Researchers used Grok 3 to scrutinise climate-related datasets and climate change models to establish whether the anthropogenic global warming narrative is supported by evidence.
“This paper aims to rigorously test the anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming hypothesis by integrating unadjusted [observational] datasets with recent analytical frameworks, scrutinising model performance, isotopic evidence and the IPCC’s solar forcing assumptions to determine whether the prevailing narrative withstands empirical scrutiny,” the paper states.
The observational datasets used in the review include temperature data, sea ice data, and atmospheric CO₂ and isotopic data, using model outputs from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change‘s (“IPCC’s”) Sixth Assessment Report (“AR6”). Analytical frameworks included Koutsoyiannis et al. (2023), Soon et al. (2023, 2024), Harde (2017, 2022) and Connolly et al. (2023).
Announcing the paper had been published, Jonathan Cohler tweeted on Friday that the AI-led and human-checked review found: Human CO₂ (just 4% of the carbon cycle) sinks into oceans and forests in 3-4 years, not centuries like the IPCC claims. Temperature leads CO₂, not the reverse – think 800-year ice core lags and 2020’s lockdown “no-blip” at Mauna Loa. IPCC models exaggerate warming (0.5°C/decade vs. reality’s 0.13°C). Solar activity and natural cycles steal the show ....<<<Read More>>>...
