, but they're hidden by their very nature. Try to imagine
conducting a study on congressional or executive branch psychopathy. How
would you gain access to such a sample, let alone get them to agree to
be studied?
Lobaczewski found one such method purely by
happenstance: in a pathocracy, all such types migrate to leadership
positions. He didn't have to go looking for them; they were all right
there on the local committees of the communist party. But what about
non-pathocratic countries or "mixed pathocracies" (i.e. pathocratically
captured democracies)? The best way to get data on such people is
relatively simple: talk to the individuals who have had to deal with
them due to the nature of their work. This may not provide direct
access, but has the advantage of utilizing the normal person's insight
gained from close proximity and years of experience. At the very least,
it's the place to start before better methods of detection become
available....<<<Read More>>>....