Democrats and their media allies push coronavirus “cases” while ignoring viral load, a far more accurate measure

[Natural News]: It’s now apparent that political pressure dictates public health policy; and if the Democrats had their way, they would use coronavirus “cases” to dictate public perception of their political opposition indefinitely and use the fear of a virus as a weapon to control people’s lives into the unforeseeable future. This is why, to democrats, tallying and broadcasting statistically irrelevant coronavirus “cases” is more important than understanding viral load and immune system function, which are the most important aspects of controlling spread and ensuring healthy recovery from infections.

For evidence of these political games, look no further than the democrat presidential nominee, Joe Biden, who has no hope for America’s recovery and growth. He said he would implement an (illegal) “federal mask mandate” starting late January 2021. He even mentioned he would lock the country down further, which would lead to forced vaccination with experimental cell-modifying, DNA-altering inoculations.

Who gets to decide the metrics of data for which human populations can have their freedoms again? Are people’s lives controlled by the number of cases that can be tallied in a given week? Where does a data curve begin and end? Are people’s lives dictated by the testing kit’s positivity rate (which is fundamentally flawed from the start)? Are the controls dictated by hospital bed capacity and mortality rates? If so, why aren’t strategies for enhancing immune function taught and implemented to prevent surge capacity and complications that lead to death?

For how long can emergency orders be used to control human populations? Is the science behind these metrics resolute, or are the methods of testing and isolation flawed to such a degree, that public health policy will never allow for human freedoms again?

If people are not allowed to live normally, what are the determining factors of data that dictate these restrictions, and how might this data be fraudulently collected, interpreted and misunderstood, so it can be used as a political weapon to hold people down, control elections, control economies and distort public perception, among other agendas?...<<<Read The Full Article Here>>>...