If mankind was to somehow attain the fabled 'Carbon Zero' by 2050; meaning mankind no longer produced any CO2; thus eliminating the human contribution of 3% of the 0.04% Carbon Dioxide in the earth's atmosphere ... what then?
Removing that 3% of the 0.04% will do NOTHING! What will the psychotic Global Elite hatch then when nothing has changed?
For nothing will change; as we have NO direct impact on the earth's climate. Yet we are being constantly BRAINWASHED by MSM propaganda that our use of fossil fuels, and the consumption of meat, is changing the climate. It's everywhere. It's a total malicious agenda by the elite to get us to comply to their will.
The weather extremes we see are NOT down to natural climate changes. In many instances they are manufactured by advanced technological means. It is like the school yard bully who can't win a game of cards, who provides a marked deck of cards and then wins every game he plays. They are getting the MSM to say 'look at the undenial evidence of climate change' and they put their 'climate scientists' before the camera quoting the propaganda lines ... to fool and deceive people.
What's more people, in their millions, are falling for the whole package!
So, in 2030 or 2040 or 2045, when there is no change in the climate; and weather extremes continue to go crazy .... what then? Will they then decide to remove the 0.04% of CO2 in the atmosphere ... killing all vegetation and all life? Is that their plan?
150ppm CO2 in the atmosphere is the minimum survival level for vegetation. We are roughly at 180-200ppm. So by removing say 0.02% of the CO2, life on this planet will probably perish! Many of the human sheep who believe the MSM propaganda probably don't realise that millions of years ago the CO2 level was at 4000ppm! Which would have meant the CO2 level in the atmosphere would have been just under 1%!!! The CO2 levels have been in steep decline ever since. The CO2 became the extensive limestone (CaCO3) deposits around the planet ...
We are in a dire situation; and for the Australian bush fires, which were deliberately started by at least 390 people, to be blamed on climate change is a little excessive. No annual burn off and deliberately re-directed water systems are contributory factors. And its also likely that HAARP towers littered around the coast lines of Australia also contributed. Not forgetting also the constant chemtrails in the skies of Australia ... the highly flammable chemicals of which falling to earth, and acting as accelerants in many of the fires.
No, its not 'conspiracy theory' and its not 'climate change denial' ... its just presenting the theories so others can reach their own conclusions.
