Judgement (#20) and the two of weapons. A double reference to 2 goals. Two of weapons obviously hints at 2 v 0 to the reds? But then the image of the card gives a sense of one goal apiece. A confusion here? A disallowed goal in the mix somewhere?
A double reference to 2 goals - Chelsea leading 2 v 0 at one point in the game.
But then the image of the card gives a sense of one goal apiece. A confusion here? A disallowed goal in the mix somewhere - Chelsea's 2nd goal was clearly offside and should therefore have been disallowed. If Man Utd had still gone on to score 2 minutes later then there would have been a goal apiece.
Obviously hints at 2 v 0 to the reds - wishful thinking on my part.
